Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 85 references

X-ray Flaring and Variability in NGC 1275, the Heart of the Perseus Cluster

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The AGN at the center of the Perseus Cluster doubled in X-rays over days, with no tidal-disruption signature.

desk verdict A new X-ray flare in NGC 1275 is real, but the paper's start date, radius, and TDE comparison need fixing before the results can be trusted. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.13281 v1 pith:QLXAG4VE submitted 2026-08-13 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.GA

Sarah Ketchum (1) , Jon M. Miller (1) , S. W. Allen (2) , Doyee Byun (1) , Tianyin Hu (1) , Missagh Mehdipour (1) , Veronica Tananko (1) , Xin Xiang (1)
show 3 more authors
Irina Zhuravleva (3) ((1) Univ. of Michigan (2) Stanford Univ. (3) Univ. of Chicago)
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HEastro-ph.GA
keywords NGC12753C84PerseusClusterAGNX-rayvariabilityaccretiondisktidaldisruptioneventsradiojetdisk-jetconnection
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Using 89 Swift X-ray observations of NGC 1275, the central galaxy of the Perseus Cluster, spread over nearly 20 years, the paper separates the black hole's own X-ray emission from the hot cluster gas by fixing a constant plasma model for the gas and letting a power-law component vary. It reports that the AGN flux doubled in roughly five days starting on 2023 February 21, in at least two peaks, and that the decay is far slower than the $t^{-5/3}$ decline expected for a star being torn apart. The implied emission region is compact, $r \leq 870\,(10^8 M_\odot/M_{BH})\,GM/c^2$, consistent with a corona near the black hole. About 300 days later, 43 GHz radio flux rose above 4 Jy, possibly tracing the same disturbance moving into the jet. The result shows that moderate-resolution X-ray monitoring can track accretion changes in the AGN that inflate bubbles in the cluster gas.

What carries the argument

The machinery is a two-component spectral decomposition: a fixed apec plasma model representing the intracluster medium, with temperature $kT = 5.2 \pm 0.1$ keV and normalization frozen from the summed first 40 spectra, plus an absorbed power law with photon index $\Gamma = 1.7$ whose normalization is free in each of the 89 observations. This subtraction isolates the AGN's variable emission; the flare profile is then compared with the canonical $t^{-5/3}$ tidal-disruption decay, and the roughly five-day rise time is converted to a radius upper limit via $r \leq c\Delta t$. The comparison to 43 GHz radio data supplies the possible roughly 300-day disk-jet lag.

What would settle it

Re-fit the 89 spectra with the cluster plasma normalization and temperature left free, or take a high-resolution X-ray observation of the same 18-arcsecond region during and after the flare. If the inferred power-law flux no longer doubles, or if the cluster component itself varies by more than about 10 percent on week timescales, the flaring interpretation fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that NGC 1275's X-ray emission from the supermassive black hole is not steady: beginning on MJD 59956 (2023 February 21), the power-law component rose by roughly a factor of two to about $1.1\times10^{-10}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$, with at least two peaks each lasting about five days. Because the cluster emission is modeled as constant and subtracted, the variable part is attributed to accretion. The flare decays as roughly $t^{-0.27}$ and $t^{-0.11}$ for the two peaks, rather than $t^{-5/3}$, so it is not a simple tidal disruption event. The five-day rise time puts the source of the flare within $r \leq 870\,(10^8 M_\odot/M_{BH})\,GM/c^2$ of the black hole, and the 43 GHz radio brightening starting about 296 days later may be the same accretion disturbance propagating into the jet. The authors do not claim to rule out a jet origin entirely.

Load-bearing premise

That the hot cluster gas inside the 18-arcsecond extraction region was perfectly steady for 20 years, so every spectral change can be attributed to the black hole's power-law emission.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The X-ray flare's compact size, $r \leq 870\,(10^8 M_\odot/M_{BH})\,GM/c^2$, means the rapid variability likely comes from a corona within a few hundred gravitational radii, not from the kiloparsec-scale jet.
  • The slow decay rules out a standard tidal disruption event, so future searches for tidal disruptions in this source can be deprioritized; accretion-rate changes or jet shocks become the leading explanations.
  • If the roughly 296-day radio delay is real, coordinated X-ray and radio monitoring can measure propagation times from the corona into the radio-emitting jet and test disk-jet coupling.
  • A daily monitoring program over years would measure the true flaring duty cycle and the shape of flare decays, and could identify low-activity periods for clean cluster-core plasma diagnostics.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the fixed cluster template is even slightly time-variable, some of the reported flare could be an artifact; this can be tested by re-fitting the cluster normalization freely in each epoch.
  • The roughly 300-day lag, if confirmed, could be converted into a jet propagation speed once the distance between the corona and the 43 GHz emitting region is measured by radio imaging, giving a testable prediction.
  • Because the black hole mass is uncertain by roughly a factor of a hundred, the implied Eddington ratio ranges from near-Eddington for $M \sim 10^7 M_\odot$ to a few tenths of a percent for $M \sim 10^9 M_\odot$, so a precise mass would discriminate between accretion and jet explanations.
  • The same fixed-background subtraction approach could be applied to other bright cluster-center AGN, but only if cluster variability is independently shown to be negligible.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper analyzes 89 Swift/XRT photon-counting observations of NGC 1275 taken between 2007 and 2026. The authors model the cluster emission as a fixed apec component plus a power law for the AGN, and report a factor-of-two X-ray flare near MJD 59956, a limit of r <= 870 (10^8 M_sun / M_BH) GM/c^2 on the emission region, decay indices t^-0.27 and t^-0.11 that they argue rule out a TDE origin, and a possible ~300 day delay to flaring at 43 GHz in VLBA monitoring data. The paper concludes that coordinated X-ray and radio monitoring could reveal disk-jet coupling in cluster-center AGN.

Significance. The long-baseline Swift light curve of a cluster-center AGN with contemporaneous VLBA monitoring is valuable, and the paper has real strengths: the flux extraction uses standard spectral fitting with a Cash statistic; the brightest flare spectrum is validated by an independent SPEX difference-spectrum fit; and the comparison with public MOJAVE and VLBA-BU-BLAZAR data is useful. If the flare-onset claim and derived size/lag could be made secure, the result would be a significant step toward connecting X-ray accretion variability to radio jet activity in a feedback-dominated system. At present, however, the headline quantities are not all supported by the data as described, and the paper needs substantial revision before the astrophysical conclusions can be accepted.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 3, Table 1] The onset date MJD 59956 is not supported by Table 1. The last observation before the gap, at MJD 58454.44335, gives a flux of 4.83e-11 erg cm^-2 s^-1, and the next observations at MJD 59932-59939 already give fluxes of 6.43-10.95e-11, i.e. factors of 1.3-2.3 higher. Since a gap of about 1478 days separates these epochs, the rise from quiescence to flare is not observed, and the statement in the abstract that flaring 'started on MJD 59956' is unjustified. This also means the 296-day radio lag, which uses MJD 59956 as the start of the flare, is an assumption rather than a measurement, and the emission-region limit based on 'characteristic durations' is not tightly constrained by the data.
  2. [Section 3] The emission-region limit contains an arithmetic inconsistency. The text states that both peaks have characteristic durations of approximately 5 days and then derives r <= c Delta t <= 7.8e15 cm, but c times 5 days equals 1.3e16 cm, not 7.8e15 cm; the latter corresponds to c times 3 days. The dimensionless limit r <= 870 (10^8 M_sun / M_BH) GM/c^2 corresponds to roughly 1.3e16 cm for a 10^8 M_sun black hole, so the 7.8e15 cm value appears to be a mistake. Please correct the duration or the radius and state the assumed duration explicitly.
  3. [Section 3, Figures 4-5] The TDE comparison is not demonstrated as written. The best-fit decay indices are quoted as t^-0.27 and t^-0.11 with no uncertainties and no goodness-of-fit comparison against the t^-5/3 model. Each decay region contains only three or four data points, so the statement that the flaring is 'far slower' and therefore inconsistent with a TDE is not supported. The authors should report confidence intervals on the decay indices and, ideally, an explicit model comparison such as delta-Cash between the best-fit power law and the fixed t^-5/3 decay.
  4. [Section 2] All 89 flux measurements rely on the assumption that the ICM within the 18-arcsecond extraction region is temporally constant and is fully described by the apec parameters frozen from the first 40 spectra. Because this template is subtracted from every observation, any secular change in the cluster emission would appear as a spurious power-law flux variation. The paper should provide a test of this assumption, for example by allowing the apec normalization to vary in individual fits, by comparing an off-nucleus extraction region over time, or by estimating the systematic uncertainty from plausible ICM variations.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 3] The sentence referring to the flaring interval appears to contain a typo: 'between MJD 59930 and 55990' should read 'between MJD 59930 and 59990'.
  2. [Section 3] 'MOJA VE' should be written 'MOJAVE'.
  3. [Section 4] 'The flux of the AGN was inferred found by fitting' contains a duplicated verb and should be rewritten.
  4. [Section 3] The text refers to 'the black hole in NGC 1257'; this should be NGC 1275.
  5. [Section 3 and Abstract] The abstract's 'typical flux errors of ~3%' is not representative of Table 1, where many epochs have 1-sigma errors of 10-20% or more; please qualify this claim.
  6. [Section 3] The fractional variability values are quoted without uncertainties, so it is not possible to tell whether the X-ray and radio variabilities are consistent; please add errors or a statement of the precision.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the X-ray flux decomposition, flare detection, TDE comparison, and radio-lag estimate all rest on external observations and standard spectral fitting, with only non-load-bearing self-citations.

full rationale

This is an observational analysis rather than a derivation from first principles, so most of the circularity vocabulary does not apply. The central product is a set of Swift/XRT spectra; the AGN flux in each observation is obtained by fitting tbabs*zmshift*(apec+pow) with ICM parameters frozen from the summed early spectra. That is a background-subtraction modeling choice, not a prediction generated from a fitted parameter that is then renamed as a discovery. The flare claim is not self-definitional: the apec template is built from the first 40 spectra, explicitly avoiding previously reported flares and the flares reported here, and the later high-flux points are independent observations. Whether the ICM is truly constant is a model assumption and a possible systematic, but it is not circular. The TDE comparison fits power-law decays to the same flare light curve and compares them to the canonical t^-5/3 functional form; this is model comparison on the data, not an input that guarantees rejection. The causality radius r <= c Delta t is a standard light-crossing limit using observed durations of about 5 days, not an assumed onset. The 296-day radio lag is computed from the stated start date; if the start date is unconstrained by the roughly 1478-day data gap, that is a data-support and correctness weakness, not a circular reduction. The paper itself acknowledges the sparse sampling and that 'additional flaring may have been missed' during the sporadic monitoring. Some cited works (Miller et al. 2015, 2017; King et al. 2011) include co-authors of this paper, but they are used as examples or supporting phenomenology, not as the sole justification of the main claim, and no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors. No equation in the paper makes the claimed result equal to its input by construction. A minor internal inconsistency is that the abstract dates the start at MJD 59956 while Table 1 shows elevated fluxes (8.27-10.95 x 10^-11 erg/s) as early as MJD 59932; this affects the interpretation of 'start' and of the radio lag, but it is not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities. The central claim relies on the assumed constancy of the ICM template, the fixed power-law index, and the standard cosmology used for distance and luminosity conversions.

free parameters (4)
  • NH = 1.99e21 cm^-2
    Neutral column density fitted to the summed spectrum and frozen for individual observations; it affects the absorption correction of the power-law flux.
  • kT = 5.2 keV
    Plasma temperature of the apec ICM component, fitted to the summed spectrum and frozen for all observations.
  • K = 8.2e-3 cm^-5
    apec normalization (emission measure), fitted to the summed spectrum and frozen; the ICM template is subtracted from each observation.
  • Gamma = 1.7
    Power-law photon index, initially fit as 1.68 then fixed to 1.7 for all observations; if the true index varies, inferred fluxes change.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The ICM emission in the 18 arcsec extraction region is temporally constant over 20 years and well described by a single apec component.
    Section 2: the summed first 40 spectra are fit, and parameters are frozen for individual observations. If the cluster emission varies, the inferred AGN flux changes would be spurious.
  • domain assumption The power-law photon index of the AGN is constant at Gamma=1.7.
    Section 3: fixed after initial fit of 1.68. If the index varies during the flare, flux estimates are biased.
  • standard math The standard flat LCDM cosmology with XSPEC defaults is correct for the distance.
    Section 3: used to convert flux to luminosity; a distance error scales all luminosities.
  • standard math The causal limit r <= c dt applies to the flare emission region.
    Section 3: variability timescale of 5 days gives an upper limit; this ignores Doppler boosting or sustained emission processes.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of X-ray Flaring and Variability in NGC 1275, the Heart of the Perseus Cluster." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QLXAG4VE

@misc{pith2026260813281,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: X-ray Flaring and Variability in NGC 1275, the Heart of the Perseus Cluster},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QLXAG4VE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.13281}
}
abstract

NGC 1275 is the central galaxy in the Perseus Cluster. The active galactic nucleus (AGN) within NGC 1275 is notable for its strong and variable radio activity, tied to the production of radio jets that inflate large bubbles in the hot intracluster medium (ICM). High spatial resolution X-ray imaging can separate the AGN from the bright ICM, but monitoring the mass accretion rate onto the black hole and establishing disk-jet connections in NGC 1275 requires a high cadence. Here, we report on X-ray monitoring of NGC 1275 using data taken over 20 years with the Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory. Modeling the temporally constant ICM in each observation allows X-ray emission from accretion onto the black hole to be traced reliably, with typical flux errors of $\sim 3\%$. X-ray flaring by a factor of $\sim2$ over mere days is detected starting on MJD 59956 (2023 Feb. 21). The flares imply an emission region consistent with $r \leq 870~(10^{8}~M_{\odot}/M_{BH})~ GM/c^{2}$. The profile of the flaring is inconsistent with simple predictions for tidal disruption events. A flare appears roughly 300 days later in radio monitoring data at 43 GHz. Overall, our results indicate that coordinated, moderate-resolution X-ray imaging and radio monitoring could potentially trace disk-jet connections in the AGN that most vividly impact large-scale structure, and be extended to other sources that impact their hosts.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.13281 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. NGC 1275 X-ray flux (in erg cm−2 s −1 ) versus time (in MJD). 1σ flux errors are shown. The purple line corresponds to the mean flux value over this time period, and the blue line corresponds to the median flux during the same time period. The large flare around MJD 60000 is highlighted in pink [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Left: Swift/XRT spectra of the Perseus Cluster and NGC 1275, illustrating variability in the AGN. A time-averaged spectrum is shown in black. The brightest single observation is shown in red (ObsID 34765023). Right: The difference spectrum (ObsID 34765023 minus the time-averaged spectrum), fit with an absorbed Γ = 1.7 power-law over the band with sufficient signal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Zoomed-in view of the peak at 60000 MJD highlighted in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Close-in look at the first subregion (the red region of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Close-in look at the second subregion (the blue region of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The Swift/XRT, MOJAVE, and VLBA-BU-BLAZAR light curve of NGC 1275 over the same time span. The MOJAVE data are based on observations made using the VLBA at 15 Ghz (Lister et al. 2018). The VLBA-BU-BLAZAR data is based on observations made using the VLBA at 43 GHz (Weav…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

85 extracted references · 28 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , year = 2014, volume =

    Contemporaneous observations of the radio galaxy NGC 1275 from radio to very high energy gamma-rays. , year = 2014, volume =

    2014

  2. [2]

    , keywords =

    On the Absorption of X-Rays in the Interstellar Medium. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/317016 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0008425 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  3. [5]

    Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V , year =

    XSPEC: The First Ten Years. Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V , year =

  4. [7]

    Distribution of the C statistic with applications to the sample mean of Poisson data. J. Appl. Stat. , year = 2019, volume =

    2019

  5. [8]

    Space Sci

    The Swift X-Ray Telescope. Space Sci. Rev. , year = 2005, volume =

    2005

  6. [9]

    Astrophys

    Kinematics of Parsec-scale Jets of Gamma-Ray Blazars at 43 GHz during 10 yr of the VLBA-BU-BLAZAR Program. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. , year = 2022, month = may, volume =

    2022

  7. [10]

    Nature , year = 2008, month = aug, volume =

    Magnetic support of the optical emission line filaments in NGC 1275. Nature , year = 2008, month = aug, volume =

    work page 2008

  8. [11]

    , year = 2007, volume =

    An online repository of Swift/XRT light curves of GRBs. , year = 2007, volume =

    work page 2007

Show all 85 references
  1. [12]

    , year = 2009, volume =

    Methods and results of an automatic analysis of a complete sample of Swift-XRT observations of GRBs. , year = 2009, volume =

    2009

  2. [13]

    , year = 2004, volume =

    The Swift Gamma-Ray Burst Mission. , year = 2004, volume =

    2004

  3. [14]

    New Astron

    Multiwavelength study of the radio galaxy NGC 1275 with TACTIC, Fermi, and Swift during December 2016--February 2017. New Astron. , year = 2020, volume =

    2016

  4. [15]

    , year = 2024, volume =

    Very High-energy Gamma-Ray Episodic Activity of Radio Galaxy NGC 1275 in 2022--2023 Measured with MACE. , year = 2024, volume =

    2022

  5. [16]

    A standardized catalogue of Fundamental Plane data

    Streaming motions of galaxy clusters within 12 000 km s ^ -1 -- III. A standardized catalogue of Fundamental Plane data. , year = 2001, volume =

    2001

  6. [17]

    , year = 2020, month = aug, volume =

    X-ray and Gamma-ray Variability of NGC 1275. , year = 2020, month = aug, volume =. doi:10.3390/galaxies8030057 , adsurl =

    2020 doi

  7. [19]

    , year = 2015, volume =

    Effects of the variability of the nucleus of NGC 1275 on X-ray observations of the surrounding intracluster medium. , year = 2015, volume =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1134 , adsurl =

    2015 doi

  8. [20]

    A Search for ``Dwarf'' Seyfert Nuclei. III. Spectroscopic Parameters and Properties of the Host Galaxies. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series , year = 1997, month = oct, volume =

    1997

  9. [21]

    The M _ BH - L _ host relation

    BAT AGN Spectroscopic Survey - VI. The M _ BH - L _ host relation. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , year = 2018, month = may, volume =

    2018

  10. [22]

    The Astronomical Journal , year = 2001, month = oct, volume =

    On the Nature of the NGC 1275 System. The Astronomical Journal , year = 2001, month = oct, volume =

    2001

  11. [23]

    The Astrophysical Journal , year = 2006, month = feb, volume =

    Heating Cooling Flows with Weak Shock Waves. The Astrophysical Journal , year = 2006, month = feb, volume =

    2006

  12. [28]

    The Astrophysical Journal , year = 1974, month = sep, volume =

    An Atlas of Seyfert Galaxies. The Astrophysical Journal , year = 1974, month = sep, volume =

    1974

  13. [29]

    On the measurement of the black hole mass of type 2 AGN and the unified model

    Detection of faint broad emission lines in type 2 AGN - II. On the measurement of the black hole mass of type 2 AGN and the unified model. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters , year = 2017, month = jun, volume =

    2017

  14. [30]

    The Astrophysical Journal , year = 2021, month = oct, volume =

    The Anatomy of an AGN-driven Outflow: The Case of NGC 1275. The Astrophysical Journal , year = 2021, month = oct, volume =

    2021

  15. [31]

    , keywords =

    An Obscured, Seyfert 2-like State of the Stellar-mass Black Hole GRS 1915+105 Caused by Failed Disk Winds. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abbb31 , archivePrefix =. 2007.07005 , primaryClass =

    1915 arXiv

  16. [32]

    NGC 1275: An Outlier of the Black Hole-Host Scaling Relations. Front. Astron. Space Sci. , year = 2018, volume =

    2018

  17. [33]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , year = 2020, month = aug, volume =

    Ionized and hot molecular outflows in the inner 500 pc of NGC 1275. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , year = 2020, month = aug, volume =

    2020

  18. [34]

    Kinematics and excitation of the molecular hydrogen accretion disc in NGC 1275. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. , year = 2013, month = mar, volume =

    2013

  19. [35]

    , year = 2018, month = jun, volume =

    The origins of the gamma-ray flux variations of NGC 1275 based on eight years of Fermi-LAT observations. , year = 2018, month = jun, volume =

    2018

  20. [36]

    , keywords =

    The nature of the Compton-thick X-ray reprocessor in NGC 4945. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21129.x , archivePrefix =. 1204.4196 , primaryClass =

    2012

  21. [37]

    , keywords =

    An online repository of Swift/XRT light curves of -ray bursts. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20077530 , archivePrefix =. 0704.0128 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  22. [38]

    , keywords =

    Methods and results of an automatic analysis of a complete sample of Swift-XRT observations of GRBs. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14913.x , archivePrefix =. 0812.3662 , primaryClass =

    2009

  23. [39]

    , keywords =

    Optimal binning of X-ray spectra and response matrix design. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201527395 , archivePrefix =. 1601.05309 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  24. [40]

    Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V , year = 1996, editor =

    XSPEC: The First Ten Years. Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V , year = 1996, editor =

    1996

  25. [42]

    , keywords =

    Updated Atomic Data and Calculations for X-Ray Spectroscopy. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/756/2/128 , archivePrefix =. 1207.0576 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  26. [45]

    , keywords =

    The quiescent intracluster medium in the core of the Perseus cluster. , keywords =. doi:10.1038/nature18627 , archivePrefix =. 1607.04487 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  27. [46]

    , keywords =

    Disentangling multiple gas kinematic drivers in the Perseus galaxy cluster. , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41586-025-10017-x , archivePrefix =. 2509.04421 , primaryClass =

  28. [48]

    , keywords =

    Flows of X-ray gas reveal the disruption of a star by a massive black hole. , keywords =. doi:10.1038/nature15708 , archivePrefix =. 1510.06348 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  29. [49]

    , keywords =

    A Distinctive Disk-Jet Coupling in the Seyfert-1 Active Galactic Nucleus NGC 4051. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/729/1/19 , archivePrefix =. 1012.0762 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  30. [50]

    , keywords =

    Disk-Jet Connection in the Radio Galaxy 3C 120. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/704/2/1689 , archivePrefix =. 0909.2051 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  31. [51]

    MOJAVE. XV. VLBA 15 GHz Total Intensity and Polarization Maps of 437 Parsec-scale AGN Jets from 1996 to 2017. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aa9c44 , archivePrefix =. 1711.07802 , primaryClass =

    1996 arXiv

  32. [53]

    , keywords =

    Superluminal Proper Motion in the X-Ray Jet of Centaurus A. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad73a1 , archivePrefix =. 2408.14078 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  33. [54]

    , keywords =

    On the Nature of the NGC 1275 System. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/323534 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0108019 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  34. [55]

    , keywords =

    Observational Evidence of Active Galactic Nuclei Feedback. , keywords =. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125521 , archivePrefix =. 1204.4114 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  35. [57]

    , keywords =

    Chandra Imaging of the Outer Accretion Flow onto the Black Hole at the Center of the Perseus Cluster. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aa9566 , archivePrefix =. 1711.07418 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  36. [58]

    , keywords =

    A non-thermal study of the brightest cluster galaxy NGC 1275 - the Gamma-Radio connection over four decades. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu975 , archivePrefix =. 1405.3647 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  37. [59]

    XMM-Newton Observations of the Perseus Cluster. I. The Temperature and Surface Brightness Structure. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/374923 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0301482 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  38. [62]

    UV and X-ray Spectroscopy of Astrophysical and Laboratory Plasmas , year = 1996, editor =

    SPEX: a new code for spectral analysis of X & UV spectra. UV and X-ray Spectroscopy of Astrophysical and Laboratory Plasmas , year = 1996, editor =

    1996

  39. [63]

    Arnaud , K. A. 1996, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 101, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V, ed. G. H. Jacoby & J. Barnes , 17

    1996

  40. [64]

    1979, , 228, 939, 10.1086/156922

    Cash , W. 1979, , 228, 939, 10.1086/156922

    1979 doi

  41. [65]

    P., Jorstad , S

    Chatterjee , R., Marscher , A. P., Jorstad , S. G., et al. 2009, , 704, 1689, 10.1088/0004-637X/704/2/1689

    2009 doi

  42. [66]

    2003, , 590, 225, 10.1086/374923

    Churazov , E., Forman , W., Jones , C., & B \"o hringer , H. 2003, , 590, 225, 10.1086/374923

    2003 doi

  43. [67]

    J., Gallagher , John S., I., & Wyse , R

    Conselice , C. J., Gallagher , John S., I., & Wyse , R. F. G. 2001, The Astronomical Journal, 122, 2281, 10.1086/323534

    2001 doi

  44. [68]

    L., Edge , A

    Dutson , K. L., Edge , A. C., Hinton , J. A., et al. 2014, , 442, 2048, 10.1093/mnras/stu975

    2014 doi

  45. [69]

    Fabian , A. C. 2012, , 50, 455, 10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125521

    2012 doi

  46. [70]

    C., Johnstone , R

    Fabian , A. C., Johnstone , R. M., Sanders , J. S., et al. 2008, Nature, 454, 968, 10.1038/nature07169

    2008 doi

  47. [71]

    C., Sanders , J

    Fabian , A. C., Sanders , J. S., Allen , S. W., et al. 2003, , 344, L43, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06902.x

    2003

  48. [72]

    L., Fuentes , A., et al

    Foschi , M., G \'o mez , J. L., Fuentes , A., et al. 2025, , 696, A17, 10.1051/0004-6361/202453406

    2025 doi

  49. [73]

    R., Ji , L., Smith , R

    Foster , A. R., Ji , L., Smith , R. K., & Brickhouse , N. S. 2012, , 756, 128, 10.1088/0004-637X/756/2/128

    2012 doi

  50. [74]

    2017, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 465, L94, 10.1093/mnrasl/slw221

    Fujita , Y., & Nagai , H. 2017, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 465, L94, 10.1093/mnrasl/slw221

    2017 doi

  51. [75]

    2018, , 855, 93, 10.3847/1538-4357/aaabc0

    Fukazawa , Y., Shiki , K., Tanaka , Y., et al. 2018, , 855, 93, 10.3847/1538-4357/aaabc0

    2018 doi

  52. [76]

    2016, , 535, 117, 10.1038/nature18627

    Hitomi Collaboration , Aharonian , F., Akamatsu , H., et al. 2016, , 535, 117, 10.1038/nature18627

    2016 doi

  53. [77]

    C., Filippenko , A

    Ho , L. C., Filippenko , A. V., & Sargent , W. L. W. 1997, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 112, 315, 10.1086/313041

    1997 doi

  54. [78]

    S., & Bleeker , J

    Kaastra , J. S., & Bleeker , J. A. M. 2016, , 587, A151, 10.1051/0004-6361/201527395

    2016 doi

  55. [79]

    S., Mewe , R., & Nieuwenhuijzen , H

    Kaastra , J. S., Mewe , R., & Nieuwenhuijzen , H. 1996, in UV and X-ray Spectroscopy of Astrophysical and Laboratory Plasmas, ed. K. Yamashita & T. Watanabe , 411--414

    1996

  56. [80]

    Y., & Weedman , D

    Khachikian , E. Y., & Weedman , D. W. 1974, The Astrophysical Journal, 192, 581, 10.1086/153093

    1974 doi

  57. [81]

    L., Miller , J

    King , A. L., Miller , J. M., Cackett , E. M., et al. 2011, , 729, 19, 10.1088/0004-637X/729/1/19

    2011 doi

  58. [82]

    2024, The Astrophysical Journal, 970, 41, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad4d9a

    Liodakis , I., Chakraborty , S., Marin , F., et al. 2024, The Astrophysical Journal, 970, 41, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad4d9a

    2024 doi

  59. [83]

    L., Aller , M

    Lister , M. L., Aller , M. F., Aller , H. D., et al. 2018, , 234, 12, 10.3847/1538-4365/aa9c44

    2018 doi

  60. [84]

    G., Faltenbacher , A., & Brighenti , F

    Mathews , W. G., Faltenbacher , A., & Brighenti , F. 2006, The Astrophysical Journal, 638, 659, 10.1086/499119

    2006 doi

  61. [85]

    M., Bautz , M

    Miller , J. M., Bautz , M. W., & McNamara , B. R. 2017, , 850, L3, 10.3847/2041-8213/aa9566

    2017 doi

  62. [86]

    M., Kaastra , J

    Miller , J. M., Kaastra , J. S., Miller , M. C., et al. 2015, , 526, 542, 10.1038/nature15708

    2015 doi

  63. [88]

    2017, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, 468, L97, 10.1093/mnrasl/slx032

    Onori , F., Ricci , F., La Franca , F., et al. 2017, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, 468, L97, 10.1093/mnrasl/slx032

    2017 doi

  64. [89]

    F., Krichbaum , T

    Paraschos , G. F., Krichbaum , T. P., Kim , J.-Y., et al. 2022, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 665, A1, 10.1051/0004-6361/202243343

    2022 doi

  65. [90]

    Rees , M. J. 1988, , 333, 523, 10.1038/333523a0

    1988 doi

  66. [91]

    A., Storchi-Bergmann , T., Zakamska , N

    Riffel , R. A., Storchi-Bergmann , T., Zakamska , N. L., & Riffel , R. 2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 496, 4857, 10.1093/mnras/staa1922

    2020 doi

  67. [92]

    A., Nasser , A

    Saad , A. A., Nasser , A. M., Abdelbar , A. M., & Beheary , M. M. 2021, , 57, 133, 10.22201/ia.01851101p.2021.57.01.09

    2021 doi

  68. [93]

    2011, , 531, A85, 10.1051/0004-6361/200811333

    Salom \'e , P., Combes , F., Revaz , Y., et al. 2011, , 531, A85, 10.1051/0004-6361/200811333

    2011 doi

  69. [94]

    J., Dopita , M

    Scharw \"a chter , J., McGregor , P. J., Dopita , M. A., & Beck , T. L. 2013, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 429, 2315, 10.1093/mnras/sts502

    2013 doi

  70. [95]

    2025, , 77, S1, 10.1093/pasj/psaf023

    Tashiro , M., Kelley , R., Watanabe , S., et al. 2025, , 77, S1, 10.1093/pasj/psaf023

    2025 doi

  71. [96]

    Tchekhovskoy , A., Narayan , R., & McKinney , J. C. 2011, , 418, L79, 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2011.01147.x

    2011

  72. [97]

    2026, , 650, 309, 10.1038/s41586-025-10017-x

    The Xrism Collaboration , Audard , M., Awaki , H., et al. 2026, , 650, 309, 10.1038/s41586-025-10017-x

    2026 doi

  73. [98]

    V., & Fabian , A

    Vasudevan , R. V., & Fabian , A. C. 2007, , 381, 1235, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12328.x

    2007

  74. [99]

    S., & Uttley , P

    Vaughan , S., Edelson , R., Warwick , R. S., & Uttley , P. 2003, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 345, 1271, 10.1046/j.1365-2966.2003.07042.x

    2003

  75. [100]

    R., Jorstad , S

    Weaver , Z. R., Jorstad , S. G., Marscher , A. P., et al. 2022, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser., 260, 12, 10.3847/1538-4365/ac58f1

    2022 doi

  76. [101]

    2000, , 542, 914, 10.1086/317016

    Wilms , J., Allen , A., & McCray , R. 2000, , 542, 914, 10.1086/317016

    2000 doi

  77. [102]

    2013, , 65, 30, 10.1093/pasj/65.2.30

    Yamazaki , S., Fukazawa , Y., Sasada , M., et al. 2013, , 65, 30, 10.1093/pasj/65.2.30

    2013 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.