Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 102 references

Global classical solutions by transport noise for reaction-diffusion systems with entropy dissipation

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Transport noise forces global classical solutions for complex balanced reaction–diffusion networks with arbitrary polynomial growth, with probability arbitrarily close to 1.

desk verdict The global-in-time result is real under its no-boundary-equilibria hypothesis, but the ATP and combustion examples advertised in Section 1.3 violate that hypothesis, so the application section needs repair. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.13332 v1 pith:EMATPSNF submitted 2026-08-13 math.AP math-phmath.MPmath.PR

Antonio Agresti , Michael Kniely , Bao Quoc Tang This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.APmath-phmath.MPmath.PR MSC 60H5060H1535K5735B65
keywords regularizationbynoiseglobalwell-posednessenhanceddissipationstochasticreaction–diffusionequationscomplexbalancedreactionnetworkstransportentropymaximalLp(Lq)-regularity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that a specific physically motivated random stirring—transport noise—can prevent blow-up in reaction–diffusion systems for which global smooth solutions are not known in the deterministic setting. For any complex balanced chemical reaction network without boundary equilibria, and for reactions with polynomial growth of any order, one can choose the noise intensity and finitely supported Fourier-mode coefficients so that, from every admissible nonnegative initial concentration, the unique solution exists for all time and is classical in space with probability as close to 1 as desired. The same construction makes spatial fluctuations decay to the instantaneous spatial average at any prescribed exponential rate, with high probability and finite moments of the random prefactor. If the proof is right, turbulent transport is not only a modeling device but a mechanism that regularizes a class of chemical kinetics whose deterministic global regularity is open.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing identity is the Itô–Stratonovich correction (2.12): under the divergence-free Fourier vector fields $\sigma_{k,\alpha}$, the Stratonovich transport noise is exactly equivalent to an Itô noise plus an extra dissipative term $\nu\Delta v_i$, with the orthogonality identity (2.13) giving the explicit coefficient. This converts random stirring into a quantitative diffusion enhancement. Around that sits the entropy–entropy dissipation machinery: the relative entropy $E(v\mid v_8)$ and its dissipation $D(v)$, with the inequality $D(v) \ge \lambda E(v\mid v_8)$ made uniform over compact mass sets by the no-boundary-equilibria condition. The proof then runs a scaling-limit argument: stochastic RDEs with a cutoff converge, over finite intervals, to deterministic RDEs with increased diffusivity; those deterministic equations are globally well-posed and exponentially convergent by the entropy inequality; and a close-to-equilibrium stochastic stability theorem (Moser-type iteration plus a spectral gap for the linearized operator) upgrades finite-time control to global control with high probability.

What would settle it

For a concrete complex balanced network without boundary equilibria, evaluate the infimum of $D(v)/E(v\mid v_8)$ over smooth positive concentration fields $v$ on the torus with conserved mass vector $Q\bar v = M$ and entropy $E(v\mid v_8) \le N$, with $M$ ranging over the compact set $K$. If this infimum is $0$ for some $M\in K$, the uniform entropy–entropy dissipation inequality used in Proposition 6.5 is false, and the exponential convergence step on which Theorem 3.4 rests would collapse.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms the paper proves Theorem 3.4: fix a complex balanced reaction network, assume no stoichiometric compatibility class (set of states with a fixed conserved mass vector) contains a boundary equilibrium, fix $N\ge 1$, $\varepsilon\in(0,1)$, and a compact set $K$ of conserved mass vectors. Then there exist a noise intensity $\nu>0$ and finitely supported, radially symmetric coefficients $\theta$ with the following property: for every nonnegative initial datum with $L^q$ norm at most $N$ and mass vector in $K$, the unique $(p,\kappa,\delta,q)$-solution of the stochastic reaction–diffusion system is global with $P(\tau=\infty)>1-\varepsilon$ and has paths in $C^{1/2-,\infty}_{\mathrm{loc}}((0,\tau)\times\mathbb{T}^d;\mathbb{R}^\ell)$, so it is classical in space. This covers networks of arbitrary polynomial growth $h$, for which deterministic global well-posedness is unavailable. The companion Theorem 3.5 asserts that the same noise can enhance dissipation of the spatial fluctuations to any prescribed exponential rate, in the sense that $\|v(t,\cdot)-\bar v(t,\cdot)\|_{L^2}\le D e^{-\chi t}\|v_0\|_{L^2}$ on a set of probability $>1-\varepsilon$, with $\mathbb{E}[D^b]<\infty$.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that no boundary equilibrium—a state where at least one species has zero concentration—sits in any stoichiometric compatibility class within the allowed range of conserved masses. This is what forces the entropy–entropy dissipation constant to be strictly positive and drives the deterministic high-diffusivity system exponentially to equilibrium; if such a boundary equilibrium exists, the proof only goes through when the deterministic solution stays uniformly bounded away from zero.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For concrete networks such as ATP synthesis with $n\ge 3$ protons or the combustion-type single reversible reaction $\mathrm{O}_2 + 2\mathrm{N}_2 \rightleftharpoons 2\mathrm{N} + 2\mathrm{NO}$, global classical solutions follow with high probability even though deterministic global well-posedness is open.
  • The constructed transport noise leaves conservation laws and $L^q$ energy estimates unchanged, so the gain is purely in controlling blow-up and homogenization, not in adding mass dissipation.
  • Alongside global existence, the same noise yields quantitative enhanced dissipation: spatial fluctuations decay at any prescribed rate $\chi$ with high probability, which is stronger than the pure-diffusion decay rate when $\chi$ exceeds the diffusion eigenvalues.
  • For networks with boundary equilibria, the proof still works whenever the deterministic high-diffusivity system stays uniformly bounded away from zero, so the boundary-equilibria obstruction is removable in that case.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • One extension the paper leaves implicit is that any mechanism guaranteeing uniform positivity of the deterministic high-diffusivity solution, not only the no-boundary-equilibria condition, should unlock the same global result; Remark 3.6 already identifies the sufficient condition.
  • Because the noise coefficients are finitely supported, the construction is directly testable in simulation: run the stochastic RDE with the Fourier-mode noise (6.26) and check that the survival probability and the exponential homogenization estimate hold at the predicted rates.
  • The enhanced-dissipation theorem concerns decay toward the spatial mean, not toward the reaction equilibrium; for stirred combustion models this suggests that turbulent mixing can suppress spatial hot spots at essentially arbitrary rates while the mean composition still follows the deterministic reaction kinetics.
  • A neighbouring conjecture that might be approachable by the same tools is the Global Attractor Conjecture for complex balanced networks with boundary equilibria: the entropy method needs only a positive lower bound on the dissipation ratio, so stochastic transport could quantify convergence in cases where the deterministic dynamics remain unsettled.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies a stochastic reaction-diffusion system with transport noise on the torus, for nonlinearities arising from mass-action chemical reaction networks. The main result, Theorem 3.4, asserts that for a complex balanced network with no boundary equilibria, one can choose a noise intensity and finitely supported, normalized noise coefficients such that, for all admissible L^q initial data with the relevant conservation vector in a compact set, the unique (p,kappa,delta,q)-solution is global in time with probability at least 1-epsilon and is classical in space, in C_t^{1/2-}C_x^infty. Theorem 3.5 asserts that the same mechanism yields enhanced dissipation of spatial fluctuations at an arbitrarily prescribed exponential rate on a high-probability event. The proof combines uniform entropy-entropy dissipation estimates (Section 4), a close-to-equilibrium global well-posedness result (Theorem 5.1), a scaling limit for stochastic equations with cutoff (Theorem 6.3), and quantitative estimates for deterministic and stochastic convolutions (Section 7). Section 1.3 advertises the ATP synthesis and methane-combustion networks as concrete high-growth examples to which the theorems apply.

Significance. If Theorems 3.4 and 3.5 are correct, they constitute a substantial advance in the regularization-by-noise literature for reaction-diffusion systems with superquadratic nonlinearities, and the enhanced-dissipation statement goes beyond the passive-scalar setting. The proof architecture is coherent and contains several nontrivial ingredients of independent interest, including the uniform entropy-entropy dissipation inequality of Theorem 4.1, the theta-uniform close-to-equilibrium estimate of Theorem 5.1, and the sharp stochastic-convolution estimate of Lemma 7.8. The paper is also honest in identifying the technical role of the no-boundary-equilibria condition. However, the claimed applications in Section 1.3 are not covered by the stated hypotheses: the ATP and combustion networks possess boundary equilibria in positive stoichiometric compatibility classes. Since the abstract and informal Theorem 1.1 present the result without this caveat, the advertised scope is materially overstated. The conditional theorems may still be correct for networks that genuinely satisfy the no-boundary-equilibria hypothesis, but the motivating examples require substantial revision.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 1.3, Theorem 3.4, Theorem 4.1(C2)] The ATP and combustion examples do not satisfy the no-boundary-equilibria assumption of Theorem 3.4. For the ATP network, take the conservation matrix Q with rows (1,0,0,1,0,0), (0,1,0,0,1,0), (0,0,1,0,0,1), (0,1,0,1,0,0), and (0,0,1,n,0,0), which are all orthogonal to the reaction vector gamma=(-1,-1,-n,1,1,n). For v*=(0,a,b,c,0,d) with a,b,c,d>0, the mass-action rate is R(v*)=k1*0*a*b^n - k2*c*0*d^n = 0, so v* is a boundary equilibrium, while Qv*=(c,a,b+d,a+c,b+nc) has all entries positive. Moreover v*+tgamma is strictly positive for small t>0 and Q(v*+tgamma)=Qv*, so the mass vector M=Qv* belongs to Q R^l_{>0}. Thus the hypothesis 'for each M in Q R^l_{>0}, there are no boundary equilibria v8 with Qv8=M' fails for every compact K containing this M. The combustion network has the same defect: with v*=(0,a,0,b), a,b>0, one has R(v*)=0 and the conservation vector (b,2a+b) is positive for the rows (2,0,0,1) and (0,2,1,1). This is not a cosmetic issue: the no-boundary condition is used through Theorem 4.1(C2) to obtain the exponential decay (6.36) in Proposition 6.5, which is essential for Corollary 6.7 and for both main theorems. Remark 3.6 does not repair the examples because no uniform positive lower bound for the corresponding deterministic high-diffusivity solutions is proved or referenced for these networks.
  2. [Section 6.2, Theorem 6.3] The proof of Theorem 6.3 is presented only as a sketch and delegates the central compactness and convergence argument to [1, Theorem 6.1]. Since this scaling limit is the bridge from the cutoff stochastic equation to the deterministic equation with enhanced diffusivity, and since Theorem 3.4 directly relies on it, the manuscript should provide a complete proof of the claimed modifications or state precisely which assertions are imported from [1] and verify them in the present setting. In particular, the theorem's assumption of existence and uniqueness of weak solutions to (6.22) is not proved inside Theorem 6.3; the later appeal to Proposition 6.5 and [1, Corollary 5.5] should be made explicit in the statement. As written, a referee cannot check the validity of (6.25) without reconstructing the full argument from [1].
minor comments (2)
  1. [Section 1.3] The sentence 'single reversible reaction with disjoint species on the two sides ... therefore ... the relevant positive stoichiometric compatibility classes contain no boundary equilibria' is false in general; the ATP calculation in the major comments is a concrete counterexample. The passage should be rewritten or supported by a correct example.
  2. [References] Reference [59] appears to contain typesetting artifacts: 'K. Groger' should be 'K. Gröger' and 'R. Hiinlich' should be 'R. Hünlich' (or the spelling used in the original publication).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the global-in-time claim is assembled from published scaling-limit, entropy, and close-to-equilibrium results, none of which is equivalent to the conclusion.

full rationale

I walked the derivation chain of Theorems 3.4 and 3.5. The chain is: (i) uniform entropy-entropy dissipation estimates (Theorem 4.1, proved here from Lemmas 4.2-4.4 and the published results [37,46]); (ii) global well-posedness of deterministic high-diffusivity RDEs (Proposition 6.5, proved here); (iii) a finite-interval scaling limit of the cutoff stochastic RDE towards the high-diffusivity deterministic RDE (Theorem 6.3, adapted from [1] but supplied with the needed uniform mass control and density arguments); and (iv) a close-to-equilibrium global well-posedness theorem (Theorem 5.1, proved here via Moser iteration and the spectral-gap Lemma 5.3 from [98]). None of these steps introduces a fitted parameter or defines its output in terms of its input: the noise intensity nu and coefficients theta are existential choices, not data fits; the enhanced-dissipation rate chi is arbitrary and the constants are explicit functions of the stated parameters. The heavy self-citations to [1,7,8,37,45,46,98] are to published, parameter-free results whose assumptions do not include the present theorem; they therefore count as independent support rather than circularity under the review rules. One non-circular concern is flagged: the Section 1.3 claims that the ATP and combustion examples satisfy the no-boundary-equilibria hypothesis are outsourced to [45] and are questionable (boundary equilibria appear to exist on positive stoichiometric compatibility classes). This is a correctness/scope risk about the advertised applications, not a reduction of the theorem to its own assumptions, so it does not increase the circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No data fitting occurs in this paper. The noise coefficients theta and intensity nu are existential choices, not fitted to data. The central claim rests on several imported theorems: the entropy-entropy dissipation inequality of [37,46] (extended to uniform constants over compact mass sets), the scaling-limit theorem of [1], local well-posedness and smoothing from [7], the spectral gap estimate from [98], and the equilibrium representation from [102]. These are all published background results. No new entities are introduced.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Entropy-entropy dissipation inequality for complex balanced networks (Theorem 4.1, from [37] and [46]).
    The paper extends the inequality to uniform constants over compact mass sets using Lemma 4.2 and Lemma 4.4, but the base inequality is imported.
  • domain assumption Scaling limit for stochastic RDEs with cutoff (Theorem 6.3, from [1, Theorem 6.1]).
    The proof is a sketch; the central approximation of stochastic cutoff RDEs by deterministic high-diffusivity RDEs is taken from [1].
  • domain assumption Local well-posedness and instantaneous smoothing for stochastic RDEs with transport noise (Proposition 3.2, from [7]).
    Provides the starting point for the analysis and the C^infinity-in-space regularity.
  • domain assumption Spectral gap for the linearized operator around a positive complex balanced equilibrium (Lemma 5.3, from [98]).
    Used in the L2 estimates of Lemma 5.2.
  • domain assumption Equilibrium representation v_{*,i} = v_{*,i}^0 e^{K_i} (from [102, Theorem 2.3]).
    Used to prove continuity of the equilibrium as a function of the mass vector (Lemma 4.2).
  • standard math Stochastic maximal L^p(L^q)-regularity estimates for second-order systems (from [9]).
    Used in the proof of Proposition 6.1 and other maximal regularity arguments.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Global classical solutions by transport noise for reaction-diffusion systems with entropy dissipation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EMATPSNF

@misc{pith2026260813332,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Global classical solutions by transport noise for reaction-diffusion systems with entropy dissipation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EMATPSNF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.13332}
}
abstract

The existence of global classical solutions for reaction-diffusion systems arising from chemical reaction networks remains a major open problem in the deterministic setting, especially for reactions with high polynomial growth. We prove that a suitably chosen, physically motivated transport noise yields unique strong solutions for complex balanced chemical reaction networks that are global in time with arbitrarily high probability. These solutions possess paths in $C^{\theta}_t C^{\infty}_x$ for all $\theta<1/2$ and are, in particular, classical in space. Furthermore, we show that a suitable transport noise can enhance the dissipation of spatial fluctuations at an arbitrarily prescribed exponential rate. Our proofs rely on a combination of scaling-limit arguments, maximal $L^p(L^q)$-regularity, and entropy-entropy dissipation estimates.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.13332 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Proof architecture. The main results (Theorems 3.4 and 3.5) are highlighted in bold. Relevant subsections are indicated in parentheses. To prove Theorem 3.4, we also need two other ingredients. First, Theorem 6.3 adapts the finite-time scaling-limit approach of [1] in which, for suitable noise coefficients, stochastic RDEs with cutoff (see (6.2) below) are approximated by deterministic RDEs with enhanced diffusivity… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

102 extracted references · 72 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A. Agresti. Delayed blow-up and enhanced diffusion by transport noise for systems of reaction-diffusion equations.Stoch. Partial Differ. Equ. Anal. Comput., 12(3):1907–1981, 2024

    1907

  2. [2]

    A. Agresti. Global smooth solutions by transport noise of 3D Navier-Stokes equations with small hyperviscosity.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.09267, 2024. To appear in Ann. Probab

    arXiv 2024

  3. [3]

    A. Agresti. On anomalous dissipation induced by transport noise.Math. Ann., 393(3-4):3141–3190, 2025

    2025

  4. [4]

    An optimal local theory for reaction-diffusion equations driven by non-trace-class noise

    A. Agresti, F. Germ, and M.C. Veraar. An optimal local theory for reaction-diffusion equations driven by non-trace-class noise.arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.07417, 2026

    work page Pith review arXiv 2026

  5. [5]

    Agresti and M.C

    A. Agresti and M.C. Veraar. Nonlinear parabolic stochastic evolution equations in critical spaces Part I. Stochastic maximal regularity and local existence.Nonlinearity, 35(8):4100, 2022

    2022

  6. [6]

    Agresti and M.C

    A. Agresti and M.C. Veraar. Nonlinear parabolic stochastic evolution equations in critical spaces part II.J. Evol. Equ., 22(2):Paper No. 56, 2022

    2022

  7. [7]

    Agresti and M.C

    A. Agresti and M.C. Veraar. Reaction-diffusion equations with transport noise and critical superlinear diffusion: local well-posedness and positivity.J. Differential Equations, 368:247–300, 2023. 54 ANTONIO AGRESTI, MICHAEL KNIELY, AND BAO QUOC TANG

    2023

  8. [8]

    Agresti and M.C

    A. Agresti and M.C. Veraar. Reaction-diffusion equations with transport noise and critical superlinear diffusion: global well-posedness of weakly dissipative systems.SIAM J. Math. Anal., 56(4):4870–4927, 2024

    2024

Show all 102 references
  1. [9]

    Agresti and M.C

    A. Agresti and M.C. Veraar. Stochastic maximalL ppLqq-regularity for second order systems with periodic boundary conditions.Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré Probab. Stat., 60(1):413–430, 2024

    2024

  2. [10]

    Agresti and M.C

    A. Agresti and M.C. Veraar. Nonlinear SPDEs and maximal regularity: an extended survey.NoDEA Nonlinear Differential Equations Appl., 32(6):Paper No. 123, 150, 2025

    2025

  3. [11]

    Akbarian, B

    E. Akbarian, B. Najafi, M. Jafari, S.F. Ardabili, S. Shamshirband, and K.-W. Chau. Experimental and computational fluid dynamics-based numerical simulation of using natural gas in a dual-fueled diesel engine.Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 12(1):517–...

    2018

  4. [12]

    Albritton, E

    D. Albritton, E. Brué, and M. Colombo. Non-uniqueness of Leray solutions of the forced Navier-Stokes equations.Ann. of Math. (2), 196(1):415–455, 2022

    2022

  5. [13]

    Anderson

    David F. Anderson. A proof of the global attractor conjecture in the single linkage class case.SIAM J. Appl. Math., 71(4):1487–1508, 2011

    2011

  6. [14]

    Anzeletti, O

    L. Anzeletti, O. Butkovsky, M. Gerencsér, and A. Shaposhnikov. Uniqueness for stochastic differential equations in hilbert spaces with irregular drift.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.25003, 2025

    2025

  7. [15]

    Arnold, P

    A. Arnold, P. Markowich, G. Toscani, and A. Unterreiter. On convex Sobolev inequalities and the rate of convergence to equilibrium for Fokker-Planck type equations.Comm. Partial Differential Equations, 26(1-2):43–100, 2001

    2001

  8. [16]

    Bałdyga and J

    J. Bałdyga and J. R. Bourne.Turbulent Mixing and Chemical Reactions. John Wiley & Sons, 1999

    1999

  9. [17]

    Bedrossian, A

    J. Bedrossian, A. Blumenthal, and S. Punshon-Smith. Almost-sure enhanced dissipation and uniform- in-diffusivity exponential mixing for advection-diffusion by stochastic Navier-Stokes.Probab. Theory Related Fields, 179(3-4):777–834, 2021

    2021

  10. [18]

    Probab., 50(1):241–303, 2022

    J.Bedrossian, A.Blumenthal, andS.Punshon-Smith.Almost-sureexponentialmixingofpassivescalars by the stochastic Navier-Stokes equations.Ann. Probab., 50(1):241–303, 2022

    2022

  11. [19]

    Bedrossian and M

    J. Bedrossian and M. Coti Zelati. Enhanced dissipation, hypoellipticity, and anomalous small noise inviscid limits in shear flows.Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 224(3):1161–1204, 2017

    2017

  12. [20]

    Bergh and J

    J. Bergh and J. Löfström.Interpolation spaces. An introduction. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1976. Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, No. 223

    1976

  13. [21]

    Bertacco, C

    F. Bertacco, C. Orrieri, and L. Scarpa. Weak uniqueness by noise for singular stochastic PDEs.Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 378(11):7977–8023, 2025

    2025

  14. [22]

    Bouton, L

    H. Bouton, L. Desvillettes, and H. Dietert. Global strong solutions for the triangular Shigesada- Kawasaki-Teramoto cross-diffusion system in three dimensions and parabolic regularisation for in- creasing functions.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.08186, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  15. [23]

    P. D. Boyer. The ATP synthase – a splendid molecular machine.Annu. Rev. Biochem., 66:717–749, 1997

    1997

  16. [24]

    Caputo, T

    M.C. Caputo, T. Goudon, and A.F. Vasseur. Solutions of the 4-species quadratic reaction-diffusion system are bounded andC8-smooth, in any space dimension.Anal. PDE, 12(7):1773–1804, 2019

    2019

  17. [25]

    S. Cerrai. Stochastic reaction-diffusion systems with multiplicative noise and non-Lipschitz reaction term.Probab. Theory Related Fields, 125(2):271–304, 2003

    2003

  18. [26]

    S. Cerrai. Stabilization by noise for a class of stochastic reaction-diffusion equations.Probab. Theory Related Fields, 133(2):190–214, 2005

    2005

  19. [27]

    Cerrai, G

    S. Cerrai, G. Da Prato, and F. Flandoli. Pathwise uniqueness for stochastic reaction-diffusion equations in Banach spaces with an Hölder drift component.Stoch. Partial Differ. Equ. Anal. Comput., 1:507– 551, 2013

    2013

  20. [28]

    Constantin, A

    P. Constantin, A. Kiselev, L. Ryzhik, and A. Zlatoš. Diffusion and mixing in fluid flow.Ann. of Math. (2), 168(2):643–674, 2008

    2008

  21. [29]

    Coti Zelati, G

    M. Coti Zelati, G. Crippa, G. Iyer, and A.L. Mazzucato. Mixing in incompressible flows: transport, dissipation, and their interplay.Notices Amer. Math. Soc., 71(5):593–604, 2024

    2024

  22. [30]

    Coti Zelati, M

    M. Coti Zelati, M. Hairer, and D. Villringer. A stochastic RAGE theorem and enhanced dissipation for transport noise.arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.11422, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Craciun, A

    G. Craciun, A. Dickenstein, A. Shiu, and B. Sturmfels. Toric dynamical systems.J. Symbolic Comput., 44(11):1551–1565, 2009. GLOBAL CLASSICAL SOLUTIONS BY TRANSPORT NOISE 55

    2009

  24. [32]

    Da Prato, F

    G. Da Prato, F. Flandoli, E. Priola, and M. Röckner. Strong uniqueness for stochastic evolution equations in Hilbert spaces perturbed by a bounded measurable drift.Ann. Probab., 41(5):3306–3344, 2013

    2013

  25. [33]

    Dareiotis and M

    K. Dareiotis and M. Gerencsér. On the boundedness of solutions of SPDEs.Stoch. Partial Differ. Equ. Anal. Comput., 3(1):84–102, 2015

    2015

  26. [34]

    Dareiotis, T

    K. Dareiotis, T. Holland, and K. Lê. Regularisation by multiplicative noise for reaction–diffusion equations.Probab. Theory Related Fields, 2026

    2026

  27. [35]

    Debussche, M

    A. Debussche, M. Hofmanová, and J. Vovelle. Degenerate parabolic stochastic partial differential equa- tions: quasilinear case.Ann. Probab., 44(3):1916–1955, 2016

    1916

  28. [36]

    Debussche and U

    A. Debussche and U. Pappalettera. Second order perturbation theory of two-scale systems in fluid dynamics.J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS), 28(4):1533–1595, 2026

    2026

  29. [37]

    Desvillettes, K

    L. Desvillettes, K. Fellner, and B. Q. Tang. Trend to equilibrium for reaction-diffusion systems arising from complex balanced chemical reaction networks.SIAM J. Math. Anal., 49(4):2666–2709, 2017

    2017

  30. [38]

    P. E. Dimotakis. Turbulent mixing.Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 37:329–356, 2005

    2005

  31. [39]

    Dionysis and S

    M. Dionysis and S. Michael. Global in time solutions to stochastic reaction-diffusion systems with superlinear reactions satisfying a triangular control of mass.arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.06645, 2026

    2026 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Érdi and J

    P. Érdi and J. Tóth.Mathematical models of chemical reactions. Nonlinear Science: Theory and Ap- plications. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1989. Theory and applications of deterministic and stochastic models

    1989

  33. [41]

    C. L. Fefferman. Existence and smoothness of the Navier-Stokes equation.The millennium prize prob- lems, 57:67, 2006

    2006

  34. [42]

    Feinberg

    M. Feinberg. The existence and uniqueness of steady states for a class of chemical reaction networks. Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 132(4):311–370, 1995

    1995

  35. [43]

    Feinberg.Foundations of chemical reaction network theory, volume 202 ofApplied Mathematical Sciences

    M. Feinberg.Foundations of chemical reaction network theory, volume 202 ofApplied Mathematical Sciences. Springer, Cham, 2019

    2019

  36. [44]

    Fellner, J

    K. Fellner, J. Morgan, and B.Q. Tang. Global classical solutions to quadratic systems with mass control in arbitrary dimensions.Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire, 37(2):281–307, 2020

    2020

  37. [45]

    Fellner and B.Q

    K. Fellner and B.Q. Tang. Explicit exponential convergence to equilibrium for nonlinear reaction– diffusion systems with detailed balance condition.Nonlinear Analysis, 159:145–180, 2017

    2017

  38. [46]

    Fellner and B.Q

    K. Fellner and B.Q. Tang. Convergence to equilibrium of renormalised solutions to nonlinear chemical reaction–diffusion systems.Zeitschrift für angewandte Mathematik und Physik, 69(3):1–30, 2018

    2018

  39. [47]

    Feng and I

    Y. Feng and I. Gautam. Dissipation enhancement by mixing.Nonlinearity, 32(5):1810–1851, 2019

    2019

  40. [48]

    J. Fischer. Global existence of renormalized solutions to entropy-dissipating reaction-diffusion systems. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 218(1):553–587, 2015

    2015

  41. [49]

    J. Fischer. Weak-strong uniqueness of solutions to entropy-dissipating reaction-diffusion equations. Nonlinear Anal., 159:181–207, 2017

    2017

  42. [50]

    Flandoli.Random perturbation of PDEs and fluid dynamic models, volume 2015 ofLecture Notes in Mathematics

    F. Flandoli.Random perturbation of PDEs and fluid dynamic models, volume 2015 ofLecture Notes in Mathematics. Springer, Heidelberg, 2011. Lectures from the 40th Probability Summer School held in Saint-Flour, 2010, École d’Été de Probabilités de Saint-Flour

    2015

  43. [51]

    Flandoli, L

    F. Flandoli, L. Galeati, and D. Luo. Delayed blow-up by transport noise.Comm. Partial Differential Equations, 46(9):1757–1788, 2021

    2021

  44. [52]

    Flandoli, L

    F. Flandoli, L. Galeati, and D. Luo. Quantitative convergence rates for scaling limit of SPDEs with transport noise.J. Differential Equations, 394:237–277, 2024

    2024

  45. [53]

    Flandoli and D

    F. Flandoli and D. Luo. High mode transport noise improves vorticity blow-up control in 3D Navier- Stokes equations.Probab. Theory Related Fields, 180, 2021

    2021

  46. [54]

    Flandoli and D

    F. Flandoli and D. Luo. Enhanced dissipation and Lyapunov exponents for stochastic transport- diffusion equations with small molecular diffusivity and small noise intensity.Stochastics and Partial Differential Equations: Analysis and Computations, pages 1–15, 2026

    2026

  47. [55]

    Flandoli and U

    F. Flandoli and U. Pappalettera. From additive to transport noise in 2D fluid dynamics.Stochastics and Partial Differential Equations: Analysis and Computations, pages 1–41, 2022

    2022

  48. [56]

    R. O. Fox.Computational Models for Turbulent Reacting Flows. Cambridge University Press, 2003

    2003

  49. [57]

    L. Galeati. On the convergence of stochastic transport equations to a deterministic parabolic one. Stochastics and Partial Differential Equations: Analysis and Computations, 8(4):833–868, 2020. 56 ANTONIO AGRESTI, MICHAEL KNIELY, AND BAO QUOC TANG

    2020

  50. [58]

    Gess and I

    B. Gess and I. Yaroslavtsev. Stabilization by transport noise and enhanced dissipation in the Kraichnan model.J. Evol. Equ., 25(2):Paper No. 42, 63, 2025

    2025

  51. [59]

    Glitzky, K

    A. Glitzky, K. Groger, and R. Hiinlich. Free energy and dissipation rate for reaction diffusion processes of electrically charged species.Applicable Analysis, 60(3-4):201–217, 1996

    1996

  52. [60]

    Glitzky and R

    A. Glitzky and R. Hünlich. Energetic estimates and asymptotics for electro-reaction-diffusion systems. ZAMM-Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics/Zeitschrift für Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik, 77(11):823–832, 1997

    1997

  53. [61]

    K. Gröger. Asymptotic behavior of solutions to a class of diffusion-reaction equations.Mathematische Nachrichten, 112(1):19–33, 1983

    1983

  54. [62]

    On the existence of steady states of certain reaction-diffusion systems.Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 92:297–306, 1986

    K Gröger. On the existence of steady states of certain reaction-diffusion systems.Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 92:297–306, 1986

    1986

  55. [63]

    K. Gröger. Free energy estimates and asymptotic behaviour of reaction-diffusion processes.Preprint 20, Institut für Angewandte Analysis und Stochastik, Berlin, 1992

    1992

  56. [64]

    He and A

    S. He and A. Kiselev. Stirring speeds up chemical reaction.Nonlinearity, 35(8):4599–4623, 2022

    2022

  57. [65]

    F. Horn. Necessary and sufficient conditions for complex balancing in chemical kinetics.Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 49(3):172–186, 1972

    1972

  58. [66]

    Horn and R

    F. Horn and R. Jackson. General mass action kinetics.Arch. Rational Mech. Anal., 47:81–116, 1972

    1972

  59. [67]

    T. Hou, Y. Wang, and C. Yang. Nonuniqueness of Leray-Hopf solutions to the unforced incompressible 3D Navier-Stokes equation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.25116, 2025

    2025

  60. [68]

    Hytönen, J.M.A.M

    T.P. Hytönen, J.M.A.M. van Neerven, M.C. Veraar, and L.W. Weis.Analysis in Banach spaces. Vol. I. Martingales and Littlewood-Paley theory, volume 63 ofErgebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Gren- zgebiete. 3. Folge.Springer, 2016

    2016

  61. [69]

    Kraichnan

    R.H. Kraichnan. Small-scale structure of a scalar field convected by turbulence.The Physics of Fluids, 11(5):945–953, 1968

    1968

  62. [70]

    Kraichnan

    R.H. Kraichnan. Anomalous scaling of a randomly advected passive scalar.Physical review letters, 72(7):1016, 1994

    1994

  63. [71]

    N.V. Krylov. A relatively short proof of Itô’s formula for SPDEs and its applications.Stoch. Partial Differ. Equ. Anal. Comput., 1(1):152–174, 2013

    2013

  64. [72]

    T. Lange. Regularization by noise of an averaged version of the Navier–Stokes equations.J. Dyn. Differ. Equ., 36(4):3011–3036, 2024

    2024

  65. [73]

    P. G. Lemarié-Rieusset.The Navier-Stokes problem in the 21st century. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2016

    2016

  66. [74]

    Leocata and J

    M. Leocata and J. Vovelle. Global solutions to quadratic systems of stochastic reaction-diffusion equa- tions in space-dimension two.arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.05360, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Liu and M

    W. Liu and M. Röckner.Stochastic partial differential equations: an introduction. Universitext. Springer, Cham, 2015

    2015

  68. [76]

    D. Luo. Enhanced dissipation for stochastic Navier-Stokes equations with transport noise.J. Dynam. Differential Equations, 37(1):859–894, 2025

    2025

  69. [77]

    Majda and P.R

    A.J. Majda and P.R. Kramer. Simplified models for turbulent diffusion: theory, numerical modelling, and physical phenomena.Phys. Rep., 314(4-5):237–574, 1999

    1999

  70. [78]

    Mazzucato, Y

    A. Mazzucato, Y. Feng, and C. Nobili. Enhanced dissipation by advection and applications to PDEs. Appl. Math. Model., 150:116310, 2026

    2026

  71. [79]

    Méndez, S

    V. Méndez, S. Fedotov, and W. Horsthemke.Reaction-transport systems. Springer Series in Synergetics. Springer, Heidelberg, 2010. Mesoscopic foundations, fronts, and spatial instabilities

    2010

  72. [80]

    Morgan and B.Q

    J. Morgan and B.Q. Tang. Boundedness for reaction–diffusion systems with lyapunov functions and intermediate sum conditions.Nonlinearity, 33(7):3105–3133, 2020

    2020

  73. [81]

    Murray.Mathematical biology

    J.D. Murray.Mathematical biology. II, volume 18 ofInterdisciplinary Applied Mathematics. Springer- Verlag, New York, third edition, 2003. Spatial models and biomedical applications

    2003

  74. [82]

    C. Pantea. On the persistence and global stability of mass-action systems.SIAM J. Math. Anal., 44(3):1636–1673, 2012

    2012

  75. [83]

    PhD thesis, Université Paris-Sud (Centre d’Orsay), 1975

    E.Pardoux.Equations aux dérivées partielles stochastiques non linéaires monotones; Etude de solutions fortes de type Itô. PhD thesis, Université Paris-Sud (Centre d’Orsay), 1975

    1975

  76. [84]

    Peters.Turbulent Combustion

    N. Peters.Turbulent Combustion. Cambridge University Press, 2000. GLOBAL CLASSICAL SOLUTIONS BY TRANSPORT NOISE 57

    2000

  77. [85]

    M. Pierre. Global existence in reaction-diffusion systems with control of mass: a survey.Milan J. Math., 78(2):417–455, 2010

    2010

  78. [86]

    Pierre and D

    M. Pierre and D. Schmitt. Blowup in reaction-diffusion systems with dissipation of mass.SIAM J. Math. Anal., 28(2):259–269, 1997

    1997

  79. [87]

    M.PierreandD.Schmitt.Examplesoffinitetimeblowupinmassdissipativereaction-diffusionsystems with superquadratic growth.Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems-Series A, 43(3&4):1686– 1701, 2023

    2023

  80. [88]

    Prüss and G

    J. Prüss and G. Simonett.Moving interfaces and quasilinear parabolic evolution equations, volume 105 ofMonographs in Mathematics. Birkhäuser/Springer, 2016

    2016

  81. [89]

    Prüss, G

    J. Prüss, G. Simonett, and M. Wilke. Critical spaces for quasilinear parabolic evolution equations and applications.J. Differential Equations, 264(3):2028–2074, 2018

    2018

  82. [90]

    Rothe.Global solutions of reaction-diffusion systems, volume 1072 ofLecture Notes in Mathematics

    F. Rothe.Global solutions of reaction-diffusion systems, volume 1072 ofLecture Notes in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1984

    1984

  83. [91]

    Runst and W

    T. Runst and W. Sickel.Sobolev spaces of fractional order, Nemytskij operators, and nonlinear partial differential equations, volume 3 ofDe Gruyter Series in Nonlinear Analysis and Applications. Walter de Gruyter & Co., Berlin, 1996

    1996

  84. [92]

    Schmeisser and H

    H.J. Schmeisser and H. Triebel.Topics in Fourier Analysis and Function Spaces. Wiley, 1987

    1987

  85. [93]

    Siegel and D

    D. Siegel and D. MacLean. Global stability of complex balanced mechanisms.J. Math. Chem., 27(1- 2):89–110, 2000

    2000

  86. [94]

    E. D. Sontag. Structure and stability of certain chemical networks and applications to the kinetic proofreading model of T-cell receptor signal transduction.IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 46(7):1028– 1047, 2001

    2001

  87. [95]

    P. Souplet. Global existence for reaction–diffusion systems with dissipation of mass and quadratic growth.Journal of Evolution Equations, 18(4):1713–1720, 2018

    2018

  88. [96]

    Soyhan, H

    H.S. Soyhan, H. Yasar, and C. Sorusbay. Performance and emissions of a spark-ignition engine fuelled with methane.Archiwum Motoryzacji, (2):103–111, 2000

    2000

  89. [97]

    Sun, B.Q

    C. Sun, B.Q. Tang, and J. Yang. Analysis of mass controlled reaction-diffusion systems with nonlin- earities having critical growth rates.J. Evol. Equ., 23:44, 2023

    2023

  90. [98]

    B. Q. Tang. Close-to-equilibrium regularity for reaction–diffusion systems.Journal of Evolution Equa- tions, 18(2):845–869, 2018

    2018

  91. [99]

    Theewis and M.C

    E. Theewis and M.C. Veraar. Large deviations for stochastic evolution equations in the critical varia- tional setting.Stochastic Process. Appl., 196:Paper No. 104898, 2026

    2026

  92. [100]

    Z. Warhaft. Passive scalars in turbulent flows.Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 32:203–240, 2000

    2000

  93. [101]

    Yoshida, E

    M. Yoshida, E. Muneyuki, and T. Hisabori. ATP synthase – a marvellous rotary engine of the cell. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol., 2:669–677, 2001

    2001

  94. [102]

    P. Y. Yu and G. Craciun. Mathematical analysis of chemical reaction systems.Israel Journal of Chem- istry, 58(6–7):733–741, 2018. Department of Mathematics Guido Castelnuovo, Sapienza University of Rome, P.le Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy Email address:antonio.agresti@uniroma...

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.