Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 5 minor 72 references

Langlands Duality and Invariant Differential Operators: the Case SL(2n+1)

T0 review · 5 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that for $\mathrm{SL}(2n+1,\mathbb{R})$ with $n=1,2,3$, every admissible representation induced from the maximal parabolic with $M = \mathfrak{sl}(n+1)\oplus\mathfrak{sl}(n)$ sits in an explicitly listed quiver…

desk verdict A useful data supplement, not a proof: the SL(5) and SL(7) multiplet tables may be new, but the exhaustiveness claim is asserted rather than shown, and the text has too many errors to take the list at face value. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.13400 v1 pith:G6IH3YQE submitted 2026-08-13 math.RT math-phmath.MPmath.QA

V.K. Dobrev This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.RTmath-phmath.MPmath.QA MSC 22E4622E47
keywords LanglandsdualityinvariantdifferentialoperatorselementaryrepresentationsKnapp-SteinmultipletsSL(2n+1)parabolicinductionWeylgroupratio
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that for the real groups $\mathrm{SL}(2n+1,\mathbb{R})$ with $n=1,2,3$, every admissible representation induced from the maximal parabolic subgroup with $M = \mathfrak{sl}(n+1)\oplus\mathfrak{sl}(n)$ belongs to one of the explicitly listed elementary-representation multiplets. The size of a main multiplet is fixed by a ratio of Weyl-group orders: 3, 10, and 35 for $n=1,2,3$. Each multiplet is drawn as a quiver whose arrows are invariant differential operators, obtained by regularizing the integral intertwining operators of Knapp and Stein at singular parameter values. The paper's bridge claim is that Knapp-Stein duality between opposite members of a multiplet is a manifestation of Langlands duality. A sympathetic reader would care because the paper turns an abstract duality into concrete lists of signatures and operators for a whole family of groups.

What carries the argument

The central object is the elementary representation multiplet: the finite set of induced representations with signatures $\chi$ obtained from one another by the action of the Weyl group on the infinitesimal character, with the number of members equal to the ratio of Weyl-group orders $|W(G_{\mathbb{C}},H_{\mathbb{C}})| \big/ |W(M_{\mathbb{C}},H_{m}^{\mathbb{C}})|$. The multiplet is displayed as a quiver whose nodes are signatures and whose arrows are the invariant differential operators that intertwine them. Two mechanisms carry the argument: the Knapp-Stein integral intertwining operators $G^{\pm}$, whose kernels are two-point functions, and the Gelfand-Graev-Vilenkin regularization procedure that turns these integral operators into differential operators at singular parameter values.

What would settle it

For $\mathrm{SL}(7,\mathbb{R})$ with $M = \mathfrak{sl}(4)\oplus\mathfrak{sl}(3)$, enumerate all Langlands-Knapp-Zuckermann induced signatures by computer; if any admissible signature lies outside the 35 main signatures and the listed reduced ones, the paper's exhaustiveness claim is false.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central assertion is that the elementary representations of $\mathrm{SL}(2n+1,\mathbb{R})$ induced from the maximal parabolic $M = \mathfrak{sl}(n+1)\oplus\mathfrak{sl}(n)$ are exhausted, for $n=1,2,3$, by the multiplets tabulated in the paper: one main multiplet of size 3 for $\mathrm{SL}(3)$, size 10 for $\mathrm{SL}(5)$, and size 35 for $\mathrm{SL}(7)$, together with the reduced multiplets obtained by setting individual parameters to zero. Each element of a multiplet is a signature $\chi$, and the multiplet is generated from the first signature by Weyl reflections acting on the corresponding weight $\Lambda$; the arrows between signatures are invariant differential operators that arise when Knapp-Stein integral intertwining operators are regularized at points where the representation becomes singular. The paper also asserts that this Knapp-Stein duality is a manifestation of Langlands duality. If the exhaustiveness claim is right, the quiver pictures are complete classification diagrams for these induced representations.

Load-bearing premise

The exhaustiveness claim rests on the unstated assumption that the Weyl-group ratio and the multiplet algorithm from earlier work count every admissible induced representation for $M = \mathfrak{sl}(n+1)\oplus\mathfrak{sl}(n)$ without missing any orbit.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For the three groups treated, the listed multiplets give a complete catalogue of admissible induced representations from this parabolic, so any such representation can be identified by its position in a quiver.
  • Every arrow in a quiver is an invariant differential operator, so the quiver construction enumerates the invariant differential operators acting between members of each multiplet.
  • The Weyl-group ratio formula predicts multiplet sizes for larger $n$: 126 main members for $n=4$ and 462 for $n=5$, so the same classification can be attempted for $\mathrm{SL}(9)$ and beyond.
  • The regularization mechanism shows that differential intertwining operators are singular limits of integral intertwining operators, linking the two families in a systematic way.
  • The identification of Knapp-Stein duality with Langlands duality, if accepted, inserts invariant differential operators into the Langlands program as concrete dual objects.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An unstated consequence of the ratio formula is that the entire classification for this parabolic family may be governed by symmetric-group combinatorics, so the quivers for all $n$ could in principle be generated algorithmically rather than by hand.
  • The paper's exhaustiveness is verified only for $n=1,2,3$; the natural next test is to run the same enumeration for $n=4$, where the ratio predicts 126 main multiplet members, and compare with an independent Langlands-Knapp-Zuckermann parameter count.
  • The slogan that Knapp-Stein duality manifests Langlands duality is programmatic; taken literally it would make every invariant differential operator on these groups a Langlands-dual object, which is stronger than what the paper proves.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper claims to build a bridge between Langlands duality and invariant differential operators for the group SL(2n+1,R), with maximal parabolic subgroup P=M⊕A⊕N where M=sl(n+1)⊕sl(n). For n=1,2,3 it lists signatures of "elementary representations" (ERs) in main and reduced multiplets, draws quivers whose arrows are invariant differential operators, and states in the Conclusion that the listed ERs exhaust all induced representations for M=sl(n+1,n). It also asserts in Section 3 that Knapp-Stein duality is a manifestation of Langlands duality. The construction relies on the author's earlier book [61] for the multiplet algorithm and for the regularization of integral intertwining operators.

Significance. If the exhaustiveness and duality claims were rigorously established, the paper would give a complete multiplet classification for the maximal parabolic of SL(2n+1,R) for n=1,2,3 and would provide a concrete link between two large subjects. The explicit signature lists and quiver diagrams encode a substantial amount of information, and the Weyl-group ratio in Eq. (11) is a clean structural observation. However, the manuscript does not prove the completeness of the enumeration, several table entries are internally inconsistent, and the central duality assertion is stated without a precise formulation or proof. As it stands, the contribution is not verifiable and cannot support the advertised conclusions.

major comments (5)
  1. [Conclusion and Outlook] The load-bearing assertion that "the ERs listed in the previous section exhaust all representations of the algebras sl(2n+1) for n=1,2,3 induced in the case M=sl(n+1,n)" is not supported by the manuscript. Eq. (11) gives the size of one main multiplet (3, 10, 35 for n=1,2,3), but it is not an orbit count and says nothing about the number of distinct multiplets or about reduced multiplets. The completeness of the enumeration is delegated to [61] and is not demonstrated here. Moreover, Section 4 explicitly states "for further reduced cases we show only those with physical applicability," so the reduced lists are deliberately incomplete; a deliberately filtered list cannot be the basis for an exhaustiveness claim.
  2. [Eq. (46) and Eq. (31)] The enumeration is not well-defined as written. In Eq. (46) the label 135χ18_7 is assigned to three different signatures, while a fourth line has the label 135χ23_7; a list in which one label denotes three different objects cannot support any counting or exhaustion statement. In Eq. (31) the relation "Λ3 = Λ3" is a self-equality carrying no information. These are not harmless typos: they prevent a reader from verifying which quiver nodes are identified and which arrows exist.
  3. [Section 3] The sentence "Thus, the Knapp-Stein duality is a manifestation of the Langlands duality" is the paper's central conceptual claim, but it is only asserted, not proved or even formulated precisely. The preceding construction shows that Weyl reflections generate a finite multiplet and that integral intertwining operators pair certain signatures; it does not define Langlands duality in this setting, nor does it give a theorem relating Knapp-Stein duality to Langlands duality. Without a precise statement of what "manifestation" means and a proof or a reference establishing the identification, this claim is not assessable.
  4. [Sections 2-5] The claimed exhaustion is also under-specified because no continuous parameter appears in any signature list. In Section 2 the parabolic is P=M⊕A⊕N with dim A=1, so an induced representation from P carries a character of A parameterized by a continuous exponent. All signatures in Sections 3-5, e.g. Eq. (28), contain only discrete labels m_j. Unless the exhaustiveness claim is silently restricted to reducible/integral points, the statement that the lists exhaust all induced representations cannot be literally true. This restriction is never stated.
  5. [Eq. (29)] The Knapp-Stein duality list in Eq. (29) contains both "χ9_7 ∼ χ2_7" and "χ9_7 ∼ χ26_7". If "∼" is an equivalence relation, this implies χ2_7 ∼ χ26_7, which is not listed; if the relation is not transitive, the notation needs a definition. As written, the list is ambiguous and prevents verification of the claimed duality pairing.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract says "their representation theories is rather different"; the verb should agree with the plural subject.
  2. [Section 4] The notation for reduced signatures is inconsistent: entries such as "m1,3", "m1,34", and "m142,," in Eqs. (24)-(26) are not defined, and the commas inside subscripts make the indexing hard to read. A consistent convention, preferably a definition of m_{ij} and of multi-index labels, would remove ambiguity.
  3. [Eqs. (30), (38)] Some lines in the reduced multiplet tables, for example 1χ5_7 in Eq. (30) and 15χ5_7 in Eq. (38), are listed without any relation for their Λ-weight, while neighboring lines include such relations. The intended meaning of these entries should be stated explicitly.
  4. [Eq. (35)] In the line for 5χ15_7 the text reads "Λ15 = L20", using the letter L instead of Λ; this should be corrected to "Λ15 = Λ20".
  5. [Throughout] There are unresolved equation references "(??)" in Sections 3 and 5 (before Eqs. (18) and (28)); these cross-references must be fixed before the paper can be read.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 5.0 of 10

Central claims lean on the author's prior classification and a terminological identification; the exhaustiveness claim is imported from [61] and the Langlands-duality bridge is a renaming of Knapp–Stein duality.

  1. uniqueness imported from authors [Conclusion; Sections 3–5 (multiplet construction and exhaustiveness claim)]
    "The ERs listed in the previous section exhaust all representations of the algebras sl(2n+1) for n=1,2,3. induced in the case M=sl(n+1, n)."

    The exhaustiveness of the lists is the paper's load-bearing claim, but the only basis given for generating and counting the multiplets is the author's own book [61]: Section 1 says 'for an exposition we refer to [61]' and Section 3 says 'we have three-member multiplets using [61]'. The in-paper formula (11), |W(GC,HC)|/|W(MC,H_m^C)|, counts only the elements of one main multiplet; it does not certify the reduced multiplets, and Section 4 explicitly states 'for further reduced cases we show only those with physical applicability'. Thus the completeness assertion is inherited from the author's earlier classification rather than derived in the present paper, and the choice of which ERs exhaust the induced representations is not independently verified.

  2. renaming known result [Section 3, after Eqs. (16)–(18)]
    "Thus, the Knapp-Stein duality is a manifestation of the Langlands duality."

    The paper gives no definition of the Langlands dual group for SL(2n+1) and no theorem connecting the dual group to the signature-reversal relations. It simply renames the known Knapp–Stein integral-operator pattern (χ1↔χ3 in SL(3), and the analogous ∼ pairings in SL(5) and SL(7)) as 'Langlands duality'. The claimed bridge is therefore terminological: the new 'prediction' is the old empirical/structural fact under a new label, so the unification reduces to a renaming of known content rather than a derivation of Langlands duality from invariant differential operators or vice versa.

full rationale

The paper is not circular in the data-fitting sense: no parameters are fitted and then predicted, and the multiplet sizes 3, 10, 35 follow from a standard Weyl-group ratio. However, the two headline assertions are not independently established. First, the conclusion that the listed ERs 'exhaust all representations' is asserted on the strength of the author's prior book [61]; Eq. (11) counts only main-multiplet elements and gives no completeness certification for the reduced multiplets, which are explicitly filtered by 'physical applicability'. This makes the exhaustiveness claim load-bearing on a self-citation. Second, 'the Knapp-Stein duality is a manifestation of the Langlands duality' is a labeling claim: no dual-group data, functor, or correspondence is exhibited, so the advertised bridge is a renaming of a known integral-operator symmetry. These issues warrant a moderate circularity score. Separate correctness concerns—such as the incomplete reduced lists, the reuse of the same label '135χ18_7' for three different signatures in Eq. (46), and the absence of continuous character parameters in the signatures—are not circularity and are not counted in this score.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new entities and fits no constants. Its central claim rests on prior classification theorems (Langlands, Knapp-Zuckerman, Weyl group counting), on the author's own multiplet algorithm from [61], and on an asserted identification between Knapp-Stein and Langlands duality that is not argued. These are inputs, not outputs, so the ledger records them as axioms.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math The number of ERs in a multiplet equals |W(G_C,H_C)| / |W(M_C,H_C^m)| (Eq. 11), taken from Langlands classification [2].
    Invoked in Section 2 to count 10 and 35 multiplets for SL(5) and SL(7); the exhaustiveness claim depends on this count being correct and applicable.
  • domain assumption The multiplet construction algorithm of the author's book [61] applies unchanged to SL(2n+1) with M = sl(n+1) + sl(n).
    The paper delegates the entire enumeration to [61] without stating the algorithm, so the tables are only as reliable as this transfer of method.
  • domain assumption Knapp-Stein integral intertwiners, after regularization at singular representation points, become invariant differential operators via the Gelfand-Graev-Vilenkin mechanism [72].
    Stated in Section 3 around Eq. (21); this is the step that turns the duality into differential operators, and no proof is given in this paper.
  • domain assumption Every induced admissible representation is captured by the signature notation chi = (m_1,...,m_{2n}) with integer parameters m_j and the listed shifts Lambda_i.
    The paper assumes this parametrization covers all cases without discussing exceptional parameters, multiplicity, or reducibility subtleties.
  • ad hoc to paper Knapp-Stein duality is a manifestation of Langlands duality.
    Asserted after Eq. (16) in Section 3; no argument connects the Knapp-Stein intertwining relation to Langlands parameter duality.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Langlands Duality and Invariant Differential Operators: the Case SL(2n+1)." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/G6IH3YQE

@misc{pith2026260813400,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Langlands Duality and Invariant Differential Operators: the Case SL(2n+1)},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/G6IH3YQE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.13400}
}
abstract

Recently we started building a bridge between two cases of Langlands duality. The latter is one of the most influential topics in mathematical research. It has many different appearances and influential subtopics. Yet there is a topic that until now seems unrelated to the Langlands program. That is the topic of invariant differential operators. That is strange since both items are deeply rooted in Harish-Chandra's representation theory of semisimple Lie groups. We started with the case of the group ~$SL(2n)$. In the present paper we deal with the group $SL(2n+1)$. The two mentioned groups are similar, but their representation theories is rather different.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.13400 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Fig.2. The SL(5) Quiver [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages

  1. [61]

    V.K. Dobrev,Invariant Differential Operators, Volume 1: Noncompact Semisimple Lie Algebras and Groups; De Gruyter Studies in Mathematical Physics; De Gruyter: Berlin, Germany; Boston, MA, USA, 2016; Volume 35, pp. 408 + xii, ISBN 978-3-11-042764-6

    work page 2016

  2. [1]

    Langlands Problems in the theory of automorphic forms, Lect

    R.P. Langlands Problems in the theory of automorphic forms, Lect. Notes Math. 170 (1970) 18-61

    work page 1970

  3. [2]

    Langlands On the Classification of Irreducible Representations of Real Algebraic Groups, Mimeographed notes Princeton 1973; Published in: Math.Surveys Monogr

    R.P. Langlands On the Classification of Irreducible Representations of Real Algebraic Groups, Mimeographed notes Princeton 1973; Published in: Math.Surveys Monogr. 31 (1989) 101-170

    work page 1989

  4. [3]

    Dobrev, Langlands Duality and Invariant Differential Operators, Mathematics, volume 13, no

    V.K. Dobrev, Langlands Duality and Invariant Differential Operators, Mathematics, volume 13, no. 5, 855 10.3390/math13050855, (2025)

    work page doi:10.3390/math13050855 2025

  5. [4]

    Ben-Zvi, Y

    D. Ben-Zvi, Y. Sakellaridis, A. Venkatesh, Relative Langlands Duality, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2409.04677

    arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2409.04677

  6. [5]

    T.-H. Chen, D. Nadler, Real groups, symmetric varieties and Langlands duality, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2403.13995

    arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2403.13995

  7. [6]

    E.Y. Chen, A. Venkatesh, Some Singular Examples of Relative Langlands Duality, arXiv:2405.18212

    arXiv

  8. [7]

    Chua, Kazhdan-Lusztig map and Langlands duality, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2403.07080

    A. Chua, Kazhdan-Lusztig map and Langlands duality, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2403.07080

    arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2403.07080

Show all 72 references
  1. [8]

    J.-F. Dat, D. Helm, R. Kurinczuk, G. Moss, Local Langlands in families: The banal case, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2406.09283

    doi arXiv

  2. [9]

    D. Dinh, J. Teschner, Classical limit of the geometric Langlands correspondence for SL2(C) arXiv:2312.13393

    arXiv

  3. [10]

    Espinosa, The Multiplicative Formula of Langlands for Orbital Integrals in GL(2)

    M. Espinosa, The Multiplicative Formula of Langlands for Orbital Integrals in GL(2). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2402.08013

    doi arXiv

  4. [11]

    Gaiotto, J

    D. Gaiotto, J. Teschner, Quantum Analytic Langlands Correspondence, arXiv:2402.00494

    arXiv

  5. [12]

    Gaiotto, E

    D. Gaiotto, E. Witten Gauge Theory and the Analytic Form of the Geometric Langlands Program, Ann. Henri Poincare, 25 (1) (2024) 557-671

    2024

  6. [13]

    Hameister, Z

    T. Hameister, Z. Luo, B. Morrissey, Relative Dolbeault Geometric Langlands via the Regular Quotient, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2409.15691

    doi arXiv

  7. [14]

    van den Hove, The stack of spherical Langlands parameters, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2409.09522

    T. van den Hove, The stack of spherical Langlands parameters, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2409.09522

    doi

  8. [15]

    Topological aspects of matters and Langlands program,

    K. Ikeda, “Topological aspects of matters and Langlands program,” Rev. Math. Phys.36(2024) no.04, 2450005; “Quantum Hall Effect and Langlands Program,” Annals Phys.397(2018), 136-150

    2024

  9. [16]

    Imai, On the geometrization of the local Langlands correspondence, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2408.16571

    N. Imai, On the geometrization of the local Langlands correspondence, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2408.16571

    doi arXiv

  10. [17]

    Jeong, N

    S. Jeong, N. Lee, N. Nekrasov, di-Langlands correspondence and extended observables J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2024) 105

    2024

  11. [18]

    Kimura, G

    T. Kimura, G. Noshita, Gauge origami and quiver W-algebras II: Vertex function and beyond quantum q-Langlands correspondence https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2404.17061

    doi arXiv

  12. [19]

    Lenart, G

    C. Lenart, G. Zhao, C. Zhong, Elliptic classes via the periodic Hecke module and its Langlands dual, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2309.09140

    doi arXiv

  13. [20]

    De Martino, E

    M. De Martino, E. Opdam, A remark on the Langlands correspondence for tori, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2410.06346

    doi arXiv

  14. [21]

    Matringe, Local converse theorems and Langlands parameters, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2409.20240

    N. Matringe, Local converse theorems and Langlands parameters, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2409.20240

    doi

  15. [22]

    Nakajima, S-dual of Hamiltonian G spaces and relative Langlands duality, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2409.06303

    H. Nakajima, S-dual of Hamiltonian G spaces and relative Langlands duality, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2409.06303

    doi arXiv

  16. [23]

    Suzuki, Rationality of the Local Jacquet-Langlands Correspondence for GL(n), https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2307.06039

    K. Suzuki, Rationality of the Local Jacquet-Langlands Correspondence for GL(n), https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2307.06039

    doi arXiv

  17. [24]

    Collacciani, A Reduction over finite fields of the tame local Langlands correspondence for SLn, arXiv:2501.09085 [math.RT]

    E. Collacciani, A Reduction over finite fields of the tame local Langlands correspondence for SLn, arXiv:2501.09085 [math.RT]

    arXiv

  18. [25]

    Scholze Geometrization of the local Langlands correspondence, motivically, arXiv:2501.07944 [math.AG]

    P. Scholze Geometrization of the local Langlands correspondence, motivically, arXiv:2501.07944 [math.AG]

  19. [26]

    Nima Moshayedi, From BV-BFV Quantization to Reshetikhin-Turaev Invariants, arXiv:2604.04556

    arXiv

  20. [27]

    Zeyu Wang, Wenqing Wei, Arithmetic volume of Shtukas and Langlands duality, arXiv:2604.03763

    arXiv

  21. [28]

    Gaitsgory, V

    D. Gaitsgory, V. Lafforgue, S. Raskin, Tempered vs generic automorphic functions and the canonical filtration on automorphic functions, arXiv:2603.26925

    arXiv

  22. [29]

    Dotto, M

    A. Dotto, M. Emerton, T. Gee, A categorical p-adic Langlands correspondence forGL 2(Qp), arXiv:2603.26887

  23. [30]

    Haoshuo Fu, Derived Weil Representation and Relative Langlands Duality, arXiv:2603.26058

  24. [31]

    Schneider, Local coherence for representations of amalgams, arXiv:2603.25474

    P. Schneider, Local coherence for representations of amalgams, arXiv:2603.25474

  25. [32]

    Daniels, P

    P. Daniels, P. van Hoften, D. Kim, M. Zhang, Igusa Stacks and the Cohomology of Shimura Varieties II, arXiv:2603.24921

  26. [33]

    Colin Jia Sheng Loh, Period integrals of distinguished polarised strongly tempered hyperspherical varieties, arXiv:2603.23895

  27. [34]

    R. Cass, T. van den Hove, J. Scholbach, Exponential motives on the affine Grassmannian, arXiv:2603.23435

  28. [35]

    A. Jana, A. Mondal, On the depth of the adjoint representations, arXiv:2603.1635

  29. [36]

    T. Deng, C. Huang, B. Xu, Q. Zhao, Relating Arthur packets of real unitary groups and -adic symplectic and orthogonal groups, arXiv:2603.16314

  30. [37]

    Masao Oi, Twisted endoscopic character relation for toral supercuspidal L-packets of classical groups, arXiv:2603.15113

  31. [38]

    Yang, On Moy-Prasad quotients over Laurent series fields, arXiv:2603.12623

    D. Yang, On Moy-Prasad quotients over Laurent series fields, arXiv:2603.12623

  32. [39]

    Bando, Derived geometric Satake equivalence on the Beilinson-Drinfeld Grassmannian with one leg in mixed characteristic arXiv:2603.12542

    K. Bando, Derived geometric Satake equivalence on the Beilinson-Drinfeld Grassmannian with one leg in mixed characteristic arXiv:2603.12542

  33. [40]

    Daxin Xu, Lingfei Yi, Frobenius structure on rigid connections and arithmetic applications, arXiv:2603.09252

  34. [41]

    van den Hove, Cycles on splitting models of Shimura varieties, arXiv:2603.08870

    T. van den Hove, Cycles on splitting models of Shimura varieties, arXiv:2603.08870

  35. [42]

    Nadler, Z

    D. Nadler, Z. Yun, The global nilpotent cone for universal curves, arXiv:2603.01261

    arXiv

  36. [43]

    Maulik, J

    D. Maulik, J. Shen, Q. Yin, Dualizable abelian fibrations, arXiv:2602.19318

  37. [44]

    Venkatesh, X.G

    A. Venkatesh, X.G. Wang, The Tetrahedral (or 6j) Symbol, arXiv:2602.14908

  38. [45]

    Dat, Jessica Fintzen, Parametrization and reduction to depth zero of Z-blocks of tame p-adic groups, arXiv:2602.12333

    J.-F. Dat, Jessica Fintzen, Parametrization and reduction to depth zero of Z-blocks of tame p-adic groups, arXiv:2602.12333

  39. [46]

    Toda, A proof of Dolbeault geometric Langlands for with reduced spectral curves, arXiv:2602.09359

    Y. Toda, A proof of Dolbeault geometric Langlands for with reduced spectral curves, arXiv:2602.09359

    arXiv

  40. [47]

    Yang, The Global Jacquet-Langlands Correspondence via Tensor Products, arXiv:2602.08053

    J. Yang, The Global Jacquet-Langlands Correspondence via Tensor Products, arXiv:2602.08053

  41. [48]

    Ambrosio, Giovanna Carnovale, F

    F. Ambrosio, Giovanna Carnovale, F. Esposito, N. Saunders, L. Topley, Sheets, Jordan classes and induced orbits in the exotic and enhanced modules, arXiv:2602.02404

  42. [49]

    F. Chen, B. Sun, Y. Weng, Vector-valued Gelfand-Kazhdan criterion, arXiv:2601.23199

  43. [50]

    Shtotland, Relative Kazhdan Lusztig isomorphism for GL(2n)/Sp(2n), arXiv:2601.22846

    G. Shtotland, Relative Kazhdan Lusztig isomorphism for GL(2n)/Sp(2n), arXiv:2601.22846

  44. [51]

    Park, Skeins, q-series, and modularity, arXiv:2601.18042

    S. Park, Skeins, q-series, and modularity, arXiv:2601.18042

  45. [52]

    Chen, A relative Langlands dual realization of T*(G/K) and derived Satake, arXiv:2601.18022

    T.-H. Chen, A relative Langlands dual realization of T*(G/K) and derived Satake, arXiv:2601.18022

  46. [53]

    Baine, C

    J. Baine, C. Hone, The geometry of tilting composition series via Richardson varieties, arXiv:2601.16937

    arXiv

  47. [54]

    Du Pei, Gauge Theory and Skein Modules, arXiv:2601.16213

  48. [55]

    Kazhdan, A

    D. Kazhdan, A. Polishchuk,L 2-property for algebraic stacks over local non-archimedean fields, arXiv:2601.14557

  49. [56]

    Z. Li, B. Su, Z. Wu, Locally analytic vectors in the completed cohomology of quaternionic Shimura curves, arXiv:2601.13625

  50. [57]

    Ikeda, S

    K. Ikeda, S. Rayan, Quantum Entanglement, Stratified Spaces, and Topological Matter: Towards an Entanglement-Sensitive Langlands Correspondence, arXiv:2601.13467

    arXiv

  51. [58]

    Banerjee, S

    D. Banerjee, S. Das, A note on extensions of p-adic representations ofGL 2(Qp), arXiv:2601.07707

    arXiv

  52. [59]

    Liang, A Coherent Version of Geometric Satake Equivalence for Type A, arXiv:2601.07390

    S. Liang, A Coherent Version of Geometric Satake Equivalence for Type A, arXiv:2601.07390

  53. [60]

    Gleason, Stacks of p-adic shtukas and spatial kimberlites, arXiv:2601.02741

    I. Gleason, Stacks of p-adic shtukas and spatial kimberlites, arXiv:2601.02741

  54. [62]

    Knapp, G.J

    A.W. Knapp, G.J. Zuckerman, Lecture Notes in Math. ; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1977; Volume 587, pp. 138–159.Ann. Math.1982,116, 389–501

    1977

  55. [63]

    Etingof, E

    P. Etingof, E. Frenkel, D. Kazhdan A general framework for the analytic Langlands correspondence, Pure Appl. Math. Quart. 20 (1) (2024) 307-426; Hecke Operators and Analytic Langlands Correspondence for Curves Over Local Fields, Duke Math. J. 172 (11) (2023) 2015-2071; Analyti...

    2024

  56. [64]

    Braverman, D

    A. Braverman, D. Kazhdan, Normalized intertwining operators and nilpotent elements in the Langlands dual group, Moscow Math. J. 2(3) (2002). DOI: 10.17323/1609-4514-2002-2-3-533-553

    2002 doi

  57. [65]

    Adams, D.A

    J. Adams, D.A. Vogan Jr, Contragredient representations and characterizing the local Langlands correspondence, Amer. J. Math. 138, 3 (2016), 657-682. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24736404

    2016

  58. [66]

    Dobrev, G

    V.K. Dobrev, G. Mack, V.B. Petkova, S.G. Petrova, I.T. Todorov, Harmonic Analysis on the n-Dimensional Lorentz Group and Its Application to Conformal Quantum Field Theory.Lect. Notes Phys.1977,63, 1–280

    1977

  59. [67]

    Knapp,Lie Groups Beyond an Introduction, 2nd ed.; Progr

    A.W. Knapp,Lie Groups Beyond an Introduction, 2nd ed.; Progr. Math.; Birkh¨ auser: Boston, MA, USA; Basel, Switzerland; Stuttgart, Germany, 2002; Volume 14

    2002

  60. [68]

    Dobrev, Multiplet classification of the reducible elementary representations of real semisimple Lie groups: theSO e(p, q) example,Lett

    V.K. Dobrev, Multiplet classification of the reducible elementary representations of real semisimple Lie groups: theSO e(p, q) example,Lett. Math. Phys.1985,9, 205–211

    1985

  61. [69]

    Dobrev, V.B

    V.K. Dobrev, V.B. Petkova, On the group-theoretical approach to extended conformal supersymmetry : classification of multiplets,Lett. Math. Phys.1985,9, 287–298

    1985

  62. [70]

    Dixmier,Enveloping Algebras; North Holland: New York, NY, USA, 1977

    J. Dixmier,Enveloping Algebras; North Holland: New York, NY, USA, 1977

    1977

  63. [71]

    Knapp, E.M

    A.W. Knapp, E.M. Stein,Ann. Math.1971,93, 489–578.Inv. Math.1980,60, 9–84

    1971

  64. [72]

    Gel’fand, M.I

    I.M. Gel’fand, M.I. Graev, N.Y. Vilenkin,Generalised Functions, vol. 5 (Academic Press, New York, 1966). . ? Λ1 Λ2 Λ3 Λ4 Λ5 Λ6 Λ7 Λ8 Λ9 m2α14 Λ10 m3α3 m2α23 m2α23 m4α34 m4α34 m4α34m3α24 m3α24 HHHHH j m1α13 m1α13 m1α13 HHHHH j HHHHH j HHHHH j HHHHH j ? Fig.2. The SL(5) Quiver w...

    1966

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.