Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Asset Pricing and Deep Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2209.12014 v1 pith:27LCIYAO submitted 2022-09-24 q-fin.ST cs.LGq-fin.PR

classification q-fin.STcs.LGq-fin.PR
keywords learningdeepmethodsassetfinancialpricingdemonstratedistribution
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Traditional machine learning methods have been widely studied in financial innovation. My study focuses on the application of deep learning methods on asset pricing. I investigate various deep learning methods for asset pricing, especially for risk premia measurement. All models take the same set of predictive signals (firm characteristics, systematic risks and macroeconomics). I demonstrate high performance of all kinds of state-of-the-art (SOTA) deep learning methods, and figure out that RNNs with memory mechanism and attention have the best performance in terms of predictivity. Furthermore, I demonstrate large economic gains to investors using deep learning forecasts. The results of my comparative experiments highlight the importance of domain knowledge and financial theory when designing deep learning models. I also show return prediction tasks bring new challenges to deep learning. The time varying distribution causes distribution shift problem, which is essential for financial time series prediction. I demonstrate that deep learning methods can improve asset risk premium measurement. Due to the booming deep learning studies, they can constantly promote the study of underlying financial mechanisms behind asset pricing. I also propose a promising research method that learning from data and figuring out the underlying economic mechanisms through explainable artificial intelligence (AI) methods. My findings not only justify the value of deep learning in blooming fintech development, but also highlight their prospects and advantages over traditional machine learning methods.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Is attention truly all we need? An empirical study of asset pricing in pretrained RNN sparse and global attention models

    q-fin.PR 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Pre-trained RNN models with global self-attention or sliding-window sparse attention deliver the highest value-weighted Sortino ratios (2.0 and 1.80) in a COVID-era backtest of 420 large-cap US stocks.

  2. Asset Pricing in Pre-trained Transformer

    q-fin.CP 2025-05 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    A new encoder-only Transformer variant with autoencoder pre-training is reported to achieve high out-of-sample R2 for US stock returns, but the headline numbers come from test-set model selection.

  3. Integrating Natural Language Processing Techniques of Text Mining Into Financial System: Applications and Limitations

    cs.CL 2024-12 conditional novelty 1.0 of 10

    A survey of 2018-2023 NLP-in-finance papers reports that asset pricing is the most studied component and that classification, LSTM, and BERT-style models dominate, with persistent data and interpretability limitations.

Pith tools