The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2410.13893 · v1 · pith:2A3NJ45N · submitted 2024-10-14 · cs.CR

Can LLMs be Scammed? A Baseline Measurement Study

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:2A3NJ45Nrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cs.CR
keywords scamllmsmodelsdetectionfinrascenariostacticstaxonomy
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Despite the importance of developing generative AI models that can effectively resist scams, current literature lacks a structured framework for evaluating their vulnerability to such threats. In this work, we address this gap by constructing a benchmark based on the FINRA taxonomy and systematically assessing Large Language Models' (LLMs') vulnerability to a variety of scam tactics. First, we incorporate 37 well-defined base scam scenarios reflecting the diverse scam categories identified by FINRA taxonomy, providing a focused evaluation of LLMs' scam detection capabilities. Second, we utilize representative proprietary (GPT-3.5, GPT-4) and open-source (Llama) models to analyze their performance in scam detection. Third, our research provides critical insights into which scam tactics are most effective against LLMs and how varying persona traits and persuasive techniques influence these vulnerabilities. We reveal distinct susceptibility patterns across different models and scenarios, underscoring the need for targeted enhancements in LLM design and deployment.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.