Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Thinking about GPT-3 In-Context Learning for Biomedical IE? Think Again

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2203.08410 v3 pith:2ERTLTY5 submitted 2022-03-16 cs.CL cs.IR

classification cs.CLcs.IR
keywords gpt-3in-contextlearningfew-shotbiomedicalextractionfine-tuninghigh
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The strong few-shot in-context learning capability of large pre-trained language models (PLMs) such as GPT-3 is highly appealing for application domains such as biomedicine, which feature high and diverse demands of language technologies but also high data annotation costs. In this paper, we present the first systematic and comprehensive study to compare the few-shot performance of GPT-3 in-context learning with fine-tuning smaller (i.e., BERT-sized) PLMs on two highly representative biomedical information extraction tasks, named entity recognition and relation extraction. We follow the true few-shot setting to avoid overestimating models' few-shot performance by model selection over a large validation set. We also optimize GPT-3's performance with known techniques such as contextual calibration and dynamic in-context example retrieval. However, our results show that GPT-3 still significantly underperforms compared to simply fine-tuning a smaller PLM. In addition, GPT-3 in-context learning also yields smaller gains in accuracy when more training data becomes available. Our in-depth analyses further reveal issues of the in-context learning setting that may be detrimental to information extraction tasks in general. Given the high cost of experimenting with GPT-3, we hope our study provides guidance for biomedical researchers and practitioners towards more promising directions such as fine-tuning small PLMs.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Can AI Extract Antecedent Factors of Human Trust in AI? An Application of Information Extraction for Scientific Literature in Behavioural and Computer Sciences

    cs.CL 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The paper introduces the first English annotated corpus for extracting factors that influence human trust in AI from scientific text, and shows supervised NER and RE models outperform prompt-based LLMs.

Pith tools