Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 300 references

Uncovering expert objectives in production planning via inverse optimization: An industrial case study

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that expert planners' hidden objectives can be recovered from historical production plans, and that in a real industrial case the recovered weights make avoiding inventory shortages and keeping cycle lengths consistent…

desk verdict Credible industrial inverse-optimization study with honest validation; central preference claims need a sensitivity check before being taken literally. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.07398 v1 pith:2GOAKGBL submitted 2026-08-07 math.OC cs.HCcs.LG

Shivi Dixit , Rishabh Gupta , Adam Kelloway , John Wassick , Qi Zhang This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.OCcs.HCcs.LG MSC 90C1190B3090C90
keywords inverseoptimizationproductionplanningmixed-integerlinearprogrammingapprenticeshiplearninghuman-in-the-loopdecision-makingobjectiveinferenceindustrialcasestudysuboptimalityloss
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that the implicit objectives of human production planners can be learned from historical plans instead of being elicited directly. It models the planning problem as a mixed-integer linear program with known constraints and an unknown weighted-sum objective, and infers the seven objective weights from 50 past production plans using suboptimality-loss inverse optimization. The learned weights indicate that avoiding inventory shortages and maintaining consistent cycle lengths dominate planners' decisions, while inventory holding cost itself contributes nothing. If correct, this makes tacit expertise explicit enough to build a decision-support model that predicts planner behavior and earns planner trust.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the suboptimality-loss formulation of inverse mixed-integer linear optimization. For each observed plan, it introduces a nonnegative slack $\epsilon_i$ measuring how much better a feasible plan could be under candidate weights, then minimizes the sum of these slacks plus an $\ell^1$ penalty on the weights, avoiding the mixed-integer bilevel structure that would otherwise make the inverse problem intractable. The resulting semi-infinite linear program is solved by a cutting-plane algorithm that alternates between a linear master problem and forward MILP cut-generating problems. The output is the vector of seven objective coefficients $\alpha_k$ in the weighted-sum objective of the forward production planning model.

What would settle it

Re-estimate the weights after appending a plausible additional objective term, such as a penalty for unmet service levels or a term encoding demand-forecast bias; if $\alpha_{\mathrm{sl}}$ and $\alpha_{\mathrm{cl}}$ no longer dominate, the claimed priority ranking is an artifact of the hypothesized objective set.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that expert planners' historical production plans encode a recoverable objective function, and that the recovered weights are both interpretable and practically valid. Across five training-test splits of a seven-term model, the estimated weights show $\alpha_{\mathrm{sl}}$ and $\alpha_{\mathrm{cl}}$ are largest, $\alpha_{\mathrm{ic}}$ is effectively zero, and understock penalties outweigh overstock penalties ($\alpha_{\mathrm{sl}} \gg \alpha_{\mathrm{su}}$, $\alpha_{\mathrm{el}} \gg \alpha_{\mathrm{eu}}$). Time-dependent weights decline for $\alpha_{\mathrm{sl}}$ and rise for $\alpha_{\mathrm{cl}}$ across the horizon, and product-dependent weights vary across the eight products. An expert planner interview corroborated the main hypotheses, including the primacy of avoiding understock and keeping cycle lengths consistent, while invalidating two derived hypotheses about start-versus-end inventory attention and deliberate downtime avoidance.

Load-bearing premise

The learned weights are trustworthy only if the planner's true objective is exactly a weighted sum of the seven hypothesized cost terms; the paper itself notes that further business-specific objectives were excluded for confidentiality, and an omitted objective correlated with an included term could bias the weights.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Adding the learned objective terms yields predicted inventory profiles that match actual planner decisions more closely than an inventory-cost-only baseline.
  • The recovered weights give a quantitative priority ordering: understock penalties dominate overstock penalties, and cycle-length consistency and gap avoidance are strong drivers.
  • Time- and product-dependent extensions show planners focus more on early periods and on certain products, and these extensions improve predictive accuracy.
  • An interpretable model whose objectives match planner reasoning is more likely to be adopted as a trusted decision-support tool.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If any confidential omitted objective is correlated with an included term, the learned dominance of understock avoidance and cycle consistency could be partly an artifact of the chosen objective set; a robustness study adding plausible omitted terms would reveal how stable the ranking is.
  • The same suboptimality-loss pipeline should transfer to other rolling-horizon planning settings where constraints are well specified but human objectives are tacit, such as logistics scheduling or hospital resource planning.
  • A stronger validity test would be to elicit pairwise preferences from planners independently and check whether the learned weights reproduce the rank order implied by those preferences.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper applies data-driven inverse optimization to infer the objective function of expert production planners at a Dow chemical plant. The forward problem is a mixed-integer linear program whose constraints encode campaign, cycle, and inventory rules, and whose objective is a weighted sum of seven hypothesized cost terms (inventory holding, four inventory-range penalties, cycle-length consistency, and production-gap reduction). Weights are learned from 50 historical production plans by minimizing a suboptimality loss with L1 regularization using a cutting-plane method. The authors compare one-, five-, and seven-parameter models, report test-set RMSE improvements, and then extend the model to time- and product-dependent weights. They interpret the estimated weights as revealing that avoiding inventory shortages and maintaining consistent cycle lengths dominate planner decisions, and they report expert-planner confirmation of several hypotheses and rejection of two.

Significance. If the central interpretation holds, this is a valuable demonstration that inverse optimization can extract interpretable, data-efficient models from real industrial planning data with rich discrete constraints. The strengths are the genuine industrial case study, the transparent expert-validation protocol that includes falsified hypotheses, the explicit treatment of planner suboptimality via suboptimality loss, and the data efficiency achieved with only 50 training plans. These features make the paper a useful empirical contribution to the inverse-optimization and apprenticeship-learning literature. However, the central claim that the learned weights faithfully describe the planners' true priorities depends on the completeness of the hypothesized objective set and on several modeling choices that are not fully disclosed or stress-tested.

major comments (4)
  1. [§2.3 and §4.3] The central interpretive claim that the estimated α values reveal the planners' true priorities is load-bearing, but Section 2.3 explicitly states that additional business-specific objectives were excluded for confidentiality. If any omitted objective is correlated with an included cost term, the corresponding α absorbs that omitted priority, so the reported dominance of α_sl and α_cl could be an artifact of the incomplete candidate set. Because the same expert helped enumerate the candidate objectives in §2.3 and later validated hypotheses in §4.3, the confirmation is not independent evidence against this omitted-variable bias. Please add sensitivity analyses with alternative or expanded objective sets, or at minimum state clearly that the learned weights are conditional on the chosen specification and cannot be interpreted as unbiased causal priorities.
  2. [§2.3, problem (P), and §3.2] The interpretation of α magnitudes relies on the scaling factors ρ_k, described only as 'calculated beforehand,' and on the regularization parameter λ in (IOP-SL), whose value and selection procedure are not reported. Different choices of ρ_k change the relative scale of the cost terms and therefore the comparability of α values across objectives; different λ values induce different shrinkage and sparsity, so the observation α_ic=0 in Figure 7 could be a regularization artifact rather than a planner preference. Please report how ρ_k is computed, the value or tuning method for λ, and a sensitivity analysis with λ=0 and a range of ρ choices to show that the ranking of weights is stable.
  3. [§3.2 and §3.4] The suboptimality-loss formulation (IOP-SL) can admit multiple optimal cost vectors, and the paper does not analyze identifiability of α or report variation of the estimates across different algorithmic restarts or initializations. The five training-testing splits provide variance across data subsets, but not evidence that the specific estimated α is unique. Please add an identifiability analysis, report the range of optimal α vectors obtained from different master-problem starts, or discuss the non-uniqueness and its implications for the weight-ranking claims.
  4. [§4.3] The expert-validation loop is presented as confirming practical validity, but the same expert who helped elicit the candidate objectives in §2.3 later confirmed or refuted hypotheses generated from the learned weights. The two false hypotheses (Hypotheses 3 and 6) show that the validation has some discriminative power, but the 'True' conclusions are still vulnerable to confirmation bias because the expert is not independent of the model-building process. Please solicit feedback from a second planner not involved in the study, or explicitly reframe the expert interviews as illustrative and hypothesis-generating rather than confirmatory evidence for the weight interpretation.
minor comments (6)
  1. [§4.2 and Figures 5, 8, 11] The RMSE comparisons are presented only graphically; please report the numerical mean and standard deviation over the five splits so that readers can assess whether the improvements of model-7 over model-5 are substantial relative to the variability.
  2. [§3.2] The feasible set C for the cost vector c is not specified. Please state explicitly whether nonnegativity of α is enforced, how the trivial all-zero solution is excluded, and what bounds, if any, are imposed on the weights.
  3. [§4.4] Model-7-t&p estimates 7×4×8 = 224 weights from only 50 training plans, and the paper does not report the regularization strength or parameter counts for this model. Please add a discussion of overfitting risk and the effective number of parameters.
  4. [§4.4] There are several typos in this section, including 'The is also true' in the paragraph introducing model-7-t&p and 'deviating form the targeted cycle length' in Hypothesis 9; these should be corrected.
  5. [§4.3, Hypothesis 6 discussion] The explanation for the moderate value of α_g is speculative ('we do not know exactly why these plant downtimes occurred'). Consider labeling that explanation as a hypothesis requiring future investigation rather than a conclusion.
  6. [§4.1 and §4.2] The statement that results are 'normalized if necessary' is vague; please specify the normalization applied to the data and confirm that the RMSE values reported in inventory-profile units are indeed in units of the batch size β in all figures.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: learned weights are fit to training plans and evaluated on held-out test plans.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. The inverse problem (IOP-SL) minimizes suboptimality losses plus an l1 regularizer over candidate weight vectors; the weights alpha are free parameters, not functions of the observed decisions beyond the loss itself. The seven objective terms in Section 2.3 are defined from fixed inventory targets, campaign start/end indicators, cycle-length bounds, and downtime indicators; none is defined in terms of alpha, so no weight is forced to a particular value by construction. Predictive evaluation uses 20 held-out production plans (Section 4.1), so the reported RMSE improvements of model-5 and model-7 over model-1 are independent checks, not refits. The self-citations (Gupta and Zhang 2022a,b; Holani et al. 2026) are background; the suboptimality formulation used is explicitly attributed to Moghaddass and Terekhov (2021), so no load-bearing self-citation chain is present. The acknowledged incompleteness of the objective set in Section 2.3 ('for confidentiality reasons, we only consider the more generally applicable objectives') is a genuine external-validity caveat about omitted-variable bias, but it does not make any equation equal to its input and therefore is not a circularity step. The expert-validation loop is qualitative and potentially self-referential, but it is not part of the mathematical derivation and hence does not meet the exhibited-reduction criterion for circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The inferred weights depend on a set of modeling choices that are not fully specified: the scaling factors rho_k used to normalize objective terms, the regularization parameter lambda in the inverse problem, and the time-bucket partition for the time-dependent model. These choices affect the learned alpha values and therefore the interpretation of what 'dominates' the planners' decisions.

free parameters (3)
  • scaling factors rho_k
    Chosen beforehand to normalize the seven objective terms (Section 2.3); the values and procedure are not reported, and the relative alpha values depend directly on them.
  • regularization parameter lambda
    Appears in the inverse problem (IOP-SL) to encourage sparsity; its value is not specified, so the trade-off between suboptimality loss and sparsity is unknown.
  • time bucket boundaries for model-7-t = four buckets of 50 periods
    The planning horizon is split into four 50-period buckets by hand (Section 4.4); the learned time-dependent weights depend on this partition.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The observed production plans are feasible or near-feasible for the MILP constraints (1)-(33).
    The inverse formulation (IOP-SL) measures suboptimality relative to the feasible set; if the historical plans violate the modeled constraints, the suboptimality loss is not meaningful.
  • domain assumption All planners at the plant share the same underlying objective function.
    Section 4.1 states 'We assume that their decisions are driven by the same underlying objective function', which is necessary to pool 70 plans from multiple planners into one dataset.
  • ad hoc to paper The set of seven hypothesized objectives is sufficient to represent the true planner objective.
    Section 2.3 lists the objectives derived from an expert interview and excludes business-specific objectives for confidentiality; if an important term is missing, the learned weights are biased.
  • standard math The suboptimality-loss reformulation (IOP-SL) yields a valid estimate of the true objective when data is noisy.
    This is the theoretical foundation from Moghaddass and Terekhov (2021), which the paper adopts without modification.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Uncovering expert objectives in production planning via inverse optimization: An industrial case study." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2GOAKGBL

@misc{pith2026260807398,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Uncovering expert objectives in production planning via inverse optimization: An industrial case study},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2GOAKGBL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.07398}
}
read the original abstract

Production planning in the manufacturing industry often relies on the use of optimization models, but defining an appropriate objective function can be a challenge. In practice, planners must balance competing goals, manage uncertainty, and account for qualitative business preferences that are difficult to quantify. As a result, many optimization models fail to match expert behavior, limiting trust and adoption. In this work, we propose a data-driven inverse optimization framework to infer the objective function implicitly captured in expert planners' decisions. We formulate the production planning problem as a mixed-integer linear program, where the unknown objective function is represented as a weighted sum of hypothesized cost terms. A suboptimality-loss-based inverse optimization method is then applied to learn the objective weights from historical production plans. The proposed approach is applied to a real industrial case provided by Dow, where the inferred weights reveal that avoiding inventory shortages and maintaining consistent cycle lengths dominate the planners' decision-making. Time- and product-dependent extensions further improve predictive accuracy and uncover evolving priorities. Expert interviews confirm the practical validity of these insights. Overall, this study shows that inverse optimization can transform tacit human expertise into interpretable models, enabling more accurate and trusted decision-support tools for complex industrial systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.07398 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Example of a Gantt chart depicting a typical production plan, where each bar indicates a campaign for a particular product [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Example of typical demand and inventory profiles for a particular product. 2.2 Scheduling constraints We now describe the mixed-integer constraints that jointly define the set of feasible solutions for the production planning problem. We apply a discrete-time formulation with a planning horizon of T time periods, where the notation is such that time period t starts at time t−1 and ends at time t. The resulting inven… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Cutting-plane scheme for solving problem (IOP-SL): alternate between solving the mas￾ter problem on a finite set of cuts and generating new cuts via the cut-generating problems. 12 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (10 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: RMSEs achieved by model-1, model-5, and model-7. Using a particular instance, we examine the differences in the predicted production schedules, which are shown in terms of the resulting inventory profiles in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Comparing for a particular instance the actual inventory profiles for all eight products with the profiles predicted by model-1, model-5, and model-7. 15 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Estimates of the weighting factors obtained for model-5 and model-7. Hypothesis 1. Planners do not directly consider inventory holdings costs to inform their planning deci￾sions. – True. According to the expert planner we spoke to, the planners never explicitly compute…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: RMSEs achieved by model-1, model-5, and model-7 for different time periods of the planning horizon. 17 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Estimates of the time-dependent weighting factors across the four 50-period time buck￾ets obtained for model-7-t. We see an opposite trend for αcl, i.e. it increases over time. Hypothesis 9. Maintaining consistent cycles times is more important in the later time period…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Comparing for a particular instance the actual inventory profiles for all eight products with the profiles predicted by model-7, model-7-t, and model-7-t&p. The heat maps in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: RMSEs achieved by model-7, model-7-t, and model-7-t&p for different time periods of the planning horizon [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Heat maps showing the average values of α in model-7-t&p for all four time buckets and eight products. can have different profit margins, and different customers can also have different priorities. Plan￾ners typically try to maintain a higher inventory level for impor…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Training times required by the proposed cutting-plane algorithm for different models [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Convergence of the IO algorithm for different models. 5 Conclusions In this work, we were given a production planning optimization problem for which the constraints were known but the objective function was not. Assuming that the right objective function is cap￾tured …

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

300 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Abbeel and A

    P. Abbeel and A. Y. Ng. Apprenticeship learning via inverse reinforcement learning. In Proceedings of the twenty-first international conference on Machine learning, page 1, 2004

    2004

  2. [2]

    R. K. Ahuja and J. B. Orlin. Inverse Optimization . Operations Research, 49 0 (5): 0 771--783, 2001

    2001

  3. [3]

    Ajayi, T

    T. Ajayi, T. Lee, and A. J. Schaefer. Objective selection for cancer treatment: An inverse optimization approach. Operations Research, 70 0 (3): 0 1717--1738, 2022

    2022

  4. [4]

    Alsabah, A

    H. Alsabah, A. Capponi, O. Ruiz Lacedelli, and M. Stern. Robo-advising: Learning investors’ risk preferences via portfolio choices. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 19 0 (2): 0 369--392, 2021

    2021

  5. [5]

    B. D. Argall, S. Chernova, M. Veloso, and B. Browning. A survey of robot learning from demonstration. Robotics and autonomous systems, 57 0 (5): 0 469--483, 2009

    2009

  6. [6]

    Arora and P

    S. Arora and P. Doshi. A survey of inverse reinforcement learning: Challenges, methods and progress. Artificial Intelligence, 297: 0 103500, 2021

    2021

  7. [7]

    Aswani, Z.-J

    A. Aswani, Z.-J. M. Shen, and A. Siddiq. Inverse Optimization with Noisy Data . Operations Research, 66 0 (3): 0 870--892, 2018

    2018

  8. [8]

    Babier, T

    A. Babier, T. C. Chan, T. Lee, R. Mahmood, and D. Terekhov. An ensemble learning framework for model fitting and evaluation in inverse linear optimization. Informs Journal on Optimization, 3 0 (2): 0 119--138, 2021

    2021

Show all 300 references
  1. [9]

    M. Bara. Revealing objectives in university financial aid: An inverse optimization approach. 2025

    2025

  2. [10]

    Bodur, T

    M. Bodur, T. C. Chan, and I. Y. Zhu. Inverse mixed integer optimization: Polyhedral insights and trust region methods. INFORMS Journal on Computing, 34 0 (3): 0 1471--1488, 2022

    2022

  3. [11]

    Bulut and T

    A. Bulut and T. K. Ralphs. On the complexity of inverse mixed integer linear optimization. SIAM Journal on Optimization, 31 0 (4): 0 3014--3043, 2021

    2021

  4. [12]

    Burton and P

    D. Burton and P. L. Toint. On an instance of the inverse shortest paths problem . Mathematical Programming, 53 0 (1-3): 0 45--61, 1992

    1992

  5. [13]

    P. M. Castro, I. E. Grossmann, and Q. Zhang. Expanding scope and computational challenges in process scheduling. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 114: 0 14--42, 2018

    2018

  6. [14]

    T. Chan, E. Delage, and B. Lin. Conformal inverse optimization for adherence-aware prescriptive analytics. Available at SSRN, 2024

    2024

  7. [15]

    T. C. Chan, R. Mahmood, and I. Y. Zhu. Inverse optimization: Theory and applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.03920, 2021

    2021 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Codevilla, M

    F. Codevilla, M. M \"u ller, A. L \'o pez, V. Koltun, and A. Dosovitskiy. End-to-end driving via conditional imitation learning. In 2018 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), pages 4693--4700. IEEE, 2018

    2018

  9. [17]

    Dunning, J

    I. Dunning, J. Huchette, and M. Lubin. Jump: A modeling language for mathematical optimization. SIAM Review, 59 0 (2): 0 295--320, 2017

    2017

  10. [18]

    Esteban-Perez, D

    A. Esteban-Perez, D. Bunn, and Y. Ghiassi-Farrokhfal. Estimating the unobservable components of electricity demand response with inverse optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.02774, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Gupta and Q

    R. Gupta and Q. Zhang. Decomposition and adaptive sampling for data-driven inverse linear optimization. INFORMS Journal on Computing, 34 0 (5): 0 2720--2735, 2022 a

    2022

  12. [20]

    Gupta and Q

    R. Gupta and Q. Zhang. Efficient learning of decision-making models: A penalty block coordinate descent algorithm for data-driven inverse optimization. Computers & Chemical Engineering, page 108123, 2022 b

    2022

  13. [21]

    Harjunkoski, C

    I. Harjunkoski, C. T. Maravelias, P. Bongers, P. M. Castro, S. Engell, I. E. Grossmann, J. Hooker, C. M \'e ndez, G. Sand, and J. Wassick. Scope for industrial applications of production scheduling models and solution methods. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 62: 0 161--193, 2014

    2014

  14. [22]

    Heuberger

    C. Heuberger. Inverse combinatorial optimization: A survey on problems, methods, and results . Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, 8 0 (3): 0 329--361, 2004

    2004

  15. [23]

    Holani, R

    A. Holani, R. Gupta, J. Wassick, and Q. Zhang. An inverse mixed-integer optimization framework for learning interpretable models of expert decision-making. arXiv preprint arXiv:2608.05585, 2026

    2026 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Hussein, M

    A. Hussein, M. M. Gaber, E. Elyan, and C. Jayne. Imitation learning: A survey of learning methods. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 50 0 (2): 0 1--35, 2017

    2017

  17. [25]

    Keshavarz, Y

    A. Keshavarz, Y. Wang, and S. Boyd. Imputing a Convex Objective Function . In IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Control, pages 613--619, 2011

    2011

  18. [26]

    Lu, W.-S

    Y.-A. Lu, W.-S. Hu, J. A. Paulson, and Q. Zhang. Bo4io: A bayesian optimization approach to inverse optimization with uncertainty quantification. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 192: 0 108859, 2025

    2025

  19. [27]

    Moghaddass and D

    M. Moghaddass and D. Terekhov. Inverse integer optimization with multiple observations. Optimization Letters, 15 0 (4): 0 1061--1079, 2021

    2021

  20. [28]

    Mohajerin Esfahani, S

    P. Mohajerin Esfahani, S. Shafieezadeh-Abadeh, G. A. Hanasusanto, and D. Kuhn. Data-driven inverse optimization with imperfect information. Mathematical Programming, 167 0 (1): 0 191--234, 2018

    2018

  21. [29]

    Saez-Gallego and J

    J. Saez-Gallego and J. M. Morales. Short-term forecasting of price-responsive loads using inverse optimization. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 9 0 (5): 0 4805--4814, 2017

    2017

  22. [30]

    A. J. Smith and J. J. Boutilier. Gap-gradient methods for solving generalized mixed integer inverse optimization: an application to political gerrymandering. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.09457, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  23. [31]

    R. S. Sutton, A. G. Barto, et al. Reinforcement learning: An introduction, volume 1. MIT press Cambridge, 1998

    1998

  24. [32]

    Y. Tan, D. Terekhov, and A. Delong. Learning linear programs from optimal decisions. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33: 0 19738--19749, 2020

    2020

  25. [33]

    M. D. Troutt, W.-K. Pang, and S.-H. Hou. Behavioral estimation of mathematical programming objective function coefficients. Management science, 52 0 (3): 0 422--434, 2006

    2006

  26. [34]

    L. Wang. Cutting plane algorithms for the inverse mixed integer linear programming problem . Operations Research Letters, 37 0 (2): 0 114--116, 2009

    2009

  27. [35]

    S. Yu, H. Wang, and C. Dong. Learning risk preferences from investment portfolios using inverse optimization. Research in International Business and Finance, 64: 0 101879, 2023

    2023

  28. [36]

    Zattoni Scroccaro, P

    P. Zattoni Scroccaro, P. van Beek, P. Mohajerin Esfahani, and B. Atasoy. Inverse optimization for routing problems. Transportation Science, 59 0 (2): 0 301--321, 2025

    2025

  29. [37]

    Zhang and I

    J. Zhang and I. C. Paschalidis. Data-driven estimation of travel latency cost functions via inverse optimization in multi-class transportation networks. In 2017 IEEE 56th Annual Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), pages 6295--6300. IEEE, 2017

    2017

  30. [38]

    Zheng, S

    B. Zheng, S. Verma, J. Zhou, I. W. Tsang, and F. Chen. Imitation learning: Progress, taxonomies and challenges. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 35 0 (5): 0 6322--6337, 2022

    2022

  31. [39]

    Langley , title =

    P. Langley , title =. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 2000) , address =. 2000 , pages =

    2000

  32. [40]

    T. M. Mitchell. The Need for Biases in Learning Generalizations. 1980

    1980

  33. [41]

    M. J. Kearns , title =

  34. [42]

    Machine Learning: An Artificial Intelligence Approach, Vol. I. 1983

    1983

  35. [43]

    R. O. Duda and P. E. Hart and D. G. Stork. Pattern Classification. 2000

    2000

  36. [44]

    Suppressed for Anonymity , author=

  37. [45]

    Newell and P

    A. Newell and P. S. Rosenbloom. Mechanisms of Skill Acquisition and the Law of Practice. Cognitive Skills and Their Acquisition. 1981

    1981

  38. [46]

    A. L. Samuel. Some Studies in Machine Learning Using the Game of Checkers. IBM Journal of Research and Development. 1959

    1959

  39. [47]

    Computers and Chemical Engineering , keywords =

    Bhosekar, Atharv and Ierapetritou, Marianthi , file =. Computers and Chemical Engineering , keywords =

  40. [48]

    and Miller, David C

    Cozad, Alison and Sahinidis, Nikolaos V. and Miller, David C. , eprint =. AIChE Journal , number =

  41. [49]

    Manfred Morari and Carlos E Garcia and David M Prett , title =

  42. [50]

    Dhall and C

    Sudarshan K. Dhall and C. L. Liu , issue =. On a Real-Time Scheduling Problem , volume =. Operations Research , month =

  43. [51]

    Fiacco and Yo Ishizuka , issue =

    Anthony V. Fiacco and Yo Ishizuka , issue =. Sensitivity and stability analysis for nonlinear programming , volume =. Annals of Operations Research , month =

  44. [52]

    Diangelakis and Ioana Nascu and Maria M

    Richard Oberdieck and Nikolaos A. Diangelakis and Ioana Nascu and Maria M. Papathanasiou and Muxin Sun and Styliani Avraamidou and Efstratios N. Pistikopoulos , journal =. On multi-parametric programming and its applications in process systems engineering , volume =

  45. [53]

    Diangelakis and Justin Katz and Efstratios N

    Baris Burnak and Nikolaos A. Diangelakis and Justin Katz and Efstratios N. Pistikopoulos , journal =. Integrated process design, scheduling, and control using multiparametric programming , volume =

  46. [54]

    Rossiter and B

    J.A. Rossiter and B. Pluymers and J.A.K. Suykens and B. De Moor , issue =. A MULTI PARAMETRIC QUADRATIC PROGRAMMING SOLUTION TO ROBUST PREDICTIVE CONTROL , volume =. IFAC Proceedings Volumes , pages =

  47. [55]

    Pistikopoulos , issue =

    Vivek Dua and Efstratios N. Pistikopoulos , issue =. bnB , volume =. Annals of Operations Research , pages =

  48. [56]

    Cybenko , issue =

    G. Cybenko , issue =. Approximation by superpositions of a sigmoidal function , volume =. Mathematics of Control, Signals, and Systems , month =

  49. [57]

    Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translate , year =

    Dzmitry Bahdanau and Kyunghyun Cho and Yoshua Bengio , month =. Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translate , year =

  50. [58]

    Surrogate-based optimization for mixed-integer nonlinear problems , volume =

    Sun Hye Kim and Fani Boukouvala , journal =. Surrogate-based optimization for mixed-integer nonlinear problems , volume =

  51. [59]

    Deep Speech 2: End-to-End Speech Recognition in English and Mandarin , year =

    Dario Amodei and Rishita Anubhai and Eric Battenberg and Carl Case and Jared Casper and Bryan Catanzaro and Jingdong Chen and Mike Chrzanowski and Adam Coates and Greg Diamos and Erich Elsen and Jesse Engel and Linxi Fan and Christopher Fougner and Tony Han and Awni Hannun and...

  52. [60]

    Jackel and Mathew Monfort and Urs Muller and Jiakai Zhang and Xin Zhang and Jake Zhao and Karol Zieba , month =

    Mariusz Bojarski and Davide Del Testa and Daniel Dworakowski and Bernhard Firner and Beat Flepp and Prasoon Goyal and Lawrence D. Jackel and Mathew Monfort and Urs Muller and Jiakai Zhang and Xin Zhang and Jake Zhao and Karol Zieba , month =. End to End Learning for Self-Drivi...

  53. [61]

    Ferdinando Fioretto and Terrence W. K. Mak and Pascal Van Hentenryck , month =. Predicting AC Optimal Power Flows: Combining Deep Learning and Lagrangian Dual Methods , year =

  54. [62]

    Solving Mixed Integer Programs Using Neural Networks , year =

    Vinod Nair and Sergey Bartunov and Felix Gimeno and Ingrid von Glehn and Pawel Lichocki and Ivan Lobov and Brendan O'Donoghue and Nicolas Sonnerat and Christian Tjandraatmadja and Pengming Wang and Ravichandra Addanki and Tharindi Hapuarachchi and Thomas Keck and James Keeling...

  55. [63]

    Measuring the impact of primal heuristics , volume =

    Timo Berthold , issue =. Measuring the impact of primal heuristics , volume =. Operations Research Letters , month =

  56. [64]

    Branching rules revisited , volume =

    Tobias Achterberg and Thorsten Koch and Alexander Martin , issue =. Branching rules revisited , volume =. Operations Research Letters , month =

  57. [65]

    A Simple Effective Heuristic for Embedded Mixed-Integer Quadratic Programming , year =

    Reza Takapoui and Nicholas Moehle and Stephen Boyd and Alberto Bemporad , month =. A Simple Effective Heuristic for Embedded Mixed-Integer Quadratic Programming , year =

  58. [66]

    Zico Kolter , month =

    Brandon Amos and J. Zico Kolter , month =. OptNet: Differentiable Optimization as a Layer in Neural Networks , year =

  59. [67]

    Anselm Paulus and Michal Rolínek and Vít Musil and Brandon Amos and Georg Martius , title =

  60. [68]

    The Voice of Optimization , year =

    Dimitris Bertsimas and Bartolomeo Stellato , month =. The Voice of Optimization , year =

  61. [69]

    Machine Learning for Combinatorial Optimization: a Methodological Tour d'Horizon , year =

    Yoshua Bengio and Andrea Lodi and Antoine Prouvost , month =. Machine Learning for Combinatorial Optimization: a Methodological Tour d'Horizon , year =

  62. [70]

    Optimization-Online , year=

    Selecting cutting planes for quadratic semidefinite outer-approximation via trained neural networks , author=. Optimization-Online , year=

  63. [71]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

    Exact combinatorial optimization with graph convolutional neural networks , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

  64. [72]

    Top , volume=

    On learning and branching: a survey , author=. Top , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  65. [73]

    Springer Science , volume=

    Numerical optimization , author=. Springer Science , volume=

  66. [74]

    Computers & Chemical Engineering , pages=

    Efficient learning of decision-making models: A penalty block coordinate descent algorithm for data-driven inverse optimization , author=. Computers & Chemical Engineering , pages=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  67. [75]

    Computational Optimization and Applications , volume=

    An exact primal--dual penalty method approach to warmstarting interior-point methods for linear programming , author=. Computational Optimization and Applications , volume=. 2007 , publisher=

    2007

  68. [76]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.12161 , year=

    Data-driven decision-focused surrogate modeling , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.12161 , year=

    arXiv

  69. [77]

    Traces and emergence of nonlinear programming , pages=

    Nonlinear programming , author=. Traces and emergence of nonlinear programming , pages=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  70. [78]

    Wiley Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science

    Constraint qualifications , author=. Wiley Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science. Wiley, New York , year=

  71. [79]

    Journal of optimization theory and applications , volume=

    On constraint qualifications , author=. Journal of optimization theory and applications , volume=. 1992 , publisher=

    1992

  72. [80]

    8th symposium on multidisciplinary analysis and optimization , pages=

    A surrogate-model-based method for constrained optimization , author=. 8th symposium on multidisciplinary analysis and optimization , pages=

  73. [81]

    Optimization Techniques IFIP Technical Conference: Novosibirsk, July 1--7, 1974 , pages=

    On Bayesian methods for seeking the extremum , author=. Optimization Techniques IFIP Technical Conference: Novosibirsk, July 1--7, 1974 , pages=. 1975 , organization=

    1974

  74. [82]

    Industrial & engineering chemistry research , volume=

    Multiobjective optimization of mixed-integer linear programming problems: a multiparametric optimization approach , author=. Industrial & engineering chemistry research , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  75. [83]

    IEEE Transactions on Power Systems , volume=

    Combining deep learning and optimization for preventive security-constrained DC optimal power flow , author=. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  76. [84]

    Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , volume=

    Fast approximations for job shop scheduling: A lagrangian dual deep learning method , author=. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , volume=

  77. [85]

    2018 Annual American control conference (ACC) , pages=

    Approximating explicit model predictive control using constrained neural networks , author=. 2018 Annual American control conference (ACC) , pages=. 2018 , organization=

    2018

  78. [86]

    IEEE Control Systems Letters , volume=

    Approximate closed-loop robust model predictive control with guaranteed stability and constraint satisfaction , author=. IEEE Control Systems Letters , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  79. [87]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.01329 , year=

    Neural network branching for neural network verification , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.01329 , year=

    1912 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

    Learning large neighborhood search policy for integer programming , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

  81. [89]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.10201 , year=

    Learning a large neighborhood search algorithm for mixed integer programs , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.10201 , year=

    arXiv

  82. [90]

    Proceedings of the aaai conference on artificial intelligence , volume=

    Accelerating primal solution findings for mixed integer programs based on solution prediction , author=. Proceedings of the aaai conference on artificial intelligence , volume=

  83. [91]

    Discrete mathematics , volume=

    On the ratio of optimal integral and fractional covers , author=. Discrete mathematics , volume=. 1975 , publisher=

    1975

  84. [92]

    1998 , publisher=

    Theory of linear and integer programming , author=. 1998 , publisher=

    1998

  85. [93]

    Data Science and Engineering , volume=

    Dimensionality Reduction in Surrogate Modeling: A Review of Combined Methods , author=. Data Science and Engineering , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  86. [94]

    Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research , volume=

    Application of surrogate models as an alternative to process simulation for implementation of the self-optimizing control procedure on large-scale process plants—A natural gas-to-liquids (GTL) case study , author=. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research , volume=. 2021 , ...

    2021

  87. [95]

    Discrete Applied Mathematics , volume=

    Cutting planes in integer and mixed integer programming , author=. Discrete Applied Mathematics , volume=. 2002 , publisher=

    2002

  88. [96]

    2021 , publisher=

    Chemical Production Scheduling: Mixed-Integer Programming Models and Methods , author=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  89. [97]

    SIAM Review , volume =

    Iain Dunning and Joey Huchette and Miles Lubin , title =. SIAM Review , volume =

  90. [98]

    Machine Learning , volume=

    The voice of optimization , author=. Machine Learning , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  91. [99]

    AIChE Journal , pages=

    Data-driven decision-focused surrogate modeling , author=. AIChE Journal , pages=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  92. [100]

    Annals of operations research , volume=

    An algorithm for the solution of multiparametric mixed integer linear programming problems , author=. Annals of operations research , volume=. 2000 , publisher=

    2000

  93. [101]

    Operations Research Letters , volume=

    A branch-and-bound algorithm for 0--1 parametric mixed integer programming , author=. Operations Research Letters , volume=. 1985 , publisher=

    1985

  94. [102]

    Operations research letters , volume=

    An algorithm for multiparametric mixed-integer linear programming problems , author=. Operations research letters , volume=. 1999 , publisher=

    1999

  95. [103]

    Naval Research Logistics Quarterly , volume=

    Postoptimality analysis in zero-one programming by implicit enumeration , author=. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly , volume=. 1972 , publisher=

    1972

  96. [104]

    Computers & Chemical Engineering , volume=

    Multi-parametric mixed integer linear programming under global uncertainty , author=. Computers & Chemical Engineering , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  97. [105]

    International Conference on Machine Learning , pages=

    Surco: Learning linear surrogates for combinatorial nonlinear optimization problems , author=. International Conference on Machine Learning , pages=. 2023 , organization=

    2023

  98. [106]

    European Journal of Operational Research , volume=

    Machine learning for combinatorial optimization: a methodological tour d’horizon , author=. European Journal of Operational Research , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  99. [107]

    Learning for Dynamics and Control Conference , pages=

    End-to-end learning to warm-start for real-time quadratic optimization , author=. Learning for Dynamics and Control Conference , pages=. 2023 , organization=

    2023

  100. [108]

    INFORMS Journal on Computing , volume=

    Online mixed-integer optimization in milliseconds , author=. INFORMS Journal on Computing , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  101. [109]

    Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , volume=

    Learning to branch in mixed integer programming , author=. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , volume=

  102. [110]

    A learning-based algorithm to quickly compute good primal solutions for stochastic integer programs , author=. Integration of Constraint Programming, Artificial Intelligence, and Operations Research: 17th International Conference, CPAIOR 2020, Vienna, Austria, September 21--24...

    2020

  103. [111]

    2021 international joint conference on neural networks (ijcnn) , pages=

    Learning primal heuristics for mixed integer programs , author=. 2021 international joint conference on neural networks (ijcnn) , pages=. 2021 , organization=

    2021

  104. [112]

    Knowledge-Based Systems , volume=

    Warm-starting constraint generation for mixed-integer optimization: A machine learning approach , author=. Knowledge-Based Systems , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  105. [113]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.09166 , year=

    Machine learning for cutting planes in integer programming: A survey , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.09166 , year=

    arXiv

  106. [114]

    International conference on machine learning , pages=

    Reinforcement learning for integer programming: Learning to cut , author=. International conference on machine learning , pages=. 2020 , organization=

    2020

  107. [115]

    Pattern Recognition , volume=

    Learning to select cuts for efficient mixed-integer programming , author=. Pattern Recognition , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  108. [116]

    The McKinsey Quarterly , pages=

    Where machines could replace humans-and where they can't (yet) , author=. The McKinsey Quarterly , pages=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  109. [117]

    2015 , publisher=

    Introduction to operations research , author=. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  110. [118]

    2006 , publisher=

    Explaining Preference Learning , author=. 2006 , publisher=

    2006

  111. [119]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.01643 , year=

    Offline reinforcement learning: Tutorial, review, and perspectives on open problems , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.01643 , year=

    2005 arXiv

  112. [120]

    Artificial Intelligence , volume=

    A survey of inverse reinforcement learning: Challenges, methods and progress , author=. Artificial Intelligence , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  113. [121]

    ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) , volume=

    Imitation learning: A survey of learning methods , author=. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  114. [122]

    Future Generation Computer Systems , volume=

    A survey of human-in-the-loop for machine learning , author=. Future Generation Computer Systems , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  115. [123]

    INFORMS Journal on Computing , volume=

    Decomposition and adaptive sampling for data-driven inverse linear optimization , author=. INFORMS Journal on Computing , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  116. [124]

    SIAM Journal on Optimization , volume=

    On the complexity of inverse mixed integer linear optimization , author=. SIAM Journal on Optimization , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  117. [125]

    European Journal of Operational Research , year=

    Effects of many conflicting objectives on decision-makers’ cognitive burden and decision consistency , author=. European Journal of Operational Research , year=

  118. [126]

    Expert Systems with Applications , volume=

    A preference elicitation framework for automated planning , author=. Expert Systems with Applications , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  119. [127]

    Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining , pages=

    Collaborative filtering with temporal dynamics , author=. Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining , pages=

  120. [128]

    IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering , volume=

    User preference learning for online social recommendation , author=. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  121. [129]

    Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

    Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences , author=. Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

  122. [130]

    Reliability Engineering & System Safety , volume=

    Bayesian framework for managing preferences in decision-making , author=. Reliability Engineering & System Safety , volume=. 2006 , publisher=

    2006

  123. [131]

    Operations research , volume=

    Inverse optimization: A new perspective on the Black-Litterman model , author=. Operations research , volume=. 2012 , publisher=

    2012

  124. [132]

    Discrete Applied Mathematics , volume=

    Inverse radiation therapy planning—a multiple objective optimization approach , author=. Discrete Applied Mathematics , volume=. 2002 , publisher=

    2002

  125. [133]

    INFORMS Journal on Computing , volume=

    Inverse mixed integer optimization: Polyhedral insights and trust region methods , author=. INFORMS Journal on Computing , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  126. [134]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.01954 , year=

    Behavioral cloning from observation , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.01954 , year=

    arXiv

  127. [135]

    2025 , eprint=

    Decision-Focused Surrogate Modeling for Mixed-Integer Linear Optimization , author=. 2025 , eprint=

    2025

  128. [136]

    Optimization Letters , volume=

    Inverse integer optimization with multiple observations , author=. Optimization Letters , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  129. [137]

    Mathematical Programming , volume=

    Data-driven inverse optimization with imperfect information , author=. Mathematical Programming , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  130. [138]

    Computers & Chemical Engineering , volume=

    Scope for industrial applications of production scheduling models and solution methods , author=. Computers & Chemical Engineering , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

    2014

  131. [139]

    Computers & Chemical Engineering , volume=

    Expanding scope and computational challenges in process scheduling , author=. Computers & Chemical Engineering , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  132. [140]

    Management science , volume=

    Behavioral estimation of mathematical programming objective function coefficients , author=. Management science , volume=. 2006 , publisher=

    2006

  133. [141]

    Proceedings of the twenty-first international conference on Machine learning , pages=

    Apprenticeship learning via inverse reinforcement learning , author=. Proceedings of the twenty-first international conference on Machine learning , pages=

  134. [142]

    2018 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA) , pages=

    End-to-end driving via conditional imitation learning , author=. 2018 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA) , pages=. 2018 , organization=

    2018

  135. [143]

    Robotics and autonomous systems , volume=

    A survey of robot learning from demonstration , author=. Robotics and autonomous systems , volume=. 2009 , publisher=

    2009

  136. [144]

    IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems , volume=

    Imitation learning: Progress, taxonomies and challenges , author=. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  137. [145]

    1998 , publisher=

    Reinforcement learning: An introduction , author=. 1998 , publisher=

    1998

  138. [146]

    Revealing Objectives in University Financial Aid: An Inverse Optimization Approach , author=

  139. [147]

    Learning interpretable decision rules via data-driven inverse mixed-integer optimization , author=

  140. [148]

    Applied and Computational Mathematics , volume=

    Advances for the pooling problem: Modeling, global optimization, and computational studies , author=. Applied and Computational Mathematics , volume=

  141. [149]

    Convexification and Global Optimization in Continuous and Mixed-Integer Nonlinear Programming: Theory, Algorithms, Software, and Applications , pages=

    The pooling problem , author=. Convexification and Global Optimization in Continuous and Mixed-Integer Nonlinear Programming: Theory, Algorithms, Software, and Applications , pages=. 2002 , publisher=

    2002

  142. [150]

    Optimization and Analytics in the Oil and Gas Industry, International Series in Operations Research and ManagementScience

    Pooling problems: an overview , author=. Optimization and Analytics in the Oil and Gas Industry, International Series in Operations Research and ManagementScience. Springer, Berlin , year=

  143. [151]

    Optimization , volume=

    A bilinear approach to the pooling problem , author=. Optimization , volume=. 1992 , publisher=

    1992

  144. [152]

    Computer Aided Chemical Engineering , volume=

    Decision-Focused Surrogate Modeling with Feasibility Guarantee , author=. Computer Aided Chemical Engineering , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  145. [153]

    Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research , volume=

    A Lagrangian approach to the pooling problem , author=. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research , volume=. 1999 , publisher=

    1999

  146. [154]

    Journal of Machine Learning Research , volume=

    OMLT: Optimization & machine learning toolkit , author=. Journal of Machine Learning Research , volume=

  147. [155]

    Mathematical programming , volume=

    On the implementation of an interior-point filter line-search algorithm for large-scale nonlinear programming , author=. Mathematical programming , volume=. 2006 , publisher=

    2006

  148. [156]

    1997 , publisher=

    Systematic methods for chemical process design , author=. 1997 , publisher=

    1997

  149. [157]

    Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Process Design and Development , volume=

    Internal model control: Extension to nonlinear system , author=. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Process Design and Development , volume=. 1986 , publisher=

    1986

  150. [158]

    Computers & Chemical Engineering , volume=

    Efficient learning of decision-making models: A penalty block coordinate descent algorithm for data-driven inverse optimization , author=. Computers & Chemical Engineering , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  151. [159]

    2006 , publisher=

    Numerical optimization , author=. 2006 , publisher=

    2006

  152. [160]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , number =

    Wang, Kai and Wilder, Bryan and Perrault, Andrew and Tambe, Milind , eprint =. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , number =

  153. [161]

    and Goel, Vikas , doi =

    Tarhan, Bora and Grossmann, Ignacio E. and Goel, Vikas , doi =. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research , title =

  154. [162]

    and Grossmann, Ignacio E

    Apap, Robert M. and Grossmann, Ignacio E. , doi =. Computers and Chemical Engineering , keywords =

  155. [163]

    Mujtaba, I. M. and Aziz, N. and Hussain, M. A. , doi =. Chemical Engineering Research and Design , keywords =

  156. [164]

    Paz and Tang, Lixin and Lotero, Irene and Gopalakrishnan, Ajit and Grossmann, Ignacio E

    Zhao, Shengnan and Ochoa, M. Paz and Tang, Lixin and Lotero, Irene and Gopalakrishnan, Ajit and Grossmann, Ignacio E. , doi =. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research , number =

  157. [165]

    Computers and Chemical Engineering , keywords =

    C. Computers and Chemical Engineering , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2013.01.004 , file =

    2013 doi

  158. [166]

    IEEE Control Systems Letters , keywords =

    Hertneck, Michael and Kohler, Johannes and Trimpe, Sebastian and Allgower, Frank , doi =. IEEE Control Systems Letters , keywords =. arXiv , arxivId =:1806.04167 , file =

    arXiv

  159. [167]

    and Nascu, Ioana and Papathanasiou, Maria M

    Oberdieck, Richard and Diangelakis, Nikolaos A. and Nascu, Ioana and Papathanasiou, Maria M. and Sun, Muxin and Avraamidou, Styliani and Pistikopoulos, Efstratios N. , doi =. Chemical Engineering Research and Design , keywords =

  160. [168]

    International Journal of Hydrogen Energy , keywords =

    Marques, Jo. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.09.179 , file =

    2016 doi

  161. [169]

    Castle, W. F. , doi =. International Journal of Refrigeration , keywords =

  162. [170]

    Molzahn, Daniel K. and D. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid , keywords =. doi:10.1109/TSG.2017.2720471 , eprint =

    2017

  163. [171]

    Shahriari, Bobak and Swersky, Kevin and Wang, Ziyu and Adams, Ryan P. and. Proceedings of the IEEE , keywords =. doi:10.1109/JPROC.2015.2494218 , file =

    2015

  164. [172]

    Computers

    Shah, Nilay , doi =. Computers

  165. [173]

    Rebennack, Steffen and Kallrath, Josef and Pardalos, Panos M. , doi =. Journal of Global Optimization , keywords =

  166. [174]

    BioSystems , keywords =

    Moreno, Alvaro and Etxeberria, Arantza and Umerez, Jon , doi =. BioSystems , keywords =

  167. [175]

    Krause, Andreas and Ong, Cheng Soon , booktitle =

  168. [176]

    Management Science , keywords =

    Zhang, Minjiao and K. Management Science , keywords =. doi:10.1287/mnsc.2013.1822 , file =

    2013

  169. [177]

    Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews , keywords =

    Sharifzadeh, Mahdi and Lubiano-Walochik, Helena and Shah, Nilay , doi =. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews , keywords =

  170. [178]

    and Endale, Dinku M

    Spiegal, Sheri and Kleinman, Peter J.A. and Endale, Dinku M. and Bryant, Ray B. and Dell, Curtis and Goslee, Sarah and Meinen, Robert J. and Flynn, K. Colton and Baker, John M. and Browning, Dawn M. and McCarty, Greg and Bittman, Shabtai and Carter, Jennifer and Cavigelli, Mic...

  171. [179]

    Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research , number =

    Liu, Botong and Zhang, Qi and Ge, Xiaolong and Yuan, Zhihong , doi =. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research , number =

  172. [180]

    and Minoux, Michel and Ierapetritou, Marianthi G

    Saharidis, Georgios K.D. and Minoux, Michel and Ierapetritou, Marianthi G. , doi =. International Transactions in Operational Research , keywords =

  173. [181]

    and Barbosa-P

    Relvas, Susana and Matos, Henrique A. and Barbosa-P. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research , number =. doi:10.1021/ie060309c , file =

    doi

  174. [182]

    Sahinidis, N. V. and Grossmann, I. E. and Fornari, R. E. and Chathrathi, M. , doi =. Computers and Chemical Engineering , number =

  175. [183]

    doi:10.1080/00207543.2015.1057625 , file =

    International Journal of Production Research , keywords =. doi:10.1080/00207543.2015.1057625 , file =

    2015

  176. [184]

    Annals of Operations Research , keywords =

    Farahani, Reza Zanjirani and Drezner, Zvi and Asgari, Nasrin , doi =. Annals of Operations Research , keywords =

  177. [185]

    Daoutidis, Prodromos and Tang, Wentao and Jogwar, Sujit S. , doi =. Computers and Chemical Engineering , keywords =

  178. [186]

    Computers and Chemical Engineering , keywords =

    Christian, Brianna and Cremaschi, Selen , doi =. Computers and Chemical Engineering , keywords =

  179. [187]

    and Macgregor, John F

    Dayal, Bhupinder S. and Macgregor, John F. , doi =. Journal of Chemometrics , keywords =

  180. [188]

    , file =

    Wesolowsky, George O. , file =. Management Science , number =

  181. [189]

    AIChE Journal , number =

    Yue, Dajun and You, Fengqi , doi =. AIChE Journal , number =. arXiv , arxivId =:0201037v1 , file =

  182. [190]

    , file =

    He, Xinyu and Powell, Warren B. , file =. SIAM Journal on Optimization , keywords =

  183. [191]

    Ryoo, H. S. and Sahinidis, N. V. , doi =. Computers and Chemical Engineering , number =

  184. [192]

    IISE Transactions , keywords =

    Basciftci, Beste and Ahmed, Shabbir and Gebraeel, Nagi , doi =. IISE Transactions , keywords =

  185. [193]

    Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture , keywords =

    Selcuk, Sule , doi =. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture , keywords =

  186. [194]

    and Pinto, J

    Rejowski, R. and Pinto, J. M. , doi =. Computers and Chemical Engineering , keywords =

  187. [195]

    and Ungar, Lyle H

    Psichogios, Dimitris C. and Ungar, Lyle H. , doi =. AIChE Journal , number =

  188. [196]

    Saez-Gallego, Javier and Morales, Juan M. , doi =. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid , keywords =. arXiv , arxivId =:1607.07209 , file =

    arXiv

  189. [197]

    Forbes, J. F. and Marlin, T. E. and MacGregor, J. F. , doi =. Computers and Chemical Engineering , number =

  190. [198]

    , eprint =

    Gao, Rui and Kleywegt, Anton J. , eprint =. arXiv preprint arXiv:1604.02199 , keywords =

    arXiv

  191. [199]

    and Apap, Robert M

    Grossmann, Ignacio E. and Apap, Robert M. and Calfa, Bruno A. and Garc. Computers. doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2016.03.002 , file =

    2016 doi

  192. [200]

    doi:10.1007/s41412-020-00098-6 , file =

    Xu, Yongsheng and Yoshihara, Naoki , booktitle =. doi:10.1007/s41412-020-00098-6 , file =

    doi

  193. [201]

    Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications , keywords =

    Thai, J. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.jmaa.2016.09.031 , file =

    2016 doi

  194. [202]

    Morgenstern, Oskar and von Neumann, John , publisher =

  195. [203]

    Computers and Chemical Engineering , keywords =

    Engell, Sebastian and Harjunkoski, Iiro , doi =. Computers and Chemical Engineering , keywords =

  196. [204]

    Transportation Science , keywords =

    Kang, Jee Eun and Recker, Will , doi =. Transportation Science , keywords =

  197. [205]

    Industrial

    Wiebe, Johannes and Cec. Industrial. doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.9b01772 , eprint =

    doi

  198. [206]

    Computers

    Li, Can and Grossmann, Ignacio E , doi =. Computers

  199. [207]

    and Wolfe, Philip , file =

    Dantzig, George B. and Wolfe, Philip , file =. Operations Research , number =

  200. [208]

    Mathematical Programming , keywords =

    Bertsimas, Dimitris and Georghiou, Angelos , doi =. Mathematical Programming , keywords =

  201. [209]

    Computers and Chemical Engineering , keywords =

    M. Computers and Chemical Engineering , keywords =. doi:10.1016/S0098-1354(03)00050-4 , file =

    doi

  202. [210]

    Ashok, S. , doi =. Applied Energy , keywords =

  203. [211]

    and Pantelides, C.C

    Schilling, G. and Pantelides, C.C. , doi =. Computers

  204. [212]

    Held, Harald and Woodruff, David L. , doi =. Journal of Heuristics , keywords =

  205. [213]

    European Journal of Operational Research , keywords =

    Rahmaniani, Ragheb and Crainic, Teodor Gabriel and Gendreau, Michel and Rei, Walter , doi =. European Journal of Operational Research , keywords =

  206. [214]

    Management Science , keywords =

    Lulli, Guglielmo and Sen, Suvrajeet , doi =. Management Science , keywords =

  207. [215]

    Luedtke, James and Ahmed, Shabbir and Nemhauser, George L. , doi =. Mathematical Programming , pages =

  208. [216]

    arXiv , pages =

    Agrawal, Akshay and Barratt, Shane and Boyd, Stephen , eprint =. arXiv , pages =

  209. [217]

    Biegler, Lorenz T. , doi =. AIChE Journal , number =

  210. [218]

    , file =

    Gomory, Ralph E. , file =. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society , number =

  211. [219]

    Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research , number =

    Ghosh, Sambit and. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research , number =. doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.9b04739 , file =

    doi

  212. [220]

    and Ierapetritou, Marianthi G

    Saharidis, Georgios K.D. and Ierapetritou, Marianthi G. , doi =. Annals of Operations Research , keywords =

  213. [221]

    Cell , number =

    Bal. Cell , number =. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.01.030 , file =

    2011 doi

  214. [222]

    Computers and Chemical Engineering , keywords =

    Venkatasubramanian, Venkat and Rengaswamy, Raghunathan and Yin, Kewen and Kavuri, Surya N , doi =. Computers and Chemical Engineering , keywords =

  215. [223]

    Applied Thermal Engineering , keywords =

    Kleme. Applied Thermal Engineering , keywords =. doi:10.1016/S1359-4311(96)00087-7 , file =

    doi

  216. [224]

    Computers and Chemical Engineering , keywords =

    Sass, Susanne and Faulwasser, Timm and Hollermann, Dinah Elena and Kappatou, Chrysoula Dimitra and Sauer, Dominique and Sch. Computers and Chemical Engineering , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2020.106760 , file =

    2020

  217. [225]

    Games and Economic Behavior , number =

    Nisan, Noam and Ronen, Amir , doi =. Games and Economic Behavior , number =

  218. [226]

    Krishnamoorthy, Dinesh and Skogestad, Sigurd , booktitle =

  219. [227]

    Naysmith, M. R. and Douglas, P. L. , doi =. Developments in Chemical Engineering and Mineral Processing , number =

  220. [228]

    Operations Research , keywords =

    Pritchard, Geoffrey and Zakeri, Golbon and Philpott, Andrew , doi =. Operations Research , keywords =

  221. [229]

    Chemical Engineering Science , keywords =

    Obermeier, Andreas and Windmeier, Christoph and Esche, Erik and Repke, Jens Uwe , doi =. Chemical Engineering Science , keywords =

  222. [230]

    and Sayed, Ali H

    Cattivelli, Federico S. and Sayed, Ali H. , doi =. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing , keywords =

  223. [231]

    and Enembreck, Fabr

    Leite, Allan R. and Enembreck, Fabr. Expert Systems with Applications , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2014.02.039 , file =

    2014 doi

  224. [232]

    and Sharda, Bikram and Bury, Scott J

    Amaran, Satyajith and Sahinidis, Nikolaos V. and Sharda, Bikram and Bury, Scott J. , doi =. Annals of Operations Research , keywords =. arXiv , arxivId =:1706.08591 , file =

    arXiv

  225. [233]

    Benders, J. F. , doi =. Numerische Mathematik , pages =

  226. [234]

    and Paulson, Joel A

    Heirung, Tor Aksel N. and Paulson, Joel A. and O'Leary, Jared and Mesbah, Ali , doi =. Computers and Chemical Engineering , keywords =

  227. [235]

    Savelsbergh, Martin W. P. , file =. Operations Research , number =

  228. [236]

    and Zemkoho, A

    Dempe, S. and Zemkoho, A. B. , doi =. Mathematical Programming , keywords =

  229. [237]

    and Badwal, S

    Giddey, S. and Badwal, S. P S and Kulkarni, A. , doi =. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy , keywords =

  230. [238]

    Bertsimas, Dimitris and de Ruiter, Frans J. C. T. , doi =. INFORMS Journal on Computing , keywords =

  231. [239]

    Computational Management Science , keywords =

    Georghiou, Angelos and Kuhn, Daniel and Wiesemann, Wolfram , doi =. Computational Management Science , keywords =

  232. [240]

    Chemie-Ingenieur-Technik , keywords =

    Niethammer, Benjamin and Wodarz, Simon and Betz, Matthias and Haltenort, Philipp and Oestreich, Dorian and Hackbarth, Kathrin and Arnold, Ulrich and Otto, Thomas and Sauer, J. Chemie-Ingenieur-Technik , keywords =. doi:10.1002/cite.201700117 , file =

    doi

  233. [241]

    Computers and Chemical Engineering , keywords =

    Baldea, Michael and Harjunkoski, Iiro , doi =. Computers and Chemical Engineering , keywords =

  234. [242]

    Shen, Xinyue and Diamond, Steven and Udell, Madeleine and Gu, Yuantao and Boyd, Stephen , booktitle =

  235. [243]

    , file =

    Gautam, Rajeev and Seider, Warren D. , file =. AIChE Journal , number =

  236. [244]

    and Weber, Jana M

    Schweidtmann, Artur M. and Weber, Jana M. and Wende, Christian and Netze, Linus and Mitsos, Alexander , doi =. Optimization and Engineering , keywords =

  237. [245]

    Vohra, Rakesh V. , doi =. Mathematical Programming , number =

  238. [246]

    and Fouska, Nikoletta , doi =

    Berman, Oded and Larson, Richard C. and Fouska, Nikoletta , doi =. Transportation Science , number =

  239. [247]

    Operations Research Letters , keywords =

    Wang, Lizhi , ddoi =. Operations Research Letters , keywords =

  240. [248]

    Gupta, Dhruv and Maravelias, Christos T. , doi =. Computers and Chemical Engineering , keywords =

  241. [249]

    and Akula, Paul and Eslick, John C

    Isenberg, Natalie M. and Akula, Paul and Eslick, John C. and Bhattacharyya, Debangsu and Miller, David C. and Gounaris, Chrysanthos E. , doi =. AIChE Journal , keywords =

  242. [250]

    Adamson, Richard and Hobbs, Martin and Silcock, Andy and Willis, Mark J. , doi =. Computers and Chemical Engineering , keywords =

  243. [251]

    Goggin, Michael and Gramlich, Rob , title =

  244. [252]

    Operations Research , number =

    Luss, Hanan , file =. Operations Research , number =

  245. [253]

    McNamara, J. M. and Houston, A. I. and Collins, E. J. , doi =. SIAM Review , keywords =

  246. [254]

    Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Decision and Control , doi =

    Vayanos, Phebe and Kuhn, Daniel and Rustem, Ber. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Decision and Control , doi =

  247. [255]

    and Touretzky, Cara R

    Pattison, Richard C. and Touretzky, Cara R. and Harjunkoski, Iiro and Baldea, Michael , doi =. AIChE Journal , number =. arXiv , arxivId =:arXiv:1402.6991v1 , file =

    arXiv

  248. [256]

    and Pantelides, C

    Kondili, E. and Pantelides, C. C. and Sargent, R. W.H. , doi =. Computers and Chemical Engineering , number =

  249. [257]

    and Wassick, John M

    Terrazas-Moreno, Sebastian and Grossmann, Ignacio E. and Wassick, John M. and Bury, Scott J. and Akiya, Naoko , doi =. Computers and Chemical Engineering , keywords =

  250. [258]

    European Journal of Operational Research , keywords =

    Holmberg, Kaj , doi =. European Journal of Operational Research , keywords =

  251. [259]

    Transportation Science , keywords =

    Agra, Agostinho and Christiansen, Marielle and Hvattum, Lars Magnus and Rodriguesa, Filipe , doi =. Transportation Science , keywords =

  252. [260]

    Karuppiah, Ramkumar and Grossmann, Ignacio E. , doi =. Computers

  253. [261]

    SIAM Journal on Optimization , number =

    Nemirovski, Arkadi and Shapiro, Alexander , file =. SIAM Journal on Optimization , number =

  254. [262]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.01899 , keywords =

    Vayanos, Phebe and Mcelfresh, Duncan C and Ye, Yingxiao and Dickerson, John P and Rice, Eric , file =. arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.01899 , keywords =

    2003 arXiv

  255. [263]

    Computers and Chemical Engineering , keywords =

    Li, Bo and Chen, Bingzhen , doi =. Computers and Chemical Engineering , keywords =

  256. [264]

    and Soumis, Fran

    Desaulniers, Guy and Desrosiers, Jacques and Loachim, Irina and Solomon, Marius M. and Soumis, Fran. Fleet Management and Logistics , doi =

  257. [265]

    Industrial

    Feng, Wei and Zhang, Yi and Rong, Gang and Feng, Yiping , doi =. Industrial

  258. [266]

    Computers and Operations Research , keywords =

    Dayarian, Iman and Crainic, Teodor Gabriel and Gendreau, Michel and Rei, Walter , doi =. Computers and Operations Research , keywords =

  259. [267]

    Industrial

    Wiebe, Johannes and Cec. Industrial. doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.8b03292 , eprint =

    doi

  260. [268]

    and Cerd

    Cafaro, Diego C. and Cerd. Optimization and Engineering , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s11081-016-9330-5 , file =

    doi

  261. [269]

    and Matthews, Logan R

    Guzman, Yannis A. and Matthews, Logan R. and Floudas, Christodoulos A. , doi =. Computers and Chemical Engineering , keywords =

  262. [270]

    Jenabi, M. and. Annals of Operations Research , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s10479-015-1983-5 , file =

    1983 doi

  263. [271]

    and Vaidya, Prakash D

    Jadhav, Suhas G. and Vaidya, Prakash D. and Bhanage, Bhalchandra M. and Joshi, Jyeshtharaj B. , doi =. Chemical Engineering Research and Design , keywords =

  264. [272]

    Mathematical Programming , keywords =

    G. Mathematical Programming , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s10107-010-0360-z , file =

    doi

  265. [273]

    Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences , keywords =

    Alessio, Alessandro and Bemporad, Alberto , file =. Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences , keywords =

  266. [274]

    and Nair, Suresh K

    Bapna, Ravi and Thakur, Lakshman S. and Nair, Suresh K. , doi =. European Journal of Operational Research , keywords =

  267. [275]

    Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research , number =

    Bas. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research , number =. doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.7b04435 , file =

    doi

  268. [276]

    and Espu

    Huercio, A. and Espu. Computers

  269. [277]

    and Engell, Sebastian , doi =

    Hadera, Hubert and Harjunkoski, Iiro and Sand, Guido and Grossmann, Ignacio E. and Engell, Sebastian , doi =. Computers and Chemical Engineering , keywords =

  270. [278]

    and Brandyberry, Alan A

    Troutt, Marvin D. and Brandyberry, Alan A. and Sohn, Changsoo and Tadisina, Suresh K. , doi =. European Journal of Operational Research , keywords =

  271. [279]

    Astington, Janet Wilde and Jenkins, Jennifer M. , doi =. Cognition and Emotion , number =

  272. [280]

    and Sahinidis, Nikolaos V

    Wilson, Zachary T. and Sahinidis, Nikolaos V. , doi =. Computers and Chemical Engineering , keywords =. arXiv , arxivId =:1705.10918 , file =

    arXiv

  273. [281]

    and Wets, Roger J.B

    Ryan, Sarah M. and Wets, Roger J.B. and Woodruff, David L. and Silva-Monroy, Cesar and Watson, Jean Paul , doi =. IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting , keywords =

  274. [282]

    and Dua, Vivek and Pinto, Jose M

    Charitopoulos, Vassilis M. and Dua, Vivek and Pinto, Jose M. and Papageorgiou, Lazaros G. , doi =. Optimization and Engineering , keywords =

  275. [283]

    and Ierapetritou, Marianthi G

    Boukouvala, Fani and Muzzio, Fernando J. and Ierapetritou, Marianthi G. , doi =. AIChE Journal , number =. arXiv , arxivId =:0201037v1 , file =

  276. [284]

    doi:10.1007/s10107-017-1125-8 , eprint =

    Bertsimas, Dimitris and Gupta, Vishal and Kallus, Nathan , booktitle =. doi:10.1007/s10107-017-1125-8 , eprint =

    doi

  277. [285]

    European Journal of Operational Research , keywords =

    Ogbe, Emmanuel and Li, Xiang , doi =. European Journal of Operational Research , keywords =

  278. [286]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , number =

    Wilder, Bryan and Ewing, Eric and Dilkina, Bistra and Tambe, Milind , eprint =. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , number =

  279. [287]

    Operations Research Letters , keywords =

    Zhao, Chaoyue and Guan, Yongpei , doi =. Operations Research Letters , keywords =

  280. [288]

    Operations Research , keywords =

    Bertsimas, Dimitris and Sim, Melvyn , doi =. Operations Research , keywords =

  281. [289]

    Hitaj, Claudia and Suttles, Shellye , institution =

  282. [290]

    IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation , keywords =

    Sinha, Ankur and Malo, Pekka and Deb, Kalyanmoy , doi =. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation , keywords =. arXiv , arxivId =:1705.06270 , file =

    arXiv

  283. [291]

    Chen, Qi and Grossmann, I.E. , doi =. Annual Review of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering , keywords =

  284. [292]

    Cott, B. J. and Macchietto, S. , doi =. Computers and Chemical Engineering , number =

  285. [293]

    and Li, Can and Sahinidis, Nikolaos V

    Hubbs, Christian D. and Li, Can and Sahinidis, Nikolaos V. and Grossmann, Ignacio E. and Wassick, John M. , doi =. Computers. arXiv , arxivId =:1906.08809 , file =

    1906 arXiv

  286. [294]

    RSC Advances , number =

    Zhang, Yajing and Li, Debao and Zhang, Sujuan and Wang, Kangjun and Wu, Jing , doi =. RSC Advances , number =

  287. [295]

    doi:10.1145/2736277.2741667 , file =

    Elkahky, Ali and Song, Yang and He, Xiaodong , booktitle =. doi:10.1145/2736277.2741667 , file =

  288. [296]

    INFORMS Journal on Computing , keywords =

    Postek, Krzysztof and den Hertog, Dick , file =. INFORMS Journal on Computing , keywords =

  289. [297]

    Journal of Global Optimization , keywords =

    Wang, Zilong and Ierapetritou, Marianthi , doi =. Journal of Global Optimization , keywords =

  290. [298]

    26th Annual European Symposium on Algorithms , doi =

    Ahmadian, Sara and Bhaskar, Umang and Sanit. 26th Annual European Symposium on Algorithms , doi =

  291. [299]

    Available on Optimization Online , keywords =

    Boland, Natashia and Dumitrescu, Irina and Froyland, Gary , file =. Available on Optimization Online , keywords =

  292. [300]

    Top , keywords =

    Guignard, Monique , doi =. Top , keywords =

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.