Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 76 references

Langlands Duality and Invariant Differential Operators

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Knapp–Stein duality is Langlands duality for SL(2n,R).

desk verdict A plausible pattern in SL(2n,R) multiplet data, but the 'Langlands dual' label is a renaming unless a dictionary with L-parameters is supplied. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.16432 v3 pith:2HHQSMDU submitted 2024-11-25 math.RT hep-thmath-phmath.MPmath.QA

V.K. Dobrev This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.RThep-thmath-phmath.MPmath.QA MSC 22E4622E4711F70
keywords LanglandsdualityinvariantdifferentialoperatorselementaryrepresentationsmultipletsKnapp-SteinSL(2nR)conformalweightWeylgroupreflections
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper attempts to build the first bridge between two subjects that grew from the same root but have stayed separate: Langlands duality and the theory of invariant differential operators. Using the case G = SL(2n,R) with maximal parabolic M = SL(n,R) ⊕ SL(n,R), it claims that the multiplet of elementary representations organizes itself into Langlands-dual pairs, with the partner of χ_n being χ_{21−n}, obtained by swapping the two SL(n) factors and changing the sign of the conformal weight. In particular, the paper states that Knapp–Stein duality—the integral intertwining operators that connect elementary representations at opposite ends of a multiplet—is a manifestation of Langlands duality. If correct, this gives representation theory a concrete dictionary in which the arrows of invariant differential operators carry the same information as Langlands duality.

What carries the argument

The central object is the multiplet: a maximal set of reducible elementary representations with the same Casimir values, drawn as a connected graph whose vertices are representations and whose edges are intertwining operators. The pairing mechanism is the Weyl-group reflection n ↦ 21−n acting on signatures, combined with the bookkeeping identities m_{ij} = m_i + m_j and the conformal factor c written as ±(...). The intertwining differential operators are generated from the standard reducibility condition (Λ+ρ, β∨)=m via singular vectors applied to the representation space, while the Knapp–Stein integral operators G± provide the ± pairing; at reducibility points the two-point kernel degenerates, with regularization turning it into a delta-function, so the integral operators become differential operators.

What would settle it

Compute the Langlands parameters of χ_n and χ_{21−n} under the refined Langlands classification for SL(2n,R) and check whether they are exchanged by the L-group duality involution. A concrete place to look is the SL(6) multiplet with m1=m2=m3=m4=m5=1, where equation (33) predicts the full 20-member pairing; if for a single pair the two parameters are merely contragredient or Hermitian dual, or if the infinitesimal characters differ, the proposed bridge fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that for G = SL(2n,R), induced from the maximal parabolic subgroup with M = SL(n,R) ⊕ SL(n,R), the elementary representations form multiplets whose members are paired by a duality that swaps the two M factors and negates the conformal weight. In the n=3 multiplet of 20 representations, χ_n and χ_{21−n} form such pairs (equation (33)); in the n=4 case, with 70 members, the same pairing is exhibited for the first 35 signatures (equation (40)). The paper calls the ± pairs Knapp–Stein pairs, and asserts that Knapp–Stein duality is a manifestation of Langlands duality.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the partner obtained by reflecting the index n to 21−n, which swaps the two SL(n) factors and flips the sign of the conformal weight, is genuinely the Langlands dual of the original representation, an identification made by matching signatures rather than by checking the standard Langlands parameterization.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For each n, the multiplet size (2n)!/(n!)² is even and the members split into Knapp–Stein/Langlands dual pairs, so the dual partner of every elementary representation already lies inside the same multiplet.
  • The same Weyl-group reflection that produces the dual pair also gives the reducibility point for the intertwining operator, so the operator and the duality are two views of one datum.
  • At reducibility points the Knapp–Stein integral kernels degenerate to delta-function kernels, turning the dual-pairing integral operators into the invariant differential operators of the multiplet.
  • The pattern extends from sl(4) through sl(6) to sl(8) and to the su(n,n) real form, so the correspondence covers an infinite family of real groups, not a single example.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the paper's identification is right, each multiplet becomes a concrete realization of an L-packet for SL(2n,R), and the explicit intertwining differential operators are the morphisms between packet members.
  • A natural test is to look at other real groups whose maximal parabolic Levi is a product of two isomorphic blocks, such as SO(p,p) or split exceptional groups; if the swap-and-negate pattern appears there too, the mechanism is structural, whereas its absence would mark the SL(2n) case as special.
  • The conformal su(2,2) reading suggests a dictionary with electric-magnetic duality: the multiplet arrows then correspond to S-duality maps between boundary conditions, extending the n=2 remark to the full multiplet.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a bridge between Langlands duality and the theory of invariant differential operators on real reductive groups. For G = SL(2n,R) with the maximal parabolic P = MAN and M = SL(n) × SL(n), the author constructs multiplets of elementary representations and identifies the Knapp-Stein dual pairs χ_n and χ_{21-n} as Langlands duals, with duality implemented by swapping the two SL(n) factors and changing the sign of the conformal weight. Explicit multiplet tables are given for sl(4), sl(6), and sl(8) (the latter in an appendix). The paper also presents the n=2 case as an electromagnetic-duality example, connecting to conformal field theory.

Significance. If the identification were rigorously established, the paper would provide a concrete, computational bridge between two major programs in representation theory. Its strengths are the explicit multiplet tables, the use of Weyl-group counting (Eq. (25)), and the physical illustration for n=2. However, the central claim is currently an assertion: the paper does not define 'Langlands dual' for elementary representations, does not compare the pairing (33)/(40) to the standard local Langlands parameterization for SL(2n,R), and does not prove that the map is not merely the contragredient or a Hermitian dual. The n=4 data cannot be checked because of typographical corruption in the appendix. The paper is best viewed as a research announcement of a plausible conjecture, not as a proof of the bridge.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4.1, §5 (Eqs. (33), (40))] The statement that χ_n and χ_{21-n} are Langlands duals is asserted without a precise definition or verification. In the local Langlands correspondence, duality of representations is a statement about L-homomorphisms; the proposed pairing only swaps the two SL(n) factors and flips the conformal weight, which for generic parameters is not the contragredient operation (which would also reverse Dynkin labels within each factor). The paper must either compute the L-parameters of the two representations and show that they are related by the expected duality operation, or clearly label this identification as a conjecture with supporting evidence. As written, the duality is built into the multiplet parametrization, making the central claim circular.
  2. [Appendix (Eqs. (38), (40))] The n=4 case cannot be verified because the appendix contains multiple errors: Eq. (38) refers to sl(9,R) instead of sl(8,R); Eq. (40) contains unbalanced parentheses (e.g., '−m14 (m15 , m 56 , m 7)±' and '−m25 (m24 , m 56 , m 7)±') and undefined shorthand such as m−1,57 and m−12,67. These defects must be corrected before the claimed sl(8) multiplet can be checked.
  3. [§5 (Eqs. (34a)-(34c))] The reduced multiplets are not presented transparently. The superscripts ± are missing in several entries (e.g., '135 χ 6'), and the notation χ′± and χ′′± is not defined; as a result, the reader cannot determine how the reduced multiplets are derived from the main multiplet or verify that the Knapp-Stein pairing persists in the reduced cases.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Throughout] There are numerous typographical errors, e.g., 'subt opics', 'pro gram', 'strang e', 'Knapp=Stein', and 'm2L' vs 'M2L'; these should be corrected.
  2. [§2, Eq. (1)] The use of A′ and 'H ∈ A′' is confusing; clarify that A′ is the Lie algebra of A and specify the pairing between H and ν.
  3. [§4.1, Eq. (27b)] The formula 'c± = ± 1/(2(m1+m3))' appears to be missing parentheses or factors; it should be consistent with the alternative parametrization given before Eq. (33).
  4. [§5, Eq. (33)] The shorthand 'm12,45' and similar partial-sum notation is introduced without definition; define it before first use.
  5. [Figures] The figures (Fig. 1 and Fig. 2) are mentioned but not shown in the manuscript text; ensure they are included in the final version.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The alleged Langlands-duality pairing is introduced by the same ± relabeling that is then 'observed'; the bridge reduces to renaming Knapp-Stein multiplet structure as Langlands duality.

  1. renaming known result [Section 4.1, after Eqs. (24)-(26)]
    "Note that the ± pairs are related by Knapp=Stein [57] integral intertwining operators G± so that the operators G+ act from χ− to χ+, while G− act from χ+ to χ−, etc. Thus, the Knapp-Stein duality is a manifestation of the Langlands duality."

    No independent definition of 'Langlands duality' is supplied at this point. The ± pairing was just introduced as the Knapp-Stein pairing, and the alternative parametrization immediately above is called 'stressing the duality'; hence the sentence equates the names rather than deriving a relation between Knapp-Stein duality and Langlands duality.

  2. renaming known result [Section 5, Eq. (33) and following sentence]
    "We quickly observe that the representations χ n and χ 21−n are Langlands duals related by Knapp-Stein operators. More explicitly, this duality is given by the following presentation of the same multiplet: ... where ( p, q ; r, s )+ ≡ (r, s ; p, q ), ( p, q ; r, s )− ≡ (p, q ; r, s ), and the inducing number of the dilatation subalgebra A is replaced by the conformal factor c. Clearly, χ − n = χ n, χ + n = χ 21−n for 1 ≤ n ≤ 10."

    The map 'χ^+_n = χ_{21−n}' is true by the definition of the + notation immediately above it: + swaps the two SL(n) factors and flips the sign of c. No Langlands parameter, L-group element, or local Langlands correspondence datum is computed or compared. Calling the Knapp-Stein pair a 'Langlands dual' is therefore a relabeling of the author's own multiplet parametrization, not an independent prediction.

full rationale

The core technical work—construction of multiplets and invariant differential operators for SL(2n,R)—is internally coherent and follows the author's earlier multiplet formalism; that part is not circular. The circularity is confined to the paper's advertised bridge: the identification of χ_n with χ_{21−n} as 'Langlands duals' is built into the notation of Eq. (33) and (40), and the sentence 'Knapp-Stein duality is a manifestation of the Langlands duality' is an assertion of name-equivalence rather than a derived correspondence. The paper cites [10] for relative Langlands duality but never checks the present pairing against the L-parameter dictionary there. The appendix's n=4 'evidence' is additionally corrupted by malformed signatures (e.g., Eq. (38) says 'sl(9,R)' for sl(8,R)), so it cannot supply independent confirmation. Thus the central claim is partially circular: it reduces by construction to a renaming of Knapp-Stein pairs, while the surrounding differential-operator classification retains independent content.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters or invented entities. The paper rests on the author's prior multiplet formalism (book [60]) and the BGG reducibility criterion, plus the unproven identification of Knapp-Stein pairs with Langlands duals.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The multiplet classification of elementary representations and the intertwining operators from [60] are correct and complete.
    The paper builds entirely on the author's prior book [60] for the list of multiplets and operators; no independent verification is given.
  • standard math The BGG reducibility condition (Λ+ρ, β∨)=m correctly determines embeddings of Verma modules and the existence of intertwiners.
    Standard result used in Section 2, equation (3).
  • ad hoc to paper Langlands duality is manifested by the Knapp-Stein integral intertwining operators, i.e., the ± pairs are Langlands dual.
    This is the central assertion of the paper, stated in Section 4.1, not proven.
  • standard math The Weyl group orbit computation giving NM = |W(G,H)|/|W(M,H_m)| multiplets is valid.
    Standard formula, used in equations (25), (31), and (39).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Langlands Duality and Invariant Differential Operators." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2HHQSMDU

@misc{pith2026241116432,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Langlands Duality and Invariant Differential Operators},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2HHQSMDU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.16432}
}
read the original abstract

Langlands duality is one of the most influential topics in mathematical research. It has many different appearances and influential subtopics. Yet there is a topic that until now seems unrelated to the Langlands program. That is the topic of invariant differential operators. That is strange since both items are deeply rooted in Harish-Chandra's representation theory of semisimple Lie groups. In this paper we start building the bridge between the two programs.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.16432 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Simplest case of conformal invariant differential op [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Main multiplets for sl(6, R) 12 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Langlands Problems in the theory of automorphic forms, Lec t

    R.P. Langlands Problems in the theory of automorphic forms, Lec t. Notes Math. 170 (1970) 18-61

    work page 1970

  2. [2]

    Langlands On the Classification of Irreducible Representatio ns of Real Algebraic Groups, Mimeographed notes Princeton 1973; Publis hed in: Math.Surveys Monogr

    R.P. Langlands On the Classification of Irreducible Representatio ns of Real Algebraic Groups, Mimeographed notes Princeton 1973; Publis hed in: Math.Surveys Monogr. 31 (1989) 101-170

    work page 1989

  3. [3]

    Adams, D.A

    J. Adams, D.A. Vogan Jr, Contragredient representations and character- izing the local Langlands correspondence, Amer. J. Math. 138, 3 ( 2016), 657-682. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24736404

    work page arXiv 2016

  4. [4]

    Aganagic, E

    M. Aganagic, E. Frenkel, A. Okounkov, Quantum q-Langlands Co rre- spondence, Trans. Moscow Math. Soc. 79, 2018 1-83

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    Alekseev, A

    A. Alekseev, A. Berenstein, B. Hoffman, Y. Li, Langlands Duality a nd Poisson-Lie Duality via Cluster Theory and Tropicalization, Selecta Mathematica, New Series 27 (4) (2021)69

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    Arakawa, E

    T. Arakawa, E. Frenkel, Quantum Langlands duality of represen tations of W-algebras, Compos. Math. 155 (2019) no.12, 2235-2262

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    Balasubramanian, J

    A. Balasubramanian, J. Teschner, Supersymmetric field theorie s and geometric langlands: The other side of the coin Proc. Symp. Pure Ma th. 98 (2018) 79-105

    work page 2018

  8. [8]

    Beilinson Langlands parameters for Heisenberg modules, In: B ern- stein, J., Hinich, V., Melnikov, A

    A. Beilinson Langlands parameters for Heisenberg modules, In: B ern- stein, J., Hinich, V., Melnikov, A. (eds) Studies in Lie Theory. Progres s in Mathematics, vol 243. (2006, Birkh¨ auser, Boston)

    work page 2006

Show all 76 references
  1. [9]

    Ben-Zvi, D

    D. Ben-Zvi, D. Nadler, Loop Spaces and Langlands Parameters, arXiv:0706.0322

    arXiv

  2. [10]

    Ben-Zvi, Y

    D. Ben-Zvi, Y. Sakellaridis, A. Venkatesh, Relative Langlands Du ality, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2409.04677

    doi arXiv

  3. [11]

    Braverman, D

    A. Braverman, D. Kazhdan, Normalized intertwining operators and nilpotent elements in the Langlands dual group, Moscow Math. J. 2( 3) (2002). DOI: 10.17323/1609-4514-2002-2-3-533-553 16

    2002 doi

  4. [12]

    Campbell, S

    J. Campbell, S. Raskin, Langlands duality on the Beilinson-Drinfeld Grassmannian, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2310.19734

    doi arXiv

  5. [13]

    T.-H. Chen, D. Nadler, Real groups, symmetric varieties and La nglands duality, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2403.13995

    doi arXiv

  6. [14]

    E.Y. Chen, A. Venkatesh, Some Singular Examples of Relative Lan g- lands Duality, arXiv:2405.18212

    arXiv

  7. [15]

    Chua, Kazhdan-Lusztig map and Langlands duality, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2403.07080

    A. Chua, Kazhdan-Lusztig map and Langlands duality, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2403.07080

    doi arXiv

  8. [16]

    J.-F. Dat, D. Helm, R. Kurinczuk, G. Moss, Local Langlands in fa milies: The banal case, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2406.09283

    doi arXiv

  9. [17]

    D. Dinh, J. Teschner, Classical limit of the geometric Langlands c orre- spondence for SL2(C) arXiv:2312.13393

    arXiv

  10. [18]

    Donagi, T

    R. Donagi, T. Pantev, Langlands duality for Hitchin systems, In vent. math. 189, 653–735 (2012)

    2012

  11. [19]

    Drinfeld, Proof of the global Langlands conjecture for GL (2) over a function field, Funct

    V.G. Drinfeld, Proof of the global Langlands conjecture for GL (2) over a function field, Funct. Anal. Its Appl. 11 (1977) 223–225; On the L ang- lands retraction, arXiv:1301.1940

    1977 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Espinosa, The Multiplicative Formula of Langlands for Orbital I nte- grals in GL(2)

    M. Espinosa, The Multiplicative Formula of Langlands for Orbital I nte- grals in GL(2). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2402.08013

    doi arXiv

  13. [21]

    Etingof, E

    P. Etingof, E. Frenkel, D. Kazhdan A general framework for t he ana- lytic Langlands correspondence, Pure Appl. Math. Quart. 20 (1) ( 2024) 307-426; Hecke Operators and Analytic Langlands Corresponden ce for Curves Over Local Fields, Duke Math. J. 172 (11) (2023) 2015-20 71; A...

    2023

  14. [22]

    Fargues, Cohomology of moduli spaces of p-divlsible groups a nd local Langlands correspondence, Asterisque 291 (2004) 1-199

    L. Fargues, Cohomology of moduli spaces of p-divlsible groups a nd local Langlands correspondence, Asterisque 291 (2004) 1-199

    2004

  15. [23]

    Fargues, P

    L. Fargues, P. Scholze, Geometrization of the local Langlands correspon- dence arXiv:2102.13459. 17

    arXiv

  16. [24]

    Feigin, E

    B. Feigin, E. Frenkel, Quantization of soliton systems and Langla nds duality, in: Exploration of New Structures and Natural Construct ions in Mathematical Physics, pp. 185274, Adv. Stud. Pure Math. 61, M ath. Soc. Japan, Tokyo, 2011

    2011

  17. [25]

    Frenkel, Langlands Program, Trace Formulas, and their Geo metriza- tion, Bul

    E. Frenkel, Langlands Program, Trace Formulas, and their Geo metriza- tion, Bul. AMS, 50, 1, 2013, 1–55; Affine Algebras, Langlands Duality and Bethe Ansatz, Proceedings, 11th International Congress M athe- matical physics., Paris, France, July 18-22, 1994, arXiv:q-alg/950 6003;...

    2013 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Frenkel, D

    E. Frenkel, D. Gaiotto, Quantum Langlands dualities of boundar y con- ditions, D-modules, and conformal blocks, Commun. Number Theor y & Physics 14 (2) 2020 199-313

    2020

  19. [27]

    Frenkel, D

    E. Frenkel, D. Gaitsgory, D. Kazhdan, K. Vilonen, Geometric Re aliza- tion of Whittaker Functions and the Langlands Conjecture, J. AMS , 11, 2, 1998, 451-484

    1998

  20. [28]

    Frenkel, D

    E. Frenkel, D. Gaitsgory, K. Vilonen, On the geometric Langland s con- jecture J. AMS, 15 (2) 2002 367-417

    2002

  21. [29]

    Frenkel, D

    E. Frenkel, D. Hernandez, Spectra of Quantum KdV Hamiltonian s, Langlands Duality, and Affine Opers, Commun. Math. Phys. 362 (2) 2018 361-414

    2018

  22. [30]

    Gaiotto, J

    D. Gaiotto, J. Teschner, Quantum Analytic Langlands Corresp ondence, arXiv:2402.00494

    arXiv

  23. [31]

    Gaiotto, E

    D. Gaiotto, E. Witten Gauge Theory and the Analytic Form of the Geometric Langlands Program, Ann. Henri Poincare, 25 (1) (2024 ) 557- 671

    2024

  24. [32]

    Ginzburg, Langlands Reciprocity for Algebraic Surfaces arX iv:q- alg/9502013

    V. Ginzburg, Langlands Reciprocity for Algebraic Surfaces arX iv:q- alg/9502013

  25. [33]

    Gukov, E

    S. Gukov, E. Witten, Gauge Theory, Ramification, and the Geom etric Langlands Program, arXiv:hep-th/0612073

    arXiv

  26. [34]

    Hameister, Z

    T. Hameister, Z. Luo, B. Morrissey, Relative Dol- beault Geometric Langlands via the Regular Quotient, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2409.15691

    doi arXiv

  27. [35]

    Hansen, Beijing notes on the categorical local Langlands co njecture, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2310.04533 18

    D. Hansen, Beijing notes on the categorical local Langlands co njecture, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2310.04533 18

    doi arXiv

  28. [36]

    Enhanced mirror symmetry for Langlands dual Hitc hin sys- tems.,

    T. Hausel, “Enhanced mirror symmetry for Langlands dual Hitc hin sys- tems.,” doi:10.4171/ICM2022/164 [arXiv:2112.09455 [math.AG]]

    arXiv

  29. [37]

    Hitchin, Langlands duality and G2 spectral curves, Quarter ly J

    N. Hitchin, Langlands duality and G2 spectral curves, Quarter ly J. Math., 58, 3, 2007, 319–344

    2007

  30. [38]

    van den Hove, The stack of spherical Langlands parameter s, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2409.09522

    T. van den Hove, The stack of spherical Langlands parameter s, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2409.09522

    doi

  31. [39]

    Topological aspects of matters and Langlands pro gram,

    K. Ikeda, “Topological aspects of matters and Langlands pro gram,” Rev. Math. Phys. 36 (2024) no.04, 2450005; “Quantum Hall Effect and Lang- lands Program,” Annals Phys. 397 (2018), 136-150

    2024

  32. [40]

    Imai, On the geometrization of the local Langlands correspo ndence, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2408.16571

    N. Imai, On the geometrization of the local Langlands correspo ndence, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2408.16571

    doi arXiv

  33. [41]

    Jeong, N

    S. Jeong, N. Lee, N. Nekrasov, di-Langlands correspondenc e and ex- tended observables J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2024) 105

    2024

  34. [42]

    Kapustin, E

    A. Kapustin, E. Witten, Electric-Magnetic Duality and the Geome tric Langlands Program, Commun. Num. Theor. Phys. 1 (2007) 1-236

    2007

  35. [43]

    Kimura, G

    T. Kimura, G. Noshita, Gauge origami and quiver W-algebras II: Vertex function and beyond quantum q-Langlands corresponden ce https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2404.17061

    doi arXiv

  36. [44]

    Koroteev, D.S

    P. Koroteev, D.S. Sage, A.M. Zeitlin, (SL(N),q)-opers, the q-L anglands correspondence, and quantum/classical duality, Communications in Mathematical Physics 381 (2) (2021) 641-672

    2021

  37. [45]

    Lafforgue, Chtoucas for Reductive Groups and Parameter ization of Global Langlands, J

    V. Lafforgue, Chtoucas for Reductive Groups and Parameter ization of Global Langlands, J. AMS 31 (3) 719-891 (2018)

    2018

  38. [46]

    Lenart, G

    C. Lenart, G. Zhao, C. Zhong, Elliptic classes via the periodic Hecke module and its Langlands dual, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2309.09140

    doi arXiv

  39. [47]

    De Martino, E

    M. De Martino, E. Opdam, A remark on the Langlands correspon dence for tori, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2410.06346

    doi arXiv

  40. [48]

    Matringe, Local converse theorems and Langlands parame ters, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2409.20240

    N. Matringe, Local converse theorems and Langlands parame ters, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2409.20240

    doi

  41. [49]

    Nakajima, S-dual of Hamiltonian G spaces and relative Langlan ds duality, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2409.06303 19

    H. Nakajima, S-dual of Hamiltonian G spaces and relative Langlan ds duality, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2409.06303 19

    doi arXiv

  42. [50]

    Suzuki, Rationality of the Local Jacquet-Langlands Corres pondence for GL(n), https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2307.06039

    K. Suzuki, Rationality of the Local Jacquet-Langlands Corres pondence for GL(n), https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2307.06039

    doi arXiv

  43. [51]

    Seiberg-Witten prepotential from WZNW conformal block: Langlands duality and Selberg trace formula,

    T. S. Tai, “Seiberg-Witten prepotential from WZNW conformal block: Langlands duality and Selberg trace formula,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A 27 (2012),

    2012

  44. [52]

    M.-C. Tan, M-Theoretic Derivations of 4d-2d Dualities: From a Ge omet- ric Langlands Duality for Surfaces, to the AGT Correspondence, t o Inte- grable Systems, JHEP 07 (2013) 171, Vafa-Witten Theory: Invar iants, Floer Homologies, Higgs Bundles, a Geometric Langlands Correspon...

    2013 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Teschner, Quantization of the Hitchin moduli spaces, Liouville theory and the geometric Langlands correspondence I, Adv

    J. Teschner, Quantization of the Hitchin moduli spaces, Liouville theory and the geometric Langlands correspondence I, Adv. Theor. Mat h. Phys. 15 (2011) Number 2, pp. 471-564

    2011

  46. [54]

    Witten, More on gauge theory and geometric Langlands, Adv

    E. Witten, More on gauge theory and geometric Langlands, Adv . Math. 327 (2018) 624-707; Geometric Langlands duality and the equation s of Nahm and Bogomolny, Proc. Royal Soc. Edinburgh A-Math. 140 (20 10) 857-895; Geometric Langlands from Six Dimensions, in: Celebration o f t...

    2018

  47. [55]

    Dobrev, Positive energy unitary irreducible representatio ns of D=6 conformal supersymmetry, J

    V.K. Dobrev, Positive energy unitary irreducible representatio ns of D=6 conformal supersymmetry, J. Phys. A35 (2002) 7079-7100; hep- th/0201076

    2002

  48. [56]

    Knapp, G.J

    A.W. Knapp, G.J. Zuckerman, Lecture Notes in Math. ; Springer : Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1977; Volume 587, pp. 138–159. Ann. Math. 1982, 116, 389–501

    1977

  49. [57]

    Knapp, E.M

    A.W. Knapp, E.M. Stein, Ann. Math. 1971, 93, 489–578. Inv. Math. 1980, 60, 9–84

    1971

  50. [58]

    Dobrev, G

    V.K. Dobrev, G. Mack, V.B. Petkova, S.G. Petrova, I.T. Todoro v, Har- monic Analysis on the n-Dimensional Lorentz Group and Its Applicatio n to Conformal Quantum Field Theory. Lect. Notes Phys. 1977, 63, 1–280. 20

    1977

  51. [59]

    Knapp, Lie Groups Beyond an Introduction , 2nd ed.; Progr

    A.W. Knapp, Lie Groups Beyond an Introduction , 2nd ed.; Progr. Math.; Birkh¨ auser: Boston, MA, USA; Basel, Switzerland; Stuttg art, Germany, 2002; Volume 140

    2002

  52. [60]

    V.K. Dobrev, Invariant Differential Operators, Volume 1: Noncompact Semisimple Lie Algebras and Groups ; De Gruyter Studies in Mathemat- ical Physics; De Gruyter: Berlin, Germany; Boston, MA, USA, 2016 ; Volume 35, pp. 408 + xii, ISBN 978-3-11-042764-6

    2016

  53. [61]

    Dobrev, Multiplet classification of the reducible elementary r epre- sentations of real semisimple Lie groups: the SOe(p, q ) example, Lett

    V.K. Dobrev, Multiplet classification of the reducible elementary r epre- sentations of real semisimple Lie groups: the SOe(p, q ) example, Lett. Math. Phys. 1985, 9, 205–211

    1985

  54. [62]

    Dobrev, V.B

    V.K. Dobrev, V.B. Petkova, On the group-theoretical approa ch to ex- tended conformal supersymmetry : classification of multiplets, Lett. Math. Phys. 1985, 9, 287–298

    1985

  55. [63]

    Dobrev, Invariant Differential Operators, Volume 2: Quantum Groups; De Gruyter Studies in Mathematical Physics; De Gruyter: Berlin, Germany; Boston, MA, USA, 2017; Volume 39, pp

    V.K. Dobrev, Invariant Differential Operators, Volume 2: Quantum Groups; De Gruyter Studies in Mathematical Physics; De Gruyter: Berlin, Germany; Boston, MA, USA, 2017; Volume 39, pp. 394 + xii, ISBN 978-3-11-043543-6 (h.c.), 978-3-11-042770-7

    2017

  56. [64]

    Dobrev, Invariant Differential Operators, Volume 3: Su- persymmetry; De Gruyter Studies in Mathematical Physics; De Gruyter: Berlin, Germany; Boston, MA, USA, 2018; Volume 49, pp

    V.K. Dobrev, Invariant Differential Operators, Volume 3: Su- persymmetry; De Gruyter Studies in Mathematical Physics; De Gruyter: Berlin, Germany; Boston, MA, USA, 2018; Volume 49, pp. 218 + viii, ISBN 978-3-11-052-7490 (Print), 978-3-11-052-6 639, ISSN 2194-3532

    2018

  57. [65]

    V.K. Dobrev, Invariant Differential Operators, Volume 4: AdS/CFT, (Super-)Virasoro and Affine (Super-)Algebras ; De Gruyter Studies in Mathematical Physics; De Gruyter, Berlin, Boston, 2019; Volume 5 3, pp. 234 + x, ISBN-10: 3110609681 ISBN-13: 978-3110609684

    2019

  58. [66]

    Dixmier, Enveloping Algebras ; North Holland: New York, NY, USA, 1977

    J. Dixmier, Enveloping Algebras ; North Holland: New York, NY, USA, 1977

    1977

  59. [67]

    Jacquet, S

    H. Jacquet, S. Rallis, Uniqueness of linear periods. Compos. Mat h., 102(1):65–123, 1996

    1996

  60. [68]

    Gel’fand, M.I

    I.M. Gel’fand, M.I. Graev, N.Y. Vilenkin, Generalised Functions, vol. 5 (Academic Press, New York, 1966)

    1966

  61. [69]

    Collacciani, A Reduction over finite fields of the tame local Lang lands correspondence for SLn, arXiv:2501.09085 [math.RT]

    E. Collacciani, A Reduction over finite fields of the tame local Lang lands correspondence for SLn, arXiv:2501.09085 [math.RT]. 21

    arXiv

  62. [70]

    Scholze Geometrization of the local Langlands corresponde nce, mo- tivically, arXiv:2501.07944 [math.AG]

    P. Scholze Geometrization of the local Langlands corresponde nce, mo- tivically, arXiv:2501.07944 [math.AG]

  63. [71]

    Braverman, M

    A. Braverman, M. Finkelberg, D. Kazhdan, R. Travkin Relative L ang- lands duality for osp(2n+1—2n), arXiv:2412.20544 [math.RT]

  64. [72]

    Xin Tong, p-adic Local Langlands Correspondence, arXiv:2412 .12055 [math.AG]

  65. [73]

    Letellier, T

    E. Letellier, T. Scognamiglio, PGL2(C) -character stacks and L anglands duality over finite fields, arXiv:2412.03234 [math.RT]

    arXiv

  66. [74]

    Kapranov, V

    M. Kapranov, V. Schechtman, O. Schiffmann, J. Yuan, The Lan glands formula and perverse sheaves, arXiv:2412.01638 [math.RT]

    arXiv

  67. [75]

    Solleveld, Y

    M. Solleveld, Y. Xu, Hecke algebras and local Langlands corresp on- dence for non-singular depth-zero representations, arXiv:2411 .19846 [math.RT]

  68. [76]

    Dospinescu, J

    G. Dospinescu, J. Esteban Rodr ´ ıguez Camargo, A Jacquet-L anglands functor for p-adic locally analytic representations, arXiv:2411.170 82 [math.NT]. 22

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.