Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

The Hidden Dangers of Browsing AI Agents

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2505.13076 v1 pith:2JNXZN2M submitted 2025-05-19 cs.CR cs.AI

The Hidden Dangers of Browsing AI Agents

classification cs.CR cs.AI
keywords agentsbrowsingattackcontentsecurityaccessacrossactionable
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Autonomous browsing agents powered by large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to automate web-based tasks. However, their reliance on dynamic content, tool execution, and user-provided data exposes them to a broad attack surface. This paper presents a comprehensive security evaluation of such agents, focusing on systemic vulnerabilities across multiple architectural layers. Our work outlines the first end-to-end threat model for browsing agents and provides actionable guidance for securing their deployment in real-world environments. To address discovered threats, we propose a defense in depth strategy incorporating input sanitization, planner executor isolation, formal analyzers, and session safeguards. These measures protect against both initial access and post exploitation attack vectors. Through a white box analysis of a popular open source project, Browser Use, we demonstrate how untrusted web content can hijack agent behavior and lead to critical security breaches. Our findings include prompt injection, domain validation bypass, and credential exfiltration, evidenced by a disclosed CVE and a working proof of concept exploit.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Throttling Web Agents Using Reasoning Gates

    cs.AI 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0

    Rebus-based reasoning gates, puzzles built from random word/domain clue sets, impose token costs on LM web agents that are up to 9.2x the generator's cost.

  2. A Whole New World: Creating a Parallel-Poisoned Web Only AI-Agents Can See

    cs.CR 2025-08 conditional novelty 4.0

    A website can identify AI agents by their digital fingerprints and serve them a poisoned hidden version of the page, hijacking their actions via indirect prompt injection.