Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Large Language Models are Not Stable Recommender Systems

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2312.15746 v1 pith:2NDAFSBB submitted 2023-12-25 cs.IR cs.AI

classification cs.IRcs.AI
keywords llmsrecommendationframeworklanguagerecommenderbayesianbiaslarge
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

With the significant successes of large language models (LLMs) in many natural language processing tasks, there is growing interest among researchers in exploring LLMs for novel recommender systems. However, we have observed that directly using LLMs as a recommender system is usually unstable due to its inherent position bias. To this end, we introduce exploratory research and find consistent patterns of positional bias in LLMs that influence the performance of recommendation across a range of scenarios. Then, we propose a Bayesian probabilistic framework, STELLA (Stable LLM for Recommendation), which involves a two-stage pipeline. During the first probing stage, we identify patterns in a transition matrix using a probing detection dataset. And in the second recommendation stage, a Bayesian strategy is employed to adjust the biased output of LLMs with an entropy indicator. Therefore, our framework can capitalize on existing pattern information to calibrate instability of LLMs, and enhance recommendation performance. Finally, extensive experiments clearly validate the effectiveness of our framework.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. LBR: Towards Mitigating Length Bias in Large Language Models for Recommendation

    cs.IR 2026-07 accept novelty 6.5 of 10

    LBR removes length bias in LLM recommenders via length-aware attention offsets and Trie-branching information-length normalization, improving accuracy and fairness with negligible cost.

  2. Augment or Not? A Comparative Study of Pure and Augmented Large Language Model Recommenders

    cs.IR 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A survey and benchmark of LLM recommenders finds that augmenting LLMs with non-LLM techniques (semantic IDs, collaborative signals) generally improves sequential recommendation accuracy on Amazon'23.

  3. LlamaRec-LKG-RAG: A Single-Pass, Learnable Knowledge Graph-RAG Framework for LLM-Based Ranking

    cs.IR 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A KG-enhanced LlamaRec that feeds user-specific relation paths into a Llama-2 ranker reports modest MRR, NDCG, and Recall gains on two benchmarks.

Pith tools