REVIEW 2 cited by
A First Look at GPT Apps: Landscape and Vulnerability
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Following OpenAI's introduction of GPTs, a surge in GPT apps has led to the launch of dedicated LLM app stores. Nevertheless, given its debut, there is a lack of sufficient understanding of this new ecosystem. To fill this gap, this paper presents a first comprehensive longitudinal (5-month) study of the evolution, landscape, and vulnerability of the emerging LLM app ecosystem, focusing on two GPT app stores: \textit{GPTStore.AI} and the official \textit{OpenAI GPT Store}. Specifically, we develop two automated tools and a TriLevel configuration extraction strategy to efficiently gather metadata (\ie names, creators, descriptions, \etc) and user feedback for all GPT apps across these two stores, as well as configurations (\ie system prompts, knowledge files, and APIs) for the top 10,000 popular apps. Our extensive analysis reveals: (1) the user enthusiasm for GPT apps consistently rises, whereas creator interest plateaus within three months of GPTs' launch; (2) nearly 90\% system prompts can be easily accessed due to widespread failure to secure GPT app configurations, leading to considerable plagiarism and duplication among apps. Our findings highlight the necessity of enhancing the LLM app ecosystem by the app stores, creators, and users.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
When GPT Spills the Tea: Comprehensive Assessment of Knowledge File Leakage in GPTs
A measurement of 651,022 GPTs identifies five knowledge-file leakage vectors, and the Code Interpreter tool enables direct download of original files in 95.95% of tested GPTs that enable it.
-
LaQual: An Automated Framework for LLM App Quality Evaluation
LaQual automates LLM app-store quality evaluation through scenario classification, static indicator filtering, and LLM-generated dynamic metrics, with Spearman correlations of about 0.6 against human ratings.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.