pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.20181 · v1 · pith:2QTR5KGHnew · submitted 2026-05-19 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el

Band Structure and topology of a periodically deformed Kitaev honeycomb model

Abdullah AlJishi , Ali AlSwaid , Moayad Ekhwan , Hocine Bahlouli , Raditya Weda Bomantara , Michael Vogl This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 03:14 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el
keywords Kitaev modelhoneycomb latticeperiodic deformationChern numberstopological transitionsband structuremagnetic fieldspin liquids
0
0 comments X

The pith

Periodic deformation and magnetic fields in the Kitaev honeycomb model produce multiple topological transitions with nontrivial Chern numbers.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper investigates the combined impact of periodic deformations resembling moiré patterns and an applied magnetic field on the Kitaev honeycomb spin-liquid model. It starts from a simplified solution of the undeformed model that extends directly to the deformed lattice with hexagonal symmetry. Deformation shrinks the Brillouin zone and opens new gaps at its edges. The magnetic field then drives repeated gap closings and reopenings that generate a sequence of topological phase changes distinguished by nontrivial Chern numbers, with implications for thermal Hall or Nernst responses.

Core claim

Under specific parameter conditions the magnetic field applied to the periodically deformed Kitaev model produces multiple band-gap closings and openings. Topological analysis of the resulting bands yields nontrivial Chern numbers together with a large number of topological transitions, indicating possible thermal Hall or Nernst-type responses and suggesting bulk measurement routes for the Chern numbers.

What carries the argument

Simplified solution of the undeformed Kitaev model extended to the hexagonally symmetric periodically deformed lattice, used to compute the band structure and Chern numbers after the magnetic field breaks time-reversal symmetry.

Load-bearing premise

The simplified solution obtained for the undeformed Kitaev model carries over to the periodically deformed case without extra approximations that would modify the band topology.

What would settle it

Explicit computation of the Chern numbers at parameter values where the magnetic field is predicted to close and reopen multiple gaps, checking whether those numbers are indeed nontrivial integers.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.20181 by Abdullah AlJishi, Ali AlSwaid, Hocine Bahlouli, Michael Vogl, Moayad Ekhwan, Raditya Weda Bomantara.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Lattice structure of the honeycomb Kitaev model. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The figure shows the Jordan-Wigner path that was [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Vector plot of the deformation field [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The result of deformation by applying [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The path for the Jordan-Wigner transform in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. The band structure of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. The high symmetry path used for the band structure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. The band structure of undeformed (but enlarged [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. The band structure of undeformed (but enlarged [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. The band structure of undeformed (but enlarged [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. The band structure of undeformed (but enlarged [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15. The Band structure of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: FIG. 17. In the top figure we show the Chern number for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: FIG. 19. Chern numbers 2 with the band gap between bands [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_19.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Motivated by the growing interest in spin liquids and topological phases, as well as the rise of deformation engineering, we study the combined effects of deformation and magnetic fields on the honeycomb Kitaev model. The Kitaev model, as one of the prototypical and exactly solvable spin liquid-hosting models, serves as a simple platform that demonstrates the rich physics one can expect at the intersection of deformation physics and quantum spin liquids. Our work builds on a simplified solution to the undeformed base model that we present. This simplified solution allows for a straightforward extension of our analysis to the deformed case. After incorporating periodic deformations into the Kitaev model (chosen for its similarity to moir\'e physics), we investigate the effects of a hexagonally symmetric deformation on the band structure. We find that deformation leads to a smaller Brillouin zone with new band gaps at the edges, indicating the potential for topological transitions. Finally, we introduce a magnetic field to break time-reversal symmetry and thereby allow for non-trivial topology. We find that, under specific parameter conditions, the magnetic field leads to multiple band-gap closings and openings. An investigation into topological properties reveals nontrivial Chern numbers and a plethora of topological transitions. Our results suggest possible thermal Hall or Nernst-type responses. We also suggest a potential bulk measurement approach for he Chern numbers and possible path to physical realization. Most importantly, our results serve as a demonstration of the rich phenomenology that can arise due to the interplay between deformation and spin-liquid physics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines the Kitaev honeycomb model under periodic hexagonal deformations combined with an external magnetic field. It first presents a simplified solution for the undeformed model and claims this permits a direct extension to the deformed case. The authors report that the deformation reduces the Brillouin zone, opens new gaps at zone edges, and that the magnetic field induces multiple gap closings and reopenings. Topological analysis yields nontrivial Chern numbers and a sequence of transitions; possible thermal Hall or Nernst responses and bulk measurement protocols are suggested.

Significance. If the extension of the simplified solution preserves exact solvability and the computed Chern numbers are free of uncontrolled approximations, the work illustrates how lattice deformations can enrich the topological phase diagram of a Kitaev spin liquid, offering a concrete platform for deformation-engineered topology analogous to moiré systems.

major comments (2)
  1. [§2 and §3] §2 (simplified solution) and §3 (extension to deformed model): The central claim that the simplified solution 'allows for a straightforward extension' to the periodically deformed Kitaev model is load-bearing for all subsequent band-structure and Chern-number results. Periodic deformation enlarges the unit cell, folds the Brillouin zone, and introduces position-dependent modulation of the three Kitaev couplings. The manuscript must explicitly demonstrate that the Majorana fermionization, exact diagonalization, and Berry-curvature integration remain valid without additional truncations or mean-field decouplings that could shift gap-closing loci or alter integrated Chern numbers. Absent this demonstration, the reported 'plethora of topological transitions' cannot be considered reliable.
  2. [§4] §4 (magnetic-field results): The statement that 'under specific parameter conditions' the field produces multiple gap closings is not accompanied by a systematic scan or error analysis of the deformation amplitude and field strength. Because these are the two free parameters identified in the model, the locations of the reported transitions and the associated Chern numbers must be shown to be robust rather than artifacts of post-hoc parameter selection.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract and introduction repeatedly use 'plethora of topological transitions' without quantifying the number or the precise parameter windows in which they occur.
  2. [§3] Notation for the modulated Kitaev couplings (e.g., J_x(r), J_y(r), J_z(r)) should be introduced once and used consistently; current usage mixes position-dependent and constant symbols.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address the major points below and will revise the manuscript to strengthen the presentation of the exact solvability and robustness of our results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: §2 and §3: The central claim that the simplified solution 'allows for a straightforward extension' to the periodically deformed Kitaev model is load-bearing for all subsequent band-structure and Chern-number results. Periodic deformation enlarges the unit cell, folds the Brillouin zone, and introduces position-dependent modulation of the three Kitaev couplings. The manuscript must explicitly demonstrate that the Majorana fermionization, exact diagonalization, and Berry-curvature integration remain valid without additional truncations or mean-field decouplings that could shift gap-closing loci or alter integrated Chern numbers.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this important observation. The simplified solution begins from the exact Majorana fermionization of the Kitaev Hamiltonian, which maps spins to free Majorana fermions without approximation. Periodic hexagonal deformation modulates the three bond couplings but preserves the quadratic (bilinear) structure in the Majorana operators; the enlarged supercell simply folds the Brillouin zone, after which the Hamiltonian is still diagonalized exactly by Fourier transform. Berry curvature is obtained by direct numerical integration over the reduced zone with no mean-field decoupling. We will add an explicit subsection in the revised manuscript that derives this extension step by step, confirms the absence of truncations, and verifies that gap-closing points and integrated Chern numbers are unaffected by any uncontrolled approximation. revision: yes

  2. Referee: §4: The statement that 'under specific parameter conditions' the field produces multiple gap closings is not accompanied by a systematic scan or error analysis of the deformation amplitude and field strength. Because these are the two free parameters identified in the model, the locations of the reported transitions and the associated Chern numbers must be shown to be robust rather than artifacts of post-hoc parameter selection.

    Authors: We agree that robustness must be demonstrated explicitly. The examples shown were chosen to illustrate the sequence of transitions; they are not claimed to be exhaustive. In the revised manuscript we will include a systematic parameter scan over deformation amplitude and magnetic-field strength, together with a phase diagram that tracks the gap-closing loci and the associated Chern numbers. We will also report numerical convergence checks and error estimates for the Berry-curvature integration to confirm that the reported transitions are not sensitive to the particular parameter choices. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected; derivation remains self-contained

full rationale

The paper introduces and presents its own simplified solution for the undeformed Kitaev model, then applies a direct extension to the periodically deformed case before adding a magnetic field term and computing band structures plus Chern numbers. All steps are internal to the current manuscript with no reduction of outputs to fitted parameters, self-referential definitions, or load-bearing prior self-citations that presuppose the final topological transitions. The reported gap closings and nontrivial Chern numbers emerge from explicit diagonalization and Berry curvature integration on the extended Hamiltonian rather than being equivalent to the inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the exact solvability of the base Kitaev model, the validity of the simplified solution when deformations are added, and standard band-theory assumptions for computing Chern numbers. No new particles or forces are postulated.

free parameters (2)
  • deformation amplitude
    Strength of the periodic deformation chosen to mimic moiré patterns; controls gap sizes and zone folding.
  • magnetic field strength
    Tuned to induce gap closings and reopenings; specific values determine the locations of topological transitions.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The Kitaev honeycomb model remains exactly solvable or approximately solvable after periodic deformation is introduced.
    Invoked when extending the simplified undeformed solution to the deformed lattice.
  • standard math Standard tight-binding or momentum-space diagonalization yields the correct band structure and Chern numbers for the deformed model.
    Used for the topological invariant calculations after magnetic field is added.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5824 in / 1447 out tokens · 29414 ms · 2026-05-20T03:14:02.506575+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    We start our discussion at the highest point in the gapped region

    We take the undeformed case as the reference for comparison. We start our discussion at the highest point in the gapped region. Our results are shown in Fig. 10: The band structure here is gapped around zero energy and remains so even after deformation, as expected for parameters deep in the gapped region of the phase dia- -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 FIG. 10. Th...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Anyons in an exactly solved model and beyond

    Alexei Kitaev. Anyons in an exactly solved model and beyond. Annals of Physics, 321(1):2–111, Jan 2006

    work page 2006

  3. [3]

    Quantum computation and shor’s factoring algorithm

    Artur Ekert and Richard Jozsa. Quantum computation and shor’s factoring algorithm. Rev. Mod. Phys., 68:733– 753, Jul 1996

    work page 1996

  4. [4]

    Daley, Immanuel Bloch, Christian Kokail, Stuart Flannigan, Natalie Pearson, Matthias Troyer, and Peter Zoller

    Andrew J. Daley, Immanuel Bloch, Christian Kokail, Stuart Flannigan, Natalie Pearson, Matthias Troyer, and Peter Zoller. Practical quantum advantage in quantum simulation, Jul 2022

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    Chong, Junyu Liu, Tianfan Fu, and Zhiding Liang

    Yidong Zhou, Jintai Chen, Jinglei Cheng, Xu Cao, Yuanyuan Zhang, Gopal Karemore, Marinka Zitnik, Frederic T. Chong, Junyu Liu, Tianfan Fu, and Zhiding Liang. Quantum-machine-assisted drug discovery. npj Drug Discovery, 3(1), January 2026

    work page 2026

  6. [6]

    Steiger, Thomas H¨ aner, Markus Reiher, and Matthias Troyer

    Hongbin Liu, Guang Hao Low, Damian S. Steiger, Thomas H¨ aner, Markus Reiher, and Matthias Troyer. Prospects of quantum computing for molecular sciences. Materials Theory, 6(1), March 2022

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    P.W. Shor. Algorithms for quantum computation: discrete logarithms and factoring. In Proceedings 35th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 124–134, 1994

    work page 1994

  8. [8]

    Cross, Jay M

    Sergey Bravyi, Andrew W. Cross, Jay M. Gambetta, Dmitri Maslov, Patrick Rall, and Theodore J. Yoder. High-threshold and low-overhead fault-tolerant quantum memory. Nature, 627(8005):778–782, Mar 2024

    work page 2024

  9. [9]

    McKay, Ian Hincks, Emily J

    David C. McKay, Ian Hincks, Emily J. Pritchett, Mal- colm Carroll, Luke C. G. Govia, and Seth T. Merkel. Benchmarking quantum processor performance at scale, 2023

    work page 2023

  10. [10]

    A. A. Houck, J. A. Schreier, B. R. Johnson, J. M. Chow, Jens Koch, J. M. Gambetta, D. I. Schuster, L. Frunzio, M. H. Devoret, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf. Con- trolling the spontaneous emission of a superconducting transmon qubit. Phys. Rev. Lett., 101:080502, Aug 2008

    work page 2008

  11. [11]

    Schacham, and Eliyahu Farber

    Yoav Koral, Shilo Avraham, Manimuthu Peryasamy, Shmuel E. Schacham, and Eliyahu Farber. Decoherence estimation of superconducting qubit, 2025

    work page 2025

  12. [12]

    Simon, Ady Stern, Michael Freedman, and Sankar Das Sarma

    Chetan Nayak, Steven H. Simon, Ady Stern, Michael Freedman, and Sankar Das Sarma. Non-abelian anyons and topological quantum computation. Reviews of Modern Physics, 80(3):1083–1159, September 2008

    work page 2008

  13. [13]

    Quantum mechanics of fractional-spin particles

    Frank Wilczek. Quantum mechanics of fractional-spin particles. Physical Review Letters, 49(14):957–959, Oct 1982

    work page 1982

  14. [14]

    Nakamura, S

    J. Nakamura, S. Liang, G. C. Gardner, and M. J. Manfra. Direct observation of anyonic braiding statistics. Nature Physics, 16(9):931–936, 2020

    work page 2020

  15. [15]

    Fiete, Victor Chua, Mehdi Kargarian, Rex Lundgren, Andreas R¨ uegg, Jun Wen, and Vladimir Zyuzin

    Gregory A. Fiete, Victor Chua, Mehdi Kargarian, Rex Lundgren, Andreas R¨ uegg, Jun Wen, and Vladimir Zyuzin. Topological insulators and quantum spin liquids. Physica E: Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures, 44(5):845–859, February 2012

    work page 2012

  16. [16]

    Helical liquids and majorana bound states in quantum wires

    Yuval Oreg, Gil Refael, and Felix von Oppen. Helical liquids and majorana bound states in quantum wires. Physical Review Letters, 105(17), October 2010

    work page 2010

  17. [17]

    Majorana fermions and quantum infor- mation with fractional topology and disorder, 2024

    Ephraim Bernhardt, Brian Chung Hang Cheung, and Karyn Le Hur. Majorana fermions and quantum infor- mation with fractional topology and disorder, 2024

    work page 2024

  18. [18]

    Unpaired majorana modes in the gapped phase of ki- taev’s honeycomb model

    Olga Petrova, Paula Mellado, and Oleg Tchernyshyov. Unpaired majorana modes in the gapped phase of ki- taev’s honeycomb model. Phys. Rev. B, 88:140405(R), Oct 2013. 12

    work page 2013

  19. [19]

    Wesley Roberts, Michael Vogl, and Gregory A. Fiete. Fidelity of the kitaev honeycomb model under a quench. Physical Review B, 109(22), June 2024

    work page 2024

  20. [20]

    Ashcroft and N.D

    N.W. Ashcroft and N.D. Mermin. Solid State Physics. HRW international editions. Holt, Rinehart and Win- ston, 1976

    work page 1976

  21. [21]

    Relaxation and its effects on electronic structure in twisted systems: An analytical perspective, 09 2025

    Junxi Yu and Bingbing Wang. Relaxation and its effects on electronic structure in twisted systems: An analytical perspective, 09 2025

    work page 2025

  22. [22]

    MacDonald, and Dmitri K

    Xiaobo Lu, Petr Stepanov, Wei Yang, Ming Xie, Mo- hammed Ali Aamir, Ipsita Das, Carles Urgell, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Guangyu Zhang, Adrian Bachtold, Allan H. MacDonald, and Dmitri K. Efe- tov. Superconductors, orbital magnets and corre- lated states in magic-angle bilayer graphene. Nature, 574(7780):653–657, October 2019

    work page 2019

  23. [23]

    Unconventional superconductivity in magic- angle graphene superlattices

    Yuan Cao, Valla Fatemi, Shiang Fang, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Efthimios Kaxiras, and Pablo Jarillo- Herrero. Unconventional superconductivity in magic- angle graphene superlattices. Nature, 556(7699):43–50, March 2018

    work page 2018

  24. [24]

    Signatures of fractional quantum anomalous hall states in twisted mote2

    Jiaqi Cai, Eric Anderson, Chong Wang, Xiaowei Zhang, Xiaoyu Liu, William Holtzmann, Yinong Zhang, Fen- gren Fan, Takashi Taniguchi, Kenji Watanabe, Ying Ran, Ting Cao, Liang Fu, Di Xiao, Wang Yao, and Xiaodong Xu. Signatures of fractional quantum anomalous hall states in twisted mote2. Nature, 622(7981):63–68, June 2023

    work page 2023

  25. [25]

    Guinea, M

    F. Guinea, M. I. Katsnelson, and A. K. Geim. Energy gaps and a zero-field quantum hall effect in graphene by strain engineering. Nature Physics, 6(1):30–33, Jan 2010

    work page 2010

  26. [26]

    Vozmediano, M.I

    M.A.H. Vozmediano, M.I. Katsnelson, and F. Guinea. Gauge fields in graphene. Physics Reports, 496(4):109– 148, 2010

    work page 2010

  27. [27]

    Effects of strain on electronic properties of graphene

    Seon-Myeong Choi, Seung-Hoon Jhi, and Young-Woo Son. Effects of strain on electronic properties of graphene. Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, 81(8):081407, 2010

    work page 2010

  28. [28]

    Strain engineering of graphene: a review

    Chen Si, Zhimei Sun, and Feng Liu. Strain engineering of graphene: a review. Nanoscale, 8(6):3207–3217, 2016

    work page 2016

  29. [29]

    Nedell, Jonah Spector, Adel Abbout, Michael Vogl, and Gregory A

    Jack G. Nedell, Jonah Spector, Adel Abbout, Michael Vogl, and Gregory A. Fiete. Deep learning of deformation-dependent conductance in thin films: Nanobubbles in graphene. Phys. Rev. B, 105:075425, Feb 2022

    work page 2022

  30. [30]

    Pseudo electric field and pumping valley current in graphene nanobub- bles

    Naif Hadadi, Adel Belayadi, Ahmed AlRabiah, Ousmane Ly, Collins Ashu Akosa, Michael Vogl, Hocine Bahlouli, Aurelien Manchon, and Adel Abbout. Pseudo electric field and pumping valley current in graphene nanobub- bles. Phys. Rev. B, 108:195418, Nov 2023

    work page 2023

  31. [31]

    Strain tun- ing of highly frustrated magnets: Order and disorder in the distorted kagome heisenberg antiferromagnet

    Mary Madelynn Nayga and Matthias Vojta. Strain tun- ing of highly frustrated magnets: Order and disorder in the distorted kagome heisenberg antiferromagnet. Phys. Rev. B, 105:094426, Mar 2022

    work page 2022

  32. [32]

    Magnon landau levels and emergent supersym- metry in strained antiferromagnets

    Mary Madelynn Nayga, Stephan Rachel, and Matthias Vojta. Magnon landau levels and emergent supersym- metry in strained antiferromagnets. Phys. Rev. Lett., 123:207204, Nov 2019

    work page 2019

  33. [33]

    Strain- engineering of magnetic coupling in two-dimensional magnetic semiconductor crsite3: Competition of di- rect exchange interaction and superexchange interaction

    Xiaofang Chen, Jingshan Qi, and Daning Shi. Strain- engineering of magnetic coupling in two-dimensional magnetic semiconductor crsite3: Competition of di- rect exchange interaction and superexchange interaction. Physics Letters A, 379(1):60–63, 2015

    work page 2015

  34. [34]

    Strain-tunable magnetic anisotropy in monolayer crcl3, crbr3, and cri3

    Lucas Webster and Jia-An Yan. Strain-tunable magnetic anisotropy in monolayer crcl3, crbr3, and cri3. Phys. Rev. B, 98:144411, Oct 2018

    work page 2018

  35. [35]

    Landau levels of majorana fermions in a spin liquid

    Stephan Rachel, Lars Fritz, and Matthias Vojta. Landau levels of majorana fermions in a spin liquid. Phys. Rev. Lett., 116:167201, Apr 2016

    work page 2016

  36. [36]

    Gapless state of interact- ing majorana fermions in a strain-induced landau level

    Adhip Agarwala, Subhro Bhattacharjee, Johannes Knolle, and Roderich Moessner. Gapless state of interact- ing majorana fermions in a strain-induced landau level. Phys. Rev. B, 103:134427, Apr 2021

    work page 2021

  37. [37]

    Seebeck and anomalous nernst effects in chern insulator nicl3 monolayer

    Edi Suprayoga. Seebeck and anomalous nernst effects in chern insulator nicl3 monolayer. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 3034(1):012005, jul 2025

    work page 2025

  38. [38]

    Han-Dong Chen and Zohar Nussinov. Exact results of the kitaev model on a hexagonal lattice: spin states, string and brane correlators, and anyonic excitations.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 41(7):075001, February 2008

    work page 2008

  39. [39]

    MacDonald

    Rafi Bistritzer and Allan H. MacDonald. Moir´ e bands in twisted double-layer graphene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(30):12233–12237, July 2011

    work page 2011

  40. [40]

    Interaction- induced moir´ e systems in twisted bilayer optical lattices

    Jian-Hua Zeng, Qizhong Zhu, and Liang He. Interaction- induced moir´ e systems in twisted bilayer optical lattices. Physical Review A, 111(6), June 2025

    work page 2025

  41. [41]

    Strain tuning of highly frustrated magnets: Order and disor- der in the distorted kagome heisenberg antiferromagnet

    Mary Madelynn Nayga and Matthias Vojta. Strain tuning of highly frustrated magnets: Order and disor- der in the distorted kagome heisenberg antiferromagnet. Physical Review B, 105(9), March 2022

    work page 2022

  42. [42]

    Ferromagnetism in the hubbard model on line graphs and further considerations

    A Mielke. Ferromagnetism in the hubbard model on line graphs and further considerations. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 24(14):3311, jul 1991

    work page 1991

  43. [43]

    Wakefield, Mingu Kang, Paul M

    Joshua P. Wakefield, Mingu Kang, Paul M. Neves, Dongjin Oh, Shiang Fang, Ryan McTigue, S. Y. Frank Zhao, Tej N. Lamichhane, Alan Chen, Seongy- ong Lee, Sudong Park, Jae-Hoon Park, Chris Jozwiak, Aaron Bostwick, Eli Rotenberg, Anil Rajapitamahuni, Elio Vescovo, Jessica L. McChesney, David Graf, Jo- hanna C. Palmstrom, Takehito Suzuki, Mingda Li, Riccardo C...

    work page 2023

  44. [44]

    Nur ¨Unal, Nick Fl¨ aschner, Benno S

    Matthias Tarnowski, F. Nur ¨Unal, Nick Fl¨ aschner, Benno S. Rem, Andr´ e Eckardt, Klaus Sengstock, and Christof Weitenberg. Measuring topology from dynamics by obtaining the chern number from a linking number. Nature Communications, 10(1), Apr 2019

    work page 2019

  45. [45]

    Chern numbers in discretized brillouin zone: Efficient method of computing (spin) hall conductances, Apr 2005

    Takahiro Fukui, Yasuhiro Hatsugai, and Hiroshi Suzuki. Chern numbers in discretized brillouin zone: Efficient method of computing (spin) hall conductances, Apr 2005

    work page 2005

  46. [46]

    D. J. Thouless, M. Kohmoto, M. P. Nightingale, and M. den Nijs. Quantized hall conductance in a two- dimensional periodic potential. Phys. Rev. Lett., 49:405– 408, Aug 1982

    work page 1982

  47. [47]

    Topological invariant and the quan- tization of the hall conductance

    Mahito Kohmoto. Topological invariant and the quan- tization of the hall conductance. Annals of Physics, 160(2):343–354, 1985

    work page 1985

  48. [48]

    Thermal transport in the kitaev model

    Joji Nasu, Junki Yoshitake, and Yukitoshi Motome. Thermal transport in the kitaev model. Phys. Rev. Lett., 119:127204, Sep 2017

    work page 2017

  49. [49]

    Hosho Katsura, Naoto Nagaosa, and Patrick A. Lee. The- ory of the thermal hall effect in quantum magnets. Phys. Rev. Lett., 104:066403, Feb 2010. 13

    work page 2010

  50. [50]

    Kivelson

    Hong Yao and Steven A. Kivelson. Exact chiral spin liquid with non-abelian anyons. Phys. Rev. Lett., 99:247203, Dec 2007

    work page 2007

  51. [51]

    D. J. Thouless. Quantization of particle transport. Phys. Rev. B, 27:6083–6087, May 1983

    work page 1983

  52. [52]

    Aidelsburger, M

    M. Aidelsburger, M. Lohse, C. Schweizer, M. Atala, J. T. Barreiro, S. Nascimb` ene, N. R. Cooper, I. Bloch, and N. Goldman. Measuring the chern number of hofstadter bands with ultracold bosonic atoms. Nature Physics, 11(2):162–166, Feb 2015

    work page 2015

  53. [53]

    Ma˜ nes, and Mar´ ıa A

    Fernando de Juan, Juan L. Ma˜ nes, and Mar´ ıa A. H. Voz- mediano. Gauge fields from strain in graphene. Phys. Rev. B, 87:165131, Apr 2013

    work page 2013

  54. [54]

    Quan- tum transport spectroscopy of pseudomagnetic field in graphene

    Divya Sahani, Sunit Das, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Amit Agarwal, and Aveek Bid. Quan- tum transport spectroscopy of pseudomagnetic field in graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett., 136:166604, Apr 2026

    work page 2026

  55. [55]

    Strain-induced pseudo magnetic field in theα−T 3 lattice

    Junsong Sun, Tianyu Liu, Yi Du, and Huaiming Guo. Strain-induced pseudo magnetic field in theα−T 3 lattice. Phys. Rev. B, 106:155417, Oct 2022

    work page 2022

  56. [56]

    Light-induced control of magnetic phases in kitaev quantum magnets

    Adithya Sriram and Martin Claassen. Light-induced control of magnetic phases in kitaev quantum magnets. Physical Review Research, 4(3), 2022

    work page 2022

  57. [57]

    Optical detection of bond-dependent and frustrated spin in the two-dimensional cobalt-based honeycomb antifer- romagnet cu3co2sbo6

    Baekjune Kang, Uksam Choi, Taek Sun Jung, Se- unghyeon Noh, Gye-Hyeon Kim, Uihyeon Seo, Miju Park, Jin-Hyun Choi, Min Jae Kim, GwangCheol Ji, and et al. Optical detection of bond-dependent and frustrated spin in the two-dimensional cobalt-based honeycomb antifer- romagnet cu3co2sbo6. Nature Communications, 16(1), Feb 2025. Appendix A: Mathematical detail ...

    work page 2025