REVIEW 2 cited by
Detecting AI-Generated Text: Factors Influencing Detectability with Current Methods
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have advanced to a point that even humans have difficulty discerning whether a text was generated by another human, or by a computer. However, knowing whether a text was produced by human or artificial intelligence (AI) is important to determining its trustworthiness, and has applications in many domains including detecting fraud and academic dishonesty, as well as combating the spread of misinformation and political propaganda. The task of AI-generated text (AIGT) detection is therefore both very challenging, and highly critical. In this survey, we summarize state-of-the art approaches to AIGT detection, including watermarking, statistical and stylistic analysis, and machine learning classification. We also provide information about existing datasets for this task. Synthesizing the research findings, we aim to provide insight into the salient factors that combine to determine how "detectable" AIGT text is under different scenarios, and to make practical recommendations for future work towards this significant technical and societal challenge.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
A Practical Examination of AI-Generated Text Detectors for Large Language Models
Under a 1% false-positive budget, seven AI-text detectors miss most machine-written text on unseen tasks and languages, and rewriting human text further evades them.
-
Exploring AI Text Generation, Retrieval-Augmented Generation, and Detection Technologies: a Comprehensive Overview
A descriptive review of AI text generation, RAG, and AI text detection tools, based on cited literature and vendor descriptions, with ethical discussion.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.