The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2101.11043 · v1 · pith:2VFNWEJE · submitted 2021-01-26 · cs.CL

Deep Subjecthood: Higher-Order Grammatical Features in Multilingual BERT

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:2VFNWEJErecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cs.CL
keywords alignmentlanguagessubjecthoodembeddingfeaturesgrammaticalmbertmorphosyntactic
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We investigate how Multilingual BERT (mBERT) encodes grammar by examining how the high-order grammatical feature of morphosyntactic alignment (how different languages define what counts as a "subject") is manifested across the embedding spaces of different languages. To understand if and how morphosyntactic alignment affects contextual embedding spaces, we train classifiers to recover the subjecthood of mBERT embeddings in transitive sentences (which do not contain overt information about morphosyntactic alignment) and then evaluate them zero-shot on intransitive sentences (where subjecthood classification depends on alignment), within and across languages. We find that the resulting classifier distributions reflect the morphosyntactic alignment of their training languages. Our results demonstrate that mBERT representations are influenced by high-level grammatical features that are not manifested in any one input sentence, and that this is robust across languages. Further examining the characteristics that our classifiers rely on, we find that features such as passive voice, animacy and case strongly correlate with classification decisions, suggesting that mBERT does not encode subjecthood purely syntactically, but that subjecthood embedding is continuous and dependent on semantic and discourse factors, as is proposed in much of the functional linguistics literature. Together, these results provide insight into how grammatical features manifest in contextual embedding spaces, at a level of abstraction not covered by previous work.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. When transformers learn "impossible" languages, what do they learn?

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Transformers on impossible-language variants show gradual grammatical sensitivity loss but sharp long-sentence generation failures, supporting generative deficiency as a link to non-attestation.

  2. Different types of syntactic agreement recruit the same units within large language models

    cs.CL 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Different types of syntactic agreement recruit overlapping units within LLMs, indicating that agreement forms a meaningful functional category across English, Russian, Chinese, and structurally similar languages.