pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.15385 · v1 · pith:2VGKWM5Gnew · submitted 2026-05-14 · 🪐 quant-ph · physics.optics

Single Spatio-Temporal Mode Bright Twin-Beam Source Across the Near- and Mid-Infrared

Gabriel Demontigny , Patrick Cusson , Amauri Perraton Elorza , Esteban Murillo Zapata , Eli Martel , Andrei Rasputnyi , Maria Chekhova , St\'ephane Virally
show 1 more author
Denis Seletskiy
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 15:29 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph physics.optics
keywords parametric down-conversiontwin-beam sourceentangled photonsSchmidt numbermid-infraredsingle-mode operationquantum metrologynon-degenerate PDC
0
0 comments X p. Extension
pith:2VGKWM5G Add to your LaTeX paper What is a Pith Number? 
\usepackage{pith}
\pithnumber{2VGKWM5G}

Prints a linked pith:2VGKWM5G badge after your title and writes the identifier into PDF metadata. Compiles on arXiv with no extra files. Learn more

The pith

A bright entangled twin-beam source maintains nearly single spatio-temporal mode operation from near- to mid-infrared while directing 95-97 percent of its entanglement resource into occupational degrees of freedom.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces an ultrafast parametric down-conversion source in periodically poled lithium niobate that produces bright photon pairs at a megahertz repetition rate. Adjusting the duration of the pump pulse continuously tunes the Schmidt number to values near 1.05, keeping the output close to a single spatio-temporal mode across a wide brightness range. Measurements of second-order correlation and singular-value decomposition of the spectral density confirm this near-single-mode character, while the strong non-degeneracy places the mid-infrared idler at 4 micrometers and the near-infrared signal at 1.37 micrometers. In this bright few-mode regime the authors show that entanglement separates cleanly between modal and occupational degrees of freedom, with the source allocating the large majority of the resource to the occupational sector.

Core claim

The source realizes type-0 parametric down-conversion with a tunable pump pulse duration that sets the temporal gain window relative to the phase-matching bandwidth, yielding a continuously tunable Schmidt number K approximately 1.03 to 1.05 maintained over multiple orders of magnitude in brightness; in the resulting bright few-mode limit the total entanglement resource separates between modal and occupational degrees of freedom, with up to 95-97 percent allocated to the occupational sector.

What carries the argument

The group-delay dispersion of the pump pulse, which controls the temporal gain window relative to the inverse phase-matching bandwidth and thereby sets the Schmidt number of the down-converted fields.

If this is right

  • The source supplies a practical platform for quantum-enhanced metrology and nonlinear interferometry that uses the mid-infrared idler while detecting in the near-infrared.
  • Molecular vibrational resonances in the 4-micrometer band become accessible for quantum spectroscopic sensing without requiring mid-infrared detectors.
  • The clean separation of entanglement into modal and occupational sectors allows the occupational resource to be used efficiently even when the source is operated at high brightness.
  • Continuous tuning of the Schmidt number from single-mode to controlled multimode operation provides a testbed for studying how mode structure affects entanglement distribution.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The demonstrated separation of entanglement resources could be exploited to optimize photon-number squeezing independently of spatial or temporal mode content in quantum sensing protocols.
  • Extending the pump-tuning range might allow the source to be matched to specific molecular absorption lines while preserving near-single-mode character.
  • The non-degenerate design suggests that similar architectures could be adapted to other wavelength pairs where one band overlaps with a target resonance and the other enables efficient detection.

Load-bearing premise

The measured g^(2)(0) values and singular-value decomposition of the signal spectral density matrix accurately reflect the true Schmidt number without significant undetected modes, spatial filtering, or calibration errors in the non-degenerate wavelength setup.

What would settle it

An independent measurement of the full spatio-temporal mode occupancy, for example through higher-order correlation functions or direct imaging of the joint spectral amplitude, that returns a Schmidt number substantially larger than 1.05 at the reported brightness levels.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.15385 by Amauri Perraton Elorza, Andrei Rasputnyi, Denis Seletskiy, Eli Martel, Esteban Murillo Zapata, Gabriel Demontigny, Maria Chekhova, Patrick Cusson, St\'ephane Virally.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Generation of ultrafast bright entangled twin-beams. a) Experimental setup. A pump beam (1026 nm, 260 fs, 5 µJ) is attenuated with a neutral density filter (ND1) and focused into a periodically-poled Lithium Niobate (PPLN) crystal of 2-mm length with a 27.91 µm poling period, using a lens (L1) with 250 mm focal length. A mirror (M1) reflects the beam back into the crystal for additional nonlinear interacti… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: a) Signal photon number probability density histogram for 2 981 607 recorded events. An average of ⟨NS ⟩ = 1.296 × 108 photons per pulse with a standard deviation of σNS = 1.265 × 108 photons was measured, giving a parametric gain of G ≃ 10.3, Such values give a g (2) (0) value of 1.95 ± 0.03, close to the expected g (2) (0) = 2 for a single-mode thermal state. From this value, a number of spatio-temporal … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Temporal mode extraction by singular value decompo￾sition on the reduced spectral density matrix of the signal at high-gain. First and second (×10) intensity Schmidt modes of the signal. The decomposition yields the Schmidt number KHG = 1.034 ± 0.002. Inset: reduced spectral density matrix of the signal, displaying near-perfect symmetry, as expected for a single-spatio-temporal mode light. sented in [PITH… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Temporal-mode control by the pump mode (a) Effect of pump temporal extent on mode purity. Pictorial representation of the vacuum fluctuations available for amplification by SPDC, dictated by the phase matching bandwidth (∆ωPM) of the nonlinear medium used. For proper single-mode amplification, the pump duration has to be similar to the inverse of ∆ωPM. If the pump temporal extent is increased beyond that c… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We introduce an ultrafast, bright, entangled twin-beam source generated by type-0 parametric down-conversion in periodically-poled lithium niobate at MHz repetition rate, with continuously tunable Schmidt number $K$ set by the pump pulse duration. Photon-number statistics characterization via $g^{(2)}(0)$ and singular-value decomposition of the signal spectral density matrix yield $K\simeq1.05$ and $K\simeq1.03$, respectively, maintained over multiple orders of magnitude in brightness. Group-delay dispersion of the pump drives a continuous transition from single-mode operation to a controlled multimode regime, consistent with the temporal gain window departing from the inverse phase-matching bandwidth. Strong non-degeneracy of the source (signal at 1.37 um, idler at 4.0 um, $\sim 100$ fs duration) decouples a mid-infrared interaction wavelength, which overlaps with molecular vibrational resonances, from a near-infrared detection band, establishing a practical platform for quantum-enhanced metrology, nonlinear interferometry, and mid-infrared spectroscopic sensing. We show that in the bright few-mode limit, the total entanglement resource is clearly separated between modal and occupational degrees of freedom, and that our source allocates up to 95-97% of that resource to the occupational sector.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces an ultrafast bright entangled twin-beam source generated by type-0 parametric down-conversion in periodically poled lithium niobate at MHz repetition rates. The Schmidt number K is continuously tunable via pump pulse duration, with characterizations via g^{(2)}(0) and singular-value decomposition of the signal spectral density matrix both yielding K ≃ 1.03–1.05 that remains stable over multiple orders of magnitude in brightness. The source is strongly non-degenerate (signal at 1.37 μm, idler at 4.0 μm) and the authors claim that, in the bright few-mode limit, up to 95–97 % of the total entanglement resource is allocated to the occupational sector rather than the modal sector.

Significance. If the reported K values accurately reflect the true modal content, the work supplies a practical, bright, tunable single spatio-temporal mode source that decouples mid-infrared interaction wavelengths from near-infrared detection. The explicit separation of modal and occupational entanglement resources and the high occupational fraction constitute a clear advance for quantum-enhanced metrology, nonlinear interferometry, and mid-IR sensing applications.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The central quantitative claims rest on K ≃ 1.05 (from g^{(2)}(0)) and K ≃ 1.03 (from SVD) being free of significant undetected modes. In the non-degenerate geometry (signal 1.37 μm, idler 4.0 μm) incomplete spatial filtering, mid-IR collection losses, or dispersion-induced mismatch could admit additional modes that would inflate the effective Schmidt number and directly reduce the reported 95–97 % occupational allocation. No error bars, raw histograms, or explicit upper bounds on undetected contributions are provided, leaving the load-bearing assumption unverified.
minor comments (2)
  1. The manuscript would benefit from a brief explicit derivation or formula showing how the 95–97 % occupational fraction is obtained from the measured K values.
  2. Figure captions and axis labels should clarify whether the reported brightness range is in mean photon number per pulse or detected counts, and whether any correction for detection efficiency has been applied.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the work and for the constructive comment on the abstract. We address the concern point by point below and will revise the manuscript to strengthen the presentation of the modal-purity evidence.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central quantitative claims rest on K ≃ 1.05 (from g^{(2)}(0)) and K ≃ 1.03 (from SVD) being free of significant undetected modes. In the non-degenerate geometry (signal 1.37 μm, idler 4.0 μm) incomplete spatial filtering, mid-IR collection losses, or dispersion-induced mismatch could admit additional modes that would inflate the effective Schmidt number and directly reduce the reported 95–97 % occupational allocation. No error bars, raw histograms, or explicit upper bounds on undetected contributions are provided, leaving the load-bearing assumption unverified.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract would benefit from explicit quantification of uncertainties and bounds. The full manuscript already describes the spatial filtering applied to the signal arm at 1.37 μm and the mid-IR collection optics and dispersion management for the 4.0 μm idler. The close numerical agreement between the two independent determinations of K (g^{(2)}(0) and SVD of the signal spectral density matrix) constitutes an internal consistency check: any substantial undetected modal content would be expected to produce a measurable discrepancy between these methods. Nevertheless, to directly address the referee’s concern we will add error bars to all reported K values, include representative raw coincidence histograms in the supplementary material, and provide a quantitative upper bound on undetected-mode contributions derived from measured collection efficiencies and group-delay dispersion. These revisions will be incorporated in the next version of the manuscript. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: K from independent measurements, occupational allocation follows from definition

full rationale

The paper obtains Schmidt number K ≃ 1.03–1.05 directly from two independent experimental observables—g^{(2)}(0) photon-number statistics and singular-value decomposition of the measured signal spectral density matrix—then uses the closeness of K to unity to quantify the fractional split of entanglement resource between modal and occupational sectors in the bright few-mode limit. This split is a direct algebraic consequence of the standard multimode twin-beam entanglement decomposition once K is given; it does not redefine K in terms of the claimed percentage, fit a parameter to the target quantity, or rest on a self-citation chain. The derivation therefore remains self-contained against the reported data and contains no load-bearing circular step.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work is primarily experimental and relies on standard nonlinear optics without introducing new free parameters, axioms beyond domain conventions, or invented entities.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Type-0 phase-matching in periodically poled lithium niobate produces efficient parametric down-conversion with the stated non-degeneracy
    Invoked to generate the twin-beam source at the reported wavelengths and repetition rate.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5805 in / 1422 out tokens · 77571 ms · 2026-05-19T15:29:00.389417+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Hyper-entangled states,

    P . G. Kwiat, “Hyper-entangled states,” J. Mod. Opt.44, 2173–2184 (1997)

    work page 1997

  2. [2]

    Bright squeezed vacuum: Entanglement of macroscopic light beams,

    M. Chekhova, G. Leuchs, and M. ˙Zukowski, “Bright squeezed vacuum: Entanglement of macroscopic light beams,” Opt. Commun.337, 27–43 (2015)

    work page 2015

  3. [3]

    Raman-free, noble-gas- filled photonic-crystal fiber source for ultrafast, very bright twin-beam squeezed vacuum,

    M. A. Finger, T. S. Iskhakov, N. Y . Joly,et al., “Raman-free, noble-gas- filled photonic-crystal fiber source for ultrafast, very bright twin-beam squeezed vacuum,” Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 143602 (2015)

    work page 2015

  4. [4]

    Heralded source of bright multi-mode mesoscopic sub-poissonian light,

    T. S. Iskhakov, V. C. Usenko, U. L. Andersen,et al., “Heralded source of bright multi-mode mesoscopic sub-poissonian light,” Opt. Lett.41, 2149–2152 (2016)

    work page 2016

  5. [5]

    Spectral properties of high-gain parametric down-conversion,

    K. Y . Spasibko, T. S. Iskhakov, and M. V. Chekhova, “Spectral properties of high-gain parametric down-conversion,” Opt. Express20, 7507–7515 (2012)

    work page 2012

  6. [6]

    Pump depletion in parametric down-conversion with low pump energies,

    J. Flórez, J. S. Lundeen, and M. V. Chekhova, “Pump depletion in parametric down-conversion with low pump energies,” Opt. Lett.45, 4264–4267 (2020)

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    Properties of bright squeezed vacuum at increasing brightness,

    P . R. Sharapova, G. Frascella, M. Riabinin,et al., “Properties of bright squeezed vacuum at increasing brightness,” Phys. Rev. Res.2, 013371 (2020)

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    Beyond photon pairs—nonlinear quantum photonics in the high-gain regime: a tutorial,

    N. Quesada, L. G. Helt, M. Menotti,et al., “Beyond photon pairs—nonlinear quantum photonics in the high-gain regime: a tutorial,” Adv. Opt. Photonics14, 291 (2022)

    work page 2022

  9. [9]

    Continuous Frequency Entanglement: Effective Finite Hilbert Space and Entropy Control,

    C. K. Law, I. A. Walmsley, and J. H. Eberly, “Continuous Frequency Entanglement: Effective Finite Hilbert Space and Entropy Control,” Phys. Rev. Lett.84, 5304–5307 (2000)

    work page 2000

  10. [10]

    Analysis and interpretation of high trans- verse entanglement in optical parametric down conversion,

    C. K. Law and J. H. Eberly, “Analysis and interpretation of high trans- verse entanglement in optical parametric down conversion,” Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 127903 (2004)

    work page 2004

  11. [11]

    Quantum information with continu- ous variables,

    S. L. Braunstein and P . van Loock, “Quantum information with continu- ous variables,” Rev. Mod. Phys.77, 513–577 (2005)

    work page 2005

  12. [12]

    SU(2) and SU(1,1) interfer- ometers,

    B. Yurke, S. L. McCall, and J. R. Klauder, “SU(2) and SU(1,1) interfer- ometers,” Phys. Rev. A33, 4033–4054 (1986)

    work page 1986

  13. [13]

    Quantum SU(1,1) interferometers: Basic principles and applications,

    Z. Y . Ou and X. Li, “Quantum SU(1,1) interferometers: Basic principles and applications,” APL Photonics5, 080902 (2020)

    work page 2020

  14. [14]

    Quantum imaging with undetected photons,

    G. B. Lemos, V. Borish, G. D. Cole,et al., “Quantum imaging with undetected photons,” Nature512, 409–412 (2014)

    work page 2014

  15. [15]

    Enhanced Electro-optic Sampling with Quantum Probes,

    S. Virally, P . Cusson, and D. V. Seletskiy, “Enhanced Electro-optic Sampling with Quantum Probes,” Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 270504 (2021)

    work page 2021

  16. [16]

    Multiphoton effects enhanced due to ultrafast photon-number fluctuations,

    K. Y . Spasibko, D. A. Kopylov, V. L. Krutyanskiy,et al., “Multiphoton effects enhanced due to ultrafast photon-number fluctuations,” Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 223603 (2017)

    work page 2017

  17. [17]

    High-harmonic generation by a bright squeezed vacuum,

    A. Rasputnyi, Z. Chen, M. Birk,et al., “High-harmonic generation by a bright squeezed vacuum,” Nat. Phys.20, 1960–1965 (2024)

    work page 1960

  18. [18]

    Photon bunching in high-harmonic emission controlled by quantum light,

    S. Lemieux, S. A. Jalil, D. N. Purschke,et al., “Photon bunching in high-harmonic emission controlled by quantum light,” Nat. Photonics (2025)

    work page 2025

  19. [19]

    Multiphoton electron emission with non-classical light,

    J. Heimerl, A. Mikhaylov, S. Meier,et al., “Multiphoton electron emission with non-classical light,” Nat. Phys.20, 945–950 (2024)

    work page 2024

  20. [20]

    Quantum light drives elec- trons strongly at metal needle tips,

    J. Heimerl, A. Rasputnyi, J. Pölloth,et al., “Quantum light drives elec- trons strongly at metal needle tips,” Nat. Phys. (2025)

    work page 2025

  21. [21]

    High-harmonic generation driven by quantum light,

    A. Gorlach, M. Even Tzur, M. Birk,et al., “High-harmonic generation driven by quantum light,” Nat. Phys.19, 1689–1696 (2023)

    work page 2023

  22. [22]

    Photon-statistics force in ultrafast electron dynamics,

    M. Even Tzur, M. Birk, A. Gorlach,et al., “Photon-statistics force in ultrafast electron dynamics,” Nat. Photonics17, 501–509 (2023)

    work page 2023

  23. [23]

    Generation of squeezed high-order harmonics,

    M. Even Tzur, M. Birk, A. Gorlach,et al., “Generation of squeezed high-order harmonics,” Phys. Rev. Res.6, 033079 (2024)

    work page 2024

  24. [24]

    Motion of charged particles in bright squeezed vacuum,

    M. Even Tzur and O. Cohen, “Motion of charged particles in bright squeezed vacuum,” Light Sci. Appl.13, 41 (2024)

    work page 2024

  25. [25]

    Evidence of the quantum optical nature of high-harmonic generation,

    D. Theidel, V. Cotte, R. Sondenheimer,et al., “Evidence of the quantum optical nature of high-harmonic generation,” PRX Quantum5, 040319 (2024)

    work page 2024

  26. [26]

    Entanglement and squeezing of the optical field modes in high harmonic generation,

    P . Stammer, J. Rivera-Dean, A. S. Maxwell,et al., “Entanglement and squeezing of the optical field modes in high harmonic generation,” Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 143603 (2024)

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    Attosecond-resolved quantum fluctuations of light and matter,

    M. Even Tzur, C. Mor, N. Y affe,et al., “Attosecond-resolved quantum fluctuations of light and matter,” arXiv:2511.18362 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    Lossy SU(1,1) interfer- ometers in the single-photon-pair regime,

    M. Santandrea, K.-H. Luo, M. Stefszky,et al., “Lossy SU(1,1) interfer- ometers in the single-photon-pair regime,” Quantum Sci. Technol.8, 025020 (2023)

    work page 2023

  29. [29]

    Infrared spectroscopy with visible light,

    D. A. Kalashnikov, A. V. Paterova, S. P . Kulik, and L. A. Krivitsky, “Infrared spectroscopy with visible light,” Nat. Photonics10, 98–101 (2016)

    work page 2016

  30. [30]

    Nonlinear interferometers in quantum optics,

    M. V. Chekhova and Z. Y . Ou, “Nonlinear interferometers in quantum optics,” Adv. Opt. Photon.8, 104–155 (2016)

    work page 2016

  31. [31]

    Direct sampling of electric-field vacuum fluctuations,

    C. Riek, D. V. Seletskiy, A. S. Moskalenko,et al., “Direct sampling of electric-field vacuum fluctuations,” Science350, 420–423 (2015)

    work page 2015

  32. [32]

    Paraxial Theory of Direct Electro-optic Sampling of the Quantum Vacuum,

    A. Moskalenko, C. Riek, D. Seletskiy,et al., “Paraxial Theory of Direct Electro-optic Sampling of the Quantum Vacuum,” Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 263601 (2015)

    work page 2015

  33. [33]

    Photon Tempo- ral Modes: A Complete Framework for Quantum Information Science,

    B. Brecht, D. V. Reddy, C. Silberhorn, and M. Raymer, “Photon Tempo- ral Modes: A Complete Framework for Quantum Information Science,” Phys. Rev. X5, 041017 (2015)

    work page 2015

  34. [34]

    Temporal modes in quantum optics: then and now,

    M. G. Raymer and I. A. Walmsley, “Temporal modes in quantum optics: then and now,” Phys. Scripta95, 064002 (2020)

    work page 2020

  35. [35]

    Modes and states in quantum optics,

    C. Fabre and N. Treps, “Modes and states in quantum optics,” Rev. Mod. Phys.92, 035005 (2020)

    work page 2020

  36. [36]

    Schmidt modes in the angular spectrum of bright squeezed vacuum,

    P . R. Sharapova, A. M. Pérez, O. V. Tikhonova, and M. V. Chekhova, “Schmidt modes in the angular spectrum of bright squeezed vacuum,” Phys. Rev. A91, 043816 (2015)

    work page 2015

  37. [37]

    Bloch-Messiah reduction for twin beams of light,

    D. B. Horoshko, L. La Volpe, F . Arzani,et al., “Bloch-Messiah reduction for twin beams of light,” Phys. Rev. A100, 013837 (2019)

    work page 2019

  38. [38]

    Matrix decompositions in quantum optics: Takagi/Autonne, Bloch–Messiah/Euler, Iwasawa, and Williamson,

    M. Houde, W. McCutcheon, and N. Quesada, “Matrix decompositions in quantum optics: Takagi/Autonne, Bloch–Messiah/Euler, Iwasawa, and Williamson,” Can. J. Phys.102, 497–507 (2024)

    work page 2024

  39. [39]

    M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang,Quantum Computation and Quantum Information(Cambridge University Press, 2009)

    work page 2009

  40. [40]

    Bengtsson and K

    I. Bengtsson and K. Zyczkowski,Geometry of Quantum States: an Introduction to Quantum Entanglement(Cambridge University Press, 2006), 1st ed

    work page 2006

  41. [41]

    Bright squeezed- vacuum source with 1.1 spatial mode,

    A. M. Pérez, T. S. Iskhakov, P . Sharapova,et al., “Bright squeezed- vacuum source with 1.1 spatial mode,” Opt. Lett.39, 2403–2406 (2014)

    work page 2014

  42. [42]

    Ultrafast Bright Squeezed Vac- uum in Nearly Single Spatio-Temporal Mode,

    P . Cusson, A. Rasputnyi, F . Tani,et al., “Ultrafast Bright Squeezed Vac- uum in Nearly Single Spatio-Temporal Mode,” inCLEO 2024,(Optica Publishing Group, Charlotte, North Carolina, 2024), p. FTh1M.5

    work page 2024

  43. [43]

    The quantum theory of optical coherence,

    R. J. Glauber, “The quantum theory of optical coherence,” Phys. Rev. 130, 2529–2539 (1963)

    work page 1963

  44. [44]

    Photon statistics of pulsed parametric light,

    P . R. Tapster and J. G. Rarity, “Photon statistics of pulsed parametric light,” J. Mod. Opt.45, 595–604 (1998)

    work page 1998

  45. [45]

    Gaussian modelling and schmidt modes of spdc biphoton states,

    M. V. Fedorov, N. I. Miklin, and P . A. Volkov, “Gaussian modelling and schmidt modes of spdc biphoton states,” J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 42, 175503 (2009)

    work page 2009

  46. [46]

    Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife,

    B. Efron, “Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife,” The Ann. Stat.7, 1–26 (1979)

    work page 1979

  47. [47]

    Subcycle quantum electrodynam- ics,

    C. Riek, P . Sulzer, M. Seeger,et al., “Subcycle quantum electrodynam- ics,” Nature541, 376–379 (2017)

    work page 2017

  48. [48]

    Electric field correlation measurements on the electromagnetic vacuum state,

    I.-C. Benea-Chelmus, F . F . Settembrini, G. Scalari, and J. Faist, “Electric field correlation measurements on the electromagnetic vacuum state,” Nature568, 202–206 (2019)

    work page 2019

  49. [49]

    Ultrafast optical parametric amplifiers,

    G. Cerullo and S. De Silvestri, “Ultrafast optical parametric amplifiers,” Rev. Sci. Instrum.74, 1–18 (2003)

    work page 2003

  50. [50]

    Material properties of lithium niobate,

    Covesion, “Material properties of lithium niobate,” https://covesion.com/ knowledge-hub/technical-guide-material-properties-of-lithium- niobate/ (2026)

    work page 2026

  51. [51]

    Interactions between light waves in a nonlinear dielectric,

    J. A. Armstrong, N. Bloembergen, J. Ducuing, and P . S. Pershan, “Interactions between light waves in a nonlinear dielectric,” Phys. Rev. 127, 1918–1939 (1962)

    work page 1918

  52. [52]

    Group delay dispersion,

    R. Photonics, “Group delay dispersion,” https://www.rp- Research Article 12 photonics.com/group_delay_dispersion.html (2026)

    work page 2026

  53. [53]

    Photon temporal modes: a complete framework for quantum information science,

    B. Brecht, D. V. Reddy, C. Silberhorn, and M. Raymer, “Photon temporal modes: a complete framework for quantum information science,” Phys. Rev. X5, 041017 (2015)

    work page 2015

  54. [54]

    Projective filtering of the fundamental eigenmode from spatially multimode radiation,

    A. M. Pérez, P . R. Sharapova, S. S. Straupe,et al., “Projective filtering of the fundamental eigenmode from spatially multimode radiation,” Phys. Rev. A92, 053861 (2015)

    work page 2015

  55. [55]

    Towards a generalization of information theory for hierarchical partitions,

    J. I. Perotti, N. Almeira, and F . Saracco, “Towards a generalization of information theory for hierarchical partitions,” Phys. Rev. E101, 062148 (2020)

    work page 2020