Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Fewer is More: Boosting LLM Reasoning with Reinforced Context Pruning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2312.08901 v3 pith:36TLSUKX submitted 2023-12-14 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords reasoningcot-influxexamplesllmscontextmathprunerapproach
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown impressive capabilities, yet they still struggle with math reasoning. In this work, we propose CoT-Influx, a novel approach that pushes the boundary of few-shot Chain-of-Thoughts (CoT) learning to improve LLM mathematical reasoning. Motivated by the observation that adding more concise CoT examples in the prompt can improve LLM reasoning performance, CoT-Influx employs a coarse-to-fine pruner to maximize the input of effective and concise CoT examples. The pruner first selects as many crucial CoT examples as possible and then prunes unimportant tokens to fit the context window. A math reasoning dataset with diverse difficulty levels and reasoning steps is used to train the pruner, along with a math-specialized reinforcement learning approach. As a result, by enabling more CoT examples with double the context window size in tokens, CoT-Influx significantly outperforms various prompting baselines across various LLMs (LLaMA2-7B, 13B, 70B) and 5 math datasets, achieving up to 4.55% absolute improvements. Remarkably, without any fine-tuning, LLaMA2-70B with CoT-Influx surpasses GPT-3.5 and a wide range of larger LLMs (PaLM, Minerva 540B, etc.) on the GSM8K. CoT-Influx serves as a plug-and-play module for LLMs and is compatible with most existing reasoning prompting techniques, such as self-consistency and self-verification.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. EPiC: Towards Lossless Speedup for Reasoning Training through Edge-Preserving CoT Condensation

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Keeping only the first and last parts of chain-of-thought training traces preserves math reasoning accuracy on MATH500 at half the sequence length, but not on harder benchmarks.

  2. Guided by Gut: Efficient Test-Time Scaling with Reinforced Intrinsic Confidence

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Guided by Gut lets an LLM guide its own search using token-level confidence and step novelty, with a RL fine-tuning step to calibrate that confidence, achieving PRM-level accuracy at far lower compute and memory.

  3. CoTSRF: Utilize Chain of Thought as Stealthy and Robust Fingerprint of Large Language Models

    cs.CR 2025-05 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    CoTSRF fingerprints a source LLM by training a contrastive encoder on chain-of-thought responses, then flags suspect APIs whose reasoning-style feature distances are too close to the source's distribution.

Pith tools