Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Invisible, Unreadable, and Inaudible Cookie Notices: An Evaluation of Cookie Notices for Users with Visual Impairments

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2308.11643 v2 pith:3DQWAC3P submitted 2023-08-16 cs.HC cs.CR

classification cs.HCcs.CR
keywords cookienoticesuserswebsitesaccessibilityuserexperienceimpairments
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper investigates the accessibility of cookie notices on websites for users with visual impairments (VI) via a set of system studies on top UK websites (n=46) and a user study (n=100). We use a set of methods and tools--including accessibility testing tools, text-only browsers, and screen readers, to perform our system studies. Our results demonstrate that the majority of cookie notices on these websites have some form of accessibility issues including contrast issues, not having headings, and not being read aloud immediately when the page is loaded. We discuss how such practises impact the user experience and privacy and provide a set of recommendations for multiple stakeholders for more accessible websites and better privacy practises for users with VIs. To complement our technical contribution we conduct a user study and finding that people with VIs generally have a negative view of cookie notices and believe our recommendations could help their online experience. We also find a disparity in how users wish to respond to cookie notices as apposed to how they do in reality.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools