Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

GLUECons: A Generic Benchmark for Learning Under Constraints

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2302.10914 v1 pith:3OSKJAIH submitted 2023-02-16 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CL

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CL
keywords modelsconstraintsresearchbenchmarkknowledgeimprovesintegrationlearning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent research has shown that integrating domain knowledge into deep learning architectures is effective -- it helps reduce the amount of required data, improves the accuracy of the models' decisions, and improves the interpretability of models. However, the research community is missing a convened benchmark for systematically evaluating knowledge integration methods. In this work, we create a benchmark that is a collection of nine tasks in the domains of natural language processing and computer vision. In all cases, we model external knowledge as constraints, specify the sources of the constraints for each task, and implement various models that use these constraints. We report the results of these models using a new set of extended evaluation criteria in addition to the task performances for a more in-depth analysis. This effort provides a framework for a more comprehensive and systematic comparison of constraint integration techniques and for identifying related research challenges. It will facilitate further research for alleviating some problems of state-of-the-art neural models.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Neuro-Symbolic Frameworks: Conceptual Characterization and Empirical Comparative Analysis

    cs.AI 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A facet-based comparison of DeepProbLog, Scallop, and DomiKnowS with efficiency measurements on four toy tasks, identifying challenges for future neurosymbolic frameworks.

Pith tools