pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.27585 · v1 · pith:3PCBFPVFnew · submitted 2026-06-25 · 🌌 astro-ph.IM · physics.optics

Experimentally-determined performance limits for joint imaging and wavefront sensing with a photonic lantern

Aditya R. Sengupta , Vincent Chambouleyron , Rebecca Jensen-Clem , Emiel Por , Benjamin L. Gerard , Jordan Diaz , Zoe Weber-Porter , Yoo Jung Kim
show 11 more authors
Steph Sallum Matthew DeMartino Daren Dillon Kevin Bundy Anna K. Gagnebin Philip Hinz Caleb Dobias Tara Crowe Stephen S. Eikenberry Rodrigo Amezcua-Correa Stephanos Yerolatsitis
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 00:32 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.IM physics.optics
keywords photonic lanternwavefront sensingadaptive opticsphoton noiseextreme AOfocal-plane sensorimage reconstructionport allocation
0
0 comments X

The pith

Photonic lanterns set photon-noise sensitivity limits when splitting ports between wavefront sensing and image reconstruction.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper measures the photonic lantern's sensitivity to photon noise across spatial frequencies and compares the results to other wavefront sensors via simulations and lab tests. It also evaluates performance when only some output ports are assigned to sensing while the rest reconstruct the observed scene. This division creates a direct trade-off: more ports improve aberration measurement but reduce spatial and spectral information for imaging. The findings establish quantitative benchmarks for using the lantern in extreme adaptive optics systems that perform both tasks simultaneously.

Core claim

The photonic lantern's sensitivity to photon noise is computed as a function of spatial frequency and compared to existing wavefront sensors using simulations as well as experiments on the muirSEAL testbed. When only a subset of ports are available for wavefront sensing, the remaining ports support spatial and spectral scene reconstruction, enabling a trade-off between greater aberration sensitivity with fewer samples and larger aberrations with more samples for imaging.

What carries the argument

Photonic lantern, whose multiple single-mode output ports encode focal-plane wavefront information through intensity measurements, with sensitivity derived per spatial frequency mode.

If this is right

  • Allocating more ports to wavefront sensing increases sensitivity to aberrations but leaves fewer ports for spatial and spectral image reconstruction.
  • Using fewer ports for sensing permits correction of larger aberrations while retaining more ports for detailed scene imaging.
  • The derived sensitivity metrics versus spatial frequency provide design targets for adaptive optics systems that integrate the photonic lantern for joint sensing and imaging.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If photon noise is not the dominant error term on real telescopes, the reported sensitivities would overestimate achievable performance.
  • Combining the lantern with a separate low-order sensor could relax the port-allocation trade-off by handling large aberrations separately.
  • Extending the analysis to include detector read noise or other non-photon errors would show how the trade-off shifts under more complete noise budgets.

Load-bearing premise

The laboratory testbed configuration and the assumption that photon noise dominates measurement error match the noise budget and conditions of real extreme adaptive optics systems on telescopes.

What would settle it

On-sky measurement of wavefront reconstruction error in an extreme adaptive optics system, compared directly against the photon-noise-limited sensitivity curves predicted from the testbed data, would confirm or refute the claimed performance limits.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.27585 by Aditya R. Sengupta, Anna K. Gagnebin, Benjamin L. Gerard, Caleb Dobias, Daren Dillon, Emiel Por, Jordan Diaz, Kevin Bundy, Matthew DeMartino, Philip Hinz, Rebecca Jensen-Clem, Rodrigo Amezcua-Correa, Stephanos Yerolatsitis, Stephen S. Eikenberry, Steph Sallum, Tara Crowe, Vincent Chambouleyron, Yoo Jung Kim, Zoe Weber-Porter.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Simulated throughput as a function of f-number for a 6-port standard photonic lantern. The blue line [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Sensitivity as a function of spatial frequency for both lantern designs. The thicker green line represents [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: As in Figure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Updated muirSEAL configuration. Compared to the previous design, the PL input stays fixed, and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Photon noise sensitivity measurements from muirSEAL (not normalized to power at the PL entrance.) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: “Leave-two-out” sensitivity measurements. At each point, the port whose exclusion would minimize [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The photon noise sensitivity of the unmodulated pyramid WFS computed three ways (one incorrectly [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The photonic lantern (PL) is a focal-plane wavefront sensor (WFS) that can be used for second-stage control of extreme adaptive optics (AO) systems. While the number of sensed modes and the dynamic range with respect to each mode have been relatively well characterized, little attention has been paid to the PL's sensitivity, i.e. how measurement noise impacts the accuracy of PL wavefront reconstruction. We compute the PL's sensitivity to photon noise as a function of spatial frequency, and compare it to existing WFSs, using simulations as well as experiments on the muirSEAL testbed. We further assess these metrics in the case where only a subset of PL ports are available for wavefront sensing. In this configuration, the remaining ports are used to spatially and spectrally reconstruct the observed scene using algorithms such as SPADE. Using more ports for wavefront sensing enables greater aberration sensitivity but leaves less spatial information for image reconstruction. This allows us to trade off between fewer samples with smaller aberrations and more samples with larger aberrations. This work sets the stage for AO system design incorporating the PL as a joint WFS and imager.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that simulations and experiments on the muirSEAL testbed can be used to determine the photonic lantern's sensitivity to photon noise as a function of spatial frequency for wavefront sensing in extreme AO, with direct comparisons to other WFSs; it further quantifies the trade-off when only a subset of PL ports are allocated to sensing (with the remainder used for SPADE-based scene reconstruction), enabling a balance between aberration correction and imaging performance.

Significance. If the reported sensitivities hold under photon-noise-limited conditions, the work supplies concrete performance metrics and a port-allocation framework that could guide the integration of photonic lanterns into second-stage extreme AO systems as joint sensors and imagers. The combination of simulation and testbed data, together with the explicit treatment of the subset-port case, represents a practical contribution to AO instrumentation design.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4] §4 (muirSEAL Experiments): No quantitative error budget or separate measurements of read noise, background, vibration, or residual turbulence are presented to substantiate the assumption that photon noise is the dominant term on the testbed. Without this verification, the reported sensitivity curves versus spatial frequency and the comparisons to other WFSs cannot be directly extrapolated to the photon-noise-limited regime of on-sky extreme AO systems.
  2. [Results] Results section and associated figures (e.g., sensitivity curves): The quantitative sensitivity values and port-subset trade-off metrics are given without accompanying data tables, raw measurement statistics, or exclusion criteria for the experimental runs, preventing independent assessment of the claimed performance limits.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Methods] The manuscript would benefit from a short table summarizing the exact flux levels, spatial-frequency sampling, and number of frames used in both the simulations and muirSEAL runs to facilitate reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments, which highlight important aspects of experimental validation. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to strengthen the presentation of our results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4] §4 (muirSEAL Experiments): No quantitative error budget or separate measurements of read noise, background, vibration, or residual turbulence are presented to substantiate the assumption that photon noise is the dominant term on the testbed. Without this verification, the reported sensitivity curves versus spatial frequency and the comparisons to other WFSs cannot be directly extrapolated to the photon-noise-limited regime of on-sky extreme AO systems.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit quantitative error budget would better support the photon-noise-limited assumption and aid extrapolation. In revision we will add a dedicated subsection in §4 that tabulates estimated contributions from read noise, background, vibration, and residual turbulence based on muirSEAL instrument specifications and separate calibration measurements. We will also note that the close match between simulation and experiment already provides indirect evidence that photon noise dominates under the reported conditions, while acknowledging that on-sky validation would require additional testing. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results] Results section and associated figures (e.g., sensitivity curves): The quantitative sensitivity values and port-subset trade-off metrics are given without accompanying data tables, raw measurement statistics, or exclusion criteria for the experimental runs, preventing independent assessment of the claimed performance limits.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the current manuscript lacks tabulated statistics and explicit exclusion criteria. In the revised version we will insert a new table in the Results section that reports mean sensitivity values together with standard deviations from repeated runs, and we will add a paragraph in the Methods describing the run-selection criteria. Raw data files will be made available as supplementary material. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: results are direct experimental measurements and simulations

full rationale

The paper reports sensitivities derived from simulations and direct measurements on the muirSEAL testbed, with comparisons to other WFSs performed on the same data. No equations, self-citations, or fitted parameters are shown to reduce the reported photon-noise sensitivities or port-allocation trade-offs to quantities defined by the same inputs. The derivation chain is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on the domain assumption that photon noise is the dominant error source and that the laboratory testbed reproduces on-sky conditions; no free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Photon noise dominates the measurement error budget for wavefront reconstruction.
    The paper focuses exclusively on sensitivity to photon noise and does not discuss other noise sources.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5815 in / 1151 out tokens · 24599 ms · 2026-06-29T00:32:47.427489+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

33 extracted references

  1. [1]

    An all-photonic focal-plane wavefront sensor,

    Norris, B. R. M., Wei, J., Betters, C. H., Wong, A., and Leon-Saval, S. G., “An all-photonic focal-plane wavefront sensor,”Nature Communications11, 5335 (Oct. 2020)

    2020

  2. [2]

    Focal-plane wavefront sensing with photonic lanterns: theoretical framework,

    Lin, J., Fitzgerald, M. P., Xin, Y., Guyon, O., Leon-Saval, S., Norris, B., and Jovanovic, N., “Focal-plane wavefront sensing with photonic lanterns: theoretical framework,”Journal of the Optical Society of America B Optical Physics39, 2643 (Oct. 2022)

    2022

  3. [3]

    Experimental and on-sky demonstration of spectrally dispersed wavefront sensing using a photonic lantern,

    Lin, J., Fitzgerald, M. P., Xin, Y., Jung Kim, Y., Guyon, O., Norris, B., Betters, C., Leon-Saval, S., Ahn, K., Deo, V., Lozi, J., Vievard, S., Levinstein, D., Sallum, S., and Jovanovic, N., “Experimental and on-sky demonstration of spectrally dispersed wavefront sensing using a photonic lantern,”Optics Letters50, 2780 (Apr. 2025)

    2025

  4. [4]

    On-sky Demonstration of Second-stage Wave-front Control with a Photonic Lantern,

    Sengupta, A. R., Diaz, J., DeMartino, M., Jensen-Clem, R., Cetre, S., Gates, E., Bundy, K., Dillon, D., Hinz, P., Salama, M., and et al., “On-sky Demonstration of Second-stage Wave-front Control with a Photonic Lantern,”Astronomical Journal171, 65 (Feb. 2026)

    2026

  5. [5]

    Demonstration of a photonic lantern focal-plane wavefront sensor: measurement of atmospheric wavefront error modes and low wind effect in the nonlinear regime,

    Wei, J., Norris, B., Betters, C., and Leon-Saval, S., “Demonstration of a photonic lantern focal-plane wavefront sensor: measurement of atmospheric wavefront error modes and low wind effect in the nonlinear regime,”Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems10, 049001 (Oct. 2024)

    2024

  6. [6]

    Exploring the capabilities of astrophotonics for the precise alignment of segmented telescopes,

    Cuevas, M., Sengupta, A. R., Chambouleyron, V., Jensen-Clem, R., Dillon, D., Cetre, S., Salama, M., Do- bias, C., Crowe, T., Eikenberry, S. S., Amezcua-Correa, R., and Yerolatsitis, S., “Exploring the capabilities of astrophotonics for the precise alignment of segmented telescopes,” in [Techniques and Instrumentation for Detection of Exoplanets XII], Ruan...

    2025

  7. [7]

    Spectroscopy using a visible photonic lantern at the Subaru Telescope: Laboratory characterization and the first on-sky demonstration on Ikiiki (αLeo) and ’Aua (αOri),

    Vievard, S., Lallement, M., Leon-Saval, S., Guyon, O., Jovanovic, N., Huby, E., Lacour, S., Lozi, J., Deo, V., Ahn, K., and et al., “Spectroscopy using a visible photonic lantern at the Subaru Telescope: Laboratory characterization and the first on-sky demonstration on Ikiiki (αLeo) and ’Aua (αOri),”Astronomy & Astrophysics691, A140 (Nov. 2024)

    2024

  8. [8]

    On-sky Demonstration of Subdiffraction-limited Astronomical Measurement Using a Photonic Lantern,

    Kim, Y. J., Fitzgerald, M. P., Vievard, S., Lin, J., Xin, Y., Lucas, M., Guyon, O., Lozi, J., Deo, V., Huby, E., and et al., “On-sky Demonstration of Subdiffraction-limited Astronomical Measurement Using a Photonic Lantern,”Astrophysical Journal Letters993, L3 (Nov. 2025)

    2025

  9. [9]

    Wavefront sensing and control for a photonic lantern nuller for exoplanet characterization,

    Xin, Y., Echeverri, D., Jovanovic, N., Mawet, D., Leon-Saval, S., Amezcua-Correa, R., Yerolatsitis, S., Fitzgerald, M. P., Gatkine, P., Kim, Y. J., Lin, J., Norris, B., Ruane, G., and Sallum, S., “Wavefront sensing and control for a photonic lantern nuller for exoplanet characterization,” in [Optical and Infrared Interferometry and Imaging IX], Kammerer, ...

    2024

  10. [10]

    (Laboratory demonstration of a photonic lantern-fed all-fiber nulling interferometer),

    Diaz, J., Jensen-Clem, R., Hinz, P. M., Dillon, D., Gatkine, P., Sengupta, A. R., Sirbu, D., Tedder, S., Bundy, K., Vyhnalek, B., Sallum, S., DeMartino, M. C., Eikenberry, S., Delfyett, P., and Amezcua- Correa, R., “(Laboratory demonstration of a photonic lantern-fed all-fiber nulling interferometer),” in [These proceedings],SPIE14148-29(2026)

    2026

  11. [11]

    Neural-network spectral reconstruction with photonic lanterns,

    DeMartino, M., Bundy, K., Eikenberry, S. S., Sengupta, A., Gagnebin, A., Patel, A., Crowe, T., Dobias, C., Amezcua-Correa, R., Yerolatsitis, S., and Schmidt, H., “Neural-network spectral reconstruction with photonic lanterns,” in [These proceedings],SPIE14154-89(2026)

    2026

  12. [12]

    Characterizing spectral reconstruction performance of a photonic lantern,

    Gagnebin, A., Bundy, K., Sengupta, A. R., Demartino, M., Dillon, D., Crowe, T. R., Dobias, C., Eikenberry, S. S., Amezcua-Correa, R., Yerolatsitis, S., Schmidt, H., Patel, A., and Bradshaw, A., “Characterizing spectral reconstruction performance of a photonic lantern,” in [These proceedings],SPIE14149-407(2026). 13

    2026

  13. [13]

    Quantum Theory of Superresolution for Two Incoherent Optical Point Sources,

    Tsang, M., Nair, R., and Lu, X.-M., “Quantum Theory of Superresolution for Two Incoherent Optical Point Sources,”Physical Review X6, 031033 (July 2016)

    2016

  14. [14]

    Quantum hypothesis testing for exoplanet detection,

    Huang, Z. and Lupo, C., “Quantum hypothesis testing for exoplanet detection,”Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 130502 (Sep 2021)

    2021

  15. [15]

    Identifying objects at the quantum limit for superresolution imaging,

    Grace, M. R. and Guha, S., “Identifying objects at the quantum limit for superresolution imaging,”Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 180502 (Oct 2022)

    2022

  16. [16]

    Focal-plane wavefront sensing with photonic lanterns II: numerical characterization and optimization,

    Lin, J., Fitzgerald, M. P., Xin, Y., Kim, Y. J., Guyon, O., Leon-Saval, S. G., Norris, B., and Jovanovic, N., “Focal-plane wavefront sensing with photonic lanterns II: numerical characterization and optimization,” Journal of the Optical Society of America B Optical Physics40, 3196 (Dec. 2023)

    2023

  17. [17]

    Spectroastrometry with photonic lanterns,

    Kim, Y. J., Sallum, S., Lin, J., Xin, Y., Norris, B., Betters, C., Leon-Saval, S., Lozi, J., Vievard, S., Gatkine, P., and et al., “Spectroastrometry with photonic lanterns,” in [Ground-based and Airborne Instru- mentation for Astronomy IX], Evans, C. J., Bryant, J. J., and Motohara, K., eds.,Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Confe...

    2022

  18. [18]

    Photonic lantern wavefront reconstruction in a multi-wavefront sensor single- conjugate adaptive optics system,

    Sengupta, A. R., Diaz, J., Gerard, B. L., Jensen-Clem, R., Dillon, D., DeMartino, M., Bundy, K., Cetre, S., and Chambouleyron, V., “Photonic lantern wavefront reconstruction in a multi-wavefront sensor single- conjugate adaptive optics system,” in [Adaptive Optics Systems IX], Jackson, K. J., Schmidt, D., and Vernet, E., eds.,Society of Photo-Optical Inst...

    2024

  19. [19]

    Experimental validation of photonic lantern imaging and wavefront sensing performance,

    Sengupta, A. R., Chambouleyron, V., Diaz, J., DeMartino, M., Jensen-Clem, R., Gerard, B. L., Messerly, M. J., Pax, P., Dillon, D., Bundy, K., Cuevas, M., Cetre, S., Macintosh, B., Dobias, C., Crowe, T., Eiken- berry, S. S., Amezcua-Correa, R., and Yerolatsitis, S., “Experimental validation of photonic lantern imaging and wavefront sensing performance,” in...

    2025

  20. [20]

    Nonlinear techniques for few-mode wavefront sensors,

    Lin, J. and Fitzgerald, M. P., “Nonlinear techniques for few-mode wavefront sensors,”Applied Optics63, 8748 (Dec. 2024)

    2024

  21. [21]

    WaveDriver: a laser guide star AO system for HWO,

    Gerard, B. L., Geringer-Sameth, A., Sengupta, A. R., Perloff, A. S., Sanchez, D. F., Waswa, P. M. B., Laguna, C., Jensen-Clem, R., Poyneer, L. A., and Eckart, M. E., “WaveDriver: a laser guide star AO system for HWO,”Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems12(4), 041015 (2026)

    2026

  22. [22]

    Variation on a Zernike wavefront sensor theme: Optimal use of photons,

    Chambouleyron, V., Fauvarque, O., Sauvage, J.-F., Dohlen, K., Levraud, N., Vigan, A., N’Diaye, M., Neichel, B., and Fusco, T., “Variation on a Zernike wavefront sensor theme: Optimal use of photons,” Astronomy & Astrophysics650, L8 (June 2021)

    2021

  23. [23]

    Spectral characterization of a three-port photonic lantern for application to spectroastrometry,

    Kim, Y. J., Fitzgerald, M. P., Lin, J., Lozi, J., Vievard, S., Xin, Y., Levinstein, D., Jovanovic, N., Leon- Saval, S., Betters, C., and et al., “Spectral characterization of a three-port photonic lantern for application to spectroastrometry,”Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems10, 045004 (Oct. 2024)

    2024

  24. [24]

    Choice of optical transformation for photonic circuit wavefront sensors,

    Lin, J., “Choice of optical transformation for photonic circuit wavefront sensors,”Applied Optics65, 4377 (May 2026)

    2026

  25. [25]

    Limits of Adaptive Optics for High-Contrast Imaging,

    Guyon, O., “Limits of Adaptive Optics for High-Contrast Imaging,”Astrophysical Journal629, 592–614 (Aug. 2005)

    2005

  26. [26]

    Modeling noise propagation in Fourier-filtering wavefront sensing, fundamental limits, and quantitative comparison,

    Chambouleyron, V., Fauvarque, O., Plantet, C., Sauvage, J.-F., Levraud, N., Ciss´ e, M., Neichel, B., and Fusco, T., “Modeling noise propagation in Fourier-filtering wavefront sensing, fundamental limits, and quantitative comparison,”Astronomy & Astrophysics670, A153 (Feb. 2023)

    2023

  27. [27]

    Towards practical wavefront sensing at the fundamental information limit,

    Paterson, C., “Towards practical wavefront sensing at the fundamental information limit,” in [Journal of Physics Conference Series],Journal of Physics Conference Series139, 012021, IOP (Nov. 2008)

    2008

  28. [28]

    General formalism for fourier-based wave front sensing,

    Fauvarque, O., Neichel, B., Fusco, T., Sauvage, J.-F., and Girault, O., “General formalism for fourier-based wave front sensing,”Optica3, 1440–1452 (Dec 2016)

    2016

  29. [29]

    Lightbeam: Simulate light through weakly-guiding waveguides

    Lin, J., “Lightbeam: Simulate light through weakly-guiding waveguides.” Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:2102.006 (Feb. 2021). 14

    2021

  30. [30]

    High Contrast Imaging for Python (HCIPy): an open-source adaptive optics and coronagraph simulator,

    Por, E. H., Haffert, S. Y., Radhakrishnan, V. M., Doelman, D. S., van Kooten, M., and Bos, S. P., “High Contrast Imaging for Python (HCIPy): an open-source adaptive optics and coronagraph simulator,” in [Adaptive Optics Systems VI], Close, L. M., Schreiber, L., and Schmidt, D., eds.,Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Seri...

    2018

  31. [31]

    Demon- stration of high-efficiency photonic lantern couplers for PolyOculus,

    Moraitis, C. D., Alvarado-Zacarias, J. C., Amezcua-Correa, R., Jeram, S., and Eikenberry, S. S., “Demon- stration of high-efficiency photonic lantern couplers for PolyOculus,”Applied Optics60, D93 (July 2021)

    2021

  32. [32]

    Laboratory characterization of a multi-photonic lantern optical waveguide using off-axis holography,

    Sengupta, A. R., Gerard, B. L., Sanchez, D., DeMartino, M., Jensen-Clem, R., Bundy, K., Messerly, M. J., Pax, P., Dillon, D., and Strang, E., “Laboratory characterization of a multi-photonic lantern optical waveguide using off-axis holography,” in [These proceedings],SPIE14150-135(2026)

    2026

  33. [33]

    Laboratory demonstration of an all-fiber-based focal plane nulling interfer- ometer,

    Diaz, J., Jensen-Clem, R., Dillon, D., Hinz, P. M., DeMartino, M. C., Bundy, K., Eikenberry, S., Delfyett, P., and Amezcua-Correa, R., “Laboratory demonstration of an all-fiber-based focal plane nulling interfer- ometer,” in [Optical and Infrared Interferometry and Imaging IX], Kammerer, J., Sallum, S., and Sanchez- Bermudez, J., eds.,Society of Photo-Opt...

    2024