Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Rethinking the Hyperparameters for Fine-tuning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2002.11770 v1 pith:3TK7BFQH submitted 2020-02-19 cs.CV cs.LGstat.ML

classification cs.CVcs.LGstat.ML
keywords fine-tuninghyperparameterslearningfindingspracticescommondomainmodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Fine-tuning from pre-trained ImageNet models has become the de-facto standard for various computer vision tasks. Current practices for fine-tuning typically involve selecting an ad-hoc choice of hyperparameters and keeping them fixed to values normally used for training from scratch. This paper re-examines several common practices of setting hyperparameters for fine-tuning. Our findings are based on extensive empirical evaluation for fine-tuning on various transfer learning benchmarks. (1) While prior works have thoroughly investigated learning rate and batch size, momentum for fine-tuning is a relatively unexplored parameter. We find that the value of momentum also affects fine-tuning performance and connect it with previous theoretical findings. (2) Optimal hyperparameters for fine-tuning, in particular, the effective learning rate, are not only dataset dependent but also sensitive to the similarity between the source domain and target domain. This is in contrast to hyperparameters for training from scratch. (3) Reference-based regularization that keeps models close to the initial model does not necessarily apply for "dissimilar" datasets. Our findings challenge common practices of fine-tuning and encourages deep learning practitioners to rethink the hyperparameters for fine-tuning.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Toward Mechanistic Interpretability of an AI Foundation Model Fine-Tuned for Atmospheric Chemistry

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Aurora, a foundation model fine-tuned for air quality, captures rough NOx–ozone coupling but lacks the chemical consistency and emission-plume fidelity of process-based models.

  2. On dataset transferability in medical image classification

    cs.CV 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new metric combining NCA-based feature separability with a conv2/conv1 gradient ratio ranks medical image source models better than six existing metrics on most targets, though statistical significance is limited.

  3. Efficient Retail Video Annotation: A Robust Key Frame Generation Approach for Product and Customer Interaction Analysis

    cs.CV 2025-06 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    A YOLO-based key-frame selection method for retail videos lowers human annotation effort by auto-annotating high-confidence frames and interpolating the rest.

Pith tools