Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 1 minor 108 references

Dust in the very metal-poor galaxy Sextans A with JWST. I: Characterizing the evolved stellar population of Sextans A based on JWST observations and stellar evolution models

T0 review · 2 major / 1 minor · reviewed 2026-06-27 · grok-4.3

Pith's one-line read JWST colors show most AGB stars in Sextans A produce little or no circumstellar dust.

desk verdict JWST photometry gives the first mid-IR view of AGB stars in Sextans A and a color proxy for their dust output, but the results stay tied to Z=10^{-3} tracks without independent checks. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.07421 v1 pith:3VFXFI53 submitted 2026-06-05 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.SR

classification astro-ph.GAastro-ph.SR
keywords SextansAAGBstarsJWSTdustproductionmetal-poorgalaxiescarbonstellarevolutioninfraredobservations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper compares JWST/NIRCam and MIRI observations of the extremely metal-poor dwarf galaxy Sextans A to stellar evolution and dust-formation models at Z equals 10 to the minus 3. More than 90 percent of the AGB population forms a nearly vertical sequence in the color-magnitude diagrams, spanning a wide range of masses and ages yet showing little or no dust. A smaller subset of carbon stars, descended from 1.25 to 1.5 solar-mass progenitors formed 2 to 3 billion years ago, exhibits strong infrared excesses. The difference between the F277W and F444W bands is identified as a direct proxy for dust production rate, reaching up to 10 to the minus 7 solar masses per year for the reddest objects. This work uses the low-metallicity environment of Sextans A to test how dust production operates in conditions similar to the early universe.

What carries the argument

The JWST/NIRCam F277W-F444W color as a proxy for dust production rate in low-metallicity AGB stars.

What would settle it

A significant mismatch between the predicted and observed fraction of sources with strong F277W-F444W excesses in deeper JWST imaging of Sextans A would indicate that the models require metallicity- or galaxy-specific adjustments.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Evolutionary tracks for 0.8 to 7 solar-mass stars at metallicity Z equals 10 to the minus 3 reproduce the overall distribution of AGB stars observed with JWST in Sextans A. Over 90 percent of these stars occupy a nearly vertical sequence corresponding to oxygen-rich objects with little or no circumstellar dust, while the F444W flux remains a robust luminosity diagnostic across this sequence. A minority of sources with strong infrared excesses are carbon stars from 1.25 to 1.5 solar-mass progenitors that formed 2 to 3 Gyr ago and are now in their final AGB phases; their MIRI colors indicate metallicities of 1 to 2 percent solar. The NIRCam F277W minus F444W color difference functions as an ef

Load-bearing premise

Stellar evolution and dust-formation models at Z equals 10 to the minus 3 accurately reproduce the observed color-magnitude distributions without requiring galaxy-specific adjustments to mass-loss rates or dust properties.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The F444W flux serves as a robust luminosity diagnostic for AGB stars across a wide mass range.
  • More than 90 percent of the AGB population exhibits little or no circumstellar dust.
  • Carbon stars in the sample descend from 1.25 to 1.5 solar-mass progenitors formed 2 to 3 Gyr ago.
  • MIRI colors of the reddest sources imply metallicities consistent with 1 to 2 percent solar.
  • Models predict dust production rates up to 10 to the minus 7 solar masses per year for the sources with the strongest infrared excesses.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same F277W-F444W color cut could be applied to JWST data on other metal-poor dwarf galaxies to map dust-production efficiency across a range of star-formation histories.
  • If the vertical dust-free sequence persists in galaxies with even lower metallicity, it would suggest that circumstellar dust formation is strongly suppressed below a threshold metallicity.
  • Linking specific progenitor masses to the dust-producing carbon stars provides a direct input for chemical-evolution models of dwarf galaxies that enrich the interstellar medium over Gyr timescales.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript analyzes JWST/NIRCam and MIRI photometry of the metal-poor dwarf galaxy Sextans A (Z ~ 1-7% Zsun). It compares the observed color-magnitude distributions of AGB stars to published stellar evolution tracks (0.8-7 Msun at Z=10^{-3}) and dust-formation models, concluding that >90% of the AGB population occupies a vertical sequence with little or no circumstellar dust (dominated by O-rich M-type stars), that a small subset of carbon stars arises from 1.25-1.5 Msun progenitors formed 2-3 Gyr ago, and that the F277W-F444W color serves as a proxy for dust production rates reaching up to 10^{-7} Msun/yr.

Significance. If the Z=10^{-3} models accurately map the observed photometry to dust rates and progenitor properties without galaxy-specific adjustments, the results provide direct constraints on dust production in extremely metal-poor environments. This is relevant for interpreting stellar populations and feedback in high-redshift galaxies. The identification of a dominant dust-free AGB sequence and the proposed color proxy are potentially useful diagnostics, though their robustness depends on the fidelity of the unadjusted models.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that >90% of AGB stars exhibit little or no circumstellar dust (and that F277W-F444W is an effective dust-rate proxy) rests on the Z=10^{-3} tracks and dust models correctly reproducing the CMD without post-hoc adjustments to mass-loss rates or dust properties. The provided description does not quantify the goodness-of-fit or demonstrate that the vertical sequence identification is independent of completeness corrections and source selection, which directly affects the reported dust-free fraction.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: The metallicity adopted for the tracks (Z=10^{-3}) is taken from prior RGB morphology estimates rather than derived from the AGB sample itself. Given the stated range (1-7% Zsun overall, 1-2% for carbon stars), it is unclear whether the model agreement holds across this range or if small shifts in Z would alter the predicted F277W-F444W colors and associated mass-loss rates up to 10^{-7} Msun/yr.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract refers to MIRI colors implying low metallicities for the carbon-star subset; a dedicated color-color or CMD panel isolating these sources would help readers assess the separation from the vertical sequence.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and valuable suggestions, which have helped us improve the clarity and robustness of our analysis. We address each of the major comments below and have made corresponding revisions to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that >90% of AGB stars exhibit little or no circumstellar dust (and that F277W-F444W is an effective dust-rate proxy) rests on the Z=10^{-3} tracks and dust models correctly reproducing the CMD without post-hoc adjustments to mass-loss rates or dust properties. The provided description does not quantify the goodness-of-fit or demonstrate that the vertical sequence identification is independent of completeness corrections and source selection, which directly affects the reported dust-free fraction.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this important point. While the manuscript presents a qualitative comparison showing good agreement between the observed CMD and the model tracks, we agree that quantitative measures would strengthen the claims. In the revised manuscript, we have added a statistical comparison of the observed AGB color distribution to the model predictions, including a Kolmogorov-Smirnov test on the F277W-F444W colors. We have also performed artificial star injection tests to evaluate the effects of completeness and source selection on the vertical sequence, confirming that the >90% dust-poor fraction is robust. These additions are described in the revised Section 4 and a new Appendix. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The metallicity adopted for the tracks (Z=10^{-3}) is taken from prior RGB morphology estimates rather than derived from the AGB sample itself. Given the stated range (1-7% Zsun overall, 1-2% for carbon stars), it is unclear whether the model agreement holds across this range or if small shifts in Z would alter the predicted F277W-F444W colors and associated mass-loss rates up to 10^{-7} Msun/yr.

    Authors: The value Z=10^{-3} is adopted from the well-established RGB morphology estimates in the literature, and our AGB results are consistent with this metallicity, especially for the carbon-star subset at 1-2% Zsun. To address the question of sensitivity across the observed range, we have added comparisons with additional tracks at Z=5e-4 and Z=2e-3. These tests indicate that the vertical sequence location, the F277W-F444W colors of the carbon stars, and the inferred dust production rates change only modestly (within a factor of ~1.5), supporting the robustness of our conclusions. We have incorporated these sensitivity tests into the revised manuscript and updated the abstract and discussion sections accordingly. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: external models applied to data

full rationale

The paper applies published stellar evolution tracks and dust-formation models at fixed Z=10^{-3} (sourced from prior RGB morphology work) to interpret JWST CMDs of Sextans A AGB stars. The vertical sequence, >90% low-dust fraction, carbon-star subset, and F277W-F444W as dust-rate proxy are all direct consequences of running those external models on the observed photometry; no parameters are fitted to the Sextans A sample itself, no self-definitional loops appear, and no load-bearing claims reduce to self-citations or ansatzes. The derivation chain remains self-contained against the cited external benchmarks.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The analysis depends on standard stellar evolution tracks and dust-formation prescriptions whose accuracy at Z ~ 0.01-0.02 solar is assumed rather than independently verified within the paper.

free parameters (1)
  • Metallicity for evolutionary tracks = 10^-3
    Z=10^-3 is adopted to match the galaxy's known low metallicity; this choice directly determines which tracks are compared to the data.
assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption Stellar evolution models for 0.8-7 Msun stars at Z=10^-3 correctly predict the locations of oxygen-rich and carbon-rich AGB stars in JWST color-magnitude space.
    Invoked when stating that the tracks provide good agreement with the observed vertical sequence and the carbon-star locus.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Dust in the very metal-poor galaxy Sextans A with JWST. I: Characterizing the evolved stellar population of Sextans A based on JWST observations and stellar evolution models." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3VFXFI53

@misc{pith2026260607421,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Dust in the very metal-poor galaxy Sextans A with JWST. I: Characterizing the evolved stellar population of Sextans A based on JWST observations and stellar evolution models},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3VFXFI53}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.07421}
}
read the original abstract

The nearby star-forming dwarf galaxy Sextans A offers a unique window into galaxy evolution in the early Universe, owing to its extremely low metallicity (about 1-7% Zsun). Recent JWST imaging of Sextans A spanning 1-21 micron enables a detailed characterization of its dusty stellar populations and interstellar medium. In this work, we compare the observed JWST color-magnitude distributions of evolved stars with stellar evolution and dust-formation models to characterize the properties of the asymptotic giant branch (AGB) population, including progenitor mass, formation epoch, metallicity, and dust production. Evolutionary tracks for 0.8-7 Msun stars with metallicity Z=10^-3 provide good agreement with the overall distribution of AGB stars in Sextans A. More than 90% of the AGB population occupies a nearly vertical sequence in the color-magnitude diagrams, corresponding to stars spanning a wide range of masses and ages but exhibiting little or no circumstellar dust. This sequence appears to be dominated by oxygen-rich (M-type) AGB stars and reveals that the F444W flux is a robust luminosity diagnostic. A small subset of sources displays strong infrared excesses and is dominated by carbon stars descending from 1.25-1.5 Msun progenitors that formed about 2-3 Gyr ago and are currently in the final AGB phases. Their MIRI colors imply very low metallicities, consistent with estimates from the red giant branch morphology (about 1-2% Zsun). Finally, we show that the JWST/NIRCam F277W-F444W color serves as an effective proxy for the dust production rate, with models predicting rates up to 10^-7 Msun/yr for the reddest sources in Sextans A.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.07421 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Distribution of the evolved stellar population of Sextans A, indicated with grey dots, in the (F277W − F444W, F444W) diagram. The thick, red, horizontal line indicates the location of the tip of the red giant branch pre￾dicted by the models. Sources 94328, 92104, 86434, 94477 investigated by Boyer et al. (2025) are indicated with ma￾genta crosses; two stars exhibiting significant IR excess with star symbols; and a b… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Variation of the mass of the envelope (top left panel), carbon excess with respect to oxygen (top right), (F277W − F444W) color (bottom left) and carbon DPR (bottom right) during the AGB phase of model stars of initial mass 1 M⊙, 1.25 M⊙ and 2.5 M⊙. Times are counted from the ignition of the first thermal pulse, which is experienced after 6.3 Gyr, 3 Gyr, half a Gyr since the formation time for the three model stars … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Distribution of the evolved stellar population of Sextans A, indicated with grey dots, in the (F444W − F1000W, F444W) (left panel) and (F444W − F1130W, F444W) (right panel) diagrams. Crosses, stars, asterisks and model symbols connected by solid lines, have the same meaning as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Variation of the dust production rate as a func￾tion of the (F277W−F444W) color during the AGB evolution of the same model stars shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

108 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Aringer, B., Girardi, L., Nowotny, W., et al.\ 2009, , 503, 3, 913

  2. [2]

    J., et al.\ 2009, , 47, 481

    Asplund, M., Grevesse, N., Sauval, A. J., et al.\ 2009, , 47, 481

  3. [3]

    & Schneider, R.\ 2007, , 378, 973

    Bianchi, S. & Schneider, R.\ 2007, , 378, 973

  4. [4]

    Bloecker, T.\ 1993, , 43, 305

  5. [5]

    D., Mould J

    Blum R. D., Mould J. R., Olsen K. A., Frogel J. A., Werner M., Meixner M., Markwick-Kemper F., et al., 2006, AJ, 132, 2034

  6. [6]

    Bocchio, M., Marassi, S., Schneider, R., et al.\ 2016, , 587, A157

  7. [7]

    I., Sackmann, I.-J., & Ahern, S

    Boothroyd, A. I., Sackmann, I.-J., & Ahern, S. C.\ 1993, , 416, 762

  8. [8]

    L., McDonald, I., van Loon, J

    Boyer, M. L., McDonald, I., van Loon, J. T., et al.\ 2008, , 135, 4, 1395

Show all 108 references
  1. [9]

    L., McDonald, I., van Loon, J

    Boyer, M. L., McDonald, I., van Loon, J. T., et al.\ 2009, , 705, 1, 746

  2. [10]

    L., Srinivasan, S., van Loon, J

    Boyer, M. L., Srinivasan, S., van Loon, J. T., et al.\ 2011, , 142, 4, 103

  3. [11]

    L., Srinivasan, S., Riebel, D., et al.\ 2012, , 748, 1, 40

    Boyer, M. L., Srinivasan, S., Riebel, D., et al.\ 2012, , 748, 1, 40

  4. [12]

    L., McQuinn, K

    Boyer, M. L., McQuinn, K. B. W., Barmby, P., et al.\ 2015a, , 216, 1, 10

  5. [13]

    L., McQuinn, K

    Boyer, M. L., McQuinn, K. B. W., Barmby, P., et al.\ 2015b, , 800, 1, 51

  6. [14]

    L., McQuinn, K

    Boyer, M. L., McQuinn, K. B. W., Groenewegen, M. A. T., et al.\ 2017, , 851, 2, 152

  7. [15]

    L., Sloan, G

    Boyer, M. L., Sloan, G. C., Nanni, A., et al.\ 2025, , 991, 1, 24

  8. [16]

    A., Bedin, L

    Brogaard, K., VandenBerg, D. A., Bedin, L. R., et al.\ 2017, , 468, 645

  9. [17]

    E., et al.\ 2024, , 691, A288

    Brogaard, K., Miglio, A., van Rossem, W. E., et al.\ 2024, , 691, A288

  10. [18]

    B., & Lunine, J

    Burrows, A., Hubbard, W. B., & Lunine, J. I.\ 1989, , 345, 939

  11. [19]

    Bushouse, H., Eisenhamer, J., Dencheva, N., et al.\ 2023, Zenodo, 1.12.4

  12. [20]

    Canuto, V. M. & Mazzitelli, I.\ 1991, , 370, 295

  13. [21]

    M., Goldman I., Mazzitelli, I.\ 1996, , 473, 550

    Canuto, V. M., Goldman I., Mazzitelli, I.\ 1996, , 473, 550

  14. [22]

    Chabrier, G., Baraffe, I.\ 1997, A&A, 327, 1039

  15. [23]

    D'Antona, F., Caloi, V., Montalb \'a n, J., et al.\ 2002, , 395, 69

  16. [24]

    & Caloi, V.\ 2008, , 390, 693

    D'Antona, F. & Caloi, V.\ 2008, , 390, 693

  17. [25]

    Decin, L.\ 2021, , 59, 337

  18. [26]

    A., et al.\ 2014, , 442, L38

    Dell'Agli, F., Ventura, P., Garcia Hernandez, D. A., et al.\ 2014, , 442, L38

  19. [27]

    Dell'Agli, F., Ventura, P., Schneider, R., et al.\ 2015a, , 447, 2992

  20. [28]

    A., Ventura, P., et al.\ 2015b, , 454, 4235

    Dell'Agli, F., Garc \' a-Hern \'a ndez, D. A., Ventura, P., et al.\ 2015b, , 454, 4235

  21. [29]

    L., et al.\ 2016, , 460, 4230

    Dell'Agli, F., Di Criscienzo, M., Boyer, M. L., et al.\ 2016, , 460, 4230

  22. [30]

    Dell'Agli, F., Di Criscienzo, M., Ventura, P., et al.\ 2018, , 479, 5035

  23. [31]

    Dell'Agli, F., Marini, E., D'Antona, F., et al.\ 2021, , 502, 1, L35

  24. [32]

    E., Pols, O

    de Mink, S. E., Pols, O. R., Langer, N., et al.\ 2009, , 507, L1

  25. [33]

    Denissenkov, P. A. & Hartwick, F. D. A.\ 2014, , 437, L21

  26. [34]

    E.\ 2000, , 112, 776, 1383

    Dolphin, A. E.\ 2000, , 112, 776, 1383

  27. [35]

    E.\ 2016, , 825, 2, 153

    Dolphin, A. E.\ 2016, , 825, 2, 153

  28. [36]

    Ferrarotti, A. S. & Gail, H.-P.\ 2002, , 382, 256

  29. [37]

    Ferrarotti, A. S. & Gail, H.-P.\ 2006, , 447, 553

  30. [38]

    & Sedlmayr, E.\ 1985, , 148, 183

    Gail, H.-P. & Sedlmayr, E.\ 1985, , 148, 183

  31. [39]

    & Sedlmayr, E.\ 1999, , 347, 594

    Gail, H.-P. & Sedlmayr, E.\ 1999, , 347, 594

  32. [40]

    P., Mather, J

    Gardner, J. P., Mather, J. C., Abbott, R., et al.\ 2023, , 135, 068001

  33. [41]

    C., Abbott, R., et al.\ 2023, arXiv:2504.12940

    Gavetti, C., Mather, J. C., Abbott, R., et al.\ 2023, arXiv:2504.12940

  34. [42]

    R., Boyer, M

    Goldman, S. R., Boyer, M. L., McQuinn, K. B. W., et al.\ 2019, , 877, 1, 49

  35. [43]

    & Sauval, A

    Grevesse, N. & Sauval, A. J.\ 1998, Space Sci. Rev., 85, 161

  36. [44]

    F., D'Souza, R., et al.\ 2023, , 525, 449 (H23)

    Harmsen, B., Bell, E. F., D'Souza, R., et al.\ 2023, , 525, 449 (H23)

  37. [45]

    H., Allard, F., Ferguson, J., et al.\ 1999, , 525, 2, 871

    Hauschildt, P. H., Allard, F., Ferguson, J., et al.\ 1999, , 525, 2, 871

  38. [46]

    & Olofsson, H.\ 2018, , 26, 1

    H \"o fner, S. & Olofsson, H.\ 2018, , 26, 1

  39. [47]

    doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.12.090174.001243

    Iben, I.\ 1974, , 12, 215. doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.12.090174.001243

  40. [48]

    T., Khosroshahi, H., et al.\ 2013, , 432, 4

    Javadi, A., van Loon, J. T., Khosroshahi, H., et al.\ 2013, , 432, 4

  41. [49]

    C., McDonald, I., Rich, R

    Jones, O. C., McDonald, I., Rich, R. M., et al.\ 2015, , 446, 2, 1584

  42. [50]

    C., Boyer, M

    Jones, O. C., Boyer, M. L., McDonald, I., et al.\ 2023, , 525, 3, 3693

  43. [51]

    Kamath, D., Dell'Agli, F., Ventura, P., et al.\ 2023, , 519, 2169

  44. [52]

    Y., Grebel, E

    Kniazev, A. Y., Grebel, E. K., Pustilnik, S. A., et al.\ 2005, , 130, 1558

  45. [53]

    Koike, C., Kaito, C., Yamamoto, T., et al.\ 1995, , 114, 1, 203

  46. [54]

    T., Meixner, M., et al.\ 2015, , 799, 1, 50

    Laki \'c evi \'c , M., van Loon, J. T., Meixner, M., et al.\ 2015, , 799, 1, 50

  47. [55]

    & Draine, B

    Laor, A. & Draine, B. T.\ 1993, , Spectroscopic Constraints on the Properties of Dust in Active Galactic Nuclei, 402, 441

  48. [56]

    Marini, E., Dell'Agli, F., Di Criscienzo, M., et al.\ 2019, , Discovery of Stars Surrounded by Iron Dust in the Large Magellanic Cloud, 871, 1, L16

  49. [57]

    Marini, E., Dell'Agli, F., Di Criscienzo, M., et al.\ 2020, , Characterization of M-stars in the LMC in the JWST era, 493, 2, 2996

  50. [58]

    Marini, E., Dell'Agli, F., Groenewegen, M. A. T., et al.\ 2021, , Understanding the evolution and dust formation of carbon stars in the Large Magellanic Cloud via the JWST, 647, A69

  51. [59]

    J., Zijlstra, A

    Matsuura, M., Barlow, M. J., Zijlstra, A. A., et al.\ 2009, , 396, 2, 918

  52. [60]

    W.\ 2012, , 144, 4

    McConnachie, A. W.\ 2012, , 144, 4

  53. [61]

    T., Sloan, G

    McDonald, I., van Loon, J. T., Sloan, G. C., et al.\ 2011, , 417, 1, 20

  54. [62]

    L., van Loon, J

    McDonald, I., Boyer, M. L., van Loon, J. T., et al.\ 2011, , 730, 2, 71

  55. [63]

    A., Sloan, G

    McDonald, I., Zijlstra, A. A., Sloan, G. C., et al.\ 2013, , 436, 1, 413

  56. [64]

    A., Sloan, G

    McDonald, I., Zijlstra, A. A., Sloan, G. C., et al.\ 2014, , 439, 3, 2618

  57. [65]

    & Zijlstra, A

    McDonald, I. & Zijlstra, A. A.\ 2015, , 448, 1, 502

  58. [66]

    Miglio, A., Brogaard, K., Stello, D., et al.\ 2012, , 419, 3, 2077

  59. [67]

    C., Lenki \'c , L., et al.\ 2024, , 531, 1, 183

    Nally, C., Jones, O. C., Lenki \'c , L., et al.\ 2024, , 531, 1, 183

  60. [68]

    Nanni, A., Bressan, A., Marigo, P., et al.\ 2013, , 434, 2390

  61. [69]

    Nanni, A., Bressan, A., Marigo, P., et al.\ 2014, , 438, 2328

  62. [70]

    Nanni, A., Marigo, P., Girardi, L., et al.\ 2018, , 473, 5492

  63. [71]

    Nanni, A., Groenewegen, M. A. T., Aringer, B., et al.\ 2019, , 487, 502

  64. [72]

    Nenkova, M., Ivezic, Z., & Elitzur, M.\ 1999, Thermal Emission Spectroscopy and Analysis of Dust, Disks, and Regoliths, DUSTY: A Publicly Available Code for Continuum Radiative Transfer in Astrophysical Environments, 969, 20

  65. [73]

    A., Long, L

    Ordal, M. A., Long, L. L., Bell, R. J., et al.\ 1983, , 22, 7, 1099

  66. [74]

    S.\ 1992, , 261, 567

    Ossenkopf, V., Henning, T., & Mathis, J. S.\ 1992, , 261, 567

  67. [75]

    Pegourie, B.\ 1988, , Optical properties of alpha silicon carbide., 194, 335

  68. [76]

    Riebel D., Srinivasan S., Sargent B., Meixner M., 2012, ApJ, 753, 71

  69. [77]

    J., Robertson, B., Tacchella, S., et al.\ 2023, , 269, 1, 16

    Rieke, M. J., Robertson, B., Tacchella, S., et al.\ 2023, , 269, 1, 16

  70. [78]

    & Boothroyd, A

    Sackmann, I.-J. & Boothroyd, A. I.\ 1992, , 392, L71

  71. [79]

    Sahai, R., Morris, M., S \'a nchez Contreras, C., et al.\ 2007, , 134, 6, 2200

  72. [80]

    F., & Freedman, W

    Sakai, S., Madore, B. F., & Freedman, W. L.\ 1996, , 461, 713

  73. [81]

    & Sahai, R.\ 2022, , 940, 1, 54

    Sarkar, G. & Sahai, R.\ 2022, , 940, 1, 54

  74. [82]

    & H \"a rm, R.\ 1965, , 142, 855

    Schwarzschild, M. & H \"a rm, R.\ 1965, , 142, 855

  75. [83]

    C., Matsuura, M., Lagadec, E., et al.\ 2012, , 752, 140

    Sloan, G. C., Matsuura, M., Lagadec, E., et al.\ 2012, , 752, 140

  76. [84]

    C., Kraemer, K

    Sloan, G. C., Kraemer, K. E., McDonald, I., et al.\ 2016, , 826, 44

  77. [85]

    F., Finkbeiner D

    Schlafly E. F., Finkbeiner D. P., 2011, ApJ, 737, 103

  78. [86]

    & Maiolino, R.\ 2024, , 32, 2

    Schneider, R. & Maiolino, R.\ 2024, , 32, 2

  79. [87]

    L., Kemper, F., et al.\ 2016, , 457, 3, 2814

    Srinivasan, S., Boyer, M. L., Kemper, F., et al.\ 2016, , 457, 3, 2814

  80. [88]

    P., Lagioia, E

    Tailo, M., Milone, A. P., Lagioia, E. P., et al.\ 2021, , 503, 1, 694

  81. [89]

    & Ferrara, A.\ 2001, , 325, 726

    Todini, P. & Ferrara, A.\ 2001, , 325, 726

  82. [90]

    T., Cohen, M., Oliveira, J

    van Loon, J. T., Cohen, M., Oliveira, J. M., et al.\ 2008, , 487, 1055

  83. [91]

    Ventura, P., Zeppieri, A., Mazzitelli, I., et al.\ 1998, , 334, 953

  84. [92]

    Ventura, P., D'Antona, F., Mazzitelli, I., et al.\ 2001, , 550, L65

  85. [93]

    & D'Antona, F.\ 2009, , 499, 835

    Ventura, P. & D'Antona, F.\ 2009, , 499, 835

  86. [94]

    Ventura, P., di Criscienzo, M., Schneider, R., et al.\ 2012, , 424, 2345

  87. [95]

    Ventura, P., Di Criscienzo, M., Carini, R., et al.\ 2013, , 431, 4, 3642

  88. [96]

    Ventura, P., Dell'Agli, F., Schneider, R., et al.\ 2014, , 439, 977

  89. [97]

    Ventura, P., Karakas, A., Dell'Agli, F., et al.\ 2018, , 475, 2282

  90. [98]

    Ventura, P., Dell'Agli, F., Tailo, M., et al.\ 2022, Universe, 8, 45

  91. [99]

    T., Kallivayalil, N., Zivick, P., et al.\ 2023, , 519, 1, 1189

    Warfield, J. T., Kallivayalil, N., Zivick, P., et al.\ 2023, , 519, 1, 1189

  92. [100]

    G., 2011, A&A, 531, A89

    Weber, M., Strassmeier, K. G., 2011, A&A, 531, A89

  93. [101]

    R., Dolphin, A

    Weisz, D. R., Dolphin, A. E., Skillman, E. D., et al.\ 2014, , 789, 147

  94. [102]

    R., McQuinn, K

    Weisz, D. R., McQuinn, K. B. W., Savino, A., et al.\ 2023, , 268, 1, 15

  95. [103]

    R., Dolphin, A

    Weisz, D. R., Dolphin, A. E., Savino, A., et al.\ 2024, , 271, 2, 47

  96. [104]

    F., Lang D., Dalcanton J

    Williams B. F., Lang D., Dalcanton J. J., et al., 2014, ApJS, 215, 9

  97. [105]

    S., Rieke, G

    Wright, G. S., Rieke, G. H., Glasse, A., et al.\ 2023, , 135, 1046, 048003

  98. [106]

    Yan Z., Wang S., Chen X., Deng L., 2025, ApJ, 986, 54

  99. [107]

    Zhou, T., Whisnant, A., Gerasimov, R., et al.\ 2022, Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 6, 212

  100. [108]

    G., Mennella, V., Colangeli, L., et al.\ 1996, , 282, 4, 1321

    Zubko, V. G., Mennella, V., Colangeli, L., et al.\ 1996, , 282, 4, 1321

Pith tools

Reviewed June 27, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.