Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Fiber Bundle Gauge Theories and "Field's Dilemma"

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv physics/0005051 v1 pith:3VM2CKMX submitted 2000-05-19 physics.hist-ph gr-qchep-thphysics.gen-phquant-ph

classification physics.hist-phgr-qchep-thphysics.gen-phquant-ph
keywords fieldtheoriesbundledilemmagaugedistinctionfibermathematical
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

We propose a distinction between the physical and the mathematical parts of gauge field theories. The main problem we face is to uphold a strong and meaningful criterion of what is physical. We like to call it "Field's dilemma", referring to Hartry Field's nominalist proposal which we consider to be inadaequate. The resolution to the dilemma, we believe, is implicitly provided by the so-called fiber bundle formalism. We shall demonstrate, in detail, that the bundle structure underlying modern quantum and gravitational gauge field theories allows for a genuine distinction between the physically significant and the merely mathematical parts of these theories.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. What Price Fiber Bundle Substantivalism? On How to Avoid Holes in Fibers

    physics.hist-ph 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Using the Dressing Field Method to build invariant variables, the paper argues that a relationalized fiber bundle substantivalism avoids the generalized hole argument.

Pith tools