Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Transformer Language Models in Grammatical Error Correction

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1906.01733 v1 pith:3ZF4GFKQ submitted 2019-06-04 cs.CL cs.LGcs.NE

classification cs.CLcs.LGcs.NE
keywords languagemodelsachievecorrectionerrorgrammaticalmodelingperformance
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent work on Grammatical Error Correction (GEC) has highlighted the importance of language modeling in that it is certainly possible to achieve good performance by comparing the probabilities of the proposed edits. At the same time, advancements in language modeling have managed to generate linguistic output, which is almost indistinguishable from that of human-generated text. In this paper, we up the ante by exploring the potential of more sophisticated language models in GEC and offer some key insights on their strengths and weaknesses. We show that, in line with recent results in other NLP tasks, Transformer architectures achieve consistently high performance and provide a competitive baseline for future machine learning models.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Bangla Grammatical Error Detection Leveraging Transformer-based Token Classification

    cs.CL 2024-11 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A token-classification ensemble of BanglaBERT models with rule-based post-processing detects grammatical errors in Bangla text with a reported Levenshtein distance score of 1.04 (or 1.054, the paper is inconsistent).

Pith tools