A note on the combinatorial derivation of non-small sets
classification
🧮 math.CO
keywords
largedeltaemphsubsetcalledcombinatorialderivationevery
read the original abstract
Given an infinite group $G$ and a subset $A$ of $G$ we let $\Delta(A) = \{g \in G \,:\, |gA \cap A| =\infty\}$ (this is sometimes called the \emph{combinatorial derivation} of $A$). A subset $A$ of $G$ is called: \emph{large} if there exists a finite subset $F$ of $G$ such that $FA=G$; \emph{$\Delta$-large} if $\Delta(A)$ is large and \emph{small} if for every large subset $L$ of $G$, $(G \setminus A) \cap L$ is large. In this note we show that every non-small set is $\Delta$-large, answering a question of Protasov.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.