Impact of Errors in Operational Spreadsheets
read the original abstract
All users of spreadsheets struggle with the problem of errors. Errors are thought to be prevalent in spreadsheets, and in some instances they have cost organizations millions of dollars. In a previous study of 50 operational spreadsheets we found errors in 0.8% to 1.8% of all formula cells, depending on how errors are defined. In the current study we estimate the quantitative impacts of errors in 25 operational spreadsheets from five different organizations. We find that many errors have no quantitative impact on the spreadsheet. Those that have an impact often affect unimportant portions of the spreadsheet. The remaining errors do sometimes have substantial impacts on key aspects of the spreadsheet. This paper provides the first fully-documented evidence on the quantitative impact of errors in operational spreadsheets.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
BlueFin: Benchmarking LLM Agents on Financial Spreadsheets
BlueFin is a new benchmark for LLM agents on financial spreadsheets showing frontier models score below 50% with weaknesses in dynamic correctness.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.