Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

CoSy: Evaluating Textual Explanations of Neurons

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.20331 v2 pith:4I2DPAKD submitted 2024-05-30 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CL

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CL
keywords explanationstextualdataevaluatingframeworkneuronspointsquality
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

A crucial aspect of understanding the complex nature of Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) is the ability to explain learned concepts within their latent representations. While methods exist to connect neurons to human-understandable textual descriptions, evaluating the quality of these explanations is challenging due to the lack of a unified quantitative approach. We introduce CoSy (Concept Synthesis), a novel, architecture-agnostic framework for evaluating textual explanations of latent neurons. Given textual explanations, our proposed framework uses a generative model conditioned on textual input to create data points representing the explanations. By comparing the neuron's response to these generated data points and control data points, we can estimate the quality of the explanation. We validate our framework through sanity checks and benchmark various neuron description methods for Computer Vision tasks, revealing significant differences in quality.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Evaluating Neuron Explanations: A Unified Framework with Sanity Checks

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Most commonly used neuron explanation evaluation metrics fail two new sanity checks, and only Correlation, Cosine, AUPRC, F1-score, and IoU pass.

Pith tools