Continuous-Time Modeling of Counterfactual Outcomes Using Neural Controlled Differential Equations
read the original abstract
Estimating counterfactual outcomes over time has the potential to unlock personalized healthcare by assisting decision-makers to answer ''what-iF'' questions. Existing causal inference approaches typically consider regular, discrete-time intervals between observations and treatment decisions and hence are unable to naturally model irregularly sampled data, which is the common setting in practice. To handle arbitrary observation patterns, we interpret the data as samples from an underlying continuous-time process and propose to model its latent trajectory explicitly using the mathematics of controlled differential equations. This leads to a new approach, the Treatment Effect Neural Controlled Differential Equation (TE-CDE), that allows the potential outcomes to be evaluated at any time point. In addition, adversarial training is used to adjust for time-dependent confounding which is critical in longitudinal settings and is an added challenge not encountered in conventional time-series. To assess solutions to this problem, we propose a controllable simulation environment based on a model of tumor growth for a range of scenarios with irregular sampling reflective of a variety of clinical scenarios. TE-CDE consistently outperforms existing approaches in all simulated scenarios with irregular sampling.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Smooth Multi-Policy Causal Effect Estimation in Longitudinal Settings
PEQ-Net jointly estimates multiple longitudinal treatment policies via a shared policy encoder and kernel mean embeddings to constrain second-order bias after LTMLE correction.
-
Smooth Multi-Policy Causal Effect Estimation in Longitudinal Settings
PEQ-Net uses policy-aware reparameterization of ICE Q-functions and kernel mean embeddings in a shared encoder, followed by LTMLE, to jointly estimate multiple policies while constraining second-order bias for lower variance.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.