Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

TourRank: Utilizing Large Language Models for Documents Ranking with a Tournament-Inspired Strategy

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.11678 v2 pith:4N7WVTUX submitted 2024-06-17 cs.IR cs.CL

classification cs.IRcs.CL
keywords rankingtourrankdocumentsinputllmslargeperformanceresults
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly employed in zero-shot documents ranking, yielding commendable results. However, several significant challenges still persist in LLMs for ranking: (1) LLMs are constrained by limited input length, precluding them from processing a large number of documents simultaneously; (2) The output document sequence is influenced by the input order of documents, resulting in inconsistent ranking outcomes; (3) Achieving a balance between cost and ranking performance is challenging. To tackle these issues, we introduce a novel documents ranking method called TourRank, which is inspired by the sport tournaments, such as FIFA World Cup. Specifically, we 1) overcome the limitation in input length and reduce the ranking latency by incorporating a multi-stage grouping strategy similar to the parallel group stage of sport tournaments; 2) improve the ranking performance and robustness to input orders by using a points system to ensemble multiple ranking results. We test TourRank with different LLMs on the TREC DL datasets and the BEIR benchmark. The experimental results demonstrate that TourRank delivers state-of-the-art performance at a modest cost. The code of TourRank can be seen on https://github.com/chenyiqun/TourRank.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Likert or Not: LLM Absolute Relevance Judgments on Fine-Grained Ordinal Scales

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Pointwise LLM scoring with an 11-point ordinal scale is statistically competitive with listwise ranking for 31 of 40 model-dataset combinations on NDCG@10.

  2. Precise Zero-Shot Pointwise Ranking with LLMs through Post-Aggregated Global Context Information

    cs.IR 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A summary-based anchor document enables contrastive pointwise scoring that, when averaged with ordinary pointwise scores, improves zero-shot LLM reranking.

  3. Scaling Search Relevance: Augmenting App Store Ranking with LLM-Generated Judgments

    cs.IR 2026-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Using a fine-tuned 3B LLM to generate millions of textual relevance labels for App Store search improves the ranker's behavioral/textual Pareto frontier and lifts conversion by 0.24%.

Pith tools