Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Optimization of Genomic Classifiers for Clinical Deployment: Evaluation of Bayesian Optimization to Select Predictive Models of Acute Infection and In-Hospital Mortality

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2003.12310 v3 pith:4TJXW2PZ submitted 2020-03-27 cs.LG q-bio.QMstat.ML

Optimization of Genomic Classifiers for Clinical Deployment: Evaluation of Bayesian Optimization to Select Predictive Models of Acute Infection and In-Hospital Mortality

classification cs.LG q-bio.QMstat.ML
keywords optimizationclassifiersbayesianacuteinfectionapproachesgridin-hospital
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Acute infection, if not rapidly and accurately detected, can lead to sepsis, organ failure and even death. Current detection of acute infection as well as assessment of a patient's severity of illness are imperfect. Characterization of a patient's immune response by quantifying expression levels of specific genes from blood represents a potentially more timely and precise means of accomplishing both tasks. Machine learning methods provide a platform to leverage this 'host response' for development of deployment-ready classification models. Prioritization of promising classifiers is dependent, in part, on hyperparameter optimization for which a number of approaches including grid search, random sampling and Bayesian optimization have been shown to be effective. We compare HO approaches for the development of diagnostic classifiers of acute infection and in-hospital mortality from gene expression of 29 diagnostic markers. We take a deployment-centered approach to our comprehensive analysis, accounting for heterogeneity in our multi-study patient cohort with our choices of dataset partitioning and hyperparameter optimization objective as well as assessing selected classifiers in external (as well as internal) validation. We find that classifiers selected by Bayesian optimization for in-hospital mortality can outperform those selected by grid search or random sampling. However, in contrast to previous research: 1) Bayesian optimization is not more efficient in selecting classifiers in all instances compared to grid search or random sampling-based methods and 2) we note marginal gains in classifier performance in only specific circumstances when using a common variant of Bayesian optimization (i.e. automatic relevance determination). Our analysis highlights the need for further practical, deployment-centered benchmarking of HO approaches in the healthcare context.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.