Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

Homoclinic orbits, Reeb chords and nice Birkhoff sections for Reeb flows in 3D

T0 review · 2 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Generic Reeb flows force homoclinic orbits on every hyperbolic orbit

desk verdict Impressive scope but a real gap in Proposition 3.2: the generic homoclinic theorem is not proven as written. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.11725 v1 pith:4VLO6NOZ submitted 2025-01-20 math.SG math.DS

Vincent Colin , Umberto Hryniewicz , Ana Rechtman This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.SGmath.DS MSC 37C2937E3053D1053D3537D40
keywords ReebflowshomoclinicorbitsBirkhoffsectionschordsLegendrianknotscontact3-manifoldssurfacedynamicsequidistributionofperiodic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proves three interlocking results about Reeb vector fields on closed 3-manifolds, valid for a $C^\infty$-generic set of contact forms. First, every hyperbolic periodic orbit has a transverse homoclinic connection in each branch of its stable and unstable manifolds, obtained by adapting a surface-dynamics theorem from the literature through a Birkhoff section. Second, those homoclinic connections allow the construction of embedded Birkhoff sections that contain any prescribed finite collection of periodic orbits in their boundary and any prescribed Legendrian link, up to a $C^0$-small Legendrian isotopy, in their interior. Third, if a Reeb flow admits a Birkhoff section, then every Legendrian knot has infinitely many Reeb chords; the only flows with finitely many geometrically distinct chords are the sphere and lens spaces with exactly two periodic orbits. The paper also gives a new proof of the analogous generic result for geodesic flows on closed surfaces.

What carries the argument

The proof's main mechanism is a transfer from flow to surface dynamics. Collapsing the boundary components of a $\partial$-strong Birkhoff section $S$ to points produces a closed surface, and the first return map becomes a homeomorphism whose periodic points are hyperbolic or elliptic inside, and degenerate sectorial points (with $\ell$ prongs) at the collapsed boundary. The paper adapts a surface-dynamics theorem from the literature ([23]) to this setting, first using the equidistribution condition (G2) to eliminate one-pronged sectorial points (Proposition 3.2), then proving every equivalence class of sectorial periodic points is homoclinic through Lefschetz-index and genus estimates (Propositions 3.10–3.16). A second mechanism is pair-of-pants surgery: homoclinic connections give embedded three-holed-sphere sections (Appendix A) whose addition changes the boundary, forces embeddedness, and slides the section past a Legendrian knot. A third mechanism is the flux-zero property of the first return map, which turns the area-preserving nature of the flow into forced intersections among iterates of a loop cut out by a Legendrian knot, yielding infinitely many Reeb chords.

What would settle it

One concrete check: for a $C^\infty$-generic Reeb flow on a closed contact 3-manifold, construct the Birkhoff section from the paper's reference [3], collapse its boundary, and compute the first return map on the resulting surface; if some hyperbolic periodic point had stable and unstable branches that never intersect, Theorem 1.4 would fail. Another check targets Theorem 1.10: a $\partial$-strong Birkhoff section whose boundary has three or more components, together with a Legendrian knot having only finitely many geometrically distinct Reeb chords, would disprove the claimed dichotomy.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim (Theorem 1.4) is that any Reeb vector field on a closed 3-manifold that is strongly non-degenerate (periodic orbits are only hyperbolic or elliptic, with transverse intersections of stable and unstable manifolds), whose periodic orbits are equidistributed with respect to the invariant volume (condition G2), and which satisfies the elliptic-orbit condition (G3), has a transverse homoclinic orbit on every branch of every hyperbolic periodic orbit. Because these three conditions hold $C^\infty$-generically for a fixed co-oriented contact structure, the paper concludes that a generic Reeb flow has transverse homoclinics on every hyperbolic orbit (Theorem 1.1). The same homoclinic structure powers Theorem 1.7: given any finite set of periodic orbits $\Gamma$ and any Legendrian link $L$, one can build an embedded $\partial$-strong Birkhoff section whose boundary contains $\Gamma$ and whose interior contains a Legendrian link that is $C^0$-close to $L$. Theorem 1.10 upgrades the chord conjecture from at least one Reeb chord to infinitely many for every Legendrian knot whenever a Birkhoff section exists, with the only finite-geometric-chord exception being the two-periodic-orbit flows on the sphere or the lens spaces.

Load-bearing premise

The proof requires that a $\partial$-strong Birkhoff section can be modified so that no boundary orbit collapses to a one-pronged point in the induced surface return map; this modification uses the equidistribution of periodic orbits (or, for geodesic flows, the density of closed geodesics), and without it the surface-dynamics argument cannot begin.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Generic Reeb flows on closed 3-manifolds have transverse homoclinic connections on every branch of every hyperbolic periodic orbit, not merely positive entropy.
  • Any finite set of periodic orbits can be included in the boundary of an embedded global surface of section, and any Legendrian link can be moved by a $C^0$-small Legendrian isotopy into its interior; the same surgery works for transitive uniformly hyperbolic flows without a contact structure (the paper's Theorem 5.2).
  • Birkhoff sections imply infinitely many Reeb chords for every Legendrian knot; finite geometric distinctness occurs exactly in the two-periodic-orbit sphere or lens space case.
  • For geodesic flows on closed Riemannian surfaces, every Legendrian knot has infinitely many geometrically distinct chords, without any genericity assumption on the metric.
  • Under the paper's generic hypotheses, every Legendrian knot can be deformed by a $C^\infty$-small Legendrian isotopy so that the number of honest Reeb chords grows exponentially with the action.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The two-or-infinitely-many dichotomy for Reeb chords is likely to hold without assuming a Birkhoff section; the paper leaves this as Question 1.14, and the flux-zero mechanism suggests the dichotomy is a purely dynamical fact.
  • The exponential honest-chord count (Corollary 1.13) gives a growth invariant for Legendrian knots that could be compared with symplectic-homology wrapping numbers; the Birkhoff-section return map makes this growth computable in principle.
  • Since equidistribution enters only through Proposition 3.2, families of contact forms without the generic equidistribution property (G2) might still have Birkhoff sections yet lack universal homoclinics; testing such families, such as perturbations of integrable Reeb flows, would isolate the role of equidistribution.
  • The embedded thin pair-of-pants surgery from Appendix A is a local tool that may transfer to other non-singular flows in 3-manifolds, potentially producing global surfaces of section for flows that are not Reeb.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper proves three main results for C^∞-generic contact forms on closed 3-manifolds: (1) every hyperbolic periodic Reeb orbit admits a transverse homoclinic orbit in each branch of its stable and unstable manifolds (Theorem 1.4, implying Theorem 1.1); (2) one can find an embedded ∂-strong Birkhoff section containing any prescribed finite collection of periodic orbits in its boundary and a C^0-small Legendrian isotopic copy of any prescribed Legendrian link in its interior (Theorem 1.7); and (3) if a Reeb flow admits a Birkhoff section, then every Legendrian knot has infinitely many Reeb chords, with an explicit finite exception when the manifold is a lens space or the sphere with exactly two periodic orbits (Theorem 1.10). The proof of Theorem 1.4 follows the Le Calvez–Sambarino approach for surface diffeomorphisms, adapted to the first-return map on a Birkhoff section, using the authors' previous work [3] to eliminate degenerate points. The proof of Theorem 1.7 uses Fried pairs of pants, and the proof of Theorem 1.10 uses the flux-zero property of the first return map together with the Hutchings–Taubes chord theorem.

Significance. If the results are correct, they are substantial: the generic existence of homoclinic connections for every hyperbolic periodic orbit is a strong improvement over earlier partial results, the Birkhoff-section statement answers a natural analogue of Giroux's open-book question in a generic setting, and the Reeb-chord dichotomy is a new and meaningful finiteness result. The paper is detailed and makes honest references to external published results, including Irie's equidistribution theorem, Contreras–Mazzucchelli's Birkhoff-section theorem, the authors' own [3], and the Le Calvez–Sambarino machinery. The main weakness is that the paper is explicitly non-self-contained and, more importantly, one of the technical propositions used to eliminate 1-pronged points contains a computational error that is load-bearing for Theorem 1.4. The error appears repairable, but the proof as written is incomplete.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 3.1, Proposition 3.2] The proof of Proposition 3.2 uses an incorrect count of intersections between the trace of the Birkhoff section and the stable/unstable manifolds of a negative hyperbolic boundary orbit. For a trace of class (a,b) and a stable/unstable curve of class (1,2), the geometric intersection number is |det((1,2),(a,b))| = |b−2a|, not |b|+2|a|. In the case γ ∈ L′∩∂S_n, the paper claims the class (a_1, n b_0) intersects the stable/unstable curve in n|b_0|+2a_1 points, but the actual number is |n b_0 − 2a_1|. Taking a_1=1, b_0=1, n=1 gives 1, so the corresponding point would still be 1-pronged, contradicting the claimed lower bound. The same issue appears in the estimates for γ ∈ L\L′ and γ ∈ K. Since Proposition 3.2 is the only step that removes 1-pronged points before the Le Calvez–Sambarino adaptation, Theorem 1.4 is not proved as written. The gap appears repairable by choosing n large enough so that |n b_0 − 2a_1| ≥ 2; the authors should replace the invalid lower bound with the correct determinant formula and adjust the choice of n accordingly.
  2. [Section 4, Proposition 4.1] The same intersection-number error occurs in the geodesic-flow replacement for Proposition 3.2. After adding a Birkhoff annulus of class (a_1,0) to a boundary component of class (0,b_0), the paper asserts that the resulting trace class (a_1,b_0) meets the stable/unstable curve of class (1,2) in |b_0|+2a_1 points. The correct count is |b_0−2a_1|, which can be 1: for a_1=1 and b_0=1, the claimed lower bound gives 3, but the actual number of intersections is 1. The same problem occurs in the estimate for the orbit σ_+, where the asserted count 1+2a_0 should be |±1−2a_0|. Therefore the proof of Proposition 4.1, and with it the proof of Theorem 1.2 as presented, needs a corrected divisibility argument. As with Proposition 3.2, a suitable choice of the added annuli or of the iteration count may repair the argument, but the current text does not establish the absence of 1-pronged points.
minor comments (3)
  1. [General] The paper contains several typographical errors that should be corrected in a final revision, including 'address te following' in Section 4, 'at thxe expense' in Appendix A, and 'Propostion 4.1' in the proof of Proposition 4.1.
  2. [Section 2] The paper relies on Proposition 2.11 and Theorem 2.10 of [3] without restating them. Since these are load-bearing inputs, a short statement of their exact content would improve readability and make the logical dependence clearer.
  3. [Section 5.2, Step 1] The tetrachotomy for the four local configurations of an elliptic boundary orbit is hard to follow in prose. A table or a small figure showing the signs of q_i, α_i − q_i/p_i, and the resulting boundary orientation would help the reader verify the subsequent inequality.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the main theorems are derived from published independent prior results plus new arguments; self-citations to [3] supply lemmas, not the target conclusions.

full rationale

The derivation chain does not reduce to its inputs. Theorem 1.4 assumes (G1)-(G3) and uses Theorem 2.5 only to obtain a ∂-strong Birkhoff section; the existence of such sections is a published result ([6] for (G1), [3] for (G2+)) whose hypotheses do not include the target homoclinic statement. Proposition 3.2 invokes Propositions 2.11 and Theorem A.1 of [3] to construct a modified Birkhoff section; these are technical lemmas about links, homology classes and Birkhoff sections, not restatements of 'every hyperbolic orbit has homoclinics.' The later adaptation of Le Calvez-Sambarino is a new argument, with the degenerate boundary points treated explicitly. Theorem 1.7 uses Theorem 1.4 as an input, but a theorem may legitimately be used within the same paper to prove corollaries; there is no fitted parameter or data-dependent prediction. Theorem 1.10 is independent, relying on Hutchings-Taubes and on [11]. The paper's explicit statement in §1.4 that it is not self-contained and defers technical issues to [3] is a transparency note, not a circular step. The alleged prong-count issue in Prop. 3.2 (|b|+2|a| versus |b-2a|) would be a correctness concern, not a definitional equivalence; it does not show that the theorem was assumed as an input.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central results are proved by combining published theorems in contact topology and surface dynamics; no free parameters or invented entities appear. The paper's own previous work [3] is used for Birkhoff section constructions and two technical propositions. All inputs are external theorems rather than assumptions tailored to the conclusion.

assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Existence of a ∂-strong Birkhoff section for non-degenerate Reeb flows satisfying (G1) or (G2+) (Theorem 2.5)
    Invoked in Section 3 and Section 5.1 to start the construction. Proven by Contreras-Mazzucchelli [6] and by the authors in [3].
  • domain assumption Irie's theorem: C∞-generic Reeb flows have periodic orbits equidistributed with respect to Liouville measure (G2)
    Used in Proposition 3.2 to avoid 1-pronged Mather sectorial points by applying Proposition 2.11 of [3]. Cited as [18].
  • domain assumption Zehnder's condition (G3) is C∞-generic for elliptic periodic orbits
    Used to approximate elliptic orbits by hyperbolic orbits with homoclinic intersections; proved by Zehnder [25] and discussed in [3, Section 6.3]. For geodesic flows, established via Contreras [5] and Le Calvez [22].
  • domain assumption Le Calvez-Sambarino theorem: area-preserving surface diffeomorphisms satisfying strong non-degeneracy and Zehnder's condition have homoclinic orbits at every hyperbolic periodic point (Theorem 1.3)
    The proof of Theorem 1.4 adapts the arguments of [23] to the setting with Mather sectorial boundary points.
  • domain assumption Hutchings-Taubes chord conjecture: every Legendrian knot in a closed contact 3-manifold has at least one Reeb chord
    Used in the proof of Theorem 1.10 as the starting point to obtain a Reeb chord. Cited as [15,16].
  • domain assumption Cristofaro-Gardiner-Hryniewicz-Hutchings-Liu: classification of Reeb flows with exactly two periodic orbits as irrational pseudo-rotations on lens spaces or spheres
    Used in the final cases of Theorem 1.10 to identify the exceptional manifold and flow structure. Cited as [11].
  • domain assumption Proposition 2.11 and Theorem 2.10 from the authors' prior work [3], used to modify Birkhoff sections under equidistribution
    Imported without proof in Proposition 3.2; the paper states it is not self-contained. These are published results in [3].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Homoclinic orbits, Reeb chords and nice Birkhoff sections for Reeb flows in 3D." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4VLO6NOZ

@misc{pith2026250111725,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Homoclinic orbits, Reeb chords and nice Birkhoff sections for Reeb flows in 3D},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4VLO6NOZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.11725}
}
abstract

We prove that for a $C^\infty$-generic contact form defining a given co-oriented contact structure on a closed $3$-manifold, every hyperbolic periodic Reeb orbit admits a transverse homoclinic connection in each of the branches of its stable and unstable manifolds. We exploit this result to prove that for a $C^\infty$-generic contact form defining a given co-oriented contact structure, given any finite collection $\Gamma$ of periodic Reeb orbits and any Legendrian link $L$, there exists a global surface of section (embedded Birkhoff section) for the Reeb flow that contains $\Gamma$ in its boundary, and that contains in its interior a Legendrian link that is Legendrian isotopic to $L$ by a $C^0$-small isotopy. Finally we prove that if the Reeb vector field admits a $\partial$-strong Birkhoff section then every Legendrian knot has infinitely many geometrically distinct Reeb chords, except possibly when the ambient manifold is a lens space or the sphere and the Reeb flow has exactly two periodic orbits. In particular, $C^\infty$-generically on the contact form there are infinitely many geometrically distinct Reeb chords for every Legendrian knot. In the case of geodesic flows, every Legendrian knot has infinitely many disjoint chords, without any further assumptions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.11725 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The Fried sum of P and S that eliminates an intersec￾tion point in L ∩ S. Here we have moved it to z ∈ L ′ ∩ R2. The possible nearby intersection point z ′ of L ′ and R1 can be elimi￾nated by sliding L ′ along the characteristic foliation of R1, after first pushing S up slightly along R1 to avoid creating extra inter￾sections with S when sliding L ′ . We want to prove that, up to moving L ′ , we have that if L ∩ S h… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The pair of pants P (before smoothing) near Q0. The Reeb vector field is vertical and the contact structure approxi￾mately horizontal. We push L1 away from P along its characteris￾tic foliation ξP in counterclocwise manner to obtain L2 (in blue), without creating new chords. The Reeb chord intercepted by Q0 is in red. We are left with the four connected components B1, B2, B3 and B4 of (R1 ∪ R2) ∩ (S ′ × [0, 1]), tha… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The dynamics of the first-return map along ϕ t on a transverse disc D around a hyperbolic periodic point z0. A classical argument then implies the existence of a unique fixed point w1,1 for the first-return map from U1 to ψ n1,1 (U ′ 1 ) along the flow, of a unique fixed point w2,2 for the first-return map from U2 to ψ n2,2 (U ′ 2 ), and of a period two orbit (w1,2, w2,1) where w1,2 is in U1∩ψ n2,2 (U ′ 2 ) and w2,1… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Construction of the pair of pants P from the three periodic points w1,1, w1,2, w2,2 in D. Similarly, we obtain a segment α2,2 in U2 that connects w2,2 to w2,1, which is pushed along the flow to a segment α2,1 in ψ n2,2 (U ′ 2 ) that connects w2,2 to w1,2, and such that…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Sm\"org\aa sbord of (bi)contact structures, Reeb flows and pseudo-Anosov flows

    math.DS 2025-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A rigidity theorem for bicontact geometry: a bitransverse Anosov Reeb flow forces the supporting Anosov flow to be skew and isotopically equivalent; the rest of the paper is an open-problem survey.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

26 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [3]

    Colin, P

    V. Colin, P. Dehornoy, U. Hryniewicz and A. Rechtman, Generic properties of 3-dimensional Reeb flows: Birkhoff sections and entropy. Comment. Math. Helv. 99, No. 3, 557-611 (2024)

    work page 2024

  2. [1]

    V. I. Arnol’d, A. Avez, Probl` emes ergodiques de la m´ ecanique classique.Monographies inter- nationales de math´ ematiques modernes. 9. Paris: Gauthier-Villars. 243 p. (1967)

    work page 1967

  3. [2]

    M. R. R. Alves, M. Mazzuchelli From curve shortening to flat link stability and Birkhoff sections of geodesic flows , arXiv:2408.11938

    work page Pith review arXiv

  4. [4]

    Colin, P

    V. Colin, P. Dehornoy and A. Rechtman, On the existence of supporting broken book decom- positions for contact forms in dimension 3. Invent. math. 231, 1489–1539 (2023)

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    Contreras, Geodesic flows with positive topological entropy, twist maps and hyperbolicity

    G. Contreras, Geodesic flows with positive topological entropy, twist maps and hyperbolicity. Annals of Math., 172 (2010), 761–808

    work page 2010

  6. [6]

    Contreras and M

    G. Contreras and M. Mazzucchelli, Existence of Birkhoff sections for Kupka-Smale Reeb flows of closed contact 3-manifolds. Geom. Funct. Anal. 32, No. 5, 951-979 (2022)

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    Contreras and F

    G. Contreras and F. Oliveira, Birkhoff Program for Geodesic Flows of Surfaces and Appli- cations: Homoclinics. J. Dyn. Diff. Equat. (2024)

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    No elliptic points from fixed prime ends

    G. Contreras and F. Oliveira, No elliptic points from fixed prime ends , arXiv:2205.14768

    work page Pith review arXiv

Show all 26 references
  1. [9]

    Contreras and G

    G. Contreras and G. Paternain, Genericity of geodesic flows with positive topological entropy on S2, J. Differential Geom. 61, No. 1, 1–49 (2002)

    2002

  2. [10]

    Cristofaro-Gardiner and M

    D. Cristofaro-Gardiner and M. Hutchings, From one Reeb orbit to two , J. Differential Geom. 102, No. 1, 25–36 (2016)

    2016

  3. [11]

    Cristofaro-Gardiner, U

    D. Cristofaro-Gardiner, U. Hryniewicz, M. Hutchings and H. Liu, Contact three-manifolds with exactly two simple Reeb orbits. Geom. Topol. 27:9 (2023) 3801–3831

    2023

  4. [12]

    Cristofaro-Gardiner, U

    D. Cristofaro-Gardiner, U. Hryniewicz, M. Hutchings, H. Liu, Proof of Hofer-Wysocki- Zehnder’s two or infinity conjecture, arxiv:231007636

  5. [13]

    Fried, Transitive Anosov flows and pseudo-Anosov maps , Topology, 22 (1983), 299–303

    D. Fried, Transitive Anosov flows and pseudo-Anosov maps , Topology, 22 (1983), 299–303

    1983

  6. [14]

    Hall, A topology for free groups and related topics

    M. Hall, A topology for free groups and related topics. Ann. of Math. 52(1950), 127–139

    1950

  7. [15]

    Hutchings and C

    M. Hutchings and C. H. Taubes, Proof of the Arnold chord conjecture in three dimensions I , Math. Res. Lett. 18 (2011), 295-313

    2011

  8. [16]

    Hutchings and C

    M. Hutchings and C. H. Taubes, Proof of the Arnold chord conjecture in three dimensions II, Geometry and Topology 17 (2013), 2601-2688

    2013

  9. [17]

    Irie, Dense existence of periodic Reeb orbits and ECH spectral invariants

    K. Irie, Dense existence of periodic Reeb orbits and ECH spectral invariants. J. Mod. Dyn. 9 (2015), 357–363

    2015

  10. [18]

    Irie, Equidistributed periodic orbits of C∞-generic three-dimensional Reeb flows

    K. Irie, Equidistributed periodic orbits of C∞-generic three-dimensional Reeb flows. J. Sym- plectic Geom. 19 (2021), no. 3, 531–566

    2021

  11. [19]

    Katok, Lyapunov exponents, entropy and periodic orbits for diffeomorphisms

    A. Katok, Lyapunov exponents, entropy and periodic orbits for diffeomorphisms. Publications math´ ematiques de l’I.H.´E.S., tome 51 (1980), 137–173

    1980

  12. [20]

    Koropecki, Aperiodic invariant continua for surface homeomorphisms

    A. Koropecki, Aperiodic invariant continua for surface homeomorphisms. Math. Z. 266 (2010), no. 1, 229–236

    2010

  13. [21]

    Koropecki, P

    A. Koropecki, P. Le Calvez and M. Nassiri, Prime ends rotation numbers and periodic points. Duke Math. J. 164 (2015), no. 3, 403 –472

    2015

  14. [22]

    Le Calvez, Propri´ et´ es dynamiques des diff´ eomorphismes de l’anneau et du tore.Ast´ erisque

    P. Le Calvez, Propri´ et´ es dynamiques des diff´ eomorphismes de l’anneau et du tore.Ast´ erisque

  15. [23]

    Le Calvez, M

    P. Le Calvez, M. Sambarino, Homoclinic orbits for area preserving difffeomorphisms of sur- faces. Ergodic Theory Dyn. Syst. 42, No. 3, 1122-1165 (2022)

    2022

  16. [24]

    J. N. Mather, Invariant subsets for area preserving homeomorphisms of surfaces. Mathemat- ical analysis and applications, Part B, Adv. in Math. Suppl. Stud., vol. 7, Academic Press, New York, 1981, pp. 531–562

    1981

  17. [25]

    Zehnder, Homoclinic points near elliptic fixed points , Comm

    E. Zehnder, Homoclinic points near elliptic fixed points , Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 26 (1973), 131 – 182. 42 V. COLIN, U. HRYNIEWICZ, AND A. RECHTMAN V. Colin, Nantes Universit´e, CNRS, Laboratoire de Math´ematiques Jean Leray, LMJL, F-44000 Nantes, France Email address : vincen...

    1973

  18. [204]

    Paris: Soci´ et´ e Math´ ematique de France, 131 p. (1991)

    1991

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.