Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Tuning-Free Stochastic Optimization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.07793 v2 pith:4WZLEMGF submitted 2024-02-12 math.OC cs.LGstat.ML

classification math.OCcs.LGstat.ML
keywords algorithmstuning-freeoptimizationmatchconvergencecostdomainfunction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large-scale machine learning problems make the cost of hyperparameter tuning ever more prohibitive. This creates a need for algorithms that can tune themselves on-the-fly. We formalize the notion of "tuning-free" algorithms that can match the performance of optimally-tuned optimization algorithms up to polylogarithmic factors given only loose hints on the relevant problem parameters. We consider in particular algorithms that can match optimally-tuned Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD). When the domain of optimization is bounded, we show tuning-free matching of SGD is possible and achieved by several existing algorithms. We prove that for the task of minimizing a convex and smooth or Lipschitz function over an unbounded domain, tuning-free optimization is impossible. We discuss conditions under which tuning-free optimization is possible even over unbounded domains. In particular, we show that the recently proposed DoG and DoWG algorithms are tuning-free when the noise distribution is sufficiently well-behaved. For the task of finding a stationary point of a smooth and potentially nonconvex function, we give a variant of SGD that matches the best-known high-probability convergence rate for tuned SGD at only an additional polylogarithmic cost. However, we also give an impossibility result that shows no algorithm can hope to match the optimal expected convergence rate for tuned SGD with high probability.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Randomized Feasibility Methods for Constrained Optimization with Adaptive Step Sizes

    math.OC 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Combining adaptive DoWG-style step sizes with randomized Polyak feasibility updates yields a projection-free constrained optimization method with optimal O(1/√T) rates for convex objectives and linear convergence up t...

  2. AutoSGD: Automatic Learning Rate Selection for Stochastic Gradient Descent

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    AutoSGD runs three parallel SGD streams at nearby learning rates, uses paired noisy objective estimates to pick the winner, and is claimed to converge with little user tuning.

  3. A Parameter-Free and Near-Optimal Zeroth-Order Algorithm for Stochastic Convex Optimization

    math.OC 2025-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    POEM is a parameter-free stochastic zeroth-order method that adapts both step size and smoothing automatically and reaches near-optimal oracle complexity.

Pith tools