Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

DeepFL-IQA: Weak Supervision for Deep IQA Feature Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2001.08113 v1 pith:55IRTDER submitted 2020-01-20 eess.IV cs.CV

DeepFL-IQA: Weak Supervision for Deep IQA Feature Learning

classification eess.IV cs.CV
keywords featureimageslearningmethodsartificiallybenchmarkdeepfl-iqadistorted
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Multi-level deep-features have been driving state-of-the-art methods for aesthetics and image quality assessment (IQA). However, most IQA benchmarks are comprised of artificially distorted images, for which features derived from ImageNet under-perform. We propose a new IQA dataset and a weakly supervised feature learning approach to train features more suitable for IQA of artificially distorted images. The dataset, KADIS-700k, is far more extensive than similar works, consisting of 140,000 pristine images, 25 distortions types, totaling 700k distorted versions. Our weakly supervised feature learning is designed as a multi-task learning type training, using eleven existing full-reference IQA metrics as proxies for differential mean opinion scores. We also introduce a benchmark database, KADID-10k, of artificially degraded images, each subjectively annotated by 30 crowd workers. We make use of our derived image feature vectors for (no-reference) image quality assessment by training and testing a shallow regression network on this database and five other benchmark IQA databases. Our method, termed DeepFL-IQA, performs better than other feature-based no-reference IQA methods and also better than all tested full-reference IQA methods on KADID-10k. For the other five benchmark IQA databases, DeepFL-IQA matches the performance of the best existing end-to-end deep learning-based methods on average.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Partial-Reference IQA Based on Hermite-Gauss Structural Prediction and Texture Deviation

    eess.IV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5

    A partial-reference IQA method extracts one scalar noise prior from strong edges and fuses it with Hermite-Gauss self-prediction of structure to rival deep NR models with three parameters.

  2. Partial-Reference IQA Based on Hermite-Gauss Structural Prediction and Texture Deviation

    eess.IV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    PreSPA predicts perceptual image quality from a single reference scalar and Hermite-Gauss self-prediction of the distorted gradient field, rivaling deep NR models with three affine parameters.

  3. Spatially Localized Image Degradation Embeddings for Image Quality Assessment

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    SLIDE-IQA uses a dual-branch ViT with Threshold-Bounded Exclusion Mechanism for contrastive pretraining on localized degradations to boost sensitivity in NR-IQA while matching existing SSL benchmarks.