Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Why do LLaVA Vision-Language Models Reply to Images in English?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.02333 v1 pith:563GZFCF submitted 2024-07-02 cs.CL cs.CV

classification cs.CLcs.CV
keywords languagemodelmodelsbiasenglishimageinputsllava
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We uncover a surprising multilingual bias occurring in a popular class of multimodal vision-language models (VLMs). Including an image in the query to a LLaVA-style VLM significantly increases the likelihood of the model returning an English response, regardless of the language of the query. This paper investigates the causes of this loss with a two-pronged approach that combines extensive ablation of the design space with a mechanistic analysis of the models' internal representations of image and text inputs. Both approaches indicate that the issue stems in the language modelling component of the LLaVA model. Statistically, we find that switching the language backbone for a bilingual language model has the strongest effect on reducing this error. Mechanistically, we provide compelling evidence that visual inputs are not mapped to a similar space as text ones, and that intervening on intermediary attention layers can reduce this bias. Our findings provide important insights to researchers and engineers seeking to understand the crossover between multimodal and multilingual spaces, and contribute to the goal of developing capable and inclusive VLMs for non-English contexts.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Rethinking Multilingual Vision-Language Translation: Dataset, Evaluation, and Adaptation

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The authors introduce AibTrans, a multilingual image-text translation benchmark, show that common translation metrics mislead on dense images, and find that balanced multilingual fine-tuning preserves generalization b...

Pith tools