The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2002.06483 · v4 · pith:5C7AY3FN · submitted 2020-02-16 · cs.CV

Face Recognition: Too Bias, or Not Too Bias?

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:5C7AY3FNrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cs.CV
keywords biasperformancebalancedgapshumanlearningproblemsrecognition
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We reveal critical insights into problems of bias in state-of-the-art facial recognition (FR) systems using a novel Balanced Faces In the Wild (BFW) dataset: data balanced for gender and ethnic groups. We show variations in the optimal scoring threshold for face-pairs across different subgroups. Thus, the conventional approach of learning a global threshold for all pairs resulting in performance gaps among subgroups. By learning subgroup-specific thresholds, we not only mitigate problems in performance gaps but also show a notable boost in the overall performance. Furthermore, we do a human evaluation to measure the bias in humans, which supports the hypothesis that such a bias exists in human perception. For the BFW database, source code, and more, visit github.com/visionjo/facerec-bias-bfw.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Adaptive Calibration for Fair and Performant Facial Recognition

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Adaptive Calibration maps cosine similarities to probabilities using local context, improving accuracy and fairness in facial recognition without demographic metadata.