Do the Benefits of Joint Models for Relation Extraction Extend to Document-level Tasks?
Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:5IFSIGXZrecord.jsonopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
Two distinct approaches have been proposed for relational triple extraction - pipeline and joint. Joint models, which capture interactions across triples, are the more recent development, and have been shown to outperform pipeline models for sentence-level extraction tasks. Document-level extraction is a more challenging setting where interactions across triples can be long-range, and individual triples can also span across sentences. Joint models have not been applied for document-level tasks so far. In this paper, we benchmark state-of-the-art pipeline and joint extraction models on sentence-level as well as document-level datasets. Our experiments show that while joint models outperform pipeline models significantly for sentence-level extraction, their performance drops sharply below that of pipeline models for the document-level dataset.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.