Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 79 references

Emulating photonic time interfaces via smooth temporal transitions

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Smooth refractive-index ramps can mimic abrupt photonic time interfaces at discrete ramp times.

desk verdict A modest, honestly derived new condition (Eq. 10) for mimicking a time interface with smooth transitions, but the abstract overstates its scope by omitting the impedance-matched caveat. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.19847 v2 pith:5K5HJQXU submitted 2024-11-29 physics.optics physics.app-ph

Mariya Antyufeyeva , Victor Pacheco-Peña This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticsphysics.app-ph
keywords timeinterfacetemporalmetamaterialsadiabaticmodulationfrequencyconversioncavityresonatormodalbasismethodsmoothtransitionphotonic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether a smooth, sigmoidal change of a refractive index can stand in for an abrupt photonic time interface, the temporal analogue of a spatial boundary between two materials. Using a cavity mode expansion, the authors show that for specific discrete rise/fall times of the smooth transition, the field after the modulation has the same amplitude and phase as the field produced by a step change of the refractive index. The allowed transition rates are given by Eq. 10 and depend on the initial and final permittivities, the mode frequency, and the wave impedance. The result matters because it relaxes the requirement of switching material properties faster than the wave period: a slower adiabatic ramp chosen from the discrete set reproduces the frequency conversion and phase of a sharp time interface.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the Modal Basis Method, also called the Evolutionary Approach to Electromagnetics, applied to a perfect-electrically-conducting cavity that supports a single TE mode. Maxwell's equations are projected onto the cavity modal vectors, reducing the spatiotemporal field to two ordinary differential equations for the modal amplitudes $e_1'(t)$ and $h_1'(t)$. Their exact solution is a cosine whose instantaneous phase is set by an auxiliary time variable $\tau(t)=\int_0^t\frac{du}{Z\varepsilon(u)}$. The argument then reduces to comparing $\tau$ for the Heaviside and logistic time profiles; the extra logarithmic term in $\tau_{\text{smooth}}$ must equal $2\pi j$, which yields Eq. 10.

What would settle it

Measure the phase difference between the step-interface and smooth-ramp fields just after $t_0+\Delta t/2$ in an impedance-matched cavity while scanning $\gamma$ continuously: Eq. 10 predicts the difference vanishes only at the discrete values $\gamma_j = \frac{\omega_1'}{2\pi j}\frac{\varepsilon_2-\varepsilon_1}{\varepsilon_1\varepsilon_2 Z}\ln\left(\frac{\varepsilon_2}{\varepsilon_1}\right)$ and grows away from them. Repeating the experiment with a non-impedance-matched change should destroy the coincidence even at the predicted $\gamma_j$, because the backward wave then appears.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that an impedance-matched cavity filled with a medium whose refractive index changes smoothly from $n_1$ to $n_2$ through a logistic function can emulate the response of a time interface, provided the control parameter satisfies $\gamma = \frac{\omega_1'}{2\pi j}\frac{\varepsilon_2-\varepsilon_1}{\varepsilon_1\varepsilon_2 Z}\ln\left(\frac{\varepsilon_2}{\varepsilon_1}\right)$ for some integer $j\ge 1$. Under the constant-impedance assumption, the electric modal amplitude is $e_1'(t)=\frac{\varepsilon(0)}{\varepsilon(t)}e_0\cos[\omega_1'\tau(t)]$, with $\tau(t)=\int_0^t \frac{du}{Z\varepsilon(u)}$; the smooth transition adds a logarithmic correction to $\tau$ relative to the step case. When that correction equals an integer multiple of $2\pi$, the smooth and step solutions coincide after the modulation. The paper verifies this by computing $e_{\text{step}}-e_{\text{smooth}}\approx 0$ for $j=1,\dots,5$ in both directions of index change, $\varepsilon_1=2\to\varepsilon_2=12$ and $\varepsilon_1=12\to\varepsilon_2=2$, and confirms the prediction with time-domain numerical simulations.

Load-bearing premise

The whole derivation assumes the wave impedance of the medium stays constant while its refractive index changes, so that no backward time-reflected wave is created; without that assumption the field is not a single cosine and Eq. 10 is no longer sufficient for the emulation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A time interface can be emulated with transition times that are several periods long; the paper's examples use $\Delta t/T_1$ from about 2.2 to 40, so ultrafast switching is not required.
  • The same phase-matching condition works for both increasing and decreasing refractive index, so smooth emulation covers both up-conversion and down-conversion of the cavity frequency.
  • The accuracy of the emulation can be tuned by the parameter $\zeta$: larger $\zeta$ makes the logistic profile closer to a step at the endpoints, and observing later, for example at $t_0+2\Delta t$, further reduces $|e_{\text{step}}-e_{\text{smooth}}|$.
  • Because only the first mode eigenvalue connects to the temporal equations, the analytical result applies to any cavity geometry by using the corresponding $\omega_1'$.
  • The condition is discrete rather than continuous: only the $\gamma$ values from Eq. 10 with $j=1,2,3,\dots$ produce the phase coincidence, while intermediate ramp rates leave a phase mismatch.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper's emulation is of the forward, time-refracted wave in an impedance-matched medium; a general time interface also generates a backward wave, so a full analogue in an unmatched medium would need an additional mechanism such as a temporal anti-reflection coating.
  • The discrete condition is tied to the logistic profile; other smooth profiles would produce a different integrated phase surplus, so the same magic times would not carry over, although the same matching logic would apply.
  • Because the modal solution is spatially uniform inside the cavity, the same $\gamma$ values should be observable as a phase coincidence for the transmitted field in a waveguide or bulk experiment, offering a direct experimental test.
  • The appearance of $\ln(\varepsilon_2/\varepsilon_1)$ suggests the phase surplus comes from integrating the instantaneous frequency over the ramp; one could design other smooth profiles with the same logarithmic integral to reproduce the same emulation condition.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies whether a smooth (sigmoidal) temporal transition of the refractive index inside a PEC cavity can reproduce the field that would be produced by an abrupt time interface. Using the evolutionary approach to electromagnetics, the authors derive the time-domain modal amplitudes for the impedance-matched case μ(t)=Z²ε(t), obtain a closed-form phase-matching condition (Eq. 10) for the transition rate γ, and show that for discrete values of γ the smooth-transition field and the step-transition field nearly coincide after the transition. The analytical results are verified with COMSOL simulations for both increasing and decreasing index contrasts, and the accuracy of the emulation is characterized as a function of the transition-shape parameter ζ.

Significance. If the result holds, it is a useful contribution to the temporal-metamaterials toolkit: it shows that smooth temporal modulations can emulate step-function time interfaces at specific transition rates, potentially relaxing the switching-speed constraint. The central derivation is self-contained and parameter-free—Eq. (10) is a derived condition, not a fit—and the COMSOL comparisons provide an independent numerical check. The main caveat is that the emulation is established only for impedance-matched temporal modulations; the paper should make this limitation prominent in the abstract and conclusions.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract; Conclusions (p. 19)] The abstract and conclusions state that smooth temporal transitions of the refractive index can emulate time interfaces in general, but the analytical derivation is restricted to impedance-matched modulations. The assumption μ(t)=Z²ε(t) is stated on p. 4 ("For simplicity, we consider values of n(t) such that the impedance is preserved for all times") and is essential for the single-cosine solution in Eq. (8a) and for the phase condition Eq. (10). For a conventional ε-only modulation, a backward (time-reflected) wave appears, the modal amplitude is not of the form of Eq. (8a), and Eq. (10) by itself does not guarantee that the smooth and step fields coincide. Please add the "impedance-matched" qualification to the abstract and conclusions, and discuss whether the condition carries over to ε-only transitions.
  2. [Comparison between time interfaces and smooth temporal transitions (p. 15), Eq. (10)] Equation (10) is presented as the emulation condition for every positive integer j, but its derivation uses e^{-γt0} << 1 and the already-stated requirement t0 > Δt/2 = ζ/(2γ). For fixed t0 and ζ, these inequalities limit j to finite values; for the parameters of Fig. 5 (t0 = 53 ns, ζ = 20), t0 > Δt/2 requires γ > 1.9×10^8 s^-1, which corresponds to j ≲ 5 for the case ε1=2, ε2=12. The paper should either state this bound explicitly or specify that t0 must be chosen large enough for each j.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Methods: Amplitude matching condition (p. 20)] The condition "γt0 >> 0" should read "γt0 >> 1"; as written it is trivially satisfied for any positive γ and t0.
  2. [Derivation of Eq. (9b)] The intermediate integration steps leading to the piecewise expressions for τ(t)_smooth in Eq. (9b) are not shown; since Eq. (10) depends on the exact logarithmic phase, please include the derivation in the Methods or an appendix.
  3. [Caption of Fig. 5 and p. 18] The variable ζ is rendered as "z" in the Fig. 5 caption and in some text passages; please use a consistent symbol.
  4. [Page 18, 'Accuracy implications'] There are several typos: "In order words" should be "In other words", "as an expected results" should be "as expected", and "the difference ... gets smaller as ζ increases" should be "the difference ... decreases as ζ increases" (subject-verb agreement).
  5. [Eq. (10) context] Please state explicitly that Eq. (10) is an asymptotic condition for times t > t0 + Δt/2, after the exponential factor e^{-γ(t-t0)} has decayed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: Eq. 10 is derived analytically from the paper's own modal-amplitude solution and validated independently by COMSOL, with no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction.

full rationale

The central result, Eq. 10, is obtained by an explicit analytical derivation rather than by fitting. The paper writes the exact modal amplitude (Eq. 8) for both step and smooth permittivity profiles, computes the corresponding auxiliary time variables τ_step and τ_smooth (Eq. 9), and sets the resulting phase difference ω1'(τ_smooth − τ_step) equal to 2πj. No parameter is fitted to the observed difference e_step − e_smooth; the quantity Δt = ζ/γ is a bookkeeping definition, and ζ = 20 is an accuracy parameter for plots and convergence, not a fit to the target result. The only simplifications are explicitly stated: impedance matching μ(t) = Z²ε(t), amplitude-matching conditions such as ε1/ε2 >> e^(−γt0), and t0 > Δt/2. The derivation is therefore self-contained given those stated assumptions. The COMSOL simulations provide an external numerical check of the derived condition, and the cited EAE literature supplies the mathematical framework rather than the novel result. No load-bearing self-citation, no imported uniqueness theorem, and no ansatz smuggled in via citation appear in the derivation chain. The disclosed impedance-matching limitation narrows the generality of the abstract's phrasing, but that is a scope/correctness concern, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central derivation rests on standard cavity modal analysis, the impedance-matched non-dispersive medium assumption, the single-TE-mode initial condition, and the choice of a sigmoid transition with ζ=20. No new physical entities are introduced. The only hand-chosen numerical parameter is ζ, which controls accuracy but does not enter the phase condition Eq. 10.

free parameters (1)
  • ζ (zeta) = 20 (chosen for examples)
    Hand-chosen accuracy parameter defining Δt=ζ/γ; ensures ε(t)≈ε1 for t<t0-Δt/2 and ε(t)≈ε2 for t>t0+Δt/2. It does not appear in the phase-matching condition Eq. 10 and is not fitted to data.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math The modal basis from the cavity eigenvalue problems (Eq. 3) is complete and orthogonal, and the field can be expanded as in Eq. 2.
    Invoked in the Theory section before Eq. 2; established in refs 61 and 63-65.
  • domain assumption The medium is lossless, nondispersive, and impedance-matched, with Z=sqrt(mu/epsilon) constant in time while n(t)=Zε(t) changes.
    Stated in the Introduction and used in Eq. 1 and the evolutionary equations; suppresses the backward/time-reflected wave.
  • domain assumption Only the fundamental TE mode is excited initially, with zero magnetic field and no static field at t=0.
    Used after Eq. 3 to reduce the modal expansion to m=1; the homogeneous equations with zero initial conditions yield zero for all other modes.
  • domain assumption The source is switched off at t=0 and no sources exist for t>0.
    Configures the problem as free cavity ringing; stated around Eq. 4.
  • domain assumption For the smooth transition, the sigmoid (Eq. 1b) with ζ=20 satisfies ε(t)|_{t0-Δt/2}≈ε1 and ε(t)|_{t0+Δt/2}≈ε2, and t0>Δt/2.
    Used to equate the initial and final values of ε between smooth and step cases; the paper notes the fields never converge if this condition is violated.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Emulating photonic time interfaces via smooth temporal transitions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5K5HJQXU

@misc{pith2026241119847,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Emulating photonic time interfaces via smooth temporal transitions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5K5HJQXU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.19847}
}
read the original abstract

The introduction of time as an additional degree of freedom to control wave-matter interactions have opened new avenues to fully control wave propagation in four dimensions (x,y,z,t). Time interfaces (rapid changes of the constitutive relations of the medium where a wave propagates) have recently become popular as they are the temporal analogue of spatial interfaces. While recent groundbreaking experimental work has demonstrated time interfaces from water waves, microwaves and the optical regime, rapidly changing, for instance, the permittivity of the medium requires carefully engineered structures. Here, we study the possibility of implementing smooth temporal transitions of the refractive index of the medium in order to mimic the response of time interfaces via adiabatic modulations. It is shown that indeed, as long as the signal is inside the structure during the modulation time, there are some values of rising/falling time of the adiabatic modulation that enables a full approximate emulation of a time interface. These results may open further avenues to explore by relaxing the speed at which the time-modulation should be introduced when designing four-dimensional media.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 74 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Kock, W. E. Metal-Lens Antennas. Proceedings of the IRE 34, 828–836 (1946)

    work page 1946

  2. [2]

    & Kunz, K

    Holberg, D. & Kunz, K. Parametric properties of fields in a slab of time -varying permittivity. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag 14, 183–194 (1966)

    work page 1966

  3. [3]

    Morgenthaler, F. R. Velocity Modulation of Electromagnetic Waves. IRE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques 6, 167–172 (1958)

    work page 1958

  4. [4]

    R., Padilla, W

    Smith, D. R., Padilla, W. J., Vier, D. C., Nemat-Nasser, S. C. & Schultz, S. Composite Medium with Simultaneously Negative Permeability and Permittivity. Phys Rev Lett 84, 4184–4187 (2000)

    work page 2000

  5. [5]

    & Engheta, N

    Alù, A. & Engheta, N. Pairing an Epsilon-Negative Slab with a Mu-Negative Slab: Resonance, Tunneling and Transparency. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag 51, 2558–2571 (2003)

    work page 2003

  6. [6]

    & Ziolkowski, R

    Engheta, N. & Ziolkowski, R. W. Metamaterials: Physics and Engineering Explorations. (John Wiley & Sons, 2006)

    work page 2006

  7. [7]

    & Engheta, N

    Alú, A. & Engheta, N. Dispersion characteristics of metamaterial cloaking structures. Electromagnetics 28, 464–475 (2008)

    work page 2008

  8. [8]

    & Alù, A

    Li, H. & Alù, A. Temporal switching to extend the bandwidth of thin absorbers. Optica 8, 24–29 (2021)

    work page 2021

Show all 79 references
  1. [9]

    Hayran, Z., Khurgin, J. B. & Monticone, F. ℏω versus ℏk: dispersion and energy constraints on time-varying photonic materials and time crystals [Invited]. Opt Mater Express 12, 3904–3917 (2022)

    2022

  2. [10]

    & Caloz, C

    Ok, F., Bahrami, A. & Caloz, C. Electron scattering at a potential temporal step discontinuity. Sci Rep 14, (2024)

    2024

  3. [11]

    & Ghosh, S

    Sadhukhan, S. & Ghosh, S. Bandgap engineering and amplification in photonic time crystals. Journal of Optics 26, 45601 (2024)

    2024

  4. [12]

    G., Yakovlev, A

    MacDonald, R. G., Yakovlev, A. & Pacheco-Peña, V. Solving partial differential equations with waveguide-based metatronic networks. Advanced Photonics Nexus 3, (2024)

    2024

  5. [13]

    & Engheta, N

    Pacheco-Peña, V. & Engheta, N. Effective medium concept in temporal metamaterials. Nanophotonics 9, 379–391 (2020). 22

    2020

  6. [14]

    & Deck-Léger, Z.-L

    Caloz, C. & Deck-Léger, Z.-L. Spacetime Metamaterials—Part I: General Concepts. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag 68, 1569–1582 (2020)

    2020

  7. [15]

    & Deck-Léger, Z.-L

    Caloz, C. & Deck-Léger, Z.-L. Spacetime Metamaterials—Part II: Theory and Applications. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag 68, 1583–1598 (2020)

    2020

  8. [16]

    Metamaterials with high degrees of freedom: Space, time, and more

    Engheta, N. Metamaterials with high degrees of freedom: Space, time, and more. Nanophotonics 10, 639–642 (2021)

    2021

  9. [17]

    A., Alam, M

    Huidobro, P. A., Alam, M. Z., Engheta, N. & Pacheco-Peña, V. Feature issue introduction: temporal and spatiotemporal metamaterials. Opt Express 31, 18072–18074 (2023)

    2023

  10. [18]

    & Engheta, N

    Pacheco-Peña, V. & Engheta, N. Merging Effective Medium Concepts of Spatial and Temporal Media: Opening new avenues for manipulating wave-matter interaction in 4D. IEEE Antennas Propag Mag 65, 39–49 (2023)

    2023

  11. [19]

    & Horsley, S

    Li, M. & Horsley, S. A. R. Moving impedance profiles make one-way, spectrum-reshaping mirrors. Phys Rev Res 6, 043035 (2024)

    2024

  12. [20]

    & Engheta, N

    Pacheco-Peña, V. & Engheta, N. Spatiotemporal isotropic-to-anisotropic meta-atoms. New J Phys 23, 095006 (2021)

    2021

  13. [21]

    Stefanini, L. et al. Time‐Varying Metasurfaces for Efficient Surface‐Wave Coupling to Radiation and Frequency Conversion. Laser Photon Rev (2024) doi:10.1002/lpor.202400315

    2024 doi

  14. [22]

    Transmission of electromagnetic waves into time-varying media

    Fante, R. Transmission of electromagnetic waves into time-varying media. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag 19, 417–424 (1971)

    1971

  15. [23]

    Felsen, L. B. & Whitman, G. M. Wave Propagation in Time-Varying Media. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag AP-18, 242–253 (1970)

    1970

  16. [24]

    Fante, R. L. Optical Propagation in Space–Time-Modulated Media Using Many-Space-Scale Perturbation Theory. J Opt Soc Am 62, 1052–1060 (1972)

    1972

  17. [25]

    Fante, R. L. On the propagation of electromagnetic waves through a time -varying dielectric layer. Applied Scientific Research 27, 341–354 (1973)

    1973

  18. [26]

    G., Götte, J

    Hayrapetyan, A. G., Götte, J. B., Grigoryan, K. K., Fritzsche, S. & Petrosyan, R. G. Electromagnetic wave propagation in spatially homogeneous yet smoothly time -varying dielectric media. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transf 178, 158–166 (2016)

    2016

  19. [27]

    & Engheta, N

    Pacheco-Peña, V. & Engheta, N. Temporal aiming. Light Sci Appl 9, (2020)

    2020

  20. [28]

    & Bilotti, F

    Ramaccia, D., Alù, A., Toscano, A. & Bilotti, F. Temporal multilayer structures for designing higher-order transfer functions using time-varying metamaterials. Appl Phys Lett 118, (2021)

    2021

  21. [29]

    & Galdi, V

    Castaldi, G., Pacheco-Peña, V., Moccia, M., Engheta, N. & Galdi, V. Exploiting space -time duality in the synthesis of impedance transformers via temporal metamaterials. Nanophotonics 10, 3687–3699 (2021)

    2021

  22. [30]

    & Engheta, N

    Pacheco-Peña, V. & Engheta, N. Antireflection temporal coatings. Optica 7, 323 (2020)

    2020

  23. [31]

    Liberal, I., Vázquez-Lozano, J. E. & Pacheco-Peña, V. Quantum Antireflection Temporal Coatings: Quantum State Frequency Shifting and Inhibited Thermal Noise Amplification. Laser Photon Rev 17, (2023)

    2023

  24. [32]

    & Galdi, V

    Rizza, C., Castaldi, G. & Galdi, V. Short-Pulsed Metamaterials. Phys Rev Lett 128, (2022)

    2022

  25. [33]

    Galiffi, E. et al. Broadband coherent wave control through photonic collisions at time interfaces. Nat Phys 19, 1703–1708 (2023)

    2023

  26. [34]

    & Alù, A

    Li, H., Yin, S. & Alù, A. Nonreciprocity and Faraday Rotation at Time Interfaces. Phys Rev Lett 128, (2022)

    2022

  27. [35]

    Moussa, H. et al. Observation of temporal reflection and broadband frequency translation at photonic time interfaces. Nat Phys 19, 863–868 (2023). 23

    2023

  28. [36]

    R., Kildishev, A

    Jones, T. R., Kildishev, A. V, Segev, M. & Peroulis, D. Time-reflection of microwaves by a fast optically-controlled time-boundary. Nat Commun 15, 6786 (2024)

    2024

  29. [37]

    & Bilotti, F

    Stefanini, L., Ramaccia, D., Toscano, A. & Bilotti, F. Temporal rainbow scattering at boundary - induced time interfaces. Appl Phys Lett 122, (2023)

    2023

  30. [38]

    & Caloz, C

    Akbarzadeh, A., Chamanara, N. & Caloz, C. Inverse prism based on temporal discontinuity and spatial dispersion. Opt Lett 43, 3297 (2018)

    2018

  31. [39]

    & Caloz, C

    Akbarzadeh, A. & Caloz, C. Gaussian Beam Diffraction by the Inverse Prism. in 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation & USNC/URSI National Radio Science Meeting 2415–2416 (IEEE, 2018). doi:10.1109/APUSNCURSINRSM.2018.8608918

    2018

  32. [40]

    & Engheta, N

    Pacheco-Peña, V. & Engheta, N. Temporal equivalent of the Brewster angle. Phys Rev B 104, (2021)

    2021

  33. [41]

    & Engheta, N

    Ptitcyn, G. & Engheta, N. Temporal Twistronics. ArXiv:2403.10477 (2024) doi:https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2403.10477

    2024 doi arXiv

  34. [42]

    Wang, X. et al. Metasurface-based realization of photonic time crystals. Sci Adv 9, eadg7541 (2024)

    2024

  35. [43]

    M., Edwards, B

    Pacheco-Peña, V., Kiasat, Y., Solís, D. M., Edwards, B. & Engheta, N. Holding and Amplifying Electromagnetic Waves with Temporal Non-Foster Metastructures. ArXiv:2304.03861 (2023) doi:https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.03861

    2023 doi

  36. [44]

    Wang, X., Mirmoosa, M. S. & Tretyakov, S. A. Controlling surface waves with temporal discontinuities of metasurfaces. Nanophotonics 12, 2813–2822 (2023)

    2023

  37. [45]

    Rizza, C. et al. Harnessing the Natural Resonances of Time-Varying Dispersive Interfaces. Phys Rev Lett 133, 186902 (2024)

    2024

  38. [46]

    & Alu, A

    Yin, S., Galiffi, E., Xu, G. & Alu, A. Scattering at Temporal Interfaces: An overview from an antennas and propagation engineering perspective. IEEE Antennas Propag Mag 65, 21–28 (2023)

    2023

  39. [47]

    & Engheta, N

    Pacheco-Peña, V. & Engheta, N. Temporal Metamaterials with Gain and Loss. ArXiv:2108.01007 (2021) doi:https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2108.01007

    2021 doi arXiv

  40. [48]

    & Enrique Vázquez-Lozano, J

    Liberal, I., Ganfornina-Andrades, A. & Enrique Vázquez-Lozano, J. Spatiotemporal Symmetries and Energy-Momentum Conservation in Uniform Spacetime Metamaterials. ArXiv:2407.15592 (2024) doi:https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2407.15592

    2024 doi arXiv

  41. [49]

    M., Vázquez-Lozano, J

    Jajin, M. M., Vázquez-Lozano, J. E. & Liberal, I. Symmetries and conservation of spin angular momentum, helicity, and chirality in photonic time-varying media. ArXiv:2404.12340 (2024) doi:https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2404.12340

    2024 doi arXiv

  42. [50]

    Fr., Koutserimpas, T

    Koufidis, S. Fr., Koutserimpas, T. T., Monticone, F. & McCall, M. W. Light Propagation in Time- Periodic Bi-Isotropic Media. ArXiv:2404.11270 (2024) doi:https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2404.11270

    2024 doi arXiv

  43. [51]

    Koutserimpas, T. T. & Monticone, F. Time-varying media, dispersion, and the principle of causality [Invited]. Opt Mater Express 14, 1222–1236 (2024)

    2024

  44. [52]

    & Engheta, N

    Pacheco-Peña, V., Fink, M. & Engheta, N. Temporal Chirp, Temporal Lensing and Temporal Routing via Space-Time Interfaces. ArXiv:2311.10855 (2023) doi:https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2311.10855

    2023 doi

  45. [53]

    Solís, D. M. & Engheta, N. Functional analysis of the polarization response in linear time -varying media: A generalization of the Kramers-Kronig relations. Phys Rev B 103, (2021)

    2021

  46. [54]

    & Fort, E

    Bacot, V., Labousse, M., Eddi, A., Fink, M. & Fort, E. Time reversal and holography with spacetime transformations. Nat Phys 12, 972–977 (2016)

    2016

  47. [55]

    Tirole, R. et al. Double-slit time diffraction at optical frequencies. Nat Phys 19, 999–1002 (2023). 24

    2023

  48. [56]

    Lustig, E. et al. Time-refraction optics with single cycle modulation. Nanophotonics 12, 2221– 2230 (2023)

    2023

  49. [57]

    Galiffi, E. et al. Optical Coherent Perfect Absorption and Amplification in a Time-Varying Medium. ArXiv:2410.16426 (2024) doi:https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2410.16426

    2024 doi arXiv

  50. [58]

    & Alú, A

    Galiffi, E., Yin, S. & Alú, A. Tapered photonic switching. Nanophotonics 11, 3575–3581 (2022)

    2022

  51. [59]

    & Werner, D

    Mai, W., Xu, J. & Werner, D. H. Temporal multi-stage energy pumping. Opt Lett 47, 2494–2497 (2022)

    2022

  52. [60]

    Microwave Engineering

    Pozar David M. Microwave Engineering. (Wiley, 2012)

    2012

  53. [61]

    Tretyakov, O. A. Essentials of Nonstationary and Nonlinear Electromagnetic Field Theory. in Analytical and Numerical Methods in Electromagnetic Wave Theory (ed. Hashimoto M., Idemen M., and T. O. A.) 123–146 (Science House Co, Tokyo, 1993)

    1993

  54. [62]

    A., Gavrilov, S

    Vertiy, A. A., Gavrilov, S. P., Tretyakov, A. & Ozel, M. E. Determination of Electrodynamical Parameters of Dielectric Pipe-Shaped Materials Using Millimeter Wave Cavity. International Journal of Infrared and Millimeter Waves vol. 17 (1996)

    1996

  55. [63]

    & Tretyakov, O

    Aksoy, S. & Tretyakov, O. A. Study of a time variant cavity system. J Electromagn Waves Appl 16, 1535–1553 (2002)

    2002

  56. [64]

    Aksoy, S., Antyufeyeva, M., Basaran, E., Ergin, A. A. & Tretyakov, O. A. Time -domain cavity oscillations supported by a temporally dispersive dielectric. IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech 53, 2465–2471 (2005)

    2005

  57. [65]

    & Tretyakov, O

    Erden, F. & Tretyakov, O. A. Excitation by a transient signal of the real-valued electromagnetic fields in a cavity. Phys Rev E 77, 056605 (2008)

    2008

  58. [66]

    Tretyakov, O. A. & Erden, F. Temporal Cavity Oscillations Caused by a Wide -Band Waveform. Progress In Electromagnetics Research B 6, 183–204 (2008)

    2008

  59. [67]

    Antyufeyeva, M. S. & Tretyakov, O. A. Electromagnetic fields in a cavity filled with some nonstationary media. Progress In Electromagnetics Research B 19, 177–203 (2010)

    2010

  60. [68]

    & Wigner, E

    Teichmann, T. & Wigner, E. P. Electromagnetic Field Expansions in Loss -Free Cavities Excited through Holes. J Appl Phys 24, 262–267 (1953)

    1953

  61. [69]

    Schelkunoff, S. A. On Representation of Electromagnetic Fields in Cavities in Terms of Natural Modes of Oscillation. J Appl Phys 26, 1231–1234 (1955)

    1955

  62. [70]

    Slater, J. C. Microwave Electronics. (D. Van Nostrand Co., Inc., New York, 1950)

    1950

  63. [71]

    Slater, J. C. Microwave Electronics. Rev Mod Phys 18, 441–512 (1946)

    1946

  64. [72]

    The Expansions of Electromagnetic Fields in Cavities

    Kurokawa, K. The Expansions of Electromagnetic Fields in Cavities. IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech 6, 178–187 (1958)

    1958

  65. [73]

    Xiao, Y., Maywar, D. N. & Agrawal, G. P. Reflection and transmission of electromagnetic waves at a temporal boundary. Opt Lett 39, 574–577 (2014)

    2014

  66. [74]

    & Tretyakov, O

    Aksoy, S. & Tretyakov, O. A. The evolution equations in study of the cavity oscillations excited by a digital signal. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag 52, 263–270 (2004)

    2004

  67. [75]

    Field Theory of Guided Waves

    Collin Robert E. Field Theory of Guided Waves. (Wiley-IEEE Press, 1991)

    1991

  68. [76]

    Evolutionary approach to solve a novel time-domain cavity problem

    Erden, F. Evolutionary approach to solve a novel time-domain cavity problem. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag 65, 5918–5931 (2017)

    2017

  69. [77]

    Study of the Surge Signals in a Plasma-Filled Rectangular Cavity

    Erden, F. Study of the Surge Signals in a Plasma-Filled Rectangular Cavity. Physics of Wave Phenomena 26, 139–149 (2018)

    2018

  70. [78]

    Boas, M. L. Mathematical Methods in the Physical Sciences. (Wiley, 2005)

    2005

  71. [79]

    COMSOL Multiphysics. COMSOL. [Online]. https://www. comsol.com/

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.