pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.02024 · v1 · pith:5N5J4EXQnew · submitted 2026-06-01 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE

Locating the Production Sites of High-Energy Neutrinos in Blazar Jets

Rui Xue , Yoshiyuki Inoue , Ze-Rui Wang , Neng-Hui Liao , Dingrong Xiong This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 13:25 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE
keywords blazarshigh-energy neutrinosphotohadronic interactionsjet emission zonesbroad-line regionmulti-zone modelingneutrino production sites
0
0 comments X

The pith

Neutrino production in blazar jets requires the emitting region to be physically separated from the main electromagnetic emission zone.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper combines radio-constrained jet properties with multi-zone modeling to find the physical conditions for efficient high-energy neutrino production in blazars. Efficient production needs an external radiation field stronger than the magnetic field in the jet frame; this boosts photohadronic interactions while keeping secondary pair synchrotron radiation below observed hard X-ray limits. Those conditions are possible near or inside the broad-line region. Yet they clash with single-zone fits to the observed double-bump spectral energy distribution, forcing the conclusion that the neutrino site must be distinct from the dominant electromagnetic zone. The separation can occur only if the jet finishes accelerating inside sub-parsec scales or carries an intrinsically large bulk Lorentz factor, both of which are uncommon in current data and therefore explain the rarity of blazar-neutrino associations.

Core claim

Efficient neutrino production requires an external radiation field stronger than the magnetic field in the jet frame. This environment enhances the efficiency of photohadronic interactions but also suppresses synchrotron radiation from secondary pairs, thereby avoiding overshooting the hard X-ray data. Such conditions can be achieved in regions near or within the broad-line region. However, assuming a single emission zone, these conditions are generally inconsistent with the double-bump flux ratio of the observed broadband emission. This implies that the neutrino-emitting region should be physically separated from the dominant electromagnetic emission zone. Such a scenario can be realized ei

What carries the argument

The ratio of external radiation field energy density to magnetic field energy density in the jet frame, which controls the efficiency of photohadronic neutrino production versus unwanted secondary synchrotron emission.

If this is right

  • Efficient neutrino production occurs near or within the broad-line region.
  • Single-zone models cannot simultaneously match both efficient neutrino production and the observed double-bump flux ratios.
  • The neutrino-emitting region must be physically separated from the dominant electromagnetic emission zone.
  • Separation is possible if the jet completes acceleration within sub-parsec scales or possesses a large intrinsic bulk Lorentz factor.
  • These uncommon jet properties explain the observed rarity of blazar-neutrino associations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Multi-zone modeling is required to locate neutrino production sites consistently with electromagnetic data.
  • High-resolution radio observations of jet structure on sub-parsec scales could identify which blazars are likely neutrino sources.
  • The same separation logic may constrain production sites for other high-energy particles or radiation components in jets.

Load-bearing premise

Single-zone emission modeling of the observed double-bump flux ratio provides a reliable test of consistency with the conditions required for neutrino production.

What would settle it

Detection of high-energy neutrinos from a blazar whose broadband spectrum is well described by a single-zone model that simultaneously satisfies the neutrino-production conditions without requiring physical separation of the sites.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.02024 by Dingrong Xiong, Neng-Hui Liao, Rui Xue, Yoshiyuki Inoue, Ze-Rui Wang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Ratio of the observed neutrino flux (0.2–7.5 PeV) to the integrated X-ray flux as a function of the energy den￾sity ratio between the external photon field and the magnetic field (Y = U ′ ext/U′ B). The upper and lower panels display the results for TXS 0506+056 and PKS 1502+102, respectively. The external photon field is dominated by the AD within 5–35 RS and by the BLR beyond this range. Solid black and … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Comoving energy densities U ′ of external ra￾diation fields and the magnetic field as a function of rdiss for TXS 0506+056 (upper panel) and PKS 1502+102 (lower panel). Black curves represent the energy densities of the AD (solid line), HC (dashed line), BLR (dash-dotted line), and DT (dotted line). The vertical black dash-dotted line represents the RBLR. The yellow and orange shaded bands illustrate the U… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The multimessenger emissions of TXS 0506+056 (upper panel) predicted by the spine–layer blob model and PKS 1502+102 (lower panel) predicted by the inner–outer blob model. The teal data points show quasi-simultaneous SEDs of TXS 0506+056 and PKS 1502+102 that taken from IceCube Collaboration et al. (2018a) and A. Franckowiak et al. (2020), respectively. The grey data points are the his￾torical flux listed i… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Distribution of Γ0.06,pc/B′ 1,pc for the MOJAVE blazar sample. The histograms show the probability density for different transition distances rtran, indicated by differ￾ent colors as shown in the legend, while the solid curves de￾note Gaussian fits to the distributions. The vertical dashed and dotted lines indicate the locations of PKS 1502+102 and TXS 0506+056, respectively. Both PKS 1502+102 and TXS 0506… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Upper panel: Ratio of the observed neutrino flux to the integrated X-ray flux as a function of the energy den￾sity ratio between the external photon field and the magnetic field for J1733-1304. The line styles have the same meaning as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Secondary pairs spectra of PKS 1502+102 for different values of Y (U ′ /U′ B), shown for the AD-dominated case (left panel) and the BLR-dominated case (right panel). Solid curves represent the total emission, while the dashed, dotted, and dash-dotted curves represent the contributions from pairs produced via π ± decay, the BH process, and internal γγ annihilation, respectively. Thick curves correspond to s… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The production sites of high-energy neutrinos in blazar jets remain poorly constrained. In this work, we investigate the physical conditions required for efficient neutrino production by combining radio-constrained jet properties with multi-zone emission modeling. We show that efficient neutrino production requires an external radiation field stronger than the magnetic field in the jet frame. This environment not only enhances the efficiency of photohadronic interactions but also suppresses synchrotron radiation from secondary pairs, thereby avoiding overshooting the hard X-ray data. Such conditions can be achieved in regions near or within the broad-line region. However, assuming a single emission zone, these conditions are generally inconsistent with the double-bump flux ratio of the observed broadband emission. This implies that the neutrino-emitting region should be physically separated from the dominant electromagnetic emission zone. We further show that such a scenario can be realized either if the jet completes its acceleration within sub-parsec scales or if the bulk Lorentz factor is intrinsically large, both of which appear uncommon based on current observations. These results provide a natural explanation for the rarity of blazar-neutrino associations and highlight the importance of constraining jet structure at small scales to identify promising neutrino-emitting blazars.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that efficient high-energy neutrino production in blazar jets requires an external radiation field stronger than the magnetic field (in the jet frame) to enhance photohadronic interactions while suppressing secondary-pair synchrotron emission below hard X-ray limits. Such conditions can occur near or within the broad-line region but are generally inconsistent with observed double-bump flux ratios under single-zone assumptions, implying physically separated neutrino and electromagnetic emission zones. The required conditions are realized only if the jet completes acceleration within sub-parsec scales or has intrinsically large bulk Lorentz factor, both uncommon per current observations; this explains the rarity of blazar-neutrino associations.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work offers a physically motivated explanation for the scarcity of neutrino-blazar associations and underscores the value of small-scale jet structure constraints. The integration of radio-constrained jet properties with multi-zone emission modeling is a constructive approach that ties observable radio scales to neutrino production physics.

major comments (1)
  1. [Sections applying radio-derived jet parameters to the neutrino-emitting region and the rarity assessment] The assessment that required neutrino-production conditions are uncommon rests on radio-constrained values of B, Gamma, and opening angle applied to sub-pc scales. Because radio emission originates at parsec scales, the lack of explicit radial-evolution modeling for the decline in B or continued acceleration between these scales and the neutrino zone introduces an unpropagated systematic uncertainty into the rarity conclusion and the multi-zone SED consistency test.
minor comments (2)
  1. Clarify the precise definition and normalization of the external radiation energy density u_ext relative to the magnetic energy density in the jet frame when stating the u_ext > B condition.
  2. The abstract would benefit from naming the specific sources or sample size used for the broadband SED modeling.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback. We address the single major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Sections applying radio-derived jet parameters to the neutrino-emitting region and the rarity assessment] The assessment that required neutrino-production conditions are uncommon rests on radio-constrained values of B, Gamma, and opening angle applied to sub-pc scales. Because radio emission originates at parsec scales, the lack of explicit radial-evolution modeling for the decline in B or continued acceleration between these scales and the neutrino zone introduces an unpropagated systematic uncertainty into the rarity conclusion and the multi-zone SED consistency test.

    Authors: We agree that applying parsec-scale radio constraints directly to sub-parsec neutrino zones without explicit radial modeling of B(r) or Gamma(r) introduces a systematic uncertainty. Radio observations typically probe larger scales where the jet has already expanded, so B is lower and Gamma may be higher than at the neutrino site. In our analysis these values were used as representative benchmarks drawn from the literature on blazar jets; however, we acknowledge that a full propagation of the radial evolution would strengthen the quantitative rarity assessment. In revision we will add a dedicated paragraph discussing the expected scalings (B ∝ r^-1 or steeper, possible continued acceleration) and their effect on the B < u_ext condition and the double-bump inconsistency, noting that the conclusions remain qualitatively robust but that the precise fraction of jets satisfying the criteria carries this caveat. We will also clarify that detailed MHD jet simulations are beyond the present scope. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation uses external radio constraints and standard photohadronic physics without self-referential reduction

full rationale

The paper derives the u_ext > B requirement from photohadronic interaction efficiency and secondary-pair synchrotron suppression, then compares the resulting conditions against observed double-bump ratios under single-zone assumptions. Radio-constrained jet parameters (B, Gamma, opening angle) serve as external inputs rather than quantities fitted to the neutrino or X-ray data within the same model. No equations reduce a prediction to a fitted parameter by construction, no self-citation chain bears the central claim, and the rarity conclusion rests on independent observational statistics. The derivation chain therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be extracted. The work implicitly relies on standard domain assumptions from blazar jet physics such as photohadronic interaction cross-sections and synchrotron emission processes.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5751 in / 1381 out tokens · 36232 ms · 2026-06-28T13:25:57.867448+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

93 extracted references · 90 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Physical Review Letters , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Aartsen, M. G., Abbasi, R., Abdou, Y., et al. 2013, PhRvL, 111, 021103, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.021103

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.111.021103 2013

  2. [2]

    G., Ackermann, M., Adams, J., et al

    Aartsen, M. G., Ackermann, M., Adams, J., et al. 2014, PhRvL, 113, 101101, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.101101

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113.101101 2014

  3. [3]

    G., Ackermann, M., Adams, J., et al

    Aartsen, M. G., Ackermann, M., Adams, J., et al. 2017a, ApJ, 849, 67, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa8dfb

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa8dfb

  4. [4]

    The Contribution of Fermi-2LAC Blazars to Diffuse TeV-PeV Neutrino Flux

    Aartsen, M. G., Abraham, K., Ackermann, M., et al. 2017b, ApJ, 835, 45, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/835/1/45

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/835/1/45

  5. [5]

    G., Ackermann, M., Adams, J., et al

    Aartsen, M. G., Ackermann, M., Adams, J., et al. 2020, PhRvL, 124, 051103, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.051103

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.124.051103 2020

  6. [6]

    2022, ApJ, 938, 38, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac8de4

    Abbasi, R., Ackermann, M., Adams, J., et al. 2022, ApJ, 938, 38, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac8de4

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac8de4 2022

  7. [7]

    2023, ApJS, 269, 25, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/acfa95

    Abbasi, R., Ackermann, M., Adams, J., et al. 2023, ApJS, 269, 25, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/acfa95

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/acfa95 2023

  8. [8]

    2024, ApJ, 973, 97, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad643d

    Abbasi, R., Ackermann, M., Adams, J., et al. 2024, ApJ, 973, 97, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad643d

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad643d 2024

  9. [9]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.03989, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2507.03989

    Abbasi, R., Ackermann, M., Adams, J., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.03989, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2507.03989

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.03989 2025

  10. [10]

    The Spectral Energy Distribution of Fermi Bright Blazars.Astrophys

    Abdo, A. A., Ackermann, M., Agudo, I., et al. 2010, ApJ, 716, 30, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/716/1/30

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/716/1/30 2010

  11. [11]

    2015, ApJS, 218, 23, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/218/2/23

    Acero, F., Ackermann, M., Ajello, M., et al. 2015, ApJS, 218, 23, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/218/2/23

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/218/2/23 2015

  12. [12]

    A., Atoian, A

    Aharonian, F. A., Atoian, A. M., & Nagapetian, A. M. 1983, Astrofizika, 19, 323

    1983

  13. [13]

    , keywords =

    Ansoldi, S., Antonelli, L. A., Arcaro, C., et al. 2018, ApJL, 863, L10, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aad083

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aad083 2018

  14. [14]

    2012, ApJL, 745, L28, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/745/2/L28 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T

    Asada, K., & Nakamura, M. 2012, ApJL, 745, L28, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/745/2/L28 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Sipőcz, B. M., et al. 2018, AJ, 156, 123, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. ...

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/745/2/l28 2012

  15. [15]

    2025, A&A, 700, A228, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451328

    Azzollini, A., Buson, S., Coleiro, A., et al. 2025, A&A, 700, A228, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451328

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451328 2025

  16. [16]

    L., Larson, D., Weiland, J

    Bennett, C. L., Larson, D., Weiland, J. L., & Hinshaw, G. 2014, ApJ, 794, 135, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/794/2/135

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/794/2/135 2014

  17. [17]

    The Low-Luminosity End of the Radius-Luminosity Relationship for Active Galactic Nuclei

    Bentz, M. C., Denney, K. D., Grier, C. J., et al. 2013, ApJ, 767, 149, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/767/2/149

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1088/0004-637x/767/2/149 2013

  18. [18]

    J., Groves, B., Kauffmann, G., et al.\ 2006, , 372, 961, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10859.x

    Beskin, V. S., & Nokhrina, E. E. 2006, MNRAS, 367, 375, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.09957.x 18

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.09957.x 2006

  19. [19]

    D., & Znajek, R

    Blandford, R. D., & Znajek, R. L. 1977, MNRAS, 179, 433, doi: 10.1093/mnras/179.3.433 Böttcher, M., Reimer, A., Sweeney, K., & Prakash, A. 2013, ApJ, 768, 54, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/768/1/54

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/179.3.433 1977

  20. [20]

    Leptohadronic single-zone models for the electromagnetic and neutrino emission of TXS 0506+056.Mon

    Cerruti, M., Zech, A., Boisson, C., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 483, L12, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/sly210 De Young, D. S. 2010, ApJ, 710, 743, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/710/1/743

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/sly210 2019

  21. [21]

    D., Murase, K., & Inoue, Y

    Dermer, C. D., Murase, K., & Inoue, Y. 2014, Journal of High Energy Astrophysics, 3, 29, doi: 10.1016/j.jheap.2014.09.001 Domínguez, A., Primack, J. R., Rosario, D. J., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 410, 2556, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17631.x

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jheap.2014.09.001 2014

  22. [22]

    Drury, L. O. 1983, Reports on Progress in Physics, 46, 973, doi: 10.1088/0034-4885/46/8/002

    work page doi:10.1088/0034-4885/46/8/002 1983

  23. [23]

    2026, A&A, 708, A326, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202558593

    Eppel, F., Kadler, M., Ros, E., et al. 2026, A&A, 708, A326, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202558593

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202558593 2026

  24. [24]

    S., & Halzen, F

    Fang, K., Gallagher, J. S., & Halzen, F. 2024, Nature Astronomy, 8, 241, doi: 10.1038/s41550-023-02128-0

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-023-02128-0 2024

  25. [25]

    2006, A&A, 450, 77, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20064804

    Foschini, L., Pian, E., Maraschi, L., et al. 2006, A&A, 450, 77, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20064804

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20064804 2006

  26. [26]

    2020, ApJ, 893, 162, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab8307

    Franckowiak, A., Garrappa, S., Paliya, V., et al. 2020, ApJ, 893, 162, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab8307

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab8307 2020

  27. [27]

    2017, Galaxies, 5, 11, doi: 10.3390/galaxies5010011

    Gabuzda, D. 2017, Galaxies, 5, 11, doi: 10.3390/galaxies5010011

    work page doi:10.3390/galaxies5010011 2017

  28. [28]

    2019, Nature Astronomy, 3, 88, doi: 10.1038/s41550-018-0610-1

    Gao, S., Fedynitch, A., Winter, W., & Pohl, M. 2019, Nature Astronomy, 3, 88, doi: 10.1038/s41550-018-0610-1

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-018-0610-1 2019

  29. [29]

    2004, ApJ, 611, 1005, doi: 10.1086/422091

    Gehrels, N., Chincarini, G., Giommi, P., et al. 2004, ApJ, 611, 1005, doi: 10.1086/422091

    work page doi:10.1086/422091 2004

  30. [30]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =

    Ghisellini, G., & Madau, P. 1996, MNRAS, 280, 67, doi: 10.1093/mnras/280.1.67

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/280.1.67 1996

  31. [31]

    D., & Davé, R

    Ghisellini, G., & Tavecchio, F. 2008, MNRAS, 387, 1669, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13360.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13360.x 2008

  32. [32]

    2010, MNRAS, 401, 2343, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15859.x

    Ghisellini, G., & Tavecchio, F. 2009, MNRAS, 397, 985, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15007.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15007.x 2009

  33. [33]

    2005, A&A, 432, 401, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20041404

    Ghisellini, G., Tavecchio, F., & Chiaberge, M. 2005, A&A, 432, 401, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20041404

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20041404 2005

  34. [34]

    Giannios, D., & Uzdensky, D. A. 2019, MNRAS, 484, 1378, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz082

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz082 2019

  35. [35]

    A simplified view of blazars: Theγ-ray case.Mon

    Giommi, P., Padovani, P., & Polenta, G. 2013, MNRAS, 431, 1914, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt305

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt305 2013

  36. [36]

    R., Millman, K

    Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., et al. 2020, Nature, 585, 357, doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 2020

  37. [37]

    Harvey, A. L. W., Georganopoulos, M., & Meyer, E. T. 2020, Nature Communications, 11, 5475, doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19296-6 HI4PI Collaboration, Ben Bekhti, N., Flöer, L., et al. 2016, A&A, 594, A116, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629178

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-020-19296-6 2020

  38. [38]

    2005, ApJ, 619, 73, doi: 10.1086/426497

    Hirotani, K. 2005, ApJ, 619, 73, doi: 10.1086/426497

    work page doi:10.1086/426497 2005

  39. [39]

    C., Lister, M

    Homan, D. C., Lister, M. L., Kovalev, Y. Y., et al. 2015, ApJ, 798, 134, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/798/2/134

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/798/2/134 2015

  40. [40]

    C., Cohen, M

    Homan, D. C., Cohen, M. H., Hovatta, T., et al. 2021, ApJ, 923, 67, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac27af

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac27af 2021

  41. [41]

    , keywords =

    Hovatta, T., Lindfors, E., Kiehlmann, S., et al. 2021, A&A, 650, A83, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039481

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039481 2021

  42. [42]

    2019, in International Cosmic Ray Conference, Vol

    Huber, M. 2019, in International Cosmic Ray Conference, Vol. 36, 36th International Cosmic Ray Conference (ICRC2019), 916, doi: 10.22323/1.358.0916 IceCube Collaboration. 2013, Science, 342, 1242856, doi: 10.1126/science.1242856 IceCube Collaboration, Aartsen, M. G., Ackermann, M., et al. 2018a, Science, 361, eaat1378, doi: 10.1126/science.aat1378 IceCube...

    work page doi:10.22323/1.358.0916 2019

  43. [43]

    2018, ApJ, 869, 114, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaeb95

    Inoue, Y., & Doi, A. 2018, ApJ, 869, 114, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaeb95

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaeb95 2018

  44. [44]

    2023, MNRAS, 526, 661, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2724

    Karl, M., Padovani, P., & Giommi, P. 2023, MNRAS, 526, 661, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2724

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2724 2023

  45. [45]

    2018, ApJ, 864, 84, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aad59a

    Keivani, A., Murase, K., Petropoulou, M., et al. 2018, ApJ, 864, 84, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aad59a

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aad59a 2018

  46. [46]

    Energy spectra of gamma rays, electrons, and neutrinos produced at interactions of relativistic protons with low energy radiation.Phys

    Kelner, S. R., & Aharonian, F. A. 2008, PhRvD, 78, 034013, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.78.034013

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.78.034013 2008

  47. [47]

    F., Antonucci, R., et al

    Kishimoto, M., Hönig, S. F., Antonucci, R., et al. 2011, A&A, 536, A78, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201117367

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201117367 2011

  48. [48]

    , keywords =

    Kovalev, Y. Y., Pushkarev, A. B., Nokhrina, E. E., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 495, 3576, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa1121

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1121 2020

  49. [49]

    2018, MNRAS, 480, 1247, doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1890

    Kubota, A., & Done, C. 2018, MNRAS, 480, 1247, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1890

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1890 2018

  50. [50]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2605.24107

    Li, W.-J., Xue, R., Wang, Z.-R., & Xiong, D. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2605.24107. https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.24107

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  51. [51]

    , keywords =

    Li, X., An, T., Mohan, P., & Giroletti, M. 2020, ApJ, 896, 63, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab8f9f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab8f9f 2020

  52. [52]

    2018, ApJ, 866, 137, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aae2b7

    Liodakis, I., Hovatta, T., Huppenkothen, D., et al. 2018, ApJ, 866, 137, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aae2b7

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aae2b7 2018

  53. [53]

    Hadronuclear interpretation of a high-energy neutrino event coincident with a blazar flare.Phys

    Liu, R.-Y., Wang, K., Xue, R., et al. 2019, PhRvD, 99, 063008, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.99.063008

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.99.063008 2019

  54. [54]

    Lobanov, A. P. 1998, A&A, 330, 79, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9712132

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/9712132 1998

  55. [55]

    2010, A&A, 512, A34, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200913298

    Lusso, E., Comastri, A., Vignali, C., et al. 2010, A&A, 512, A34, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200913298

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200913298 2010

  56. [56]

    P., Jorstad, S

    Marscher, A. P., Jorstad, S. G., D’Arcangelo, F. D., et al. 2008, Nature, 452, 966, doi: 10.1038/nature06895

    work page doi:10.1038/nature06895 2008

  57. [57]

    McKinney, J. C. 2006, MNRAS, 368, 1561, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10256.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10256.x 2006

  58. [58]

    2010, MNRAS, 401, 2343, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15859.x

    Mullin, L. M., & Hardcastle, M. J. 2009, MNRAS, 398, 1989, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15232.x 19

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15232.x 2009

  59. [59]

    Murase, K., Inoue, Y., & Dermer, C. D. 2014, PhRvD, 90, 023007, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.90.023007

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.90.023007 2014

  60. [60]

    2013, ApJ, 775, 118, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/775/2/118

    Nakamura, M., & Asada, K. 2013, ApJ, 775, 118, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/775/2/118

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/775/2/118 2013

  61. [61]

    2021, JCAP, 2021, 082, doi: 10.1088/1475-7516/2021/10/082 O’Sullivan, S

    Oikonomou, F., Petropoulou, M., Murase, K., et al. 2021, JCAP, 2021, 082, doi: 10.1088/1475-7516/2021/10/082 O’Sullivan, S. P., & Gabuzda, D. C. 2009, MNRAS, 400, 26, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15428.x

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021/10/082 2021

  62. [62]

    TXS 0506+056, the first cosmic neutrino source, is not a BL Lac.Mon

    Padovani, P., Oikonomou, F., Petropoulou, M., Giommi, P., & Resconi, E. 2019, MNRAS, 484, L104, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slz011

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slz011 2019

  63. [63]

    2022, MNRAS, 510, 2671, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab3630

    Padovani, P., Giommi, P., Falomo, R., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 510, 2671, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab3630

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3630 2022

  64. [64]

    2023, MNRAS, 521, 2270, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad573

    Paiano, S., Falomo, R., Treves, A., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 521, 2270, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad573

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad573 2023

  65. [65]

    2026, ApJL, 996, L22, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ae1ffe

    Park, J., Takahashi, K., Toma, K., et al. 2026, ApJL, 996, L22, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ae1ffe

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae1ffe 2026

  66. [66]

    , keywords =

    Plavin, A., Kovalev, Y. Y., Kovalev, Y. A., & Troitsky, S. 2020, ApJ, 894, 101, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab86bd

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab86bd 2020

  67. [67]

    V., Burenin, R

    Plavin, A. V., Burenin, R. A., Kovalev, Y. Y., et al. 2024, JCAP, 2024, 133, doi: 10.1088/1475-7516/2024/05/133

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2024/05/133 2024

  68. [68]

    , keywords =

    Plavin, A. V., Kovalev, Y. Y., Kovalev, Y. A., & Troitsky, S. V. 2021, ApJ, 908, 157, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abceb8

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abceb8 2021

  69. [69]

    , keywords =

    Plavin, A. V., Kovalev, Y. Y., Kovalev, Y. A., & Troitsky, S. V. 2023, MNRAS, 523, 1799, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1467

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1467 2023

  70. [70]

    , keywords =

    Plavin, A. V., Kovalev, Y. Y., & Troitsky, S. V. 2025, ApJ, 991, 33, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adf54f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adf54f 2025

  71. [71]

    J., & Cotter, G

    Potter, W. J., & Cotter, G. 2013, MNRAS, 429, 1189, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sts407

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sts407 2013

  72. [72]

    B., Hovatta, T., Kovalev, Y

    Pushkarev, A. B., Hovatta, T., Kovalev, Y. Y., et al. 2012, A&A, 545, A113, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219173

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201219173 2012

  73. [73]

    Readhead, A. C. S. 1994, ApJ, 426, 51, doi: 10.1086/174038

    work page doi:10.1086/174038 1994

  74. [74]

    C., Fabian, A

    Ricci, C., Ho, L. C., Fabian, A. C., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 480, 1819, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1879

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1879 2018

  75. [75]

    2019, MNRAS, 484, 2067, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty3072

    Righi, C., Tavecchio, F., & Pacciani, L. 2019, MNRAS, 484, 2067, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty3072

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty3072 2019

  76. [76]

    W., et al

    Ro, H., Kino, M., Sohn, B. W., et al. 2023, A&A, 673, A159, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142988

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142988 2023

  77. [77]

    2024, A&A, 689, A147, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202450592

    Rodrigues, X., Karl, M., Padovani, P., et al. 2024, A&A, 689, A147, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202450592

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450592 2024

  78. [78]

    2026, A&A, 706, A351, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202556986

    Rodrigues, X., Rieger, F., Bohdan, A., & Padovani, P. 2026, A&A, 706, A351, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202556986

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202556986 2026

  79. [79]

    , keywords =

    Ros, E., Kadler, M., Perucho, M., et al. 2020, A&A, 633, L1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201937206

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201937206 2020

  80. [80]

    2010, New Journal of Physics, 12, 033044, doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/12/3/033044

    Schlickeiser, R., & Ruppel, J. 2010, New Journal of Physics, 12, 033044, doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/12/3/033044

    work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/12/3/033044 2010

Showing first 80 references.