Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

AgentRM: Enhancing Agent Generalization with Reward Modeling

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.18407 v1 pith:5PU2B5CY submitted 2025-02-25 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords modelpolicyrewardagentrmtasksagentguidemodeling
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Existing LLM-based agents have achieved strong performance on held-in tasks, but their generalizability to unseen tasks remains poor. Hence, some recent work focus on fine-tuning the policy model with more diverse tasks to improve the generalizability. In this work, we find that finetuning a reward model to guide the policy model is more robust than directly finetuning the policy model. Based on this finding, we propose AgentRM, a generalizable reward model, to guide the policy model for effective test-time search. We comprehensively investigate three approaches to construct the reward model, including explicit reward modeling, implicit reward modeling and LLM-as-a-judge. We then use AgentRM to guide the answer generation with Best-of-N sampling and step-level beam search. On four types of nine agent tasks, AgentRM enhances the base policy model by $8.8$ points on average, surpassing the top general agent by $4.0$. Moreover, it demonstrates weak-to-strong generalization, yielding greater improvement of $12.6$ on LLaMA-3-70B policy model. As for the specializability, AgentRM can also boost a finetuned policy model and outperform the top specialized agent by $11.4$ on three held-in tasks. Further analysis verifies its effectiveness in test-time scaling. Codes will be released to facilitate the research in this area.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. SAND: Boosting LLM Agents with Self-Taught Action Deliberation

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A self-training framework that uses self-consistency action sampling and execution-guided critiques to teach LLM agents to explicitly deliberate over candidate actions, improving average rewards by about 20% over supe...

Pith tools