Pith. sign in

REVIEW 8 cited by

Unifying Generative and Dense Retrieval for Sequential Recommendation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.18814 v2 pith:5Y3QNJQR submitted 2024-11-27 cs.IR cs.AI

classification cs.IRcs.AI
keywords retrievalgenerativedenseitemsequentialitemsrecommendationuser
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Sequential dense retrieval models utilize advanced sequence learning techniques to compute item and user representations, which are then used to rank relevant items for a user through inner product computation between the user and all item representations. However, this approach requires storing a unique representation for each item, resulting in significant memory requirements as the number of items grow. In contrast, the recently proposed generative retrieval paradigm offers a promising alternative by directly predicting item indices using a generative model trained on semantic IDs that encapsulate items' semantic information. Despite its potential for large-scale applications, a comprehensive comparison between generative retrieval and sequential dense retrieval under fair conditions is still lacking, leaving open questions regarding performance, and computation trade-offs. To address this, we compare these two approaches under controlled conditions on academic benchmarks and propose LIGER (LeveragIng dense retrieval for GEnerative Retrieval), a hybrid model that combines the strengths of these two widely used methods. LIGER integrates sequential dense retrieval into generative retrieval, mitigating performance differences and enhancing cold-start item recommendation in the datasets evaluated. This hybrid approach provides insights into the trade-offs between these approaches and demonstrates improvements in efficiency and effectiveness for recommendation systems in small-scale benchmarks.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 8 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. From Understanding to Action: Feedback-Grounded Policy Discovery for Generative Recommendation

    cs.IR 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A feedback-grounded framework discovers recommendation policies by their measured advantage over intent-only baselines and distills them into two latent tokens of a lightweight Semantic-ID recommender.

  2. Generative Recommendation with Semantic IDs: A Practitioner's Handbook

    cs.IR 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An open-source framework and ablation study showing which semantic-ID generative recommendation components actually matter, with results that challenge several standard defaults.

  3. Generating Long Semantic IDs in Parallel for Recommendation

    cs.IR 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    RPG replaces autoregressive semantic ID generation with parallel multi-token prediction plus graph-constrained decoding, improving NDCG@10 by about 12.6% over generative baselines while keeping inference cost independ...

  4. Augment or Not? A Comparative Study of Pure and Augmented Large Language Model Recommenders

    cs.IR 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A survey and benchmark of LLM recommenders finds that augmenting LLMs with non-LLM techniques (semantic IDs, collaborative signals) generally improves sequential recommendation accuracy on Amazon'23.

  5. Beyond Item Order: Temporal Gap Tokenization for Generative Recommendation with Semantic IDs

    cs.IR 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Interleaving fixed log-scale gap tokens with semantic IDs, plus TA-FAMAE temporal regularization, consistently beats ReSID and other SID generative baselines on Amazon sequential recommendation.

  6. Semantic IDs for Recommender Systems at Snapchat: Use Cases, Technical Challenges, and Design Choices

    cs.IR 2026-04 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Semantic IDs with STE-trained multi-modal RQ-VAE and heuristic collision resolution improve Snapchat ranking and generative retrieval offline and in online A/B tests.

  7. FORGE: Forming Semantic Identifiers for Generative Retrieval in Industrial Datasets

    cs.IR 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    FORGE shows that balancing codebook usage and adding multimodal side information improves semantic identifiers for generative retrieval, validated offline and on Taobao.

  8. GR-LLMs: Recent Advances in Generative Recommendation Based on Large Language Models

    cs.IR 2025-07 unverdicted novelty 3.0 of 10

    A survey of LLM-based generative recommendation systems, covering application settings, training pipelines, industrial deployment challenges, and future directions.

Pith tools