Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2507.08230 v1 pith:63BR55LN submitted 2025-07-11 cs.HC

Uncanny or Not? Perceptions of AI-Generated Faces in Autism

classification cs.HC
keywords autismfacesuncannyai-generatedautisticvalleyartificialhuman
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

As artificial intelligence (AI) systems become increasingly sophisticated at generating synthetic human faces, understanding how these images are perceived across diverse populations is important. This study investigates how autistic individuals/individuals with autism perceive AI-generated faces, focusing on the uncanny valley effect. Using a qualitative approach, we analyzed discussions from the r/autism community on Reddit to explore how autistic participants/participants with autism describe their experiences with AI-generated faces and the uncanny valley phenomenon. The findings suggest that autistic people/people with autism may experience the uncanny valley differently, often reporting stronger discomfort with real human faces than with artificial ones. This research contributes to our understanding of visual perception in autism and has implications for the development of inclusive AI systems and assistive technologies.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.