Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

The Pursuit of Fairness in Artificial Intelligence Models: A Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.17333 v1 pith:65LM275W submitted 2024-03-26 cs.AI cs.CYcs.LG

classification cs.AIcs.CYcs.LG
keywords modelsbiasdifferentfairnessresearcherssurveybiasedsystems
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) models are now being utilized in all facets of our lives such as healthcare, education and employment. Since they are used in numerous sensitive environments and make decisions that can be life altering, potential biased outcomes are a pressing matter. Developers should ensure that such models don't manifest any unexpected discriminatory practices like partiality for certain genders, ethnicities or disabled people. With the ubiquitous dissemination of AI systems, researchers and practitioners are becoming more aware of unfair models and are bound to mitigate bias in them. Significant research has been conducted in addressing such issues to ensure models don't intentionally or unintentionally perpetuate bias. This survey offers a synopsis of the different ways researchers have promoted fairness in AI systems. We explore the different definitions of fairness existing in the current literature. We create a comprehensive taxonomy by categorizing different types of bias and investigate cases of biased AI in different application domains. A thorough study is conducted of the approaches and techniques employed by researchers to mitigate bias in AI models. Moreover, we also delve into the impact of biased models on user experience and the ethical considerations to contemplate when developing and deploying such models. We hope this survey helps researchers and practitioners understand the intricate details of fairness and bias in AI systems. By sharing this thorough survey, we aim to promote additional discourse in the domain of equitable and responsible AI.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 6 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. ASCenD-BDS: Adaptable, Stochastic and Context-aware framework for Detection of Bias, Discrimination and Stereotyping

    cs.CL 2025-02 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A framework for dynamically generating context-aware bias and stereotyping test prompts for LLMs, with no empirical validation.

  2. The Process of Categorical Clipping at the Core of the Genesis of Concepts in Synthetic Neural Cognition

    cs.AI 2025-01 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Words that strongly activate both a lower-layer neuron and its strongly connected upper-layer neuron in GPT-2XL form more semantically similar clusters, which the paper interprets as a clipping process.

Pith tools