Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

ABOUT ML: Annotation and Benchmarking on Understanding and Transparency of Machine Learning Lifecycles

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1912.06166 v3 pith:6AVHPBF2 submitted 2019-12-12 cs.CY stat.ML

classification cs.CYstat.ML
keywords projecttransparencyannotationbenchmarkinginitiativelearninglifecyclesmachine
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We present the "Annotation and Benchmarking on Understanding and Transparency of Machine Learning Lifecycles" (ABOUT ML) project as an initiative to operationalize ML transparency and work towards a standard ML documentation practice. We make the case for the project's relevance and effectiveness in consolidating disparate efforts across a variety of stakeholders, as well as bringing in the perspectives of currently missing voices that will be valuable in shaping future conversations. We describe the details of the initiative and the gaps we hope this project will help address.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Developing a Risk Identification Framework for Foundation Model Uses

    cs.CR 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The paper derives four design requirements for use-based foundation model risk identification and presents an initial questionnaire-based framework demonstrated on a visitor-center chatbot example.

  2. Who Owns The Robot?: Four Ethical and Socio-technical Questions about Wellbeing Robots in the Real World through Community Engagement

    cs.CY 2025-09 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Community workshops with 22 participants yield four ethical questions (safety, beneficiaries, data ownership, necessity) as a reflective framework for wellbeing robot design.

Pith tools