REVIEW 5 cited by
CultureLLM: Incorporating Cultural Differences into Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Large language models (LLMs) are reported to be partial to certain cultures owing to the training data dominance from the English corpora. Since multilingual cultural data are often expensive to collect, existing efforts handle this by prompt engineering or culture-specific pre-training. However, they might overlook the knowledge deficiency of low-resource culture and require extensive computing resources. In this paper, we propose CultureLLM, a cost-effective solution to incorporate cultural differences into LLMs. CultureLLM adopts World Value Survey (WVS) as seed data and generates semantically equivalent training data via the proposed semantic data augmentation. Using only 50 seed samples from WVS with augmented data, we fine-tune culture-specific LLMs and one unified model (CultureLLM-One) for 9 cultures covering rich and low-resource languages. Extensive experiments on 60 culture-related datasets demonstrate that CultureLLM significantly outperforms various counterparts such as GPT-3.5 (by 8.1%) and Gemini Pro (by 9.5%) with comparable performance to GPT-4 or even better. Our human study shows that the generated samples are semantically equivalent to the original samples, providing an effective solution for LLMs augmentation. Code is released at https://github.com/Scarelette/CultureLLM.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
Partition, Prompt, Aggregate: Statistical Self-Consistency in Language Models
LLM probability estimates violate the law of total probability across partitions, and subgroup-aggregated estimates often beat direct population-level estimates (the macro fallacy).
-
Benchmarking Open-Weight Foundation Models for Global AI Technical Governance
Open-weight frontier models fabricate ~72% of AI-governance numeric answers, almost never refuse, and show inverted North/South accuracy driven largely by a proportional ±10% scoring rule and sparse high-value indicators.
-
The Alignment Veto: How Safety Training Suppresses Cultural Knowledge in LLMs
The full text builds the MENA Values benchmark (864 questions, 7 models) and reports that LLM cultural answers shift with language, decline with reasoning prompts, and hide strong internal preferences behind refusals—...
-
CulFiT: A Fine-grained Cultural-aware LLM Training Paradigm via Multilingual Critique Data Synthesis
A multilingual critique-data training paradigm with a knowledge-unit reward improves LLM cultural alignment on several benchmarks, but its headline benchmark is evaluated with the same LLM-judged metric used to select...
-
Recalibrating the Compass: Integrating Large Language Models into Classical Research Methods
LLMs extend, rather than replace, classical social science methods, with a proposed three-tier bias framework for LLM-augmented surveys.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.