pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.05310 · v1 · pith:6FI4AFKFnew · submitted 2026-06-03 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

A Decade to Map the Diffuse Universe: FRB-QSO Pairs with HST/COS Spectroscopy

Jessica Werk , Matthew McQuinn , J. Xavier Prochaska , Sunil Simha , Rongmon Bordoloi , Liam Connor , Andrew Fox , J. Chris Howk
show 11 more authors
Cameron Hummels Lordrick Kahinga Victoria Kaspi Khee-Gan Lee Nicolas Lehner Kiyoshi Masui Benjamin Oppenheimer Vikram Ravi Kate Rubin Kirill Tchernyshyov Yong Zheng
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 05:05 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords fast radio burstsquasarscircumgalactic mediumdispersion measurerotation measurediffuse gascosmic webHST/COS spectroscopy
0
0 comments X

The pith

By 2035 next-generation interferometers will produce thousands of FRB-QSO pairs at small angles for mapping the diffuse gas.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper claims that pairing arcsecond-localized fast radio bursts with nearby UV-bright quasars will supply complementary measurements of the diffuse universe that neither probe can provide alone. FRBs deliver integrated electron columns, rotation measures, and scattering times independent of gas phase, while QSO absorption spectra supply the redshift- and phase-resolved column densities needed to interpret those integrals. Forecasts based on current localization rates and QSO catalogs indicate thousands of such pairs at angular separations under 10 arcminutes, including about 100 under 1 arcminute, across 20,000 square degrees by 2035. This sample would permit direct constraints on circumgalactic-medium ionization fractions and baryon content, the partitioning of the cosmic dispersion-measure budget, and three-dimensional maps of the Milky Way and M31 halos. The measurements address how feedback, turbulence, and non-thermal pressure regulate galaxy growth in the diffuse gas, and the paper states that only HST/COS can execute the required UV spectroscopy in the 2030s.

Core claim

By 2035 there will be approximately 10^5 arcsecond-localized FRBs at z<1. Using current forecasts and UV-bright QSO catalogs, next-generation interferometers will produce thousands of FRB-QSO pairs at angular separations θ<10', including ~100 pairs at θ<1', over a common 20,000 deg² footprint. Joint analysis of FRB dispersion measures, rotation measures, and scattering times with QSO absorption lines will constrain the phases, mass distributions, and magnetic structure of the diffuse universe, including CGM ionization fractions, the role of magnetic fields and turbulence, sightline-by-sightline partitioning of the cosmic DM budget, and three-dimensional mapping of the multiphase Milky Way an

What carries the argument

FRB-QSO pairs at small projected separations, in which FRBs supply phase-independent integrated electron columns and line-of-sight magnetic-field estimates while QSOs supply redshift- and phase-resolved column densities.

If this is right

  • Constraints on CGM ionization fractions and baryon masses will follow from the combined DM and absorption data.
  • Observational limits on the contribution of magnetic fields and turbulence to the CGM and cosmic web will become available.
  • Sightline-by-sightline partitioning of the cosmic dispersion-measure budget will be possible.
  • Three-dimensional maps of the multiphase structure of the Milky Way and M31 halos will be constructed.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same pair statistics could be used to test whether specific FRB scattering times correlate with particular absorption-line components.
  • Extending the approach to fainter QSOs or additional sightlines might reveal whether the diffuse-gas constraints scale with halo mass in ways not yet modeled.

Load-bearing premise

The most recent FRB localization forecasts and UV-bright QSO catalogs used to derive the pair counts are accurate and will hold through 2035.

What would settle it

A direct count of arcsecond-localized FRBs at z<1 and of UV-bright QSOs in the same sky footprint that falls well below the forecasted numbers by 2035 would falsify the predicted sample size of thousands of close pairs.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.05310 by Andrew Fox, Benjamin Oppenheimer, Cameron Hummels, J. Chris Howk, Jessica Werk, J. Xavier Prochaska, Kate Rubin, Khee-Gan Lee, Kirill Tchernyshyov, Kiyoshi Masui, Liam Connor, Lordrick Kahinga, Matthew McQuinn, Nicolas Lehner, Rongmon Bordoloi, Sunil Simha, Victoria Kaspi, Vikram Ravi, Yong Zheng.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: PREDICTED CUMULATIVE NUMBER OF UV￾BRIGHT QSO–FRB PAIRS AS A FUNCTION OF PROJECTED ANGULAR SEPARATION θ OVER A COMMON SURVEY FOOT￾PRINT OF ∼20,000 DEG2 : Both curves assume a purely ran￾dom (Poisson) spatial distribution, N(< θ) = NFRB ΣQSO πθ2 . The blue curve shows the current epoch (2026) with NFRB ≈ 100 arcsecond-localized FRBs at z < 1. The orange curve shows the 2035 forecast with NFRB = 100,000. Shad… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Jointly analyzing the sightlines of arcsecond-localized fast radio bursts (FRBs) and UV-bright quasars (QSOs) nearby in projection has the potential to provide strong constraints on the phases, mass distributions, and magnetic structure of the diffuse universe. Each probe supplies what the other cannot: FRBs provide integrated electron columns (DM), line-of-sight magnetic field estimates (RM), and scattering constraints ($\tau_{\rm scatt}$) that are independent of gas phase; QSOs provide the redshift- and phase-resolved column densities needed to interpret them. Today, there are only $\sim100$ arcsecond-localized FRBs at $z < 1$, making statistical FRB-QSO pair surveys impossible. By 2035, there will be $\sim10^{5}$. Using the most recent FRB localization forecasts and UV-bright QSO catalogs, we estimate that next-generation interferometers will yield thousands of FRB--QSO pairs at angular separations $\theta < 10'$, including $\sim100$ pairs at $\theta < 1'$, over a common 20,000\,deg$^2$ footprint by 2035. We outline the science enabled by this sample: constraints on CGM ionization fractions and baryon masses; observational constraints on the role of magnetic fields and turbulence in the CGM and cosmic web; sightline-by-sightline partitioning of the cosmic DM budget; and three-dimensional mapping of the multiphase Milky Way and M31 halos. Together, these measurements directly address the physics of feedback, non-thermal pressure support, and energy balance in the diffuse gas that regulates galaxy growth. HST/COS is the only instrument that can carry out this program, and the 2030s are the only decade in which to do it before Habitable Worlds Observatory (HWO) defines the next era of diffuse universe science.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that by 2035 next-generation interferometers will produce ~10^5 arcsecond-localized FRBs at z<1. Folding these with UV-bright QSO catalogs yields thousands of FRB-QSO pairs at θ<10' (including ~100 at θ<1') over a common 20,000 deg² footprint. This sample will enable HST/COS spectroscopy to deliver constraints on CGM ionization fractions, baryon masses, magnetic fields, turbulence, sightline-by-sightline DM partitioning, and 3D mapping of Milky Way/M31 halos, directly addressing feedback and energy balance in the diffuse gas. The 2030s are presented as the unique window before HWO.

Significance. If the projected pair counts materialize, the dataset would supply a powerful new probe of the multiphase circumgalactic and intergalactic medium by combining phase-resolved QSO absorption with integrated FRB DM/RM/scattering measurements. The paper correctly identifies the complementarity and the timely role of HST/COS.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and pair-count estimation section] Abstract and the section presenting the pair-count estimates: the headline numbers (thousands of pairs at θ<10', ~100 at θ<1') are obtained by direct multiplication of external FRB localization forecasts and QSO catalogs, yet no explicit rate model, error propagation, or sensitivity tests on the input FRB surface density are shown. Because pair counts scale linearly with FRB density, a factor-of-two shortfall in realized localizations would halve the close-pair sample and materially reduce the statistical power claimed for CGM ionization and DM-budget science.
  2. [Science case outline] The science-case paragraphs that follow the pair-count estimate: the manuscript does not quantify how the precision of the proposed CGM ionization-fraction or cosmic-DM-budget measurements would degrade under plausible downward revisions of the FRB localization rate, leaving the load-bearing claim that the sample 'directly addresses the physics of feedback' without a robustness check.
minor comments (2)
  1. The 20,000 deg² common footprint should be explicitly tied to the intersection of the assumed FRB survey area and the UV-bright QSO catalog footprint.
  2. A table or figure breaking down the pair counts by angular-separation bin and by input catalog would improve traceability of the ~100 pairs at θ<1' claim.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thoughtful and constructive report. The comments correctly identify that our pair-count forecasts and science case would benefit from explicit robustness checks against uncertainties in the input FRB localization rates. We will revise the manuscript accordingly while preserving the core forecast and complementarity arguments.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and pair-count estimation section] Abstract and the section presenting the pair-count estimates: the headline numbers (thousands of pairs at θ<10', ~100 at θ<1') are obtained by direct multiplication of external FRB localization forecasts and QSO catalogs, yet no explicit rate model, error propagation, or sensitivity tests on the input FRB surface density are shown. Because pair counts scale linearly with FRB density, a factor-of-two shortfall in realized localizations would halve the close-pair sample and materially reduce the statistical power claimed for CGM ionization and DM-budget science.

    Authors: We agree that the current draft presents the headline pair counts without accompanying sensitivity tests or propagated uncertainties. In revision we will add a new subsection (or expanded paragraph) to the pair-count section that (i) cites the specific rate models and uncertainty ranges from the source FRB forecast papers, (ii) propagates the quoted fractional uncertainties on FRB surface density into the pair counts, and (iii) tabulates results for FRB densities scaled by factors of 0.5 and 2.0. This will make the linear scaling explicit and allow readers to assess the impact on the <10' and <1' samples. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Science case outline] The science-case paragraphs that follow the pair-count estimate: the manuscript does not quantify how the precision of the proposed CGM ionization-fraction or cosmic-DM-budget measurements would degrade under plausible downward revisions of the FRB localization rate, leaving the load-bearing claim that the sample 'directly addresses the physics of feedback' without a robustness check.

    Authors: The referee is correct that we do not currently provide a quantitative mapping from FRB sample size to measurement precision on ionization fractions or DM partitioning. In the revised version we will insert a short paragraph in the science-case section that (a) notes the linear scaling of pair statistics with FRB density, (b) states that even a factor-of-two reduction still yields >500 pairs at <10' (sufficient for first statistical constraints on CGM ionization), and (c) acknowledges that full end-to-end precision forecasts would require additional modeling beyond the scope of this paper. We will soften the phrasing around 'directly addresses' to 'enables direct constraints on' while retaining the overall science motivation. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; pair-count forecast relies on external inputs

full rationale

The paper's headline projection (∼10^5 arcsecond-localized FRBs at z<1 by 2035 yielding thousands of FRB-QSO pairs at θ<10' and ∼100 at θ<1' over 20,000 deg²) is obtained by folding cited external FRB localization forecasts with UV-bright QSO catalogs. No equations, self-definitional steps, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the text. The derivation is self-contained against external benchmarks and does not reduce to its own inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The pair-count estimates rest on the accuracy of external FRB localization rate forecasts and QSO catalog completeness; no new free parameters are introduced by the paper itself.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption FRB localization forecasts and UV-bright QSO catalogs remain valid through 2035
    Invoked to generate the ~10^5 FRBs at z<1 and the resulting pair statistics.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5962 in / 1136 out tokens · 21486 ms · 2026-06-28T05:05:37.088230+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    2021, Pathways to discovery in astronomy and astrophysics for the 2020s (The National Academies Press), doi: 10.17226/26141

    National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine.Pathways to Discovery in Astronomy and Astrophysics for the 2020s. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2021. doi: 10.17226/26141. URLhttps://doi.org/10.17226/26141

    work page doi:10.17226/26141 2021

  2. [2]

    Behroozi, Charlie Conroy, and Risa H

    Peter S. Behroozi, Charlie Conroy, and Risa H. Wechsler. A Comprehensive Analysis of Uncer- tainties Affecting the Stellar Mass–Halo Mass Relation for0< z <4.The Astrophysical Journal, 717:379, 2010. doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/717/1/379

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/717/1/379 2010

  3. [3]

    , author =

    Matthew McQuinn. Locating the “Missing” Baryons with Extragalactic Dispersion Measure Esti- mates.The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 780:L33, 2014. doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/780/2/L33

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1088/2041-8205/780/2/l33 2014

  4. [4]

    S., & Werk, J

    Jason Tumlinson, Molly S. Peeples, and Jessica K. Werk. The Circumgalactic Medium.Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 55:389, 2017. doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-091916-055240

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-091916-055240 2017

  5. [5]

    How the diffuse Universe cools.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 430:3292, 2013

    Serena Bertone, Anthony Aguirre, and Joop Schaye. How the diffuse Universe cools.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 430:3292, 2013. doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt131

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt131 2013

  6. [6]

    Adams, Hiroki Akamatsu, Moham- madreza Ayromlou, et al

    Ralph Kraft, Maxim Markevitch, Caroline Kilbourne, Joseph S. Adams, Hiroki Akamatsu, Moham- madreza Ayromlou, et al. Line Emission Mapper (LEM): Probing the physics of cosmic ecosys- tems.arXiv e-prints, art. arXiv:2211.09827, November 2022. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2211.09827

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2211.09827 2022

  7. [7]

    Green, Cynthia S

    James C. Green, Cynthia S. Froning, Steven Osterman, Dennis Ebbets, Sara H. Heap, Claus Lei- therer, et al. The Cosmic Origins Spectrograph.The Astrophysical Journal, 744:60, 2012. doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/744/1/60

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/744/1/60 2012

  8. [8]

    Jason Tumlinson, Christopher Thom, Jessica K. Werk, J. Xavier Prochaska, Todd M. Tripp, David H. Weinberg, et al. The Large, Oxygen-Rich Halos of Star-Forming Galaxies Are a Ma- jor Reservoir of Galactic Metals.Science, 334:948, 2011. doi: 10.1126/science.1209840

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1209840 2011

  9. [9]

    Jessica K. Werk, J. Xavier Prochaska, Christopher Thom, Jason Tumlinson, Todd M. Tripp, John M. O’Meara, and Molly S. Peeples. The COS-Halos Survey: An Empirical Description of Metal-Line Absorption in the Low-Redshift Circumgalactic Medium.The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 204:17, 2013. doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/204/2/17

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/204/2/17 2013

  10. [10]

    A., James , B

    Danielle A. Berg, Bethan L. James, Tom King, David Sahnow, Timothy M. Heckman, et al. The COS Legacy Archive Spectroscopy Survey (CLASSY) Treasury Atlas.The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 261:31, 2022. doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac6c03

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac6c03 2022

  11. [11]

    Berek, J

    Nicolas Lehner, Samantha C. Berek, J. Christopher Howk, Bart P. Wakker, Jason Tumlinson, Ed- ward B. Jenkins, et al. Project AMIGA: The Circumgalactic Medium of Andromeda.The Astro- physical Journal, 900(1):9, September 2020. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aba49c

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aba49c 2020

  12. [12]

    S., Boettcher, E., & et al

    Hsiao-Wen Chen, Fakhri S. Zahedy, Erin Boettcher, Thomas M. Cooper, Sean D. Johnson, Gwen C. Rudie, et al. The Cosmic Ultraviolet Baryon Survey (CUBS) - I. Overview and the diverse envi- ronments of Lyman limit systems at z<1.MNRAS, 497(1):498–520, September 2020. doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa1773

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1773 2020

  13. [13]

    Proffitt, Joanna M

    Julia Roman-Duval, Charles R. Proffitt, Joanna M. Taylor, TalaWanda R. Monroe, Travis C. Fis- cher, William J. Fischer, et al. Ultraviolet Legacy Library of Young Stars as Essential Standards i (ULLYSES): Data Release I.Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 4:205, 2020. doi: 10.3847/2515-5172/abca2f

    work page doi:10.3847/2515-5172/abca2f 2020

  14. [14]

    doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.36.1.267 , eprint =

    Michael Rauch. The Lyman Alpha Forest in the Spectra of QSOs.Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 36:267, 1998. doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.36.1.267

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.36.1.267 1998

  15. [15]

    Jessica K. Werk, J. Xavier Prochaska, Jason Tumlinson, Molly S. Peeples, Todd M. Tripp, An- drew J. Fox, et al. The COS-Halos Survey: Physical Conditions and Baryonic Mass in the Low-Redshift Circumgalactic Medium.The Astrophysical Journal, 792:8, 2014. doi: 10.1088/ 0004-637X/792/1/8

    2014

  16. [16]

    14 Astrophysics of FRBs Coordinator: Alice P

    S. Chatterjee, C. J. Law, R. S. Wharton, S. Burke-Spolaor, J. W. T. Hessels, G. C. Bower, et al. A di- rect localization of a fast radio burst and its host.Nature, 541:58, 2017. doi: 10.1038/nature20797

    work page doi:10.1038/nature20797 2017

  17. [17]

    Xavier Prochaska and Yong Zheng

    J. Xavier Prochaska and Yong Zheng. Probing Galactic haloes with fast radio bursts.MNRAS, 485 (1):648–665, May 2019. doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz261

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz261 2019

  18. [18]

    Ostriker

    Renyue Cen and Jeremiah P. Ostriker. Where Are the Baryons? II. Feedback Effects.The Astro- physical Journal, 650:560, 2006. doi: 10.1086/506505

    work page doi:10.1086/506505 2006

  19. [19]

    FRB scattering statistics through the CGM are sensitive to morphology and intermittency

    Dylan L. Jow and Calvin Leung. FRB scattering statistics through the CGM are sensitive to morphology and intermittency.arXiv e-prints, art. arXiv:2603.00336, February 2026. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2603.00336

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.00336 2026

  20. [20]

    Gregg Hallinan, V . Ravi, S. Weinreb, J. Kocz, Y . Huang, D. P. Woody, et al. The DSA-2000 — A Radio Survey Camera. InBulletin of the American Astronomical Society, volume 51, page 255, September 2019. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1907.07648

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.07648 2000

  21. [21]

    Canadian Long Range Plan for Astronomy and Astrophysics White Papers , year = 2019, volume =

    Keith Vanderlinde, Adrian Liu, Bryan Gaensler, Dick Bond, Gary Hinshaw, Cherry Ng, et al. The Canadian Hydrogen Observatory and Radio-transient Detector (CHORD). InCanadian Long Range Plan for Astronomy and Astrophysics White Papers, volume 2020, page 28, October 2019. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.3765414

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.3765414 2020

  22. [22]

    Macquart, E

    J.-P. Macquart, E. Keane, K. Grainge, M. McQuinn, R. Fender, Hessels, et al. Fast transients at cosmological distances with the SKA. InAdvancing Astrophysics with the Square Kilometre Array (AASKA14), page 55, 2015. doi: 10.22323/1.215.0055

    work page doi:10.22323/1.215.0055 2015

  23. [23]

    The Open Journal of Astrophysics , keywords =

    Eric Wim Flesch. The Million Quasars (Milliquas) Catalogue, v8.The Open Journal of Astro- physics, 6:49, December 2023. doi: 10.21105/astro.2308.01505

    work page doi:10.21105/astro.2308.01505 2023

  24. [24]

    Nature Astronomy , keywords =

    Liam Connor, Vikram Ravi, Kritti Sharma, Stella Koch Ocker, Jakob Faber, Gregg Hallinan, et al. A gas-rich cosmic web revealed by the partitioning of the missing baryons.Nature Astronomy, 9: 1226, 2025. doi: 10.1038/s41550-025-02566-y

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-025-02566-y 2025

  25. [25]

    Kritti Sharma, Vikram Ravi, Liam Connor, Elisabeth Krause, Pranjal R. S. Pandey, and Dhayaa Anbajagane. Quantifying the Impact of Selection Effects on FRB DM–zRelation Cosmological Inference.The Astrophysical Journal, 999:202, 2026. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae4696

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae4696 2026

  26. [26]

    Assef, W

    Guodong Li, Roberto J. Assef, W. N. Brandt, Matthew J. Temple, Franz E. Bauer, Marcin Mar- culewicz, et al. Predicting Quasar Counts Detectable in the LSST Survey.The Astrophysical Journal, 1000:165, 2026. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae3164. ii

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae3164 2026

  27. [27]

    R., Prochaska, J

    TalaWanda R. Monroe, J. Xavier Prochaska, Nicolas Tejos, G ¨oran Worseck, Joseph F. Hennawi, Tobias Schmidt, et al. The UV-bright Quasar Survey (UVQS): DR1.The Astronomical Journal, 152:25, 2016. doi: 10.3847/0004-6256/152/1/25

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-6256/152/1/25 2016

  28. [28]

    Wilde, Jessica K

    Matthew C. Wilde, Jessica K. Werk, Joseph N. Burchett, J. Xavier Prochaska, Kirill Tchernyshyov, Todd M. Tripp, et al. CGM 2 I: The Extent of the Circumgalactic Medium Traced by Neutral Hydrogen.The Astrophysical Journal, 912:9, 2021. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abea14

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abea14 2021

  29. [29]

    Dirirsa, S

    Matthew C. Wilde, Kirill Tchernyshyov, Jessica K. Werk, Todd M. Tripp, Joseph N. Burchett, J. Xavier Prochaska, et al. CGM2 + CASBaH: The Mass Dependence of HILyα–Galaxy Clustering and the Extent of the CGM.The Astrophysical Journal, 948:114, 2023. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ acc85b

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ 2023

  30. [30]

    Xavier Prochaska, Ilya S

    Sunil Simha, Khee-Gan Lee, J. Xavier Prochaska, Ilya S. Khrykin, Yuxin Huang, Nicolas Tejos, et al. Searching for the Sources of Excess Extragalactic Dispersion of FRBs.The Astrophysical Journal, 954:71, 2023. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ace324

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ace324 2023

  31. [31]

    Yakov Faerman and Jessica K. Werk. The Cool Circumgalactic Medium of Low-redshift Star- forming Galaxies. I. Empirical Model and Mean Properties.The Astrophysical Journal, 956:92,

  32. [32]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acf217

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acf217

  33. [33]

    Zhijie Qu and Joel N. Bregman. The Mass and Absorption Column Densities of Galactic Gaseous Halos. II. The High Ionization State Ions.The Astrophysical Journal, 862(1):23, July 2018. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaccec

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaccec 2018

  34. [34]

    Oppenheimer, Mary E

    Yong Zheng, Yakov Faerman, Benjamin D. Oppenheimer, Mary E. Putman, Kristen B. W. Mc- Quinn, Evan N. Kirby, Joseph N. Burchett, O. Grace Telford, Jessica K. Werk, and Doyeon A. Kim. A Comprehensive Investigation of Metals in the Circumgalactic Medium of Nearby Dwarf Galaxies.The Astrophysical Journal, 960(1):55, January 2024. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acfe6b

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acfe6b 2024

  35. [35]

    Peeples, Brian W

    Cassandra Lochhaas, Jason Tumlinson, Molly S. Peeples, Brian W. O’Shea, Britton D. Smith, Ra- mona Augustin, et al. Figuring Out Gas & Galaxies in Enzo (FOGGIE). VI. The Circumgalactic Medium ofL ∗ Galaxies Is Supported in an Emergent, Nonhydrostatic Equilibrium.The Astrophys- ical Journal, 948:43, 2023. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acbb06

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acbb06 2023

  36. [36]

    Butsky, Drummond B

    Iryna S. Butsky, Drummond B. Fielding, Christopher C. Hayward, Cameron B. Hummels, Thomas R. Quinn, and Jessica K. Werk. The Impact of Cosmic Rays on Thermal Instability in the Circumgalactic Medium.The Astrophysical Journal, 903(2):77, November 2020. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abbad2

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abbad2 2020

  37. [37]

    Butsky, Jessica K

    Iryna S. Butsky, Jessica K. Werk, Kirill Tchernyshyov, Drummond B. Fielding, Joseph Breneman, Daniel R. Piacitelli, et al. The Impact of Cosmic Rays on the Kinematics of the Circumgalactic Medium.The Astrophysical Journal, 935(2):69, August 2022. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7ebd

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac7ebd 2022

  38. [38]

    Eliot Quataert and Philip F. Hopkins. Cosmic Ray Feedback in Massive Halos: Implications for the Distribution of Baryons.Open Journal of Astrophysics, 8:66, 2025. doi: 10.33232/001c.138772

    work page doi:10.33232/001c.138772 2025

  39. [39]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =

    Craig S. Anderson, N. M. McClure-Griffiths, L. Rudnick, B. M. Gaensler, S. P. O’Sullivan, S. Brad- bury, et al. Probing the magnetized gas distribution in galaxy groups and the cosmic web with POSSUM Faraday rotation measures.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 533: 4068, 2024. doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1954. iii

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1954 2024

  40. [40]

    Khrykin, Metin Ata, Khee-Gan Lee, Sunil Simha, Yuxin Huang, J

    Ilya S. Khrykin, Metin Ata, Khee-Gan Lee, Sunil Simha, Yuxin Huang, J. Xavier Prochaska, Nico- las Tejos, et al. FLIMFLAM DR1: The First Constraints on the Cosmic Baryon Distribution from Eight Fast Radio Burst Sight Lines.The Astrophysical Journal, 973(2):151, October 2024. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad6567

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad6567 2024

  41. [41]

    Arag ´on-Calvo, Erwin Platen, Rien van de Weygaert, and Alexander S

    Miguel A. Arag ´on-Calvo, Erwin Platen, Rien van de Weygaert, and Alexander S. Szalay. The Spine of the Cosmic Web.The Astrophysical Journal, 723:364, 2010. doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/723/1/ 364

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/723/1/ 2010

  42. [42]

    Marius Cautun, Rien van de Weygaert, Bernard J. T. Jones, and Carlos S. Frenk. Evolution of the Cosmic Web.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 441:2923, 2014. doi: 10.1093/ mnras/stu768

    2014

  43. [43]

    Yakov Faerman, Amiel Sternberg, and Christopher F. McKee. Massive Warm/Hot Galaxy Coronae. II. Isentropic Model.The Astrophysical Journal, 893:82, 2020. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab7ffc

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab7ffc 2020

  44. [44]

    Werk, Kirill Tchernyshyov, J

    Bo-Eun Choi, Jessica K. Werk, Kirill Tchernyshyov, J. Xavier Prochaska, Yong Zheng, Mary E. Putman, Drummond B. Fielding, and Jay Strader. Metallicity Mapping of the Ionized Diffuse Gas at the Milky Way Disk-Halo Interface.The Astrophysical Journal, 976(2):222, December 2024. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad84f8

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad84f8 2024

  45. [45]

    , keywords =

    Amanda M. Cook, Mohit Bhardwaj, B. M. Gaensler, Paul Scholz, Gwendolyn M. Eadie, Alex S. Hill, et al. An FRB Sent Me a DM: Constraining the Electron Column of the Milky Way Halo with Fast Radio Burst Dispersion Measures from CHIME/FRB.The Astrophysical Journal, 946: 58, 2023. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acbbd0

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acbbd0 2023

  46. [46]

    Kahinga, J

    Lordrick A. Kahinga, J. Xavier Prochaska, Sunil Simha, Calvin Leung, Amanda C. Cook, Radu V . Craiu, Gwendolyn Eadie, et al. Constraining the mass of the M31 ionized baryon Halo using CHIME/FRB Catalog 2.arXiv e-prints, art. arXiv:2602.23749, February 2026. doi: 10.48550/ arXiv.2602.23749

    arXiv 2026

  47. [47]

    Christopher Howk, Lara Collins, Sameer, Bart P

    Nicolas Lehner, J. Christopher Howk, Lara Collins, Sameer, Bart P. Wakker, Ramona Augustin, et al. Project AMIGA: The Inner Circumgalactic Medium of Andromeda from Thick Disk to Halo. The Astrophysical Journal, 997(2):183, 2026. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae1f13

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae1f13 2026

  48. [48]

    2012.21704.x

    Brice M ´enard, Vivienne Wild, Daniel Nestor, Anna Quider, Stefano Zibetti, Sandhya Rao, and David Turnshek. Probing Star Formation across Cosmic Time with Absorption-Line Systems. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 417:801, 2011. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966. 2011.18227.x. iv

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966 2011