The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2312.00164 · v1 · pith:6G74KY6D · submitted 2023-11-30 · cs.CY · cs.AI

Towards Accurate Differential Diagnosis with Large Language Models

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:6G74KY6Drecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cs.CY cs.AI
keywords cliniciansassistanceaccuracyassisteddifferentialmedicalabilityaccurate
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

An accurate differential diagnosis (DDx) is a cornerstone of medical care, often reached through an iterative process of interpretation that combines clinical history, physical examination, investigations and procedures. Interactive interfaces powered by Large Language Models (LLMs) present new opportunities to both assist and automate aspects of this process. In this study, we introduce an LLM optimized for diagnostic reasoning, and evaluate its ability to generate a DDx alone or as an aid to clinicians. 20 clinicians evaluated 302 challenging, real-world medical cases sourced from the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) case reports. Each case report was read by two clinicians, who were randomized to one of two assistive conditions: either assistance from search engines and standard medical resources, or LLM assistance in addition to these tools. All clinicians provided a baseline, unassisted DDx prior to using the respective assistive tools. Our LLM for DDx exhibited standalone performance that exceeded that of unassisted clinicians (top-10 accuracy 59.1% vs 33.6%, [p = 0.04]). Comparing the two assisted study arms, the DDx quality score was higher for clinicians assisted by our LLM (top-10 accuracy 51.7%) compared to clinicians without its assistance (36.1%) (McNemar's Test: 45.7, p < 0.01) and clinicians with search (44.4%) (4.75, p = 0.03). Further, clinicians assisted by our LLM arrived at more comprehensive differential lists than those without its assistance. Our study suggests that our LLM for DDx has potential to improve clinicians' diagnostic reasoning and accuracy in challenging cases, meriting further real-world evaluation for its ability to empower physicians and widen patients' access to specialist-level expertise.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Capabilities of Gemini Models in Medicine

    cs.AI 2024-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Med-Gemini sets new records on 10 of 14 medical benchmarks including 91.1% on MedQA-USMLE, beats GPT-4V by 44.5% on multimodal tasks, and surpasses humans on medical text summarization.

  2. Train the Trainers -- An Agentic AI Framework for Peer-Based Mental Health Support in Battlefield Environments

    cs.HC 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    The paper introduces an agentic AI platform to train and support recovered soldiers as peer facilitators providing mental health triage and interventions in austere battlefield environments.

  3. Enhancing LLMs for Identifying and Prioritizing Important Medical Jargons from Electronic Health Record Notes Utilizing Data Augmentation

    cs.CL 2025-02 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    Fine-tuning and data augmentation improve LLM performance on medical jargon extraction and prioritization from EHR notes, with augmented open-source models sometimes outperforming closed-source ones on 106 annotated notes.