REVIEW 2 cited by
Semantic Evaluation for Text-to-SQL with Distilled Test Suites
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We propose test suite accuracy to approximate semantic accuracy for Text-to-SQL models. Our method distills a small test suite of databases that achieves high code coverage for the gold query from a large number of randomly generated databases. At evaluation time, it computes the denotation accuracy of the predicted queries on the distilled test suite, hence calculating a tight upper-bound for semantic accuracy efficiently. We use our proposed method to evaluate 21 models submitted to the Spider leader board and manually verify that our method is always correct on 100 examples. In contrast, the current Spider metric leads to a 2.5% false negative rate on average and 8.1% in the worst case, indicating that test suite accuracy is needed. Our implementation, along with distilled test suites for eleven Text-to-SQL datasets, is publicly available.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Cooperative SQL Generation for Segmented Databases By Using Multi-functional LLM Agents
Two LLM agents that each hold only part of a database schema can cooperate to write SQL almost as accurately as a single agent with the full schema.
-
Accelerating Reinforcement Learning Algorithms Convergence using Pre-trained Large Language Models as Tutors With Advice Reusing
LLM tutoring modestly accelerates RL convergence on average, with advice reuse saving wall-clock time but reducing stability.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.