pith. sign in

arxiv: 2405.03949 · v1 · pith:6HLY4BMFnew · submitted 2024-05-07 · 💻 cs.LG · cs.CR· eess.SP

FedSC: Provable Federated Self-supervised Learning with Spectral Contrastive Objective over Non-i.i.d. Data

classification 💻 cs.LG cs.CReess.SP
keywords datafederatedfedssllearningobjectivefedscprivacyself-supervised
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Recent efforts have been made to integrate self-supervised learning (SSL) with the framework of federated learning (FL). One unique challenge of federated self-supervised learning (FedSSL) is that the global objective of FedSSL usually does not equal the weighted sum of local SSL objectives. Consequently, conventional approaches, such as federated averaging (FedAvg), fail to precisely minimize the FedSSL global objective, often resulting in suboptimal performance, especially when data is non-i.i.d.. To fill this gap, we propose a provable FedSSL algorithm, named FedSC, based on the spectral contrastive objective. In FedSC, clients share correlation matrices of data representations in addition to model weights periodically, which enables inter-client contrast of data samples in addition to intra-client contrast and contraction, resulting in improved quality of data representations. Differential privacy (DP) protection is deployed to control the additional privacy leakage on local datasets when correlation matrices are shared. We also provide theoretical analysis on the convergence and extra privacy leakage. The experimental results validate the effectiveness of our proposed algorithm.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Understanding the Robustness of Distributed Self-Supervised Learning Frameworks Against Non-IID Data

    cs.LG 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Abstract-only report: theoretical comparison finds MIM more robust than CL to non-IID data in D-SSL and robustness scales with connectivity; MAR loss proposed as practical application.