Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 51 references

Toward early-type eclipsing binaries as extragalactic milestones: IV. Physical properties of three detached O/B-type systems in the LMC

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Masses and radii of six hot LMC stars are pinned down to new precision.

desk verdict Strong masses and radii for three LMC eclipsing binaries, but the quoted luminosity uncertainties forget the adopted temperature errors, and the mass-luminosity relation needs refitting. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.04080 v1 pith:6I4TVQ3M submitted 2025-01-07 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.GA

Mónica Taormina , G. Pietrzyński , R.-P. Kudritzki , B. Pilecki , I. B. Thompson , J. Puls , M. Górski , B. Zgirski
show 5 more authors
D. Graczyk M. A. Urbaneja W. Gieren W. Narloch G. Hajdu
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.SRastro-ph.GA
keywords eclipsingbinariesearly-typestarsLargeMagellanicCloudsurfacebrightness-colorrelationmass-luminosityapsidalmotionstellarfundamentalparameters
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to establish a complete set of physical parameters for three detached eclipsing binaries in the Large Magellanic Cloud, doubling the number of systems analyzed in the authors' earlier papers. If the results hold, the six systems provide masses between 11.7 and 22.1 solar masses, radii between 7.0 and 14.2 solar radii, and temperatures between 22500 and 36000 K, with enough precision to anchor the surface brightness-color relation used for extragalactic distances. For HV 2274, the best studied eclipsing binary outside the Milky Way, the new masses and radii are about six times more precise than earlier values. The paper also finds that OGLE LMC-ECL-17660 contains at least a third and probably a fourth star, detects a period decrease in HV 2274, and derives a new mass-luminosity relation for O and B stars in the LMC.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is combined eclipse-timing and radial-velocity modeling: light curves from several photometric surveys are fitted together with radial velocities extracted by the broadening-function technique, using a standard binary-modeling code. For the O-type system, non-LTE model-atmosphere calculations set the effective temperatures from helium lines, while for the B-type systems the temperatures are anchored by color-temperature calibrations or a prior ultraviolet-based determination. The analysis also uses O-C diagrams, that is, observed-minus-calculated eclipse timings, to detect apsidal motion and light-travel-time effects from additional bodies; the measured apsidal-motion rates are converted, through the internal structure constant $k_2$, into a comparison with theoretical stellar models.

What would settle it

Measure the effective temperatures of BLMC-04 and BLMC-06 from high-resolution non-LTE spectral fits; if they differ from the adopted 28000 and 23000 K by about 1000 K, the quoted luminosities and the mass-luminosity placement shift by roughly 15 percent.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that simultaneous modeling of light curves and radial velocities, supplemented by non-LTE spectral analysis for the O-type system, produces a self-consistent set of masses, radii, temperatures, and orbital solutions for BLMC-04, BLMC-05, and BLMC-06. The derived quantities place all components of the six systems analyzed in the series on the mass-luminosity and mass-radius diagrams as main-sequence stars that have evolved past the zero-age main sequence. The paper further claims that BLMC-04 is at least a triple system with a companion on a roughly 520-day orbit and probably a fourth body on a wide orbit, and that HV 2274 shows a significant non-linear period decrease whose origin is not yet identified. A new empirical relation for LMC O and B stars, $\log L/L_\odot = 3.18\,\log M/M_\odot + 0.86$, is presented.

Load-bearing premise

The absolute temperature scale for the two B-type systems is adopted from color-temperature calibrations or a prior study rather than measured spectroscopically in this paper, so a few hundred Kelvin of systematic temperature error would shift the derived luminosities by several percent and move the stars on the mass-luminosity diagram.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The components of all six systems in the series sit near the terminal-age main sequence, meaning they are evolved stars whose larger radii make them visible as eclipsing binaries.
  • HV 2274 now has masses and radii about six times more precise than earlier values, making it a stronger anchor for the surface brightness-color distance scale.
  • The new LMC mass-luminosity relation covers the 11 to 23 solar mass range and can be compared directly with Milky Way and theoretical relations.
  • The apsidal-motion comparison shows good agreement between observed and theoretical internal structure constants for the O-type systems but a significant difference for the B-type systems, a discrepancy the authors leave open.
  • If the period decrease of HV 2274 is caused by a third body, its long-term eclipse timing will continue to reveal that companion.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the B-type temperatures come from adopted calibrations rather than independent spectroscopic fits, a systematic offset of about 1000 K would move the quoted luminosities by roughly 15 percent, changing the mass-luminosity placement.
  • The triple interpretation of BLMC-04 predicts a periodic light-travel-time signal with a period near 520 days, which future radial-velocity and eclipse-timing observations can confirm and use to measure the third component.
  • If confirmed with more systems, the fitted LMC mass-luminosity relation would provide a direct test of metallicity-dependent stellar evolution models in the 11 to 23 solar mass range.
  • The same reanalysis approach applied to HV 2274 shows that long photometric baselines can shift parameters of previously studied extragalactic binaries by several sigma, suggesting other well-studied systems may deserve similar reanalysis.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper presents a detailed analysis of three detached early-type eclipsing binaries in the LMC (BLMC-04, BLMC-05, BLMC-06), combining OGLE, EROS, MACHO, Gaia, and VMC/SOFI photometry with UVES/MIKE radial velocities. The authors perform simultaneous PHOEBE modeling of light and RV curves, including apsidal motion, third light, a light-travel-time correction for a third body in BLMC-04, and a period-change term for BLMC-06. For the O-type system BLMC-05, a FASTWIND non-LTE spectroscopic analysis sets the effective temperatures. The main outputs are component masses, radii, temperatures, luminosities, apsidal-motion parameters, a comparison of observed and theoretical internal-structure constants, a new mass-luminosity relation, and an assessment of the main-sequence evolutionary advancement of the six systems in the series.

Significance. If the results hold, the paper substantially improves the precision of physical parameters for LMC early-type binaries, especially HV 2274, whose masses and radii are reported at roughly six times higher precision than in Ribas et al. (2000). The detailed treatment of apsidal motion, third light, and multiplicity, together with the consistency check between the photometric luminosity ratio and the FASTWIND model ratio (3.18 vs. 3.23) for BLMC-05, are strengths. The systems provide valuable anchors for the surface-brightness-color relation and for empirical mass-luminosity and mass-radius relations in the 11-23 Msun range. However, the luminosity error propagation is internally inconsistent, which undermines the quoted uncertainties of the mass-luminosity relation and the evolutionary-advancement conclusion. The orbital parameters and mass-radius determinations appear robust, but the luminosity-related claims require revision.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.1, Table 3] The quoted uncertainties on log L are incompatible with the adopted effective-temperature uncertainties. If log L is computed from the Stefan-Boltzmann relation, log L = 2 log R + 4 log T + const., the temperature term alone contributes d(log L) = 4 (σ_T/T)/ln 10. For BLMC-04 primary (T = 27800 ± 1500 K) this term is ≈ 0.094 dex; for the secondary ≈ 0.093 dex; yet Table 3 quotes ±0.004 for both. For BLMC-05 primary the term is ≈ 0.024 dex versus the quoted ±0.010, and for BLMC-06 primary ≈ 0.037 dex versus ±0.004. The quoted values appear to propagate only the radius errors. Since the luminosities are used in §4.3 to derive the new mass-luminosity relation and in Figures 10 and 11 to conclude that the components are evolutionarily advanced, the M-L fit parameters (log L/Lsun = 3.18 ± 0.12 log M/Msun + 0.86 ± 0.14) and the statements about evolutionary advancement are not supported at the stated precision. Please recompute the luminosity uncertainties with full propagation of the adopted Teff errors (and justify the Teff uncertainties themselves), or provide an independent distance-based luminosity derivation, and update Table 3, Figure 10, and all derived claims accordingly.
  2. [§3.2] The correction for the third body in BLMC-04 is not sufficiently documented. The paper states that including the 520-day LTTE orbit reduces the radial-velocity scatter from 12.4 to 3.9 km s^-1, but it does not provide the parameters of this orbit (period, eccentricity, semi-amplitude, or their uncertainties) and does not clarify whether these parameters were fitted simultaneously with the binary model or held fixed from the O-C fit. Because this correction directly affects the derived masses and radii of BLMC-04, the quoted mass and radius uncertainties in Table 3 should include the additional model component. Please provide the third-body orbital parameters and uncertainties, a description of the joint fitting procedure, and residual plots before and after the correction so that the reader can assess the robustness of the corrected solution.
  3. [§3.4, Table 4] The period decrease for BLMC-06 is a headline claim in the abstract ('a significant non-linear period decrease was determined'), but no uncertainty or significance test is reported. Table 4 lists 'Pdot -5.0e-9' without units or an error bar, and the text does not state how Pdot was fitted (globally over all photometric epochs or in segments) or whether the χ² improvement from 500 to 453 for the OGLE-III light curve is statistically significant given the number of additional parameters. Please provide the fitted Pdot with its uncertainty, a formal comparison against a constant-period model (e.g., Δχ² and degrees of freedom), and a discussion of possible degeneracies with apsidal motion and third light.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§5] The comparison with Ribas et al. (2000) states both that the previous values are 'in agreement with our results within their error bars' and that 'using our error bars, their best values lie from 1.2 to 5σ away, partly inconsistent with our solution.' These statements are not contradictory, but the wording should be rephrased to make clear that the old values agree with the new values only within the old, larger error bars, not within the new, smaller ones.
  2. [Table 4] The units for Pdot should be specified explicitly (e.g., d d^-1) and uncertainties should be provided for all reported values, including Pdot and the apsidal-motion periods where they are not already given in parentheses.
  3. [§3.1] The text should clarify more prominently that the effective temperatures for BLMC-04 and BLMC-06 are adopted from external calibrations (Worthey & Lee 2011 and Guinan et al. 1998a, respectively) and are not derived from the data analyzed in this work; this distinction is important for the interpretation of the luminosity uncertainties.
  4. [§4.3] The statement that 'the error bars are smaller than the point size for our DEB components with such an analysis' is only plausible if the external temperature uncertainties are ignored; after the luminosity error propagation is corrected, this sentence and the corresponding error bars in Figure 10 need to be updated.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; parameters are derived from independent light-curve and RV fits with externally anchored temperatures.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained in the sense relevant to circularity: masses and radii come from simultaneous fits to independent light curves and radial velocities (Section 3.1), not from the quantities those fits are later compared with. The only externally imposed inputs are the absolute effective temperatures for the B-type systems — 28000 ± 1500 K for BLMC-04 from Worthey & Lee (2011) color-temperature calibrations and 23000 ± 500 K for BLMC-06 adopted from Guinan et al. (1998a) — and these are transparently stated as inputs, with the paper explicitly noting that the light-curve model fits only the temperature ratio. The non-LTE temperature determination for BLMC-05 is an independent spectroscopic analysis using FASTWIND, and the consistency check between the observed and model V-band flux ratio (3.18 vs 3.23) is an external validation, not a circular reuse. The BLMC-06 period-change term is a fitted model parameter; reporting it as a detection is parameter estimation, not a prediction of a separate quantity, and the paper documents the chi-square improvement. The apsidal-motion comparison uses the Claret (2019) theoretical internal-structure constants as external benchmarks, and the mass-luminosity relation is an empirical fit to new and previously published DEB measurements compared with independent MIST tracks. Self-citations to Papers I-III are methodological and not load-bearing. The quoted luminosity uncertainties in Table 3 appear incompatible with naive propagation of the adopted temperature errors, but that is an error-propagation and robustness concern, not circularity of the claimed derivation.

Assumptions & free parameters 9 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 3 invented entities

The central mass-radius measurements rest on standard binary-model fitting with a small number of adopted astrophysical assumptions. The luminosities, mass-luminosity relation, and internal-structure comparison inherit additional assumptions about temperature scales, rotation-axis alignment, and theoretical models. No new physics entities beyond candidate companions are required.

free parameters (9)
  • Orbital period P (BLMC-04, BLMC-05, BLMC-06) = 6.2290957(4), 5.9468115(22), 5.7259370(4) days
    Fitted in simultaneous light-curve and RV modeling; defines the ephemeris.
  • Eccentricity e and argument of periastron omega = e = 0.0554(6), 0.0635(11), 0.1338(5); omega = 5.715(16), 2.338(16), 5.0948(19) rad
    Fitted orbital elements; affect eclipse geometry and apsidal motion.
  • Orbital inclination i = 89.88(10) deg, 87.7(6) deg, 89.16(15) deg
    Fitted to eclipse depth and shape; central to mass and radius determination.
  • Apsidal motion rate dw/dt = 0.0000576(15), 0.000123(6), 0.0001234(6) rad/day
    Fitted from eclipse timing shifts; used for the internal-structure constant comparison.
  • Period change Pdot (BLMC-06) = -5.0e-9 (no uncertainty given)
    Fitted to the light curve; no error bar is quoted in Table 4.
  • Effective temperatures (primaries and secondaries) = BLMC-04: 27800 +/- 1500, 28000 +/- 1500 K; BLMC-05: 36000 +/- 500, 31500 +/- 500 K; BLMC-06: 23500 +/- 500, 23000 +/…
    For B-type systems adopted from color-temperature calibration or prior literature; for BLMC-05 from FASTWIND non-LTE fits. Sets the luminosity scale.
  • Third light contribution in V band = 0.04 mag (BLMC-04), 0.06 mag (BLMC-05)
    Fitted in light-curve modeling; important for colors and surface brightness-color relation.
  • LTTE period of third body in BLMC-04 = P_out approximately 520 days
    Fitted from O-C residuals; used to correct RVs for the third body.
  • Mass-luminosity relation slope and intercept = slope = 3.18 +/- 0.12, intercept = 0.86 +/- 0.14 in log L/Lsun vs log M/Msun
    Orthogonal distance regression fit to the selected sample; not a prediction.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math Keplerian orbits and the Roche or ellipsoidal geometry implemented in PHOEBE describe the binary light and RV curves.
    Section 3.1; standard model for detached eclipsing binaries.
  • domain assumption The rotation axis of each component is aligned with the orbital axis.
    Sections 3.1 and 4.2; converts projected rotational velocities to true velocities and enters the apsidal-motion decomposition.
  • domain assumption Color-temperature calibrations of Worthey & Lee (2011) and the temperature adopted from Guinan et al. (1998a) set the absolute temperature scale of the B-type systems at LMC metallicity.
    Section 3.1; luminosities scale as T^4, so these choices affect the mass-luminosity relation.
  • ad hoc to paper The period change of BLMC-06 can be approximated by a constant Pdot over the observed interval.
    Section 3.4; residuals still show nonlinearity, so the linear term is an approximation.
  • domain assumption The theoretical internal structure constants from Claret (2019) tracks, interpolated to Z = 0.008, are applicable to these stars.
    Section 4.2; used for the internal-structure comparison.
  • domain assumption The third body in BLMC-04 has a stable Keplerian orbit with P_out around 520 days over the data span.
    Section 3.2; used to correct RVs, but cyclic behavior is not yet confirmed.
invented entities (3)
  • Third body in BLMC-04
    purpose: Explains the approximately 520-day light-travel-time oscillation and residual RV scatter.
    No spectral lines detected; contributes about 4 percent of V-band light; cyclic behavior not yet confirmed.
  • Tentative fourth body in BLMC-04
    purpose: Explains possible long-period (7000 to 8000 day) O-C residuals.
    Section 3.2 states more data are needed to confirm cyclicity.
  • Possible faint low-mass companion in BLMC-06
    purpose: Candidate explanation for the nonlinear period decrease.
    No third light detected; origin of the period change is explicitly left open.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Toward early-type eclipsing binaries as extragalactic milestones: IV. Physical properties of three detached O/B-type systems in the LMC." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6I4TVQ3M

@misc{pith2026250104080,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Toward early-type eclipsing binaries as extragalactic milestones: IV. Physical properties of three detached O/B-type systems in the LMC},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6I4TVQ3M}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.04080}
}
abstract

We present a complete set of physical parameters for three early-type eclipsing binary systems in the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC): OGLE LMC-ECL-17660, OGLE LMC-ECL-18794, and HV 2274, together with the orbital solutions. The first and third systems comprise B-type stars, while the second has O-type components and exhibits a total eclipse. We performed a complex analysis that included modeling light and radial velocity curves, O-C analysis, and additional non-LTE spectroscopic analysis for the O-type system. We found that OGLE LMC-ECL-17660 is at least a triple and, tentatively, a quadruple. A significant non-linear period decrease was determined for HV 2274. Its origin is unclear, possibly due to a faint, low-mass companion on a wide orbit. The analyzed components have masses ranging from 11.7 M$_\odot$ to 22.1 M$_\odot$, radii from 7.0 R$_\odot$ to 14.2 R$_\odot$, and temperatures between 22500 K and 36000 K. For HV 2274, the precision of our masses and radii is about six times higher than in previous studies. The position of the components of all six systems analyzed in this series on the mass-luminosity and mass-radius diagrams indicates they are evolutionarily advanced on the main sequence. Our sample contributes significantly to the knowledge of physical parameters of early-type stars in the mass range of 11 M$_\odot$ to 23 M$_\odot$. A new mass-luminosity relation for O and B-type stars in the LMC is provided. Additionally, we used the measured apsidal motion of the systems to compare the observational and theoretical internal structure constant.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.04080 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Example of the application of the BF method for the analyzed systems: BLMC-04 (top), BLMC-05 (middle), and BLMC-06 (bottom). The fitted profile of the primary component is shown in blue and of the secondary in red. Wide profiles mean the component is a fast rotator, while a narrow peak means slow rotation. The surface under the profile is related to the total brightness of the component in the analyzed wavelength ra… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. A plot showing the χ 2 values depending on the grid size (N) used for the stellar surface discretization for a given component (solid blue line). The optimal values are selected according to the behavior of the local standard deviation (σloc) for n=5 and 7 nearest points along N. For the primary, the optimal N is 67, and for the secondary, it is 84. A horizontal line representing a variation on the 0.1 − σ level is … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. O-C diagrams with residuals for BLMC-04, BLMC-05, and BLMC-06. Phase shifts of primary and secondary eclipses from a model with constant ω obtained for OGLE-III data only, calculated along all available data, are shown. As expected for apsidal motion, the shifts are anti-correlated (r close to -1). Small systematic and correlated (for both eclipses) deviations seen for BLMC-04 are probably due to an influence of a f… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: O-C diagram for BLMC-04 using only the OGLE￾IV Ic-band data. Phase shifts for different time bins with respect to the model with constant ω are shown with the LTTE fit (red line). The orbital period related to the extra component is about 520 days. (3 spectra combined)…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Dependence of the χ 2 on the radius of the primary and secondary for the three analyzed systems BLMC-04, BLMC￾05, BLMC-06 (from left to right). The presented parameter space is divided into bins; each point is the best solution inside a given bin [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figu…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: OGLE-III IC-band light curve models for BLMC￾06 taking (bottom) and not taking (top) into account the period change. The best model fits are shown as a red line. When period change is included, the χ 2 for the presented light curve decreases significantly (from 500 to …
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: BLMC-04 (left panel), BLMC-05 (center panel) and BLMC-06 (right panel). Solutions for the Ic-band light curves (top panels) and RV curves (bottom panels) are shown [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Side view for the analyzed systems, from top to bottom: BLMC-04, BLMC-05, BLMC-06. The barycenter is marked with an x, and the shortest (polar) and longest (to￾wards the barycenter) radii are given. The temperature dis￾tribution over the star’s surface is color-coded. …
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Top panel: Empirical M-L diagram showing the relationship between mass and luminosity for O- and B￾type components of the LMC DEBs. Theoretical limits for the main sequence (values for ZAMS and TAMS) at LMC metallicity are overplotted. The components of our systems (o…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Histogram of orbital periods showing a compar￾ison of our sample with other early-type stars from the LMC and the Galactic ones [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_12.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 17 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix "arXiv" = new.block " " eprint * " " * new.block " " eprint * " " * if if if FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" " " doi * " " * if FUNCTION format.pid doi empty eprint empty ur...

  3. [3]

    37o|" .] x-SL ]v 9r9 !ܑ׭HHHV/ Z ۷L29N h/UT Jʕ+ 3f 666 |!XQ ! B 3 ! B 3 ! EJGl P !( I̵k4 ! B7ID\\ 燧'qqq:L ! E '! Dtt4/_V?a4 @=@xxx¨]v B

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt -12pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key on reference command E...

    2021

  4. [4]

    A., Alves , D., et al

    Alcock , C., Allsman , R. A., Alves , D., et al. 1997, , 114, 326, 10.1086/118477

    work page doi:10.1086/118477 1997

  5. [5]

    1991, , 3, 91, 10.1007/BF00873538

    Andersen , J. 1991, , 3, 91, 10.1007/BF00873538

    doi:10.1007/bf00873538 1991

  6. [6]

    A., Gunnels , S

    Bernstein , R., Shectman , S. A., Gunnels , S. M., Mochnacki , S., & Athey , A. E. 2003, in , Vol. 4841, Instrument Design and Performance for Optical/Infrared Ground-based Telescopes, ed. M. Iye & A. F. M. Moorwood , 1694--1704, 10.1117/12.461502

    doi:10.1117/12.461502 2003

  7. [7]

    2016, , 823, 102, 10.3847/0004-637X/823/2/102

    Choi , J., Dotter , A., Conroy , C., et al. 2016, , 823, 102, 10.3847/0004-637X/823/2/102

    doi:10.3847/0004-637x/823/2/102 2016

  8. [8]

    L., Clementini , G., Girardi , L., et al

    Cioni , M.-R. L., Clementini , G., Girardi , L., et al. 2011, , 527, A116, 10.1051/0004-6361/201016137

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201016137 2011

Show all 51 references
  1. [9]

    2019, , 628, A29, 10.1051/0004-6361/201936007

    Claret , A. 2019, , 628, A29, 10.1051/0004-6361/201936007

    2019 doi

  2. [10]

    2000, in , Vol

    Dekker , H., D'Odorico , S., Kaufer , A., Delabre , B., & Kotzlowski , H. 2000, in , Vol. 4008, Optical and IR Telescope Instrumentation and Detectors, ed. M. Iye & A. F. Moorwood , 534--545, 10.1117/12.395512

    2000 doi

  3. [11]

    2016, , 222, 8, 10.3847/0067-0049/222/1/8

    Dotter , A. 2016, , 222, 8, 10.3847/0067-0049/222/1/8

    2016 doi

  4. [12]

    J., van Loon , J

    Evans , C. J., van Loon , J. T., Hainich , R., & Bailey , M. 2015, , 584, A5, 10.1051/0004-6361/201525882

    2015 doi

  5. [13]

    L., Ribas , I., Guinan , E

    Fitzpatrick , E. L., Ribas , I., Guinan , E. F., et al. 2002, , 564, 260, 10.1086/324184

    2002 doi

  6. [14]

    M., et al

    Freudling , W., Romaniello , M., Bramich , D. M., et al. 2013, , 559, A96, 10.1051/0004-6361/201322494

    2013 doi

  7. [15]

    Gaia Collaboration , Vallenari , A., Brown , A. G. A., et al. 2023, , 674, A1, 10.1051/0004-6361/202243940

    2023 doi

  8. [16]

    Gaposhkin , S. I. 1977, SAO Special Report, 380

    1977

  9. [17]

    1985, , 297, 405, 10.1086/163539

    Gimenez , A. 1985, , 297, 405, 10.1086/163539

    1985 doi

  10. [18]

    F., Ostrov , P., Morrell , N., & Minniti , D

    Gonz \'a lez , J. F., Ostrov , P., Morrell , N., & Minniti , D. 2005, , 624, 946, 10.1086/428920

    2005 doi

  11. [19]

    2011, , 61, 103

    Graczyk , D., Soszy \'n ski , I., Poleski , R., et al. 2011, , 61, 103. 1108.0446

    2011 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Groenewegen , M. A. T., & Salaris , M. 2001, , 366, 752, 10.1051/0004-6361:20010014

    2001 doi

  13. [21]

    F., Ribas , I., Fitzpatrick , E

    Guinan , E. F., Ribas , I., Fitzpatrick , E. L., & Pritchard , J. D. 1998 a , in ESA Special Publication, Vol. 413, Ultraviolet Astrophysics Beyond the IUE Final Archive, ed. W. Wamsteker , R. Gonzalez Riestra , & B. Harris , 315

    1998

  14. [22]

    F., Fitzpatrick , E

    Guinan , E. F., Fitzpatrick , E. L., DeWarf , L. E., et al. 1998 b , , 509, L21, 10.1086/311760

    1998 doi

  15. [23]

    2017, , 597, A137, 10.1051/0004-6361/201629505

    Kervella , P., Bigot , L., Gallenne , A., & Th \'e venin , F. 2017, , 597, A137, 10.1051/0004-6361/201629505

    2017 doi

  16. [24]

    1978, Dynamics of close binary systems , 10.1007/978-94-009-9780-6

    Kopal , Z. 1978, Dynamics of close binary systems , 10.1007/978-94-009-9780-6

    1978 doi

  17. [25]

    I., Neugent , K

    Massey , P., Morrell , N. I., Neugent , K. F., et al. 2012, , 748, 96, 10.1088/0004-637X/748/2/96

    2012 doi

  18. [26]

    R., & Vukovich , J

    Massey , P., Penny , L. R., & Vukovich , J. 2002, , 565, 982, 10.1086/324783

    2002 doi

  19. [27]

    G., & Lidman , C

    Moorwood , A., Cuby , J. G., & Lidman , C. 1998, The Messenger, 91, 9

    1998

  20. [28]

    A., Cook , K

    Nelson , C. A., Cook , K. H., Popowski , P., & Alves , D. R. 2000, , 119, 1205, 10.1086/301268

    2000 doi

  21. [29]

    2016, , 457, 4323, 10.1093/mnras/stw269

    Pawlak , M. 2016, , 457, 4323, 10.1093/mnras/stw269

    2016 doi

  22. [30]

    I., et al

    Pilecki , B., Pietrzy \'n ski , G., Anderson , R. I., et al. 2021, , 910, 118, 10.3847/1538-4357/abe7e9

    2021 doi

  23. [31]

    2017, , 842, 110, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6ff7

    Pilecki , B., Gieren , W., Smolec , R., et al. 2017, , 842, 110, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6ff7

    2017 doi

  24. [32]

    2005, , 628, 426, 10.1086/430591

    Pr s a , A., & Zwitter , T. 2005, , 628, 426, 10.1086/430591

    2005 doi

  25. [33]

    2016, , 152, 41, 10.3847/0004-6256/152/2/41

    Pr s a , A., Harmanec , P., Torres , G., et al. 2016, , 152, 41, 10.3847/0004-6256/152/2/41

    2016 doi

  26. [34]

    A., Venero , R., et al

    Puls , J., Urbaneja , M. A., Venero , R., et al. 2005, , 435, 669, 10.1051/0004-6361:20042365

    2005 doi

  27. [35]

    L., Maloney , F

    Ribas , I., Fitzpatrick , E. L., Maloney , F. P., Guinan , E. F., & Udalski , A. 2002, , 574, 771, 10.1086/341003

    2002 doi

  28. [36]

    F., Fitzpatrick , E

    Ribas , I., Guinan , E. F., Fitzpatrick , E. L., et al. 2000, , 528, 692, 10.1086/308210

    2000 doi

  29. [37]

    G., Puls , J., Najarro , F., & Brott , I

    Rivero Gonz \'a lez , J. G., Puls , J., Najarro , F., & Brott , I. 2012, , 537, A79, 10.1051/0004-6361/201117790

    2012 doi

  30. [38]

    1999, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Rucinski , S. 1999, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 185, IAU Colloq. 170: Precise Stellar Radial Velocities, ed. J. B. Hearnshaw & C. D. Scarfe , 82

    1999

  31. [39]

    Rucinski , S. M. 1992, , 104, 1968, 10.1086/116372

    1992 doi

  32. [40]

    2015, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Southworth , J. 2015, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 496, Living Together: Planets, Host Stars and Binaries, ed. S. M. Rucinski , G. Torres , & M. Zejda , 164, 10.48550/arXiv.1411.1219

    2015 doi arXiv

  33. [41]

    2020, , 890, 137, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab6bd0

    Taormina , M., Kudritzki , R.-P., Puls , J., et al. 2020, , 890, 137, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab6bd0

    2020 doi

  34. [42]

    2019, , 886, 111, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab4b57

    Taormina , M., Pietrzy \'n ski , G., Pilecki , B., et al. 2019, , 886, 111, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab4b57

    2019 doi

  35. [43]

    P., Pilecki , B., et al

    Taormina , M., Kudritzki , R. P., Pilecki , B., et al. 2024, , 967, 64, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad3af0

    2024 doi

  36. [44]

    2007, , 469, 387, 10.1051/0004-6361:20066017

    Tisserand , P., Le Guillou , L., Afonso , C., et al. 2007, , 469, 387, 10.1051/0004-6361:20066017

    2007 doi

  37. [45]

    2010, , 18, 67, 10.1007/s00159-009-0025-1

    Torres , G., Andersen , J., & Gim \'e nez , A. 2010, , 18, 67, 10.1007/s00159-009-0025-1

    2010 doi

  38. [46]

    2003, , 53, 291

    Udalski , A. 2003, , 53, 291. astro-ph/0401123

    2003 arXiv

  39. [47]

    1998, , 509, L25, 10.1086/311763

    Udalski , A., Pietrzy \'n ski , G., Wo \'z niak , P., et al. 1998, , 509, L25, 10.1086/311763

    1998 doi

  40. [48]

    K., et al

    Udalski , A., Soszy \'n ski , I., Szyma \'n ski , M. K., et al. 2015, , 65, 341

    2015

  41. [49]

    D., West , S

    Watson , R. D., West , S. R. D., Tobin , W., & Gilmore , A. C. 1992, , 258, 527, 10.1093/mnras/258.3.527

    1992 doi

  42. [50]

    2011, , 193, 1, 10.1088/0067-0049/193/1/1

    Worthey , G., & Lee , H.-c. 2011, , 193, 1, 10.1088/0067-0049/193/1/1

    2011 doi

  43. [51]

    2013, , 558, A51, 10.1051/0004-6361/201322054

    Zasche , P., & Wolf , M. 2013, , 558, A51, 10.1051/0004-6361/201322054

    2013 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.