Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

This paper shows that the 200-PeV neutrino KM3-230213A could plausibly come from the gamma-ray-dim radio blazar PMN J0606-0724, produced by protons interacting with soft photons in the blazar's compact radio core during a flare.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-04 17:53 UTC pith:6OWJFKFE

load-bearing objection A transparent plausibility study for the KM3NeT event; the central claim holds up conditionally, but the proton acceleration ceiling is asserted rather than demonstrated, and the untested MeV prediction is a missed opportunity. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2509.10352 v1 pith:6OWJFKFE submitted 2025-09-12 astro-ph.HE

Can a gamma-ray dim radio blazar produce a 200-PeV neutrino? The case of PMN J0606-0724 and KM3-230213A

Polina Kivokurtseva , Sergey Troitsky This is my paper
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords neutrino astronomyblazarsKM3-230213Aphotohadronic interactionsmillimeter radio coregamma-ray dim sourcesultra-high-energy neutrinosactive galactic nuclei
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper asks whether a blazar that has never been seen in gamma rays could still be responsible for the most energetic neutrino ever recorded, KM3-230213A. Using a model in which protons are accelerated in the 'millimeter radio core'—a compact standing shock near the base of the jet—the authors show that photohadronic interactions with the source's own soft photons can produce a roughly 200-PeV neutrino without producing observable high-energy gamma rays: those gamma rays are absorbed by pair production and cascade down to MeV energies, keeping the source dim for GeV telescopes. The required proton power comes out close to the source's observed photon luminosity and to the Eddington luminosity of a bright quasar, and the parameter values needed to reproduce the multiwavelength spectrum are reasonable. The paper further shows that a population of roughly 600 similar radio-flaring blazars would contribute to the diffuse ultra-high-energy neutrino flux at a level consistent with the non-detection of such events by other neutrino telescopes.

Core claim

The central claim is a proof of capability: the 220-PeV neutrino detected by KM3NeT could have been produced in PMN J0606-0724, not in spite of the source being gamma-ray dim but because of conditions that hide gamma rays. In the proposed picture, protons accelerated to about 10^19 eV in the parsec-scale millimeter core interact with the blazar's soft synchrotron photons at the Delta-resonance; charged pions yield neutrinos with about one-twentieth of the proton energy, while neutral pions produce gamma rays that are immediately absorbed by the same photon field through electron-positron pair production. The resulting electromagnetic cascade re-emits the energy in the MeV band, below Fermi-L

What carries the argument

The machinery is photohadronic neutrino production at the Delta-resonance in a 'millimeter radio core'—a stationary collimation shock in the relativistic jet, modeled as a cylinder about 1.5 pc long and 0.6 pc in radius. The key identity is the resonance condition E'_p E'_gamma roughly equal to m_Delta^2, which fixes the proton energy at about 20 times the neutrino energy and selects target photons of roughly 0.07–0.6 eV observed energy; combined with the measured multiwavelength spectrum and the relativistic Doppler factor, it sets the p-gamma optical depth and hence the fraction of protons that convert to neutrinos. A second, equally important element is the gamma-gamma opacity: the same s

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes the radio flare raised the entire quiescent photon field, including the optical and infrared target photons, by the same factor of three seen in radio; if those target photons did not rise with the flare, the neutrino-production efficiency would stay at its quiescent level and the required proton power would become implausibly large relative to the source's luminosity.

What would settle it

Check archival optical and near-infrared photometry of PMN J0606-0724 around MJD 59988, the neutrino arrival time, to see whether the target-photon density actually increased by about a factor of three; if it did not rise while the radio flare did, the p-gamma optical depth stays low and the inferred proton luminosity exceeds plausible bounds. Alternatively, catching the source in a similar flare with a GeV gamma-ray detection would contradict the predicted pair-production opacity.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If the association is right, the KM3-230213A event no longer requires an exotic source: an ordinary flaring radio blazar with a hidden core can accelerate protons to about 10^19 eV.
  • Gamma-ray non-detection becomes a diagnostic rather than a disqualifier for neutrino-emitting blazars; radio flares, not GeV flares, are the tracers to watch.
  • The model predicts that the same source should be bright in the MeV band during such flares, because the absorbed gamma rays cascade down to MeV energies.
  • The population estimate implies that a handful of similar sources, flaring with a duty cycle of about one flare per 17 years, produce a diffuse flux consistent with current upper limits, so future neutrino detectors can constrain the abundance and duty cycle of these hidden cores.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If this mechanism operates broadly, radio-selected, gamma-ray-quiet blazars could be a hidden reservoir of ultra-high-energy cosmic-ray acceleration, with a neutrino output that rivals gamma-ray-bright blazars.
  • The same pair-production argument suggests that other gamma-ray-dim transients, not only blazars, could hide neutrino production; radio-monitoring-triggered searches might find more such events.
  • A decisive test would be to catch a similar radio flare with simultaneous optical, infrared, and MeV observations: a rise in target photons without a GeV counterpart would support the model, while a GeV detection would require revising the opacity estimate.
  • The numerical calculation uses the quiescent spectrum scaled by a factor of three; if future data show the flare is spectrally harder or softer, the allowed parameter space—Doppler factor, proton luminosity—will shift, and the ratio of proton power to Eddington luminosity is the quantity to track.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper addresses the origin of KM3-230213A, the ultra-high-energy neutrino candidate detected by KM3NeT. It focuses on PMN J0606−0724, a radio blazar that was flaring at the time of the event and lies within the event's error region. The authors propose that the neutrino is produced by pγ interactions in the millimeter radio core of the jet, with target photons supplied by the quiescent SED scaled up by a factor of three. Using analytic estimates and the open-source AM3 code, they argue that protons can reach the required energy, that the source stays gamma-ray dim because of pair cascades, and that the integrated contribution of a population of similar flaring sources is consistent with non-detection by other neutrino telescopes. The claim is explicitly one of capability ('could be produced'), not confirmed association.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper provides a viable hadronic interpretation of the most energetic neutrino event observed so far, with a concrete mechanism explaining why a flaring blazar can be bright in radio yet invisible in GeV gamma rays. The work uses publicly available multiwavelength data and an open-source simulation code, and it is transparent about many of its assumptions. It also makes a falsifiable prediction: the source should be bright in MeV gamma rays. The main weaknesses are that the proton acceleration ceiling is not quantitatively demonstrated, the all-band scaling of the flare SED is arbitrary, and the diffuse-flux population check is partly circular and contains an internal numerical tension. These issues directly affect the capability claim and the abstract's consistency statement.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.2.1, Table 1] The central claim depends on protons reaching E'_p ≈ 2×10^18 eV for δ_c=5. Section 3.2.1 provides only the Hillas and synchrotron-loss inequalities; the interaction-loss check is deferred to Ref. [64] with 'marginally allow' and 'we will return to this point', but no such quantitative return appears in §3.2.2 or §3.3. The AM3 run (Table 1) injects E'_p,max = 2×10^18 eV, exactly the required value, so it verifies propagation and radiation but not acceleration. Without a quantitative interaction-loss ceiling for this source, or explicit conditionalization of the conclusion, the capability claim is not self-contained.
  2. [§3.3] The quiescent SED is scaled by a factor of three 'in all bands' as a simplification. The target photon density entering τ_pγ (Eq. 3.3) and the γγ opacity (Sec. 3.2.4) is taken from this scaled SED. If the optical/IR target photons did not participate in the radio flare, τ_pγ would be smaller by roughly the inverse of the scaling, and the required proton power (Sec. 3.2.3) would be correspondingly larger. Since radio is the only well-measured flare band, this assumption is load-bearing; its impact should be quantified or at least varied.
  3. [§4] The diffuse-flux comparison is not an independent prediction: Fν from Eq. (2.1) is derived from the same KM3NeT event, so Eq. (4.1) is a consistency constraint rather than an independent test. More importantly, the text states Ns ~ 600 comparable sources, while the derived constraint is Ns ≲ 220 (with an upper value of 530). Using the stated central values gives F_diff about 2.7 times above the limit (4.2) if all ~600 sources flare with the same duty cycle. Thus the abstract's 'matches non-observation' overstates the consistency; the section should address this tension or soften the claim.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§1] Typo: 'siginificantly' should be 'significantly'.
  2. [§3.2.2 vs Table 1] The benchmark geometry in §3.2.2 is r' = 0.2 pc, l' = 1.2 pc, while Table 1 uses r' = 0.6 pc, l' = 1.5 pc. The change in (6r'/l')^{2/3} should be propagated or explicitly noted as an order-of-magnitude choice.
  3. [Abstract, §3.2.3] The abstract states that the required proton power is 'of order of the source's photon luminosity', but the numbers in §3.2.3 give L_p ≈ 4.5×10^47 erg/s versus L_bol ≈ 1.5×10^45 erg/s, a factor of ~300. The statement would be more accurate if referred to the Eddington luminosity of a ~10^9 M_sun black hole.
  4. [§4] The diffuse flux upper limit (4.2) is quoted after multiplication by three flavors. Please clarify whether Fν in Eq. (2.1) is per flavor or summed over flavors, to avoid ambiguity in the population estimate.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; the neutrino energy is a requested input, not a predicted output, and the core plausibility argument is anchored by independent SED and gamma-opacity checks.

full rationale

The paper frames a capability question: could the known 200-PeV event be produced in PMN J0606−0724? The required proton energy E'_p is obtained from the observed neutrino energy via the standard Δ-resonance relation (Sec. 3.2.1), and the AM3 calculation (Table 1) adopts E'_p,max = 2×10^18 eV, which equals 20 E_ν(1+z)/δ_c for δ_c=5. Thus the model's neutrino spectrum at ~200 PeV is a kinematic restatement of the input, not an independent prediction. This is, however, an openly stated input rather than a hidden fit: the paper never claims to predict the neutrino energy from first principles. The independent content lies elsewhere: the observed broadband SED supplies target photons at the required energy (Sec. 3.2.2); the same SED makes the source optically thick to the accompanying gamma rays, explaining the Fermi-LAT non-detection (Sec. 3.2.4); and the population check (Sec. 4) compares with an external diffuse upper limit. The proton-acceleration ceiling is supported only by the Hillas/synchrotron necessary conditions and an external citation (Ref. [64]) with no quantitative re-derivation; this is a robustness/correctness gap, not circularity. Self-citations (Refs. [17,18]) supply the radio-core model and geometry, but they are prior model choices, not imported uniqueness theorems. Hence no derivation step reduces to its own input; score 2 reflects the load-bearing but non-circular use of the authors' earlier model.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

9 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a tightly parameterized model: the Doppler factor, flare duration, core size, magnetic field, and maximum proton energy are all free parameters chosen within broad plausibility bands, and several are tuned to reproduce the observed SED and neutrino energy. The only strong empirical inputs are the observed SED and the single neutrino event; the theoretical framework comes from the authors' earlier work (Ref [18]). No new particles or forces are introduced.

free parameters (9)
  • Doppler factor of the radio core, delta_c = 2.8 (analytical benchmark), 5 (numerical model)
    Chosen within the expected 2-5 range for mm cores (Ref [18]); not measured for this source. It strongly controls the pγ optical depth (~delta^-5.4) and the required proton power (~delta^-4).
  • Effective flare duration, Delta t = 90 days (pm 45 days)
    Free parameter; the neutrino flux F_nu scales as 1/Delta t, so the inferred luminosities are set by this choice.
  • Core radius and length (r', l') = r'=0.6 pc, l'=1.5 pc (numerical); r'=0.2 pc, l'=1.2 pc (estimates)
    Taken from typical mm-core scales in Ref [18]; no direct measurement for PMN J0606-0724.
  • Magnetic field B' = 0.05 G (numerical)
    Within the allowed range from acceleration limits (0.05/delta_c < B' < 3.8 sqrt(delta_c) G); chosen to match the SED.
  • Maximum proton energy E'_p,max = 2e18 eV
    Tuned to produce a neutrino at E_nu ~ E'_p/20 ~ 2.2e17 eV, the central energy of KM3-230213A.
  • Proton power L'_p = 5e47 erg/s (numerical); ~4.5e47 erg/s (analytical benchmark)
    Chosen to match the neutrino flux inferred from the single event; far above the bolometric luminosity.
  • Electron parameters (spectral index, E_max, power) = index 1.8, E_max 1e10 eV, L'_e 5e44 erg/s
    Adopted to reproduce the observed synchrotron SED.
  • Flare SED scaling factor = 3
    Ad hoc: all bands are scaled by the radio enhancement despite only the radio being measured.
  • Target photon power-law parameters F_0, spectral index = F_0 = 2.9e-13 erg/cm2/s at E_0=0.41 eV; index -0.2
    Fitted to the quiescent SED and extrapolated to optical/IR target photon energies.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption The KM3-230213A event and the radio flare of PMN J0606-0724 are physically associated (chance coincidence 2.6e-3).
    Ref [13] reports the coincidence probability; the paper relies on this for the flux estimate. Other candidate sources are mentioned.
  • domain assumption The neutrino production site is a stationary 'millimeter radio core' with the geometry and photon density relation of Ref [18].
    Eq. (3.1) is imported from the authors' prior model; not re-derived or independently validated for this source.
  • domain assumption Target photons are isotropic in the core rest frame.
    Used in the pγ and γγ calculations (Sec. 3.2.2, 3.2.4).
  • ad hoc to paper The quiescent SED scaled by a factor 3 represents the flaring SED in all bands.
    Sec. 3.3 states this is a simplification due to lack of flare-period data.
  • domain assumption IceCube and Baikal-GVD would have reported any comparable events.
    Footnote 2: 'We assume that corresponding events, if any, would have been reported.' Without this, the flux estimate changes.
  • domain assumption The population of similar sources has identical neutrino luminosity and duty cycle derived from this one source.
    Sec. 4: 'Assuming identical sources'.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 13936 in / 27398 out tokens · 295012 ms · 2026-08-04T17:53:48.853645+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

An extremely energetic muon has been recently detected by the Cubic Kilometre Neutrino Telescope (KM3NeT), indicating the observation of a neutrino with the estimated energy of $\left( 2.2^{+5.7}_{-1.0} \right)\times 10^{17}$~eV. Radio blazar PMN~J0606$-$0724, not detected in gamma rays, is located within the reported error region of the neutrino arrival direction, and was flaring at the time of the event. Here we demonstrate that the neutrino could be produced in a photohadronic interaction in its radio core. The necessary proton power is of order of the source's photon luminosity, and protons can be accelerated to the required energies in the core, while high-energy gamma rays cannot leave the source because of intense production of electron-positron pairs. Expected contribution of the population of similar flaring sources matches non-observation of energetic events by other neutrino telescopes.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. KM3-230213A and potential astrophysical sources

    astro-ph.HE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    KM3NeT reports the first astrophysical neutrino above 100 PeV, reviews tensions with other observatories, and explores source scenarios using the inferred diffuse flux.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 50 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [6]

    S.W. Li, P. Machado, D. Naredo-Tuero and T. Schwemberger,Clash of the Titans: ultra-high energy KM3NeT event versus IceCube data,2502.04508. [7]IceCube, Fermi-LAT, MAGIC, AGILE, ASAS-SN, HA WC, H.E.S.S., INTEGRAL, Kanata, Kiso, Kapteyn, Liverpool Telescope, Subaru, Swift NuSTAR, VERITAS, VLA/17B-403collaboration,Multimessenger observations of a flaring bl...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  2. [8]

    Kadler et al.,Coincidence of a high-fluence blazar outburst with a PeV-energy neutrino event,Nature Phys.12(2016) 807 [1602.02012]

    M. Kadler et al.,Coincidence of a high-fluence blazar outburst with a PeV-energy neutrino event,Nature Phys.12(2016) 807 [1602.02012]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  3. [9]

    Plavin, Y.Y

    A. Plavin, Y.Y. Kovalev, Y.A. Kovalev and S. Troitsky,Observational Evidence for the Origin of High-energy Neutrinos in Parsec-scale Nuclei of Radio-bright Active Galaxies,Astrophys. J. 894(2020) 101 [2001.00930]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  4. [10]

    Plavin, Y.Y

    A.V. Plavin, Y.Y. Kovalev, Y.A. Kovalev and S.V. Troitsky,Growing evidence for high-energy neutrinos originating in radio blazars,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.523(2023) 1799 [2211.09631]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  5. [11]

    Troitsky,Constraints on models of the origin of high-energy astrophysical neutrinos,Usp

    S.V. Troitsky,Constraints on models of the origin of high-energy astrophysical neutrinos,Usp. Fiz. Nauk191(2021) 1333 [2112.09611]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  6. [12]

    Troitsky,Origin of high-energy astrophysical neutrinos: new results and prospects,Usp

    S. Troitsky,Origin of high-energy astrophysical neutrinos: new results and prospects,Usp. Fiz. Nauk194(2024) 371 [2311.00281]. [13]KM3NeT, MessMapp Group, Fermi-LAT, Owens V alley Radio Obser v atory 40-m Telescope Group, SVOM, and otherscollaboration,Characterising Candidate Blazar Counterparts of the Ultra-High-Energy Event KM3-230213A,2502.08484

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  7. [14]

    Richards et al.,Blazars in the Fermi Era: The OVRO 40-m Telescope Monitoring Program,Astrophys

    J.L. Richards et al.,Blazars in the Fermi Era: The OVRO 40-m Telescope Monitoring Program,Astrophys. J. Suppl.194(2011) 29 [1011.3111]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  8. [15]

    Kovalev, Jr., N.A

    Y.Y. Kovalev, Jr., N.A. Nizhelsky, Y.A. Kovalev, A.B. Berlin, G.V. Zhekanis, M.G. Mingaliev et al.,Survey of instantaneous 1-22 GHz spectra of 550 compact extragalactic objects with declinations from -30 deg to +43 deg,Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. Ser.139(1999) 545 [astro-ph/0408264]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  9. [16]

    Kovalev, Y.A

    Y.Y. Kovalev, Y.A. Kovalev, N.A. Nizhelsky and A.B. Bogdantsov,Broad-band Radio Spectra Variability of 550 AGN in 1997-2001,Publ. Astron. Soc. Austral.19(2002) 83

    1997

  10. [17]

    Plavin, Y.Y

    A.V. Plavin, Y.Y. Kovalev, Y.A. Kovalev and S.V. Troitsky,Directional Association of TeV to PeV Astrophysical Neutrinos with Radio Blazars,Astrophys. J.908(2021) 157 [2009.08914]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  11. [18]

    Kalashev, P

    O.E. Kalashev, P. Kivokurtseva and S. Troitsky,Neutrino production in blazar radio cores, JCAP12(2023) 007 [2212.03151]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  12. [19]

    Healey, R.W

    S.E. Healey, R.W. Romani, G. Cotter, P.F. Michelson, E.F. Schlafly, A.C.S. Readhead et al., CGRaBS: An All-Sky Survey of Gamma-Ray Blazar Candidates,Astrophys. J. Suppl.175 (2008) 97 [0709.1735]. [20]Particle Data Groupcollaboration,Review of particle physics,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 030001

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  13. [21]

    Sahakyan, V

    N. Sahakyan, V. Vardanyan, P. Giommi, D. Bégué, D. Israyelyan, G. Harutyunyan et al., Markarian Multiwavelength Data Center (MMDC): A Tool for Retrieving and Modeling Multitemporal, Multiwavelength, and Multimessenger Data from Blazar Observations,Astron. J.168(2024) 289 [2410.01207]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  14. [22]

    Hurley-Walker, J.R

    N. Hurley-Walker, J.R. Callingham, P.J. Hancock, T.M.O. Franzen, L. Hindson, A.D. Kapińska et al.,GaLactic and Extragalactic All-sky Murchison Widefield Array (GLEAM) survey - I. A low-frequency extragalactic catalogue,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.464(2017) 1146 [1610.08318]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  15. [23]

    Intema, P

    H.T. Intema, P. Jagannathan, K.P. Mooley and D.A. Frail,The GMRT 150 MHz all-sky radio survey. First alternative data release TGSS ADR1,Astron. Astrophys.598(2017) A78 [1603.04368]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  16. [24]

    C.L. Hale, D. McConnell, A.J.M. Thomson, E. Lenc, G.H. Heald, A.W. Hotan et al.,The Rapid ASKAP Continuum Survey Paper II: First Stokes I Source Catalogue Data Release, Publ. Astron. Soc. Austral.38(2021) e058 [2109.00956]. – 13 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  17. [25]

    Condon, W.D

    J.J. Condon, W.D. Cotton, E.W. Greisen, Q.F. Yin, R.A. Perley, G.B. Taylor et al.,The NRAO VLA Sky Survey,Astron. J.115(1998) 1693

    1998

  18. [26]

    Gordon, M.M

    Y.A. Gordon, M.M. Boyce, C.P. O’Dea, L. Rudnick, H. Andernach, A.N. Vantyghem et al.,A Quick Look at the 3 GHz Radio Sky. I. Source Statistics from the Very Large Array Sky Survey, Astrophys. J. Suppl.255(2021) 30 [2102.11753]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  19. [27]

    Wright, M.R

    A.E. Wright, M.R. Griffith, B.F. Burke and R.D. Ekers,The Parkes-MIT-NRAO (PMN) Surveys. II. Source Catalog for the Southern Survey (-87 degrees -4pt.5 < delta < -37 degrees ), Astrophys. J. Suppl.91(1994) 111

    1994

  20. [28]

    Healey, R.W

    S.E. Healey, R.W. Romani, G.B. Taylor, E.M. Sadler, R. Ricci, T. Murphy et al.,CRATES: An All-Sky Survey of Flat-Spectrum Radio Sources,Astrophys. J. Suppl.171(2007) 61 [astro-ph/0702346]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  21. [29]

    Murphy, E.M

    T. Murphy, E.M. Sadler, R.D. Ekers, M. Massardi, P.J. Hancock, E. Mahony et al.,The Australia Telescope 20 GHz Survey: the source catalogue,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.402 (2010) 2403 [0911.0002]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  22. [30]

    Bonato, E

    M. Bonato, E. Liuzzo, D. Herranz, J. González-Nuevo, L. Bonavera, M. Tucci et al.,ALMA photometry of extragalactic radio sources,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.485(2019) 1188 [1901.08976]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  23. [31]

    Wright, P.R.M

    E.L. Wright, P.R.M. Eisenhardt, A.K. Mainzer, M.E. Ressler, R.M. Cutri, T. Jarrett et al., The Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE): Mission Description and Initial On-orbit Performance,Astron. J.140(2010) 1868 [1008.0031]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  24. [32]

    Mainzer, J

    A. Mainzer, J. Bauer, R.M. Cutri, T. Grav, J. Masiero, R. Beck et al.,Initial Performance of the NEOWISE Reactivation Mission,Astrophys. J.792(2014) 30 [1406.6025]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  25. [33]

    Flewelling, E.A

    H.A. Flewelling, E.A. Magnier, K.C. Chambers, J.N. Heasley, C. Holmberg, M.E. Huber et al., The Pan-STARRS1 Database and Data Products,Astrophys. J. Suppl.251(2020) 7 [1612.05243]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  26. [34]

    Brown, A

    Gaia Collaboration, A.G.A. Brown, A. Vallenari, T. Prusti, J.H.J. de Bruijne, F. Mignard et al.,Gaia Data Release 1. Summary of the astrometric, photometric, and survey properties, Astron. Astrophys.595(2016) A2 [1609.04172]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  27. [35]

    Bellm, S.R

    E.C. Bellm, S.R. Kulkarni, M.J. Graham, R. Dekany, R.M. Smith, R. Riddle et al.,The Zwicky Transient Facility: System Overview, Performance, and First Results,Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacific131(2019) 018002 [1902.01932]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  28. [36]

    Hart et al.,ASAS-SN Sky Patrol V2.0,2304.03791

    K. Hart et al.,ASAS-SN Sky Patrol V2.0,2304.03791. [37]eROSITAcollaboration,The SRG/eROSITA all-sky survey - First X-ray catalogues and data release of the western Galactic hemisphere,Astron. Astrophys.682(2024) A34 [2401.17274]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  29. [38]

    Stein, B

    Y. Stein, B. Vollmer, T. Boch, G. Landais, P. Vannier, M. Brouty et al.,The SPECFIND V3.0 catalog of radio continuum cross-identifications and spectra: Reaching lower frequencies, Astron. Astrophys.655(2021) A17

    2021

  30. [39]

    Rest, H.J

    A. Rest, H.J. Weiland, C.W. Stubbs, S.J. Smartt, K.W. Smith, B. Stalder et al.,ATLAS: A High-cadence All-sky Survey System,Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac.130(2018) 064505

    2018

  31. [40]

    Drake, S.G

    A.J. Drake, S.G. Djorgovski, A. Mahabal, E. Beshore, S. Larson, M.J. Graham et al.,First Results from the Catalina Real-Time Transient Survey,Astrophys. J.696(2009) 870 [0809.1394]. [41]KM3NeTcollaboration,On the Potential Galactic Origin of the Ultra-High-Energy Event KM3-230213A,2502.08387

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  32. [42]

    Amôres, R.M

    E.B. Amôres, R.M. Jesus, A. Moitinho, V. Arsenijevic, R.S. Levenhagen, D.J. Marshall et al., – 14 – GALExtin: an alternative online tool to determine the interstellar extinction in the Milky Way, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.508(2021) 1788 [2108.00561]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  33. [43]

    Amôres and J.R.D

    E.B. Amôres and J.R.D. Lépine,Models for Interstellar Extinction in the Galaxy,Astron. J. 130(2005) 659

    2005

  34. [44]

    Schlafly and D.P

    E.F. Schlafly and D.P. Finkbeiner,Measuring Reddening with Sloan Digital Sky Survey Stellar Spectra and Recalibrating SFD,Astrophys. J.737(2011) 103 [1012.4804]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  35. [45]

    Ben Bekhti, L

    HI4PI Collaboration, N. Ben Bekhti, L. Flöer, R. Keller, J. Kerp, D. Lenz et al.,HI4PI: A full-sky H I survey based on EBHIS and GASS,Astron. Astrophys.594(2016) A116 [1610.06175]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  36. [46]

    Foight, T

    D. Foight, T. Guver, F. Ozel and P. Slane,Probing X-ray Absorption and Optical Extinction in the Interstellar Medium Using Chandra Observations of Supernova Remnants,Astrophys. J. 826(2016) 66 [1504.07274]. [47]KM3NeTcollaboration,On the Potential Cosmogenic Origin of the Ultra-high-energy Event KM3-230213A,Astrophys. J. Lett.984(2025) L41 [2502.08508]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  37. [48]

    Dzhatdoev,The blazar PKS 0605-085 as the origin of the KM3-230213A ultra high energy neutrino event,2502.11434

    T.A. Dzhatdoev,The blazar PKS 0605-085 as the origin of the KM3-230213A ultra high energy neutrino event,2502.11434

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  38. [49]

    Neronov, F

    A. Neronov, F. Oikonomou and D. Semikoz,KM3-230213A: An Ultra-High Energy Neutrino from a Year-Long Astrophysical Transient,2502.12986

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  39. [50]

    Berezinsky,Extraterrestrial neutrino sources and high energy neutrino astrophysics, in Proceedings of the Neutrino-77 Conference, Moscow, p

    V. Berezinsky,Extraterrestrial neutrino sources and high energy neutrino astrophysics, in Proceedings of the Neutrino-77 Conference, Moscow, p. 177, 1977

    1977

  40. [51]

    Berezinskii and V.L

    V.S. Berezinskii and V.L. Ginzburg,On high-energy neutrino radiation of quasars and active galactic nuclei,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.194(1981) 3

    1981

  41. [52]

    Stecker, C

    F.W. Stecker, C. Done, M.H. Salamon and P. Sommers,High-energy neutrinos from active galactic nuclei,Phys. Rev. Lett.66(1991) 2697

    1991

  42. [53]

    Atoyan and C.D

    A. Atoyan and C.D. Dermer,High-energy neutrinos from photomeson processes in blazars, Phys. Rev. Lett.87(2001) 221102 [astro-ph/0108053]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  43. [54]

    Kalashev, D

    O. Kalashev, D. Semikoz and I. Tkachev,Neutrinos in IceCube from active galactic nuclei,J. Exp. Theor. Phys.120(2015) 541 [1410.8124]. [55]IceCubecollaboration,Neutrino emission from the direction of the blazar TXS 0506+056 prior to the IceCube-170922A alert,Science361(2018) 147 [1807.08794]. [56]IceCubecollaboration,Time-Integrated Neutrino Source Search...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  44. [57]

    Suray and S

    A. Suray and S. Troitsky,Neutrino flares of radio blazars observed from TeV to PeV,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.527(2024) L26 [2306.16797]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  45. [58]

    Daly and A.P

    R.A. Daly and A.P. Marscher,The Gasdynamics of Compact Relativistic Jets,Astrophys. J. 334(1988) 539. [59]Event Horizon Telescopecollaboration,Event Horizon Telescope imaging of the archetypal blazar 3C 279 at an extreme 20 microarcsecond resolution,Astron. Astrophys.640(2020) A69. [60]Event Horizon Telescopecollaboration,Resolving the Inner Parsec of the...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1988

  46. [61]

    Podlesnyi and F

    E. Podlesnyi and F. Oikonomou,Insights from leptohadronic modelling of the brightest blazar flare,2502.12111

    arXiv

  47. [62]

    Anchordoqui,Ultra-High-Energy Cosmic Rays,Phys

    L.A. Anchordoqui,Ultra-High-Energy Cosmic Rays,Phys. Rept.801(2019) 1 [1807.09645]. – 15 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  48. [63]

    Ptitsyna and S.V

    K.V. Ptitsyna and S.V. Troitsky,Physical conditions in potential sources of ultra-high-energy cosmic rays. I. Updated Hillas plot and radiation-loss constraints,Phys. Usp.53(2010) 691 [0808.0367]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  49. [64]

    Sotirov,General constraints on sources of high-energy cosmic rays from interaction losses, Phys

    S. Sotirov,General constraints on sources of high-energy cosmic rays from interaction losses, Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 123018 [2212.03483]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  50. [65]

    Ptitsyna and A

    K. Ptitsyna and A. Neronov,Particle acceleration in the vacuum gaps in black hole magnetospheres,Astron. Astrophys.593(2016) A8 [1510.04023]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  51. [66]

    Gorbunov, P.G

    D.S. Gorbunov, P.G. Tinyakov and S.V. Troitsky,Constraints on ultra-high energy neutrinos from optically thick astrophysical accelerators,Astropart. Phys.18(2003) 463 [astro-ph/0206385]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  52. [67]

    Blandford and A

    R.D. Blandford and A. Levinson,Pair cascades in extragalactic jets. 1: Gamma rays, Astrophys. J.441(1995) 79

    1995

  53. [68]

    Dermer and G

    C.D. Dermer and G. Menon,High Energy Radiation from Black Holes: Gamma Rays, Cosmic Rays, and Neutrinos, Princeton University Press (10, 2009)

    2009

  54. [69]

    Reimer, M

    A. Reimer, M. Boettcher and S. Buson,Cascading Constraints from Neutrino-emitting Blazars: The Case of TXS 0506+056,Astrophys. J.881(2019) 46 [1812.05654]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  55. [70]

    Murase, S.S

    K. Murase, S.S. Kimura and P. Meszaros,Hidden Cores of Active Galactic Nuclei as the Origin of Medium-Energy Neutrinos: Critical Tests with the MeV Gamma-Ray Connection,Phys. Rev. Lett.125(2020) 011101 [1904.04226]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  56. [71]

    E. Kun, I. Bartos, J. Becker Tjus, P.L. Biermann, F. Halzen and G. Mező,Cosmic Neutrinos from Temporarily Gamma-suppressed Blazars,Astrophys. J. Lett.911(2021) L18 [2009.09792]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  57. [72]

    Hovatta et al.,Association of IceCube neutrinos with radio sources observed at Owens Valley and Metsähovi Radio Observatories,Astron

    T. Hovatta et al.,Association of IceCube neutrinos with radio sources observed at Owens Valley and Metsähovi Radio Observatories,Astron. Astrophys.650(2021) A83 [2009.10523]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  58. [73]

    Klinger, A

    M. Klinger, A. Rudolph, X. Rodrigues, C. Yuan, G.F. de Clairfontaine, A. Fedynitch et al., AM3: An Open-source Tool for Time-dependent Lepto-hadronic Modeling of Astrophysical Sources,Astrophys. J. Suppl.275(2024) 4 [2312.13371]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  59. [74]

    Gilmore, R.S

    R.C. Gilmore, R.S. Somerville, J.R. Primack and A. Dominguez,Semi-analytic modeling of the EBL and consequences for extragalactic gamma-ray spectra,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.422 (2012) 3189 [1104.0671]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  60. [75]

    Petrov and Y.Y

    L.Y. Petrov and Y.Y. Kovalev,The Radio Fundamental Catalog. I. Astrometry,Astrophys. J. Suppl.276(2025) 38 [2410.11794]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  61. [76]

    Hovatta, E

    T. Hovatta, E. Nieppola, M. Tornikoski, E. Valtaoja, M.F. Aller and H.D. Aller,Long-term radio variability of AGN: flare characteristics,Astron. Astrophys.485(2008) 51 [0805.1283]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  62. [77]

    Liodakis, V

    I. Liodakis, V. Pavlidou, T. Hovatta, W. Max-Moerbeck, T.J. Pearson, J.L. Richards et al., Bimodal radio variability in OVRO-40 m-monitored blazars,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.467 (2017) 4565 [1702.05493]. – 16 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017