Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2306.17676 v2 pith:6QR45EZX submitted 2023-06-30 hep-ph hep-ex

SModelS v2.3: enabling global likelihood analyses

Mohammad Mahdi Altakach , Sabine Kraml , Andre Lessa , Sahana Narasimha , Timoth\'ee Pascal , Wolfgang Waltenberger This is my paper
classification hep-ph hep-ex
keywords analysessearcheselectroweak-inogloballikelihoodphysicsresultssmodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We present version 2.3 of SModelS, a public tool for the fast reinterpretation of LHC searches for new physics on the basis of simplified-model results. The main new features are a database update with the latest available experimental results for full Run 2 luminosity, comprising in particular a large variety of electroweak-ino searches, and the ability to combine likelihoods from different analyses. This enables statistically more rigorous constraints and opens the way for global likelihood analyses for LHC searches. The physics impact is demonstrated for the electroweak-ino sector of the minimal supersymmetric standard model.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. On the coverage of electroweak-inos within the pMSSM with SModelS -- a comparison with the ATLAS pMSSM study

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0

    SModelS v3.0 reproduces ATLAS pMSSM electroweak-ino constraints with good agreement, and analysis combination plus gluino constraints increase exclusion coverage by 20-35%.